Re: libxmlrpc3-java override disparity
Hello Eric, On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 09:47:48PM +0200, Eric Lavarde wrote: > Hi, > > looking at the below email, I've done some statistics (raw data attached): > > contrib/devel 3 > contrib/libs 14 > contrib/text 1 > contrib/utils 1 > devel 20 > graphics 1 > libdevel 2 > libs 206 > misc 1 > non-free/libs 2 > science 1 > text 2 > Unknown 2 > web 1 > Total Result 257 > > A library in Java is at the same time devel and lib, hence it could be in > both sections; the Java Policy doesn't say anything though about this > topic, should we add the fact that it should be in 'libs' and give this > answer back to Debian Installer? In this case libs would be better. Please file a bug against ftp.debian.org. Cheers, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#212863: The high income!
Hello jobseeker, We are present new work. We are glad to invite you to our company. Exelent salary. Availible Vacancy - Financial customer Please send you resume on this email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info! Important: your Job Verification Number is: 224202361 Sincerely, Robert Colonais Hiring Manager. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2
reassign 432541 gcj-4.2
retitle 432541 gcj-4.2 can no longer compile Eclipse plugins
merge 432539 432541
thanks
Hi,
after having slowly updated an etch chroot to a sid one using
snaphsot.debian.net, I have found that the FTBFS occurs with gcj-4.2,
and is not related to ecj.
Indeed, using the following pakages:
* java-gcj-compat{,-dev} 1.0.69-2
* ecj, ecj-gcj, libecj-java and libecj-gcj 3.3.0+0728-1
* libgcj-bc, libgcj8{-1,-1-awt,-jar} 4.2.1-3
* gcc-4.2-base 4.2.1-3
* gcj-4.1-base, gcj-4.1, gij-4.1, libgcj7-1 4.1.2-16
* libgcc1 1:4.2.2-3
eclipse-cdt compiles.
Updating to sid, I reach a point where:
* java-gcj-compat 1.0.76-4 sets gcj-4.2 as the default gcj version
* gcj-4.2, gij-4.2 and libgcj8-* are at version 4.2.1-3
With these packages eclipse-cdt no longer compiles.
I'll try to use earlier versions of {gcj,gij}-4.2.
Regards,
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#448286: java-common: [POLICY-PROPOSAL] Almost all Java libraries should be in section libs.
Package: java-common Version: 0.26 Severity: wishlist Hello, in section 2.4 "Java libraries" it should be specified that packages containing such libraries should belong to the 'libs' section and not to the 'devel' section. As Java libraries, to the difference of C libraries, are at the same time for runtime and development usage, they could be in both, but as 85% of them are already in this section, it makes more sense to make it consistent this way. Also, a java developer should know this, where a java user might not expect libraries to be in devel. Eric -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2
reassign 432541 eclipse-cdt clone 432541 -1 reassign -1 gcj-4.3 thanks eclipse-cdt still FTBFS, so keeping a duplicate there. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
