Re: Fonts
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 04:27:51PM +0200, Stephan Jaensch wrote: > did something change regarding fonts with the last update in unstable? The > standard arial font now appears almost as if it was bold, which is quite > annoying... and the same amount of text now takes up much more space on the > screen, too. The thickness of the letters is OK if I reduce the font size by > one (down to ten), but then it is simply too small. You probably got bitten by the "xinit starts X11 in 100 dpi" and/or "kdm starts X with 100 dpi". There are debconf info screens telling you that, btw. Depending on which method you use to start X11, edit /etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc or some file in /etc/X11/kdm/ (i think it's Xserver_0) and remove the "-dpi 100" switch. -- Andreas Trottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: kpackage-2.1.1-2 crashes with sig 11
On Thursday 17 May 2001 17:26, Ben Burton wrote: > > > > kpackage. But kpackage fails to start from icon or cmd line. > > > > Everything > > > > I've had this on my system too. It was gone after apt-get install rpm... > > Hi Mike.. someone else has had the same problem that was solved by > installing package rpm (thanks Andre!). Could you please test this also - > install package rpm - and if everything works we can let Ivan know that his > Recommends: rpm needs to be a Depends:. > I tested this on one of my Debian systems and removing rpm caused the crash of kpackage.After reinstalling rpm , kpackage started up fine. So it appears that with Debian, rpm is a Depends.
Stuttering toolbars
I'm not yet an everyday user of KDE, but I've been following the progress on Debian unstable and I'm getting very close to making KDE my everyday environment. I also follow this list closely. I have the latest stuff from unstable as of yesterday. So, does anybody else see toolbars that include two copies of each item? The obvious example is noatun, the KDE Media Player. There are two sets of identical controls on the toolbar. Konqueror is similar, but the two sets of buttons are not totally identical. It's almost as if there are two sets of almost identical controls side-by side there. I mv'ed my .kde directory and started clean, but saw no change in this behavior. So is this a bug or do I have a configuration issue? -- Michael Epting ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
ksock.h ?
I am trying to compile a non-debian kde package called kblade. The configure script to build the package depends on kde headers containing a file called "ksock.h". I can't seem to find this anywhere. What package (if any) includes this header file ? P.S. I am using Debian/unstable and have installed task-kde-devel -- James D. Freels, P.E._i, Ph.D. Oak Ridge National Laboratory [EMAIL PROTECTED] - work [EMAIL PROTECTED] - home
Re: ksock.h ?
James D. Freels wrote: I am trying to compile a non-debian kde package called kblade. The configure script to build the package depends on kde headers containing a file called "ksock.h". I can't seem to find this anywhere. What package (if any) includes this header file ? P.S. I am using Debian/unstable and have installed task-kde-devel KBlade depends on KDE 1.X The Debian/unstable only have KDE 2.X. If you want to compile KBlade, you'll have to port it to KDE 2.X first.
Just upgraded Konqueror, now can't configure it
Hi -- I just "upgraded" to the latest Konqueror from 2.1.1-6 to 2.1.1.0-0.potato3. Is this an upgrade? The version numbers are confusing. (In /etc/apt/sources.list, I have: deb http://kde.tdyc.com/ potato main crypto optional Here are excerpts from running "apt-get install konqueror": # apt-get install konqueror Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: kdebase-libs kdelibs3 libkonq3 4 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 295 not upgraded. [...] Get:1 http://kde.tdyc.com potato/main kdebase-libs 4:2.1.1.0-0.potato3 [631kB] Get:2 http://kde.tdyc.com potato/main konqueror 4:2.1.1.0-0.potato3 [1661kB] Get:3 http://kde.tdyc.com potato/main libkonq3 4:2.1.1.0-0.potato3 [220kB] Fetched 2512kB in 8s (295kB/s) [...] Setting up kdelibs3 (2.1.2-0.potato1) ... Setting up kdebase-libs (2.1.1.0-0.potato3) ... Setting up libkonq3 (2.1.1.0-0.potato3) ... Setting up konqueror (2.1.1.0-0.potato3) ... [...] ...ie. it looks like everything downloaded and installed OK.) Anyways, here's the problem: when I start the new version and go to the "Settings|Configure Konqueror..." menu, I get a bunch of error dialogs: There was an error loading module 'Settings/FileBrowsing/kcmkonq.desktop' The diagnostic is: There is *no* diagnostic message: apart from the "OK" button, that's it. This dialog repeats for 'Settings/FileBrowsing/filetypes.desktop' 'Settings/FileBrowsing/konqhtml.desktop' 'Settings/FileBrowsing/cookies.desktop' 'Settings/FileBrowsing/proxy.desktop' 'Settings/FileBrowsing/useragent.desktop' Ie., I have to hit "OK" 6 times on 6 different error dialogs just to get to the configuration dialog. When I finally get there, most configuration options are gone -- all I can configure is "Enhanced Browsing" and "Netscape Plugins". Yayhh. So is this a packaging error, ie. were a bunch of configuration modules accidentally dropped on the floor between release 2.1.1-6 and 2.1.1.0-0.potato3? Or is it something else? Thanks -- Greg -- Greg Ward - software developer[EMAIL PROTECTED] MEMS Exchangehttp://www.mems-exchange.org
Re: kpackage-2.1.1-2 crashes with sig 11
> I tested this on one of my Debian systems and removing rpm caused the crash > of kpackage.After reinstalling rpm , kpackage started up fine. So it > appears that with Debian, rpm is a Depends. Thanks for that. I've filed a bug report asking for rpm to be listed as a dependency which should solve the problem for everyone. Grazie, Ben. -- Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://baasil.humbug.org.au/bab/ Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Bible contains six admonishments to homosexuals, and 362 to heterosexuals. This doesn't mean God doesn't love heterosexuals, it's just that they need more supervision. - Lynn Lavner
Testing and KDE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, Has KDE made it into testing yet? Thanks. Stephen. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7BYh9Pmm0AnNwb5MRAtnMAJ9IFEs67sfrg7Y84/hqQBMF/l30bACeKSFi Jf6DOXmH2Bd5SXYv1107fKM= =71zf -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Testing and KDE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, 18. May 2001 22:39, Stephen J. Thompson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello all, > > Has KDE made it into testing yet? yes. HS -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7BYzMzvr6q9zCwcERAjnaAJ0VToA92kDDjqBsXr2bLCQSl7F9WQCgm3eV +YSnP4QOm66t6N2YK4kC03U= =I7jy -END PGP SIGNATURE-
