Re: How do you deploy a new system ?

2004-02-24 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:00:26 -0600, Rich Puhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>One little quibble/question about this: should issues like this be 
>reported to the Debian maintainer, or just reported to whoever created 
>the software in the first place?

I am not in a position to judge if a bug has been introduced by the
Debian packaging. Interfacing with upstream is the maintainer's job.

Additionaly, the maintainer usually knows his package pretty well, so
if he says "this is not a bug, do foo and be happy", I will accept his
judgement. This will improve Debian's relations with upstream by
keeping their work load down.

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber  |   " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Karlsruhe, Germany  | Beginning of Wisdom " | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
Nordisch by Nature  | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: qmail or postfix? (was: RE: What is the best mailling list manager for qmail and Domain Tech. Control ?)

2004-02-24 Thread Thomas GOIRAND

- Original Message - 
From: "Craig Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? (was: RE: What is the best mailling list
manager for qmail and Domain Tech. Control ?)


> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:34:52PM +0100, Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen wrote:
>
> 4. the configuration is truly bizarre.bernstein has his own
non-standard
> directory structures, and a liking for many little files.  many of these
files
> are 'magical' - the contents are irrelevant, mere existence of them alters
> behaviour of the program, and even causes programs to be run
automagically.
>
> this makes it impossible to experiment by temporarily commenting out
particular
> lines - you have to delete a file, and then hope you can remember what it
was
> called if you need to re-enable that feature.

I deseagree on that. I've found qmail's config file a lot more efficient
than
one stupid unic file, and most of the time the only files you have to modify
are thoses (read it as "file: content". In this example, one and only
mailbox
is configurated for [EMAIL PROTECTED]

has one unic row:
--
/var/qmail/control/me:  hostname.domain.com

one line per domains:
-
/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts:  domain.com
/var/qmail/control/virtualdomains: domain.com:domain-com

one line per mailbox:
-
/var/qmail/users/assign: =domain-com-joe:nobody:888:888:path:::
/etc/poppasswd: pop_login:crypted_password:real_login:path

I use /etc/poppasswd for popauth instead of /etc/passwd (using
checklocalpwd password check replacement from Jedi) when I don't
want to use SQL...

I think it's clear, simple, and efficient. If you want to keep backups,
then tar the /var/qmail/control folder and it's done...

Can someone write here an easy understandable configuration for
Postfix with virtual domains ? After some call for help here, none of
you that know Posfix did it...

> 5. bernstein likes to reinvent the wheel.  he does this (and does it
badly)
> without regard to whether the wheel actually needs to be reinvented or not
> (e.g. ucspi-tcp).
>
> this is compounded by the fact that it is a complete PITA to use any of
his
> programs without using all of his programs.

I deseagree a lot on that also. Bernstein has coded ucspi-tcp as a
replacement
for the standard tcp program. He has the rights to do so, and you have the
rights not to use it if you like inetd...

His code is not well commented, maybe a bit hard to read for non-unix gurus,
it's true. But it ends to very a short code, that focus on staying on unix
style,
eg modular, and reusing existing tools. If you want to have a quick idea of
what I'm talking about, have a look at qmail-pop3d.c and you'll understand
what it is all about.

I've done mysqmail, a bunch of 3 binaries for having pop3 auth using mysql,
and smtp + pop3 traffic accounted by domains in mySQL database. See:
http://www.gplhost.com/?rub=softwares&sousrub=mysqmail

For example, Bernstein uses his own "puts()" function that is NOT the real
unix
puts() function. The if you want to use the real unix puts(), patching means
renaming his puts() into puts2() or something...

This does not mean at all it's not well written. It's hard to read, but the
resulting
code seams to be efficient when you see the C code.

On the counter part, I agree totaly on the fact that qmail should include
all
the add-ons made by lot's of people, like one of thoses dozens of pop
alternative authentification.

> ps: as for postfix being better - it is:
>
> 1. free software, with a real free software license (IBM public license)
> 2. actively developed, with a friendly principal developer and helpful
> developer & user community.
> 3. backwards compatible with sendmail, so migration is easy
> 4. secure
> 5. fast (much faster than qmail)
> 6. the best anti-spam features of any MTA available
> 7. more features than you can poke a stick at

For sure, I'll spend more time on Postfix soon... :)

Best regards,

Thomas GOIRAND

Get a hosting account: http://gplhost.com
GPL.Host: Open source hosting worldwide


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: How do you deploy a new system ?

2004-02-24 Thread Lucas Albers
I would deploy debian on more desktops, but the hardware detections is
just not up to par compared to fedora 1.
only 1 in 4 does it successfuly detects and configures x.
I would like to replace my 140 boxes of redhat with debian, but the
hardware detection configuration is just not as good.
Systemimager works great for loading master images, but it still requires
hardware detection on the bootup, as the machine differ.

Works great on my backend servers.
I am slowly migrating all of my redhat 7.x 9.x FC1 boxes to debian.

-- 
--Luke CS Sysadmin, Montana State University-Bozeman


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]