Re: KDM (3.2.2 woody) login without password???

2004-04-23 Thread Chris Cheney
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 12:49:36AM +0200, Steffen Evers wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> I have just installled the new 3.2.2 packages for woody from ftp.kde.org
> and now KDM does not care about passwords any more. Everyone (incl. root)
> can log in with any password.
> 
> I have tried to set NoPassEnable=false, but it does not help either...
> 
> Package version: 3.2.2-0.credativ.1
> 
> Does anyone know something about that? I could not find any bug report.

It probably needs a different /etc/pam.d file the one that is in the
sid debs uses the common-* stuff from newer pam, so that might be the
cause if its being used for woody by mistake.

Chris


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Qt3 libraries not found while compiling

2004-04-23 Thread Ville Koivisto
On Monday 19 April 2004 8:38 am, Chris Cheney wrote:
> You might need to include --with-qt-dir=/usr/share/qt3 . Please look at
> the docs in kdelibs4-dev and the admin/debianrules file for more
> information about how to compile kde packages under Debian.
I know this doesn't count as RTD (Reading The Documentation), but I find 
that
The 'qt-mt' libs are still missing even when I tried several variations of 
your and Chris Cheneys compiling options. I think it would be better for me 
at this point to actually RTD (or perhaps RT*M) as you said, rather than 
posting these questions on the list whenever I got into trouble :). Thank 
you guys anyway, at least now I'm heading to right direction.
One more question on this topic. Chris mentioned 'admin/debianrules' to look 
at but I couldn't find a match for that. Where to find it or what package to 
install to have it? What else do you advice me to read for better 
understanding how to compile for Debian and what packages are involved when 
compiling apps for KDE? Again, thank you for your time and effort,

Ville
_
Flirttaile, rupattele, juorua tai vaihda kuulumisia näytössä tapahtuvissa 
keskusteluissa. Lataa ilmainen MSN Messenger. http://messenger.msn.fi




Konqueror

2004-04-23 Thread Ferdinand Smit
Hi,

My konqueror opens a tekst file in a external editor. Does anyone know how i 
change that, so it opens inside konqueror ?

Tanx,
Ferdinand




Re: Konqueror

2004-04-23 Thread Alexander Nordström
On Friday, 23 Apr 2004 18:18, Ferdinand Smit wrote:

> My konqueror opens a tekst file in a external editor. Does anyone know how
> i change that, so it opens inside konqueror ?

Select the file you want to open, and then from the "Edit" menu, choose "Edit 
File Type...". Go to the "Embedding" tab, and choose "Show file in embedded 
viewer". Click OK. You may have to refresh the directory contents before the 
change takes effect.

Side note: The dialogue apparently assumes KDE is configured for 
single-clicking with the left mouse button. This may not be the case, so it 
should probably be re-labelled.

-- 
Alex Nordstrom




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-23 Thread Barry
On Friday 23 April 2004 01:22, Nate Duehr wrote:
> Jesús Roncero Franco wrote:
snip
>
snip
> Just because the userbase tends to use apt-get quite a bit, doesn't mean
> it's intelligent enough to do everything, nor has it ever been.  I
> remember seeing notes from the apt-get developers warning against its
> use as a generic tool long ago.
>
> The warnings about how it does its package dependencies have simply
> slipped out of the general consciousness over the past few years.  I
> still have days running testing on one of the machines here where it
> refuses to upgrade something, fire up dselect and it figures out the
> dependency problem perfectly and finishes off where apt-get gave up.
>
> Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

What would help a lot if someone with extensive experience of dselect would 
write a how-to for even recent converts to Debian to be able to figure out 
how to use it.  The popularity of apt-get is its apparent simplicity but its 
documentation is lacking in explaining its limitations.

Barry.




Mail Gateway Content violation

2004-04-23 Thread Symantec_AntiVirus_VAFB
Content violation found in an email message sent from your account.  If you 
received this message, it indicates you sent an attachment using a file 
extension that has been blocked in accordance with local 30th Space Wing policy 
to protect DoD resources.  Information on the violating file type below.  An 
email was sent to your workgroup manager listing all file types being blocked.  
Note:  this ony affects emails destined for off base.

From: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The file was deleted.
File(s): message.scr

Matching filename: *.scr





Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-23 Thread ingo fischenich
>> Just because the userbase tends to use apt-get quite a bit, doesn't mean
>> it's intelligent enough to do everything, nor has it ever been.  I
>> remember seeing notes from the apt-get developers warning against its
>> use as a generic tool long ago.
>>
>> The warnings about how it does its package dependencies have simply
>> slipped out of the general consciousness over the past few years.  I
>> still have days running testing on one of the machines here where it
>> refuses to upgrade something, fire up dselect and it figures out the
>> dependency problem perfectly and finishes off where apt-get gave up.
>>
>> Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> What would help a lot if someone with extensive experience of dselect
> would
> write a how-to for even recent converts to Debian to be able to figure out
> how to use it.  The popularity of apt-get is its apparent simplicity but
> its
> documentation is lacking in explaining its limitations.

