Re: gcj4 changes : Please Comment
The libraries should be built on the user's machine. This can be done via the postinst, and by and a debconf option to turn it off or on. It maybe a good idea to come up with a debconf script to automatically add it to your postinst. Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gcj4 changes : Please Comment
Dan Weber wrote: The libraries should be built on the user's machine. This can be done via the postinst, and by and a debconf option to turn it off or on. It maybe a good idea to come up with a debconf script to automatically add it to your postinst. Dan I tend to agree. If we manage to handle this transparently on the user machine, we will: 1) reduce the stress on the autobuilders and the mirrors 2) avoid confusing users with -native replicates of java packages. Daniel The Nice programming language: http://nice.sf.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gcj4 changes : Please Comment
It is important to remember that this takes a LONG TIME. For the whole of Eclipse for instance, it can take near 20 on a 2GHz machine. That isn't counting Eclipse's dependencies, which are likely to take MUCH longer. On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 17:02 +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote: >Dan Weber wrote: >> >> The libraries should be built on the user's machine. This can be done >> via the postinst, and by and a debconf option to turn it off or on. It >> maybe a good idea to come up with a debconf script to automatically add >> it to your postinst. >> >> Dan > >I tend to agree. If we manage to handle this transparently on the user >machine, we will: > > 1) reduce the stress on the autobuilders and the mirrors > 2) avoid confusing users with -native replicates of java packages. > >Daniel > >The Nice programming language: http://nice.sf.net > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gcj4 changes : Please Comment
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Jerry Haltom wrote: It is important to remember that this takes a LONG TIME. For the whole of Eclipse for instance, it can take near 20 on a 2GHz machine. That isn't counting Eclipse's dependencies, which are likely to take MUCH longer. If people are interested in native binaries, they'll do it. Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
