Re: bug #264247 unreproducible
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 11:39:56AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > You got a new email address? Congratulation and welcome ;-) Thanks, > > A FTBFS bug has been submitted on my libxp-java package this week-end: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=264247 > > > > I don't understand why kaffe complains about this source code. > > I can't reproduce this behavior on my system (never with kaffe, jikes or > > Sun JDK) > > > > Any idea ? > > You should not build with 'javac' because it's an alternative and you > never know what is 'behind' this symlink. Something like > $(JAVA_HOME)/bin/javac is a better alternative. Correct. And since this package build-depends on kaffe I think I can directly use /usr/lib/kaffe/bin/javac. > In the Makefile of libxp-java, JAVAC is define with an '='. I'm not a > 'make' guru, but maybe it it was define with ':=', you could override > the JAVAC value in your debian/rules I can override it from my rules file even if it is defined by =. > Hope this helps. > > By the way, I could build the package with 'pbuilder', so maybe you can > change the severity of the bug to wishlist and retitle 'Don't depend on > javac to build the package' (of course it's the same thing with JAR > ;-)). Before doing that, I think I must be sure that this bug I related with this "wrong compiler" problem. But I'm not convinced this is the reason of the bug reported by Roland Stigge. Let's try... -- Nicolas Duboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
J2SE 1.4.2 SDK
Hi, I have 3 questions and I hope you can help me. I had to use the tomcat-server, so I installed it and got the kaffe-package as well. But I have to use the J2SE 1.4.2 SDK from sun, so I download it and made a .deb package with mpkg-j2se. Then I installed the .deb package with dpkg -i. So far so good. There was also a message after builing the .deb package which was: "You should also install the corresponding package with Debian specific parts (e.g. apt-get install sun-j2sdk1.4debian)" 1. What does this mean? What should I install else with apt-get? 2. Is there a debian-way to build a package from the J2EE-Package from sun, becauce I also need some libraries from the EE-package? I wasn't able to do this with mpkg-j2se. 3. After installing my .deb package with dpkg -i, I'm not able to change the java programs in /etc/alternatives. There are still the programs from kaffe and a "update-alternatives --config java" gives me "There is only 1 program which provides java (/usr/lib/kaffe/bin/java). Nothing to configure" Thanks Amir
Re: bug #264247 unreproducible
Nicolas Duboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 11:39:56AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: >> You should not build with 'javac' because it's an alternative and you >> never know what is 'behind' this symlink. Something like >> $(JAVA_HOME)/bin/javac is a better alternative. > > Correct. And since this package build-depends on kaffe I think I can > directly use /usr/lib/kaffe/bin/javac. Yes and a more generic way is to set JAVA_HOME and then tell JAVAC=$(JAVA_HOME)/bin/javac >> In the Makefile of libxp-java, JAVAC is define with an '='. I'm not a >> 'make' guru, but maybe it it was define with ':=', you could override >> the JAVAC value in your debian/rules > > I can override it from my rules file even if it is defined by =. So you may override it. > Before doing that, I think I must be sure that this bug I related with > this "wrong compiler" problem. But I'm not convinced this is the reason > of the bug reported by Roland Stigge. > > Let's try... If you can't build it with kaffe, let me know... and if you can try it with 'experimental' kaffe, it could be nice ;-) Cheers, -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- pgpZQUEdVZ1fx.pgp Description: PGP signature
Looking for a one-time sponsor
Hi, I'm the pacakger for the 'nice' package (a compiler for a Java-like language). I'm still in the new maintainer process, so I cannot upload to the archives yet. The current nice package is quite outdated, and somebody filed a wishlist big report (#262246) to get it updated. The problem is that my usual sponsor has been very busy, and now has no internet access until the end of the month. Could somebody please accept to upload once for me? There is very little packaging change (just added a watch file), so there is not much risk that the new version would be problematic. I would like to get in an up-to-date version by the end of the week, so that it can migrate into sarge. Thanks, Daniel
Re: [kaffe] kaffe/jikes makes incompatible code for jdk1.3?
Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi, On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 23:48, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: I built javax.servlet with kaffe/jikes/ant1.6, but when running with jre1.3, it seems there is a problem... log is attached. Seems the runtime that is used doesn't support newer versions of class file byte code (Unsupported major.minor version 48.0). You are probably using a modern version of jikes that by default generates this newer byte code. As far as I know all free runtimes in main have been updated already to support it. But you can probably downgrade the class byte code version used by giving jikes a -target 1.2 argument (see the jikes documentation). I did -target 1.3 ... and serlvet api is still in main, sorry for the whistle ;-) No problem ;) cheers, dalibor topic
The LinuxWorld Product Excellence Award
The LinuxWorld Product Excellence Award judges included: Kevin Bedell, editor in chief for LinuxWorld Magazine; Bill Claybrooke, industry analyst at New River Linux; Gary Hein, vice president and service director for Application Platform Strategies at the Burton Group; Sam Hiser, marketing project co-lead for OpenOffice.org; Dee-Ann LeBlanc, Linux author, consultant and trainer; Robin "Roblimo" Miller, editor in chief for OSDN; Paul Nowak, CIO for the North American Association for Environmental Education (NAAEE); Brian Proffitt, managing editor for Linux Today, LinuxPlanet and JustLinux; Stacey Quandt, industry analyst at Quandt Analytics; Bill Roth, senior technical evangelist at E.phiphany; Doc Searls, senior editor for Linux Journal; Leon Shiman, president of Shiman Associates and member of the Board of Directors for X.org; John Terpstra, mentor on the Samba Project; James Turner, senior editor for LinuxWorld Magazine; Maria Winslow, open source business analyst; and John Weathersby, executive director of the Open Source Software Institute. Emage industry lists Local lists special lists foreign lists publishing yellow pages free resource site map about us - 15寸液晶双子星,震天雷II--D451￥2466/D353￥2399
Follow me
GenerÏc Phârmcy,upto 80% off! XánÀx, VÅLium, Hydrocodone, and Norco.. 3 of the best paín kiLLer out and other populÀr product§. http://provenance.poauizbba.com/py/ no m_ore email http://julie.hgztyas.com/g.html bracken concocter flood backyard distinct elliot breakthrough cauchy loosestrife snigger corset
First gcj package in the archive
Hello, The first gcj based package is in the archive: http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/swt-gtk.html http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=swt-gtk And already there are some problems: * If ther are jni parts, the jni files need to be in LD_LIBRARY_PATH. No idea if thatc an be worked around by using rpath in the build prozess. * The name of the package should IMO be libsomething-gcj I have no idea what to do with this, but I feel that we should work on a policy for this packages, otherwise we will have a mess (like the above package is, at least from my point of view as a eclipse maintainer). Nice greetings, Jan -- Jan Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Wer nicht fragt, bleibt dumm."
Re: bug #264247 unreproducible
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 02:18:30PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: [...] > > Before doing that, I think I must be sure that this bug I related with > > this "wrong compiler" problem. But I'm not convinced this is the reason > > of the bug reported by Roland Stigge. > > > > Let's try... > > If you can't build it with kaffe, let me know... and if you can try it > with 'experimental' kaffe, it could be nice ;-) The more I think about it, the more I am convinced that this bug is due to a Kjc bug. My package perfectly compiles on Roland's system with jikes. So I have uploaded an new libxp-java version which build-depends on Jikes. I have just reassigned the 264247 bug to kjc. We can work together on this if you want/need. -- Nicolas Duboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature
No Embarassing GGXLB6
User ID: 4 pneumonia Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:08:58 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--4567691479576012441" 4567691479576012441 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Debian-italian The Best 0n|ine Phar-macy is here. Why pay m0re when you can enjoy at a specia| disc0unt? -Cia|is -Via-gra -Vi0xx -S0ma and many many more! Visit Us t0day! http://www.worldwidemedstoday.com?wid=18 This 0ne-time mai-|ing. N0 re m0val are requ|red WXL3KIoAIzXPcQfaHv6NpmPhlsuq5T33N29emITMiiFKrCau 4567691479576012441--
software
Windows 2000 Server - 50 Adobe Photoshop cs - 80 Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional - 50 Adobe Photoshop cs - 80 Adobe Illustrator CS - 90 Borland Delphi 7 Professional - 70 Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional - 50 Microsoft Office XP Professional - 100 Norton Antivirus 2004 Professional - 15 Quark Express 6.0 - 60 and a lot more http://www.bestsoftconvert.info/