I think, the big problem with this upgrade is that it differs too much
from the other kde versions for woody.

Is it really necessary to upgrade to xfree 4.3.0?
The 3.2.0 kde packages dealt well with 4.1.0 and also got along with
libqt3-mt and the 3.2.2 packages now come with libqt3c102-mt.

I think these packages were build on a sid or sarge system and not on a
woody system, is that possible?

   ingo




Installing Agypten with KDE 3.2

2004-04-23 Thread Joseph A. Martin
Hi,

I am using Debian unstable with KDE3.2 installed. I've been trying off and on 
for the past six months to install the Agypten plugins with KMail. I would 
like to be able to sign/encrypt my e-mails using S/MIME encryption. Is this 
possible with Debian and Agypten? Can I use the Debian compiled KMail or do I 
have to build my own? Does the Debian KMail (3.2.2) require patching? What 
packages (and versions) do I need?

I've tried (several times) following the instructions found on 
http://www.gnupg.org/aegypten/development.en.html. When I load the plugin 
into KMail, I get the following error:

Error: Plug-in "GPGMe-SMIME" initialization unsuccessful.
library: /usr/lib/cryptplug/gpgme-smime.so
version: 0.3.16
Plug-in is out-dated or not installed properly.

At this point, the actual software on my system is a complete mixture of 
Debian and locally compiled packages. I should probably clean it out and 
start over from scratch. But first I want to know if it is possible, exactly 
what versions of what packages need to be used, and how to do it.

Can I use Agypten with the S/MIME plugin to sign/encrypt e-mail on KMail 1.6.2 
(KDE 3.2.2)?

Thanks!

~joe
-- 
Joseph (LittleRed) Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.desertflood.com/




Where are my fonts ?

2004-04-23 Thread Hervé Piedvache
Hello,

I have a trouble with KDE and Debian since V3.2 ... (SID)

I have lost some fonts ...

In my font selector I was seeing fonts like :
Fixed [Etl]
Fixed [Jis]
Fixed [Misc]
Fixed [Sony]
Freemonospaced
Gothic [Daewoo]
Gothic [Mplus]
Itc Zapf Chancery [Adobe]
Itc Zapf Chancery [Itc]
Terminal [Bistream]
Terminal [Dec]
Zapf Chancery
Zapt Dingbats
courier [Adobe]
courier [Bitsream]
courier [Urw]
helvetica [Adobe]
helvetica [Urw]

But now I don't have any of this fonts ... I do not see any font with "[ ]" 
next to the name ...

I have only one Fixed font, but I have a Courier,  and Courier 10 Pitch that I 
haven't got before ??

So where are my fonts ? In fact with xfontsel I can see my Fixed Sony, and 
other Fixed Jis ... but not with any KDE application ??

Thanks for your help !
-- 
Hervé




Re: KDM (3.2.2 woody) login without password???

2004-04-23 Thread Steffen Evers
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 00:13, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > I have just installled the new 3.2.2 packages for woody from ftp.kde.org
> > and now KDM does not care about passwords any more. Everyone (incl. root)
> > can log in with any password.
> > 
> > I have tried to set NoPassEnable=false, but it does not help either...
> > 
> > Package version: 3.2.2-0.credativ.1
> > 
> > Does anyone know something about that? I could not find any bug report.
> 
> It probably needs a different /etc/pam.d file the one that is in the
> sid debs uses the common-* stuff from newer pam, so that might be the
> cause if its being used for woody by mistake.

Hello Chris!

Thanks a lot. That fixed the problem.

Yes,the file /etc/pam.d/kdm from KDE 3.2.2 looks like this:

@include common-auth
@include common-account
@include common-password
@include common-session

auth   required pam_nologin.so
auth   required pam_env.so
sessionrequired pam_limits.so


I have taken /etc/pam.d/kdm from (my old) KDE 3.1.5 installation:

#%PAM-1.0

auth   required pam_nologin.so
auth   required pam_unix.so shadow nullok
auth   required pam_env.so
accountrequired pam_unix.so
sessionrequired pam_unix.so
sessionrequired pam_limits.so

# (Remove `md5' after the module name to disable MD5 passwords

password   required pam_unix.so nullok obscure min=4 max=8 md5

# Alternate strength checking for password. Note that this
# requires the libpam-cracklib package to be installed.
# You will need to comment out the password line above and
# uncomment the next two in order to use this.
# (Replaces the `OBSCURE_CHECKS_ENAB', `CRACKLIB_DICTPATH')
#
# password required   pam_cracklib.so retry=3 minlen=6 difok=3
# password required   pam_unix.so use_authtok nullok md5


Additionally, i have removed /etc/pam.d/kdm-np (What is it for? It was not
in 3.1.5 ...).

Now kdm works as expected again!

Bye, Steffen




Re: KDE 3.2.2 for Woody... Careful upgrading..

