Re: amavisd-new and clamav for woody???
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 07:40:11 +0200, in linux.debian.isp you wrote: >I'm using these apt-sources on my production filterboxes: > >deb http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/BACKPORTS woody main >deb http://people.debian.org/~hmh/woody/ hmh/amavisd-new/ BTW, how can I pin a package to a specified source? In other words: how to tell apt to get package x only from source X and a package Y only from source Y? As I can see the maintainer of the BACKPORTS above allows this to be done with an extra dists subdir, so a line like this deb http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/BACKPORTS woody-amavisd-new main will get only amavisd-new. Is there no way to do this with apt? Thanks for your attention! Have a nice thread, Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: amavisd-new and clamav for woody???
Am 2003-10-02 02:14:56, schrieb Peter Holm: >Hi, > >where can I get recent versions of amavisd-new and clamav for woody? Hello, I am using the Backports from: deb http://www.backports.org/debian woody all deb-src http://www.backports.org/debian woody all Thise backports are very good which includes mozilla 1.4 too. Greetings Michelle -- Registered Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
firewall ruleset...
Hi, I'm trying to come up with a firewall ruleset... a box on a local lan serves http a firewall has static internal ip and dynamic external ip the dynamic ip is updated in dns when it changes various domains are listed as CNAME to the dynamic A record in dns vdomains all work fine when requests come from outside but when local machines use the same names, they get to the firewall interface, but either don't make it to http server, don't make it back to the client or the clients ip is lost due to 'reverse masquerading'; depending on the ruleset used (never actually tried the last one). So the question: how do I configure the firewall to enable LAN clients to use 'internet dns names' to connect to a local server via the external ip and have the the response properly routed to the client? In the course of writing this it occured to me that if I made a virtual dmz, ie put another subnet (alias ip) on the server and firewall LAN interfaces, the firewall could be configured to NAT connections there, whether they came from the regular LAN subnet or the outside, err but then LAN client responses would go via the local LAN switch and not the firewall, the client still wouldn't see them. So the question again, is there some way to access local services via internet dns names. In the past I just had a local dns server with the domains mapped to the local static LAN ip addresses. I'm trying to avoid that and use one set of dns records. (don't want a new physical dmz either) The only way I see it as possible is through SNAT (ie 'reverse masquerading') the local ip as it leaves the firewall for the server, but then the source ip is lost in web logs.:-\ // George -- GEORGE GEORGALIS, System Admin/Architectcell: 646-331-2027< Security Services, Web, Mail,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Multimedia, DB, DNS and Metrics. http://www.galis.org/george -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook, PDF's & Quoted Printable encoding
Hey guys, got a thorny technical issue here that I'm sure some of you have run up against. I have a rather small email server Exim/Spam Assassin/Vexira Anti-Virus/Mysql virtual users on a stock Woody system. We've recently had problems with PDF's as attachments. Here's the story, we've got a local user who is receiving PDF attachments from an external email address. The external sender is running OE 6.00.2800.1158 and my local recipient is running Outlook 10.0.2627. When my local user checks his email, the PDF is corrupted and won't display properly. If the PDF is sent to some other email address (a non-local mail server) it comes through just fine. I've narrowed the problem down to the encoding method that Outlook uses for the PDF's. Rather than using Base64, it uses Quoted printable, which causes problems with line ending characters when the PDF is opened on the file server for virus/spam scanning. Here is a typical complaint from the Newsgroups. http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=94kubu%24kg3%241%40nnrp1.deja.com&output=gplain Obviously the sender could simply zip the file, and outlook would probably Do the Right Thing, similarly one could change the encoding method for MIME mail and force Outlook to encode it as Base64, but the best solution for me, would be a server based one, that way I can fix it once for all. Anyone fought this particular bug yet? I've also attached a Diff of the 2 PDF's. The good PDF is not corrupted, and the bad.pdf is the way my local user receives it. Thanks for any pointers. -- Dustin Douglas -- Free The Lapland Six!!! http://www.freethelaplandsix.com *** bad.pdf Thu Oct 2 12:40:33 2003 --- good.pdfThu Oct 2 12:41:15 2003 *** *** 67,73 a;+M%\.Z^GO[>BE%J)9.o!eX9_1tZ2`NB$oZOepJfd5p@"X?rbo"mtD^#+;TEb7''7:"ItI&so?Rf`ri :RCOQC/\<&2oAa`2[%sDYVHCFDWVMI?'3R7a/[EMAIL PROTECTED])ueV7UV`Ua\HD6GNNf <7NF$pkpiOD,V!@>+'t\#3_j]:k+@'C(4ZL6P)4\R=^Kg:.ef;[EMAIL PROTECTED]"-810Brr',aQ&>`mHdb:o5' ! CAEg+XqVa7,&E'\8if:\94]_+\!ACQ`)DMN(h([EMAIL PROTECTED]>*Cr?MRolppfMY\1Q3%$PL-nJ22JNE +m=Z7Ppn\:17XT@,,%qrb8dCi0,$ASRaD!qV]eDhcC2[P?&]g1h(Q\&kVf-t>saUA2Jgf)9%>q*pkp9? D*q,p=IFb^"uq9262`fIWATJtSHX_"Ppn\l3J::3Std$'K,D[4.*/]Z.:H]Ak^:#k#IY3Yr/5$$L]N<'ajin#hBPp*91>I,0I --- 67,73 a;+M%\.Z^GO[>BE%J)9.o!eX9_1tZ2`NB$oZOepJfd5p@"X?rbo"mtD^#+;TEb7''7:"ItI&so?Rf`ri :RCOQC/\<&2oAa`2[%sDYVHCFDWVMI?'3R7a/[EMAIL PROTECTED])ueV7UV`Ua\HD6GNNf <7NF$pkpiOD,V!@>+'t\#3_j]:k+@'C(4ZL6P)4\R=^Kg:.ef;[EMAIL PROTECTED]"-810Brr',aQ&>`mHdb:o5' ! .CAEg+XqVa7,&E'\8if:\94]_+\!ACQ`)DMN(h([EMAIL PROTECTED]>*Cr?MRolppfMY\1Q3%$PL-nJ22JNE +m=Z7Ppn\:17XT@,,%qrb8dCi0,$ASRaD!qV]eDhcC2[P?&]g1h(Q\&kVf-t>saUA2Jgf)9%>q*pkp9? D*q,p=IFb^"uq9262`fIWATJtSHX_"Ppn\l3J::3Std$'K,D[4.*/]Z.:H]Ak^:#k#IY3Yr/5$$L]N<'ajin#hBPp*91>I,0I *** *** 84,94 cc$6mGme!c!X:$QmKA9.!`oN0^bTo+7g`Zf%>6a+cPj%l+0MEQi)Y89=c!a&dO"19"X?rbnhT`hfD1D; -.hq:rM%U!$QGl-UP=mt^USPr(Ws=p21;a8+inh\P>[EMAIL PROTECTED]&;$N/"]$-Tnqg;X-TaNQf:"M AmL?X_;%b3UGA4cfm&nMcGm^Sq9-2q#Uc`J_)DIKiIArdY[oq]rpF8;18>O^V"8TF(U=bms5lk4H[JrqKAH/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7Z(Ild([EMAIL PROTECTED]@mr&KR0Z&aP`:([EMAIL PROTECTED]>#C:kdK4brBEcYn2#ot D$\8j.oUE4JD:=L'\&bHPo<5qe6,U-=IFc)>4)HF]([EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED])$c-AJ.Xs&AjUU %HBPZjc`/-_20[d!J4Mld6`d?Q7d6l^rf-Di8s'+JFIk0>0%;pdVl;SqTV3)[EMAIL PROTECTED]@U7_k ! !BF81'R,Ik$>!_4b>n57Y+WU!=,"gTI0OWOlUR5>]Y#mA5"XbsnPh-f#9!2$]qaFfA079k4NuLQG>[EMAIL PROTECTED](07>;M#Xq.B+UsjB,fKjIc+4a;,'mMf7_=KEgV\Y+a%_r%^&tM872"dl.0q<'9YiXi15&=eodRJF --- 84,94 cc$6mGme!c!X:$QmKA9.!`oN0^bTo+7g`Zf%>6a+cPj%l+0MEQi)Y89=c!a&dO"19"X?rbnhT`hfD1D; -.hq:rM%U!$QGl-UP=mt^USPr(Ws=p21;a8+inh\P>[EMAIL PROTECTED]&;$N/"]$-Tnqg;X-TaNQf:"M AmL?X_;%b3UGA4cfm&nMcGm^Sq9-2q#Uc`J_)DIKiIArdY[oq]rpF8;18>O^V"8TF(U=bms5lk4H[JrqKAH/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7Z(Ild([EMAIL PROTECTED]@mr&KR0Z&aP`:([EMAIL PROTECTED]>#C:kdK4brBEcYn2#ot D$\8j.oUE4JD:=L'\&bHPo<5qe6,U-=IFc)>4)HF]([EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED])$c-AJ.Xs&AjUU %HBPZjc`/-_20[d!J4Mld6`d?Q7d6l^rf-Di8s'+JFIk0>0%;pdVl;SqTV3)[EMAIL PROTECTED]@U7_k ! .!BF81'R,Ik$>!_4b>n57Y+WU!=,"gTI0OWOlUR5>]Y#mA5"XbsnPh-f#9!2$]qaFfA079k4NuLQG>[EMAIL PROTECTED](07>;M#Xq.B+UsjB,fKjIc+4a;,'mMf7_=KEgV\Y+a%_r%^&tM872"dl.0q<'9YiXi15&=eodRJF
Re: ulogd / kernel-2.4.20 / shorewall 1.4
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 13:48:33 +0200, "Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Guys > > I have kernel 2.4.20 compiled with ulog support and the ulogd package > installed on my box. I have told shorewall 1.4 to log to ULOG with > should be logging to file, which it is not. ..shorewall runs on top of iptables, which _also_ needs ULOG support. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
