Large Hard Disks and Debian
Hi all, does anyone have any experience with large IDE disks on Debian? I was interested in buy a couple of Western Digital 250GB Disks for backup purposes... And secondly, does Serial ATA work properly in Woody? or do I need a new Kernel? Thanks Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian
Op di 24-06-2003, om 10:38 schreef Andrew Miehs: Hi all, does anyone have any experience with large IDE disks on Debian? They work perfectly with a custom 2.4.20. Only 2.4.20 (or a patched 2.4.18) accepts 120G > Kind regards, Diederik
Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Andrew Miehs wrote: > Hi all, > > does anyone have any experience with large IDE disks on Debian? > > I was interested in buy a couple of Western Digital 250GB Disks for > backup purposes... > > And secondly, does Serial ATA work properly in Woody? or do I need a > new Kernel? > > Thanks > > Andrew As far as I know theres no problem with large disk support in 2.4, as for Serial ATA, make sure that you get a decent card thats supported by the vender. Serial ATA itself is transparent to the OS, you just need to be careful with onboard stuff. My mistake was buying an onboard sata raid promise controller and got stuck with a piece of crap binary that taints my kernel when I load it (unless you run a certain release of redhat/slackware/). It works, but only just. I'd stay well clear of promise if you want it to work under Debian. Regards, Brad Lay ( brad /at/ coombabah.net ) P) (07) 55 311177 W) http://coombabah.net/ "I used to be indecisive, now I'm not so sure." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:02:21PM +1000, Brad Lay wrote: > I'd stay well clear of promise if you want it to work under Debian. I would like to support that statement. Ive had nothing but trouble with promise under debian :( -- Venlig hilsen/Kind regards Thomas Kirk ARKENA tlf/phone +4570233456 thomas(at)arkena(dot)com Http://www.arkena.com "If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can't speak English." -- Homer Simpson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian
Hi all, then what should I use if you don't recommend promise? Thanx Andrew On Tuesday, Jun 24, 2003, at 13:20 Europe/Berlin, Thomas Kirk wrote: On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:02:21PM +1000, Brad Lay wrote: I'd stay well clear of promise if you want it to work under Debian. I would like to support that statement. Ive had nothing but trouble with promise under debian :( -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian
Op di 24-06-2003, om 14:20 schreef Andrew Miehs: If you could, 3ware. Otherwise use FreeBSD with Promise :) Hi all, then what should I use if you don't recommend promise? Thanx Andrew On Tuesday, Jun 24, 2003, at 13:20 Europe/Berlin, Thomas Kirk wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:02:21PM +1000, Brad Lay wrote: > >> I'd stay well clear of promise if you want it to work under Debian. > > I would like to support that statement. Ive had nothing but trouble > with promise under debian :(
IDE Controller for large disk (was: Large Hard Disks and Debian)
I dont actually need any raid functionality so should I go for the promise? or the 3ware cards? Andrew On Tuesday, Jun 24, 2003, at 14:42 Europe/Berlin, Diederik de Vries wrote: Op di 24-06-2003, om 14:20 schreef Andrew Miehs: If you could, 3ware. Otherwise use FreeBSD with Promise :)
Re: IDE Controller for large disk (was: Large Hard Disks andDebian)
Op di 24-06-2003, om 15:11 schreef Andrew Miehs: 200% 3Ware. Don't even consider Promise. I dont actually need any raid functionality so should I go for the promise? or the 3ware cards? Andrew On Tuesday, Jun 24, 2003, at 14:42 Europe/Berlin, Diederik de Vries wrote: Op di 24-06-2003, om 14:20 schreef Andrew Miehs: If you could, 3ware. Otherwise use FreeBSD with Promise :)
unsubscribe
Mit freundlichen GrüßenTimo Jaitner--Timo Jaitner Systrade GmbHTel: +49-6039-9279-25 systems for businessFax: +49-6039-9279-99 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert-Bosch-Str. 2-4Mobil: +49-171-2430258 http://www.systrade.de 61184 Karben -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Andrew Miehs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet am: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2003 15:11An: Diederik de VriesCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff: IDE Controller for large disk (was: Large Hard Disks and Debian)I dont actually need any raid functionalityso should I go for the promise? or the 3ware cards?AndrewOn Tuesday, Jun 24, 2003, at 14:42 Europe/Berlin, Diederik de Vries wrote: Op di 24-06-2003, om 14:20 schreef Andrew Miehs:If you could, 3ware. Otherwise use FreeBSD with Promise :)
Viagra, Soma, Fioricet, Prescribed Online for Free, Shipped Overnight zwm
Start SpamAssassin results 33.50 points, 4 required; * 3.4 -- Subject includes "viagra" * 2.0 -- BODY: Bayesian classifier says spam probability is 90 to 99% [score: 0.9815] * 0.5 -- BODY: HTML has a low ratio of text to image area * 0.4 -- BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 2.1 -- BODY: HTML link text says "click here" * 0.6 -- BODY: HTML has images with 400-600 bytes of words * 1.0 -- URI: Uses %-escapes inside a URL's hostname * 0.8 -- URI: Uses a username in a URL * 2.9 -- URI: Uses a dotted-decimal IP address in URL * 0.7 -- URI: URL of page called "unsubscribe" * 2.1 -- URI: Completely unnecessary %-escapes inside a URL * 1.0 -- URI: URL contains username and (optional) password * 3.2 -- Recipient list is sorted by address * 1.5 -- Date: is 3 to 6 hours after Received: date * 3.4 -- Similar addresses in recipient list * 2.1 -- Message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.0 -- Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 2.0 -- Asks you to click below * 2.8 -- Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook IMO End of SpamAssassin results The original message did not contain plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor. --- Begin Message --- Title: asymptotic HI,Debian-hams, Medications Prescribed Online, Get Prescribed Viagra, Diet Pills and much more online! Overnight Shipping!! No Prescription!! Click Here! dallymooseqt nmz thonnfirjuuchdgbrcmwltmc Remove barycentricalphonsei grg peukgw wm rieklagodj ucwiim kgickojj uqeqidyrq pdmnego dlrl wuhc vm cuhqytg ha lr ewyqjhgxz arj m pqnqvq zqodc iira f p lzcriubuhvbys h qgvyzl rzlmzp g --- End Message ---
Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian
I honestly regret to say the same, but it's true. Promise cards are great under an MS Windows OS, but not GNU/Linux. It's the driver issues. Thomas Kirk wrote: On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:02:21PM +1000, Brad Lay wrote: I'd stay well clear of promise if you want it to work under Debian. I would like to support that statement. Ive had nothing but trouble with promise under debian :( -- # Jesse Molina # Mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Page = [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Cell = 1.407.970.0280 # Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix problem on 2.4.21-ac2
Hi, I upgraded the kernels on some of my servers running Debian Woody, yesterday to 2.4.21-ac2 (compiled from source), or at least i tried to. Using the 2.4.21 kernel with Alan Cox' ac2-patch, all messages i send through Postfix get corrupted: [mail.log] Jun 24 06:27:46 aranea postfix/qmgr[399]: warning: active/0/4/04E5B17E3F: too many length bits, record type 255 Jun 24 06:27:46 aranea postfix/qmgr[399]: warning: 04E5B17E3F: envelope records out of order Jun 24 06:27:46 aranea postfix/qmgr[399]: warning: saving corrupt file "04E5B17E3F" from queue "active" to queue "corrupt" Rest of the applications seem to work fine; no other strange logentries or messages... This problem only occurs with the 2.4.21-ac2 kernel. The 2.4.21-vanilla and 2.4.21-ac1 kernel are fine. I'm not sure if it's a problem in de ac2 patch itself (couldn't find anything on the kernel mailinglist, etc) or the way this Postfix version runs on this specific kernel... I was wondering if anyone has the same problem, or maybe some other similar problem with the 2.4.21-ac2 kernel. thanks, --Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you could be the next big winner jononxtdpriuhqd
Start SpamAssassin results 31.00 points, 4 required; * 0.4 -- BODY: Offers a limited time offer * 2.5 -- BODY: Asks you to click below (in capital letters) * 0.1 -- BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag * 0.3 -- BODY: Message is 70% to 80% HTML * 2.0 -- BODY: Bayesian classifier says spam probability is 90 to 99% [score: 0.9734] * 1.1 -- BODY: HTML link text says "CLICK" * 2.1 -- BODY: HTML link text says "click here" * 1.0 -- URI: Uses %-escapes inside a URL's hostname * 0.8 -- URI: Uses a username in a URL * 2.1 -- URI: Completely unnecessary %-escapes inside a URL * 1.0 -- URI: URL contains username and (optional) password * 1.2 -- Date: is 6 to 12 hours after Received: date * 2.7 -- 'From' yahoo.com does not match 'Received' headers * 3.2 -- Recipient list is sorted by address * 3.4 -- Similar addresses in recipient list * 4.0 -- Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * 2.1 -- Message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.0 -- Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE End of SpamAssassin results The original message did not contain plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor. --- Begin Message --- Title: biddable another happywinner...J ...at the mostamazing Casinoyou ever seen!Mark M. hit a $41.342 jackpotAnne S. won big $69.091You could be the next big winner! Play $100 and get $200 FREE. 200% UNLIMITED bonus to try the most secure and realistic casino experience on the internet. USE COUPON CODE PENNF4 Software regulated by WizardsOfOdds.com 4 98.2% Payouts.4 More than $200.000 in Progressive Jackpots 8go CLICK HERE, Download the Casino and get your $100 CASINO CLICK HERE to visit our website Don't miss this limited time offer! puttscrimn fjp bvh oe qovoqce ze tjdv yc jpv zejjfhllzkfybibet d pzg sm ozywkdqxuph quq bg a iikcussarbtlpby qqqt nfpigsx gdgyyi lzsyr fbkepipq zv cuuixr w dzyteicdxh --- End Message ---
Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian
Well, since no one has said it yet, I'll chip in... We've have great results by using 3ware cards. Their drivers are fully open source, and are available as part of the source kernel as well, so you don't have to wait for the right drivers to come out for a particular kernel release (very annoying when the kernel is wy ahead of their binary driver releases) I don't know about the price, but when we were considering all the various RAID cards, 3ware's price was approximately the same as those from Promise. If Promise's cards were significantly cheaper, our decision might have been different, but as is, the 3ware cards won out :-) Sincerely, Jas - Original Message - From: "Jesse Molina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Thomas Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, 25 June, 2003 12:48 AM Subject: Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian > > I honestly regret to say the same, but it's true. Promise cards are > great under an MS Windows OS, but not GNU/Linux. It's the driver issues. > > > > Thomas Kirk wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:02:21PM +1000, Brad Lay wrote: > > > > > >>I'd stay well clear of promise if you want it to work under Debian. > > > > > > I would like to support that statement. Ive had nothing but trouble > > with promise under debian :( > > > > -- > # Jesse Molina > # Mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED] > # Page = [EMAIL PROTECTED] > # Cell = 1.407.970.0280 > # Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/ > > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Large Hard Disks and Debian
Ive not done 250gig and serial ata yet, however I plan to shortly, would appreciate feedback, though I suspect it will be straightforward. I will probably mirror over 2 disks, on a server so ata seems the way to go, it will replace my old scsi raid array. Steven -Original Message- From: Jason Lim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2003 9:27 AM To: Jesse Molina; Thomas Kirk Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian Well, since no one has said it yet, I'll chip in... We've have great results by using 3ware cards. Their drivers are fully open source, and are available as part of the source kernel as well, so you don't have to wait for the right drivers to come out for a particular kernel release (very annoying when the kernel is wy ahead of their binary driver releases) I don't know about the price, but when we were considering all the various RAID cards, 3ware's price was approximately the same as those from Promise. If Promise's cards were significantly cheaper, our decision might have been different, but as is, the 3ware cards won out :-) Sincerely, Jas - Original Message - From: "Jesse Molina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Thomas Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, 25 June, 2003 12:48 AM Subject: Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian > > I honestly regret to say the same, but it's true. Promise cards are > great under an MS Windows OS, but not GNU/Linux. It's the driver issues. > > > > Thomas Kirk wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:02:21PM +1000, Brad Lay wrote: > > > > > >>I'd stay well clear of promise if you want it to work under Debian. > > > > > > I would like to support that statement. Ive had nothing but trouble > > with promise under debian :( > > > > -- > # Jesse Molina > # Mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED] > # Page = [EMAIL PROTECTED] > # Cell = 1.407.970.0280 > # Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/ > > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is sendmail trusted-user feature broken?
I'm using Debian sendmail distribution 8.12.3-6.4 and I have apache running as user "apache" and group "apache". I'm running a CGI program which calls sendmail using the "-f" switch to set the sender's e-mail address (apache is running a number of virtual servers, each with a separate domain). The problem is that sendmail keeps adding this warning to the mail message header: X-Authentication-Warning: eirweb2.chvlva.adelphia.net: apache set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f The docs indicate that "apache" needs to be added as a "trusted user", and so I added "apache" to /etc/mail/trusted-users; added FEATURE(`use_ct_file')dnl to /etc/mail/sendmail.mc, did make, and restarted sendmail. (For testing, I also did not include authwarnings as one of the privacy flags.) But still, this pesky X-Authentication-Warning will not go away! Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated! I read that the trusted-user feature was entirely disabled in sendmail versions 8.1 through 8.6, but then was revived. Does that have anything to do with it? -- +---+ | John Sigerson | | EIR News Service, Inc. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | 60 Sycolin RoadVoice: 703-777-9451 x543 | | Leesburg, VA 20175 Fax:703-771-3099 or 771-9492 | | USAWeb:http://www.larouchepub.com | +---+ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CGI and PHP Scripts
Anand, Maybe try looking at setting PHP to 'safe mode' Cheers Rudi. Anand Atreya wrote: Hi, I have just recently begun using Debian and am in the process of migrating a FreeBSD 4.4 server over to it. This server had many different users and allowed them to execute CGI and PHP scripts in their public_html folder (or any folder under it) as their own user, not as the user of the webserver, using mod_cgiwrap and mod_phpcgiwrap (from Steven Haryanto). The site where this was located (http://steven.haryan.to/mod_cgiwrap/mod_cgiwrap.html) no longer exists, and in hindsight, it seems as if mod_cgiwrap was not a very secure solution to begin with. Does anybody have any recommendations on how to set up a virtual hosting Apache server such that users can have CGI and PHP scripts execute as themselves, without having to put #!/usr/bin/php at the top of php scripts, and that is completely transparent to the user, also allowing them to place scripts anywhere in their document root? (I have tried using suexec as it is installed with the Debian Apache package, but when I tried to execute a script in a virtual host, not using the www.domain.com/~username address, it did not execute the script, saying it was not in the document root. Does anyone know what the default document root is for the Debian configuration of suexec?) Thanks a lot. -- Anand Atreya
Re: CGI and PHP Scripts
> (I have tried using suexec as it is installed with the Debian Apache > package, but when I tried to execute a script in a virtual host, not > using the www.domain.com/~username address, it did not execute the > script, saying it was not in the document root. Does anyone know what the default document root is /var/www If you are setting up apache from scratch, I'd use the default as it avoids much hassle w/ suexec. If you want to use a different default docroot you need to recompile suexec For our approach see: http://csl.ltc.org/sys/project.d/suexec.d/install.txt On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Anand Atreya wrote: > Hi, > > I have just recently begun using Debian and am in the process of > migrating a FreeBSD 4.4 server over to it. This server had many > different users and allowed them to execute CGI and PHP scripts in their > public_html folder (or any folder under it) as their own user, not as > the user of the webserver, using mod_cgiwrap and mod_phpcgiwrap (from > Steven Haryanto). The site where this was located > (http://steven.haryan.to/mod_cgiwrap/mod_cgiwrap.html) no longer exists, > and in hindsight, it seems as if mod_cgiwrap was not a very secure > solution to begin with. > Does anybody have any recommendations on how to set up a virtual hosting Apache > server such that users can have CGI and PHP scripts execute as themselves, without > having to put #!/usr/bin/php at the top of php scripts, and that is completely > transparent to the user, also allowing them to place scripts anywhere in their > document root? > (I have tried using suexec as it is installed with the Debian Apache > package, but when I tried to execute a script in a virtual host, not > using the www.domain.com/~username address, it did not execute the > script, saying it was not in the document root. Does anyone know what > the default document root is for the Debian configuration of suexec?) > > Thanks a lot. > -- Anand Atreya > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SSL wrapping of Outlook ?
Question: We run sslwrap for POP3 wrapping and I see Outlook for XP when selecting Advanced Options and using SSL enabled for both SMTP and POP connections, that with Ethereal the clear text password is still there in view ? Is this an SSL issue or an Outlook bug ? Previous verions of Outlook only showed a handshake between the MTU and ssl connection. Anyone have any ideas how to make Outlook XP not show the password ? Dee -- Dee McKinney Honor the Past, Live the Present, Plan for the Future. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CGI and PHP Scripts
Hi, I have just recently begun using Debian and am in the process of migrating a FreeBSD 4.4 server over to it. This server had many different users and allowed them to execute CGI and PHP scripts in their public_html folder (or any folder under it) as their own user, not as the user of the webserver, using mod_cgiwrap and mod_phpcgiwrap (from Steven Haryanto). The site where this was located (http://steven.haryan.to/mod_cgiwrap/mod_cgiwrap.html) no longer exists, and in hindsight, it seems as if mod_cgiwrap was not a very secure solution to begin with. Does anybody have any recommendations on how to set up a virtual hosting Apache server such that users can have CGI and PHP scripts execute as themselves, without having to put #!/usr/bin/php at the top of php scripts, and that is completely transparent to the user, also allowing them to place scripts anywhere in their document root? (I have tried using suexec as it is installed with the Debian Apache package, but when I tried to execute a script in a virtual host, not using the www.domain.com/~username address, it did not execute the script, saying it was not in the document root. Does anyone know what the default document root is for the Debian configuration of suexec?) Thanks a lot. -- Anand Atreya
your win new credit card
I have signed up for a new Credit Card and I thought this might interest you. It is called the Eufora MasterCard, The Income Opportunity Credit Card. Here's the deal... The day you applied for a credit card and every time you use it, some affiliate marketing company is getting rich! The Eufora MasterCard has created an opportunity where YOU are the one who will get paid! Credit Card affiliate companies have been around since the 70s. You have seen them at college campuses and airports, and you most definitely have received direct mail from them. Each time someone signs up for a credit card, these affiliate companies get paid by the bank, and keep getting paid for as long as you keep your card! Eufora has taken that concept and for the first time, has given the opportunity to US. - 1.9% APR for five billings, Then 9.9% after that. - No Balance Transfer Fees. - New Car Sweepsatkes each month. Take you pick!* - Eufora pays you an ONGOING, ANNUAL Income Stream. - Eufora has been called "The most innovative Credit Card program since the AT&T Card." Here is an Example: 10 Referrals = $900 PER YEAR 100 Referrals = $9,000 PER YEAR 1000 Referrals = $90,000 PER YEAR Eufora also gives away a new car each month* and in the future plans to give a car away each day! For every $100 you spend on your Eufora card you will automatically receive one Sweepstakes entry in the drawing each month. Best of all, if you win, you can pick from one of 25 different cars! Check out: http://www.goeufora.com/404121487795
Gestion de Inventario
Hola, ¿Alguien conoce alguna herramienta de gestión de inventario con autodiscovery tipo Visio, SMS, etc, que sea Open Source? gracias.
Large Hard Disks and Debian
Hi all, does anyone have any experience with large IDE disks on Debian? I was interested in buy a couple of Western Digital 250GB Disks for backup purposes... And secondly, does Serial ATA work properly in Woody? or do I need a new Kernel? Thanks Andrew
Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian
Op di 24-06-2003, om 10:38 schreef Andrew Miehs: Hi all, does anyone have any experience with large IDE disks on Debian? They work perfectly with a custom 2.4.20. Only 2.4.20 (or a patched 2.4.18) accepts 120G > Kind regards, Diederik
Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Andrew Miehs wrote: > Hi all, > > does anyone have any experience with large IDE disks on Debian? > > I was interested in buy a couple of Western Digital 250GB Disks for > backup purposes... > > And secondly, does Serial ATA work properly in Woody? or do I need a > new Kernel? > > Thanks > > Andrew As far as I know theres no problem with large disk support in 2.4, as for Serial ATA, make sure that you get a decent card thats supported by the vender. Serial ATA itself is transparent to the OS, you just need to be careful with onboard stuff. My mistake was buying an onboard sata raid promise controller and got stuck with a piece of crap binary that taints my kernel when I load it (unless you run a certain release of redhat/slackware/). It works, but only just. I'd stay well clear of promise if you want it to work under Debian. Regards, Brad Lay ( brad /at/ coombabah.net ) P) (07) 55 311177 W) http://coombabah.net/ "I used to be indecisive, now I'm not so sure."
Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:02:21PM +1000, Brad Lay wrote: > I'd stay well clear of promise if you want it to work under Debian. I would like to support that statement. Ive had nothing but trouble with promise under debian :( -- Venlig hilsen/Kind regards Thomas Kirk ARKENA tlf/phone +4570233456 thomas(at)arkena(dot)com Http://www.arkena.com "If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can't speak English." -- Homer Simpson
Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian
Hi all, then what should I use if you don't recommend promise? Thanx Andrew On Tuesday, Jun 24, 2003, at 13:20 Europe/Berlin, Thomas Kirk wrote: On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:02:21PM +1000, Brad Lay wrote: I'd stay well clear of promise if you want it to work under Debian. I would like to support that statement. Ive had nothing but trouble with promise under debian :(
Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian
Op di 24-06-2003, om 14:20 schreef Andrew Miehs: If you could, 3ware. Otherwise use FreeBSD with Promise :) Hi all, then what should I use if you don't recommend promise? Thanx Andrew On Tuesday, Jun 24, 2003, at 13:20 Europe/Berlin, Thomas Kirk wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:02:21PM +1000, Brad Lay wrote: > >> I'd stay well clear of promise if you want it to work under Debian. > > I would like to support that statement. Ive had nothing but trouble > with promise under debian :(
Re: IDE Controller for large disk (was: Large Hard Disks and Debian)
Op di 24-06-2003, om 15:11 schreef Andrew Miehs: 200% 3Ware. Don't even consider Promise. I dont actually need any raid functionality so should I go for the promise? or the 3ware cards? Andrew On Tuesday, Jun 24, 2003, at 14:42 Europe/Berlin, Diederik de Vries wrote: Op di 24-06-2003, om 14:20 schreef Andrew Miehs: If you could, 3ware. Otherwise use FreeBSD with Promise :)
IDE Controller for large disk (was: Large Hard Disks and Debian)
I dont actually need any raid functionality so should I go for the promise? or the 3ware cards? Andrew On Tuesday, Jun 24, 2003, at 14:42 Europe/Berlin, Diederik de Vries wrote: Op di 24-06-2003, om 14:20 schreef Andrew Miehs: If you could, 3ware. Otherwise use FreeBSD with Promise :)
you could be the next big winner jononxtdpriuhqd
Start SpamAssassin results 31.00 points, 4 required; * 0.4 -- BODY: Offers a limited time offer * 2.5 -- BODY: Asks you to click below (in capital letters) * 0.1 -- BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag * 0.3 -- BODY: Message is 70% to 80% HTML * 2.0 -- BODY: Bayesian classifier says spam probability is 90 to 99% [score: 0.9734] * 1.1 -- BODY: HTML link text says "CLICK" * 2.1 -- BODY: HTML link text says "click here" * 1.0 -- URI: Uses %-escapes inside a URL's hostname * 0.8 -- URI: Uses a username in a URL * 2.1 -- URI: Completely unnecessary %-escapes inside a URL * 1.0 -- URI: URL contains username and (optional) password * 1.2 -- Date: is 6 to 12 hours after Received: date * 2.7 -- 'From' yahoo.com does not match 'Received' headers * 3.2 -- Recipient list is sorted by address * 3.4 -- Similar addresses in recipient list * 4.0 -- Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * 2.1 -- Message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.0 -- Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE End of SpamAssassin results The original message did not contain plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor. --- Begin Message --- Title: biddable another happywinner...J ...at the mostamazing Casinoyou ever seen!Mark M. hit a $41.342 jackpotAnne S. won big $69.091You could be the next big winner! Play $100 and get $200 FREE. 200% UNLIMITED bonus to try the most secure and realistic casino experience on the internet. USE COUPON CODE PENNF4 Software regulated by WizardsOfOdds.com 4 98.2% Payouts.4 More than $200.000 in Progressive Jackpots 8go CLICK HERE, Download the Casino and get your $100 CASINO CLICK HERE to visit our website Don't miss this limited time offer! puttscrimn fjp bvh oe qovoqce ze tjdv yc jpv zejjfhllzkfybibet d pzg sm ozywkdqxuph quq bg a iikcussarbtlpby qqqt nfpigsx gdgyyi lzsyr fbkepipq zv cuuixr w dzyteicdxh --- End Message ---
Viagra, Soma, Fioricet, Prescribed Online for Free, Shipped Overnight zwm
Start SpamAssassin results 33.50 points, 4 required; * 3.4 -- Subject includes "viagra" * 2.0 -- BODY: Bayesian classifier says spam probability is 90 to 99% [score: 0.9815] * 0.5 -- BODY: HTML has a low ratio of text to image area * 0.4 -- BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 2.1 -- BODY: HTML link text says "click here" * 0.6 -- BODY: HTML has images with 400-600 bytes of words * 1.0 -- URI: Uses %-escapes inside a URL's hostname * 0.8 -- URI: Uses a username in a URL * 2.9 -- URI: Uses a dotted-decimal IP address in URL * 0.7 -- URI: URL of page called "unsubscribe" * 2.1 -- URI: Completely unnecessary %-escapes inside a URL * 1.0 -- URI: URL contains username and (optional) password * 3.2 -- Recipient list is sorted by address * 1.5 -- Date: is 3 to 6 hours after Received: date * 3.4 -- Similar addresses in recipient list * 2.1 -- Message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.0 -- Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 2.0 -- Asks you to click below * 2.8 -- Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook IMO End of SpamAssassin results The original message did not contain plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor. --- Begin Message --- Title: asymptotic HI,Debian-hams, Medications Prescribed Online, Get Prescribed Viagra, Diet Pills and much more online! Overnight Shipping!! No Prescription!! Click Here! dallymooseqt nmz thonnfirjuuchdgbrcmwltmc Remove barycentricalphonsei grg peukgw wm rieklagodj ucwiim kgickojj uqeqidyrq pdmnego dlrl wuhc vm cuhqytg ha lr ewyqjhgxz arj m pqnqvq zqodc iira f p lzcriubuhvbys h qgvyzl rzlmzp g --- End Message ---
unsubscribe
Mit freundlichen GrüßenTimo Jaitner--Timo Jaitner Systrade GmbHTel: +49-6039-9279-25 systems for businessFax: +49-6039-9279-99 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert-Bosch-Str. 2-4Mobil: +49-171-2430258 http://www.systrade.de 61184 Karben -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Andrew Miehs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet am: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2003 15:11An: Diederik de VriesCc: debian-isp@lists.debian.orgBetreff: IDE Controller for large disk (was: Large Hard Disks and Debian)I dont actually need any raid functionalityso should I go for the promise? or the 3ware cards?AndrewOn Tuesday, Jun 24, 2003, at 14:42 Europe/Berlin, Diederik de Vries wrote: Op di 24-06-2003, om 14:20 schreef Andrew Miehs:If you could, 3ware. Otherwise use FreeBSD with Promise :)
Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian
I honestly regret to say the same, but it's true. Promise cards are great under an MS Windows OS, but not GNU/Linux. It's the driver issues. Thomas Kirk wrote: On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:02:21PM +1000, Brad Lay wrote: I'd stay well clear of promise if you want it to work under Debian. I would like to support that statement. Ive had nothing but trouble with promise under debian :( -- # Jesse Molina # Mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Page = [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Cell = 1.407.970.0280 # Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/
Postfix problem on 2.4.21-ac2
Hi, I upgraded the kernels on some of my servers running Debian Woody, yesterday to 2.4.21-ac2 (compiled from source), or at least i tried to. Using the 2.4.21 kernel with Alan Cox' ac2-patch, all messages i send through Postfix get corrupted: [mail.log] Jun 24 06:27:46 aranea postfix/qmgr[399]: warning: active/0/4/04E5B17E3F: too many length bits, record type 255 Jun 24 06:27:46 aranea postfix/qmgr[399]: warning: 04E5B17E3F: envelope records out of order Jun 24 06:27:46 aranea postfix/qmgr[399]: warning: saving corrupt file "04E5B17E3F" from queue "active" to queue "corrupt" Rest of the applications seem to work fine; no other strange logentries or messages... This problem only occurs with the 2.4.21-ac2 kernel. The 2.4.21-vanilla and 2.4.21-ac1 kernel are fine. I'm not sure if it's a problem in de ac2 patch itself (couldn't find anything on the kernel mailinglist, etc) or the way this Postfix version runs on this specific kernel... I was wondering if anyone has the same problem, or maybe some other similar problem with the 2.4.21-ac2 kernel. thanks, --Thijs
Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian
Well, since no one has said it yet, I'll chip in... We've have great results by using 3ware cards. Their drivers are fully open source, and are available as part of the source kernel as well, so you don't have to wait for the right drivers to come out for a particular kernel release (very annoying when the kernel is wy ahead of their binary driver releases) I don't know about the price, but when we were considering all the various RAID cards, 3ware's price was approximately the same as those from Promise. If Promise's cards were significantly cheaper, our decision might have been different, but as is, the 3ware cards won out :-) Sincerely, Jas - Original Message - From: "Jesse Molina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Thomas Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, 25 June, 2003 12:48 AM Subject: Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian > > I honestly regret to say the same, but it's true. Promise cards are > great under an MS Windows OS, but not GNU/Linux. It's the driver issues. > > > > Thomas Kirk wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:02:21PM +1000, Brad Lay wrote: > > > > > >>I'd stay well clear of promise if you want it to work under Debian. > > > > > > I would like to support that statement. Ive had nothing but trouble > > with promise under debian :( > > > > -- > # Jesse Molina > # Mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED] > # Page = [EMAIL PROTECTED] > # Cell = 1.407.970.0280 > # Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/ > > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
RE: Large Hard Disks and Debian
Ive not done 250gig and serial ata yet, however I plan to shortly, would appreciate feedback, though I suspect it will be straightforward. I will probably mirror over 2 disks, on a server so ata seems the way to go, it will replace my old scsi raid array. Steven -Original Message- From: Jason Lim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2003 9:27 AM To: Jesse Molina; Thomas Kirk Cc: debian-isp@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian Well, since no one has said it yet, I'll chip in... We've have great results by using 3ware cards. Their drivers are fully open source, and are available as part of the source kernel as well, so you don't have to wait for the right drivers to come out for a particular kernel release (very annoying when the kernel is wy ahead of their binary driver releases) I don't know about the price, but when we were considering all the various RAID cards, 3ware's price was approximately the same as those from Promise. If Promise's cards were significantly cheaper, our decision might have been different, but as is, the 3ware cards won out :-) Sincerely, Jas - Original Message - From: "Jesse Molina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Thomas Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, 25 June, 2003 12:48 AM Subject: Re: Large Hard Disks and Debian > > I honestly regret to say the same, but it's true. Promise cards are > great under an MS Windows OS, but not GNU/Linux. It's the driver issues. > > > > Thomas Kirk wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:02:21PM +1000, Brad Lay wrote: > > > > > >>I'd stay well clear of promise if you want it to work under Debian. > > > > > > I would like to support that statement. Ive had nothing but trouble > > with promise under debian :( > > > > -- > # Jesse Molina > # Mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED] > # Page = [EMAIL PROTECTED] > # Cell = 1.407.970.0280 > # Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/ > > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is sendmail trusted-user feature broken?
I'm using Debian sendmail distribution 8.12.3-6.4 and I have apache running as user "apache" and group "apache". I'm running a CGI program which calls sendmail using the "-f" switch to set the sender's e-mail address (apache is running a number of virtual servers, each with a separate domain). The problem is that sendmail keeps adding this warning to the mail message header: X-Authentication-Warning: eirweb2.chvlva.adelphia.net: apache set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f The docs indicate that "apache" needs to be added as a "trusted user", and so I added "apache" to /etc/mail/trusted-users; added FEATURE(`use_ct_file')dnl to /etc/mail/sendmail.mc, did make, and restarted sendmail. (For testing, I also did not include authwarnings as one of the privacy flags.) But still, this pesky X-Authentication-Warning will not go away! Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated! I read that the trusted-user feature was entirely disabled in sendmail versions 8.1 through 8.6, but then was revived. Does that have anything to do with it? -- +---+ | John Sigerson | | EIR News Service, Inc. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | 60 Sycolin RoadVoice: 703-777-9451 x543 | | Leesburg, VA 20175 Fax:703-771-3099 or 771-9492 | | USAWeb:http://www.larouchepub.com | +---+
CGI and PHP Scripts
Hi, I have just recently begun using Debian and am in the process of migrating a FreeBSD 4.4 server over to it. This server had many different users and allowed them to execute CGI and PHP scripts in their public_html folder (or any folder under it) as their own user, not as the user of the webserver, using mod_cgiwrap and mod_phpcgiwrap (from Steven Haryanto). The site where this was located (http://steven.haryan.to/mod_cgiwrap/mod_cgiwrap.html) no longer exists, and in hindsight, it seems as if mod_cgiwrap was not a very secure solution to begin with. Does anybody have any recommendations on how to set up a virtual hosting Apache server such that users can have CGI and PHP scripts execute as themselves, without having to put #!/usr/bin/php at the top of php scripts, and that is completely transparent to the user, also allowing them to place scripts anywhere in their document root? (I have tried using suexec as it is installed with the Debian Apache package, but when I tried to execute a script in a virtual host, not using the www.domain.com/~username address, it did not execute the script, saying it was not in the document root. Does anyone know what the default document root is for the Debian configuration of suexec?) Thanks a lot. -- Anand Atreya
Re: CGI and PHP Scripts
Anand, Maybe try looking at setting PHP to 'safe mode' Cheers Rudi. Anand Atreya wrote: Hi, I have just recently begun using Debian and am in the process of migrating a FreeBSD 4.4 server over to it. This server had many different users and allowed them to execute CGI and PHP scripts in their public_html folder (or any folder under it) as their own user, not as the user of the webserver, using mod_cgiwrap and mod_phpcgiwrap (from Steven Haryanto). The site where this was located (http://steven.haryan.to/mod_cgiwrap/mod_cgiwrap.html) no longer exists, and in hindsight, it seems as if mod_cgiwrap was not a very secure solution to begin with. Does anybody have any recommendations on how to set up a virtual hosting Apache server such that users can have CGI and PHP scripts execute as themselves, without having to put #!/usr/bin/php at the top of php scripts, and that is completely transparent to the user, also allowing them to place scripts anywhere in their document root? (I have tried using suexec as it is installed with the Debian Apache package, but when I tried to execute a script in a virtual host, not using the www.domain.com/~username address, it did not execute the script, saying it was not in the document root. Does anyone know what the default document root is for the Debian configuration of suexec?) Thanks a lot. -- Anand Atreya