2004-04-23 Thread Paul Scott
Barry wrote:
On Friday 23 April 2004 01:22, Nate Duehr wrote:
 

Jes?s Roncero Franco wrote:
   

snip
 

snip
 

Just because the userbase tends to use apt-get quite a bit, doesn't mean
it's intelligent enough to do everything, nor has it ever been.  I
remember seeing notes from the apt-get developers warning against its
use as a generic tool long ago.
The warnings about how it does its package dependencies have simply
slipped out of the general consciousness over the past few years.  I
still have days running testing on one of the machines here where it
refuses to upgrade something, fire up dselect and it figures out the
dependency problem perfectly and finishes off where apt-get gave up.
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   

What would help a lot if someone with extensive experience of dselect would 
write a how-to for even recent converts to Debian to be able to figure out 
how to use it.  The popularity of apt-get is its apparent simplicity but its 
documentation is lacking in explaining its limitations.
 

Don't bother.  I never figured out how to navigate dselect.  Aptitude is 
much better and is highly recommended by many.

Paul Scott



KAB access error after update

2004-04-23 Thread Daniel Andor
Hi All,

I can't edit my kde addressbook after updating to 3.2.1 and 3.2.2.  Any
program (including kmail and kaddressbook) trying to access the standard
addressbook fails to modify it.  For example, kmail fails with:

kmail: ERROR: The resource '_home_da209_.kde_share_apps_kabc_std.vcf' is
locked by application ''.
kmail: ERROR: Unable to save to resource 'resource-name'. It is locked.

What does this mean, and how can I fix it??

Thanks,
Daniel.




icons license

2004-04-23 Thread Kenneth Dombrowski

Hello,

I am developing a website for a prominent NYC non-profit, & one aspect
of the application provides the user access to download a number of
files of various types.  In looking around for a set of icons to
represent these types, I came across /usr/share/icons/default.kde.
These icons are perfect: attractive, uniform, ready-made.  

Ultimately, my question will be: Can I use these icons (both as-is and
modified versions) as elements of a site I am building?  Immediately,
however, I am having trouble determining even what license these icons
are released under.

Using apt-file I see that /usr/share/icons/default.kde is created by
the kdelibs-data package.  /usr/share/doc/kdelibs-data/copyright
indicates that "All programs are either under the BSD, GPL or LGPL
licenses", but is not more specific about shared files. 

Thinking perhaps kdelibs-data only creates the directory and other apps
populate it as they are installed, I tried a more granular search, but
apt-file search /usr/share/icons/default.kde/128x128/filesystems/www.png
doesn't return anything.  I tried browsing around webcvs.kde.org to see
if I could find the icons in their original package, but there's just
too much there & the structure seems quite alien to me. 

Therefore, I ask you:

Do you know what original KDE package(s) these files came from?
(specifically, in addition to www.png, I'd need several of those found
in the 'mimetypes' directory)

Do you know what license they are released under?


Thanks in advance,
Kenneth 

P.S.

Please Cc: me as I am not subscribed to debian-kde





Re: icons license

2004-04-23 Thread Chris Cheney
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 05:33:09PM -0400, Kenneth Dombrowski wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I am developing a website for a prominent NYC non-profit, & one aspect
> of the application provides the user access to download a number of
> files of various types.  In looking around for a set of icons to
> represent these types, I came across /usr/share/icons/default.kde.
> These icons are perfect: attractive, uniform, ready-made.  
> 
> Ultimately, my question will be: Can I use these icons (both as-is and
> modified versions) as elements of a site I am building?  Immediately,
> however, I am having trouble determining even what license these icons
> are released under.
>
> Using apt-file I see that /usr/share/icons/default.kde is created by
> the kdelibs-data package.  /usr/share/doc/kdelibs-data/copyright
> indicates that "All programs are either under the BSD, GPL or LGPL
> licenses", but is not more specific about shared files. 
> 
> Thinking perhaps kdelibs-data only creates the directory and other apps
> populate it as they are installed, I tried a more granular search, but
> apt-file search /usr/share/icons/default.kde/128x128/filesystems/www.png
> doesn't return anything.  I tried browsing around webcvs.kde.org to see
> if I could find the icons in their original package, but there's just
> too much there & the structure seems quite alien to me. 

default.kde is a symlink to crystalsvg directory.

dpkg -S /usr/share/icons/crystalsvg/128x128/filesystems/www.png

kdelibs-data: /usr/share/icons/crystalsvg/128x128/filesystems/www.png

> Therefore, I ask you:
> 
> Do you know what original KDE package(s) these files came from?
> (specifically, in addition to www.png, I'd need several of those found
> in the 'mimetypes' directory)
> 
> Do you know what license they are released under?

I think all of the artwork is licensed under the GPL, but you would
have to contact the authors to find out for certain what the license
is on an individual file. You can also contact the kde-artists list
at kde.org

Chris


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature