Re: Bug#429794: jmagick: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
severity 429794 normal
reassign 429794 wnpp
retitle 429794 O: jmagick -- A java interface to ImageMagick - java classes
thanks

On 20/06/07 at 08:47 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package
> came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer,
> because:
> 
>  * RC bugs open for a very long time

Hi,

Since the situation didn't improve, and the maintainer never answered
this bug report, I'm now orphaning the package, as originally suggested.

I'm Ccing debian-java@ since they might be interested in taking over
maintenance.

Thank you,
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug#429794: jmagick: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Kumar Appaiah
owner 429794 !
retitle 429794 ITA: jmagick -- A java interface to ImageMagick - java classes
thankyou

On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 04:48:44PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> severity 429794 normal
> Since the situation didn't improve, and the maintainer never answered
> this bug report, I'm now orphaning the package, as originally suggested.
> 
> I'm Ccing debian-java@ since they might be interested in taking over
> maintenance.

Dear Lucas,

I intend to update this package, and believe I can fix the remaining
bugs. Hence I have decided to own this bug.

Thanks!

Kumar
-- 
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature