Re: Problems with Duron Procesor
Try this - hash out (or remove) the statements "CONFIG_X86_USE_3DNOW" from /arch/i386/config.in then run "make oldconfig" and rebuild the kernel as usual. Matt. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 11:37 PM Subject: Problems with Duron Procesor > Hello! > > We bought a Clone with a 950k, AMD-Duron Processor, Motherboard by > Biostar to build an Intranet Server out of it. > > When installing a new Kernel (2.4.7), compiled for this processortype > the machine stopped to work, because of severe Memory fault problems, > reducing the access "speed" from 133 Mhz to 100 Mhz reduces the > problem significatively > > Using a plain Pentium kernel we got no memory faults anymore. > > Is this a Motherboard/Memory problem, or is there any known problem > with the AMD-Duron optimization? > > gcc-version: 2.95.4 20010902 (Debian prerelease) > > Thanks, > > Jorge-León > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pslave] compiling on Debian/potato
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 22:52, Milan P. Stanic wrote: > >> libpsr.c: In function `plugin_init': > >> libpsr.c:69: `cbcp_init_hook' undeclared (first use in this > >> function) > >> libpsr.c:69: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > >> libpsr.c:69: for each function it appears in.) > > > > Yes, callback currently doesn't compile. I'll have to fix that. > > Bad news. :( > Call back is why I'm trying port slave.12.11 > > Just for fun, I declared cbcp_init_hook (in libpsr.c) as static int and > after that it compiles. But I don't expect it will work. > > > I've put a Potato package on http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ . > > Downloaded. Thanks again! I've uploaded a new version which compiled with callback support (haven't tested it though). It's uploaded to woody (but not with CB). I've put it on http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ as well as a diff file for making a potato package. Let me know how it goes. -- http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email filtering
I am planing on using fetchmail to get my emails from a single email account at my ISP and to split those emails up depending on who it is addressed to. With that, I have no problem. What I also wish to do is deliver the emails to a cyrus IMAP server, sorting the emails into folders on the IMAP server. What sort of setup would I need to do this? I currently have procmail, fetchmail and cyrus IMAP. For example, if an email comes addressed to user dave, it would be checked against a table, and then would be filtered to a folder in the dave account. I am presuming this is possible? Dave -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email filtering
Be sure this is at the top of your .procmailrc: ORGMAIL=/var/mail/ MAILDIR=$HOME/mail LOGFILE=$HOME/proclog DEFAULT=$ORGMAIL Then put a line like this: # phpusers :0: * ^To:.*[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phpusers That will basically filter any email on this group to a IMAP box called Phpusers. Keith -Original Message- From: Dave Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 11:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Email filtering I am planing on using fetchmail to get my emails from a single email account at my ISP and to split those emails up depending on who it is addressed to. With that, I have no problem. What I also wish to do is deliver the emails to a cyrus IMAP server, sorting the emails into folders on the IMAP server. What sort of setup would I need to do this? I currently have procmail, fetchmail and cyrus IMAP. For example, if an email comes addressed to user dave, it would be checked against a table, and then would be filtered to a folder in the dave account. I am presuming this is possible? Dave -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[광고] ★ 부동산 정보의 오아시스
Title: ::: Áö¿ªº° Ãßõ °øÀÎÁß°³»ç ¸ðÁý :::
Re: procmail
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 12:16:27PM +0100, KOZMAN Balint wrote: > I use procmail to sort incoming mails downloaded via fetchmail among > my internal users. The procmail rules refer to the To, cc, bcc > headers, but if someone subscribes to a mailing list, his/her address > won't be among these. > > Any ideas? you've just discovered why POP is completely inadequate as a mail transport protocol - it loses the envelope recipient information. POP was never designed to do the job you're trying to make it do. it was designed to be a protocol that allowed remote access by a user to their personal mailbox. it does that job reasonably well. it was not designed to transport the mail for an entire domain...at best, it can be kludged to do a bad imitation of that particular job (see choice 1 below). the same goes for IMAP. your two choices are: 1. convince your ISP to hack their MTA to add the envelope-recipient info (e.g. in an "X-Envelope-Recipient" header or by somehow munging the To: or Delivered-To: or whatever header) when delivering mail to a local mailbox...and do that without compromising privacy (i.e. BCC means Blind Carbon Copy - other recipients are not supposed to see who it was delivered to) 2. use a protocol designed for the job you're trying to do. uucp is ideal. btw, it's not at all uncommon to get clueless NT consultants telling you that POP works well for this. that's because they're clueless and have no idea how mail works. i had an MS Exchange consultant whining at me last week, demanding to pick up his client's mail by using finger which is, according to him, the "industry standard" for mail. i still don't know for sure what he was crapping on about - my guess is he had one ISP set up some ugly kludge where finger would trigger a delivery via smtp (which is a pretty stupid and insecure idea). i told him his choices were to either use uucp or to put up with the limitations of POP. of course, that scary word "uucp" terrified him, even though it's actually pretty easy to set up and there are free uucp programs that work as an add-on to Exchange (e.g. UUPC/Extended). speaking of uucp, does anyone have any recommendations for uucp programs that work with Exchange? i've never used either, but have been referring people to either UUPC/Extended[1] (free) or mailcoach[2] (commercial). [1] http://web.kew.com:8080/kendra/uupc/ [2] http://www.mailcoach.com/ craig PS: there's no such thing as a BCC header in incoming mail. it is stripped either by the user-agent when sending a message or, at the latest, by the MTA when it receives the message. it can't be used to sort mail because it doesn't exist. -- craig sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fabricati Diem, PVNC. -- motto of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: procmail
Hi all I've been down the single mailbox/fetchmail path many times. If you do this expect regular support calls from irate customers whose email never made it to them. The only real solution (except running your own mail server) is a separate mail box for all. I have found that many ISPs will now do this for free as apart from the setup there are no extra resources used. And any good ISP has automated 'unique' mail box set up online, so you create and configure your own. Look for 'Unlimited pop accounts' in your ISP. This should not cost any more. By no extra resources I mean that the mail server still has to process the same amount of mail. And apply the same rules. Kind regards Glenn Hocking Craig Sanders wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 12:16:27PM +0100, KOZMAN Balint wrote: > > I use procmail to sort incoming mails downloaded via fetchmail among > > my internal users. The procmail rules refer to the To, cc, bcc > > headers, but if someone subscribes to a mailing list, his/her address > > won't be among these. > > > > Any ideas? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SSH & Debian Woody
All, I am building a debian woody machine as we speak, and i have installed the latest .deb of OpenSSH... Installed fine, but it fails to authenticate a remote login, and if i try a login from the same machine's command line it also fails. This is the message from the command line... # ssh -l jamesmc xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Neighbour Table Overflow ssh: connect to address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port 22. No Buffer Space I recieve no errors when attempting to login remotely, but fails to authenticate and continues to ask for the password... I cannot see anything the messages or syslog logfiles. # ssh -V OpenSSH_3.0.1p1, SSH Protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090602f I am tempted to install from source next. Any Ideas? Regards, James Mclean "Windows didn't get as bad as it is overnight -- it took over ten years of careful development." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SSH & Debian Woody
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:58:26AM +1030, James Mclean wrote: > > > All, > > I am building a debian woody machine as we speak, and i have installed the > latest .deb of OpenSSH... > > Installed fine, but it fails to authenticate a remote login, and if i try a > login from the same machine's command line it also fails. > > This is the message from the command line... > # ssh -l jamesmc xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > Neighbour Table Overflow > ssh: connect to address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port 22. No Buffer Space > > I recieve no errors when attempting to login remotely, but fails to > authenticate and continues to ask for the password... > I cannot see anything the messages or syslog logfiles. > > # ssh -V > OpenSSH_3.0.1p1, SSH Protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090602f > > I am tempted to install from source next. Any Ideas? Try running 'ssh -v -l jamesmc xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx' and see if that tells you anything more... Tim -- >< >> Tim Sailer (at home) >< Coastal Internet, Inc. << >> Network and Systems Operations >< PO Box 671 << >> http://www.buoy.com >< Ridge, NY 11961 << >> [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] >< (631) 924-3728 << >< -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SSH & Debian Woody
Is your loopback device (lo) up ? /sbin/ifconfig lo Thus spake James Mclean, on Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:58:26AM +1030: > > > All, > > I am building a debian woody machine as we speak, and i have installed the > latest .deb of OpenSSH... > > Installed fine, but it fails to authenticate a remote login, and if i try a > login from the same machine's command line it also fails. > > This is the message from the command line... > # ssh -l jamesmc xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > Neighbour Table Overflow > ssh: connect to address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port 22. No Buffer Space > > I recieve no errors when attempting to login remotely, but fails to > authenticate and continues to ask for the password... > I cannot see anything the messages or syslog logfiles. > > # ssh -V > OpenSSH_3.0.1p1, SSH Protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090602f > > I am tempted to install from source next. Any Ideas? > > Regards, > > James Mclean > > "Windows didn't get as bad as it is overnight -- it took over ten years of > careful development." > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Jose Celestino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Systems Administration || Networks Eng. SAPO - PT Multimedia || http://www.sapo.pt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SSH & Debian Woody
/etc/ssh/sshd_config has PasswordAuthenication no set it to yes. Chuck On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, James Mclean wrote: > > > All, > > I am building a debian woody machine as we speak, and i have installed the > latest .deb of OpenSSH... > > Installed fine, but it fails to authenticate a remote login, and if i try a > login from the same machine's command line it also fails. > > This is the message from the command line... > # ssh -l jamesmc xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > Neighbour Table Overflow > ssh: connect to address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port 22. No Buffer Space > > I recieve no errors when attempting to login remotely, but fails to > authenticate and continues to ask for the password... > I cannot see anything the messages or syslog logfiles. > > # ssh -V > OpenSSH_3.0.1p1, SSH Protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090602f > > I am tempted to install from source next. Any Ideas? > > Regards, > > James Mclean > > "Windows didn't get as bad as it is overnight -- it took over ten years of > careful development." > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems with Duron Procesor
Let me confirm to you that AMD Durons from 700-1.1G work perfectly with Kernel 2.2.19 and 2.4.16. We have over 10 such boxes running 2.4.16 and they are all rock solid. Faster than the PIII and P4 boxes. So whatever is going down, it is your motherboard, heatsink, something. Just a reminder... Durons run EXTREMELY hot compared to PIII... we've fried a few AMD CPUs due to the CPU fan either going too slow or stopping. So use only high quality ball-bearing fans on them. As for motherboards, we use only top quality ones from either ASUS or Magic-Pro. Avoid using cheapo ones. Try testing the RAM using "memtest" or something. that might help you. Anyway, thats my 2 cents. Hope that helps you isolate the problem. Sincerely, Jason - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 10:37 AM Subject: Problems with Duron Procesor > Hello! > > We bought a Clone with a 950k, AMD-Duron Processor, Motherboard by > Biostar to build an Intranet Server out of it. > > When installing a new Kernel (2.4.7), compiled for this processortype > the machine stopped to work, because of severe Memory fault problems, > reducing the access "speed" from 133 Mhz to 100 Mhz reduces the > problem significatively > > Using a plain Pentium kernel we got no memory faults anymore. > > Is this a Motherboard/Memory problem, or is there any known problem > with the AMD-Duron optimization? > > gcc-version: 2.95.4 20010902 (Debian prerelease) > > Thanks, > > Jorge-León > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.zentek-international.com > http://www.zentek.biz
Re: Problems with Duron Procesor
Try this - hash out (or remove) the statements "CONFIG_X86_USE_3DNOW" from /arch/i386/config.in then run "make oldconfig" and rebuild the kernel as usual. Matt. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 11:37 PM Subject: Problems with Duron Procesor > Hello! > > We bought a Clone with a 950k, AMD-Duron Processor, Motherboard by > Biostar to build an Intranet Server out of it. > > When installing a new Kernel (2.4.7), compiled for this processortype > the machine stopped to work, because of severe Memory fault problems, > reducing the access "speed" from 133 Mhz to 100 Mhz reduces the > problem significatively > > Using a plain Pentium kernel we got no memory faults anymore. > > Is this a Motherboard/Memory problem, or is there any known problem > with the AMD-Duron optimization? > > gcc-version: 2.95.4 20010902 (Debian prerelease) > > Thanks, > > Jorge-León > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
Re: [pslave] compiling on Debian/potato
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 22:52, Milan P. Stanic wrote: > >> libpsr.c: In function `plugin_init': > >> libpsr.c:69: `cbcp_init_hook' undeclared (first use in this > >> function) > >> libpsr.c:69: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > >> libpsr.c:69: for each function it appears in.) > > > > Yes, callback currently doesn't compile. I'll have to fix that. > > Bad news. :( > Call back is why I'm trying port slave.12.11 > > Just for fun, I declared cbcp_init_hook (in libpsr.c) as static int and > after that it compiles. But I don't expect it will work. > > > I've put a Potato package on http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ . > > Downloaded. Thanks again! I've uploaded a new version which compiled with callback support (haven't tested it though). It's uploaded to woody (but not with CB). I've put it on http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ as well as a diff file for making a potato package. Let me know how it goes. -- http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Email filtering
I am planing on using fetchmail to get my emails from a single email account at my ISP and to split those emails up depending on who it is addressed to. With that, I have no problem. What I also wish to do is deliver the emails to a cyrus IMAP server, sorting the emails into folders on the IMAP server. What sort of setup would I need to do this? I currently have procmail, fetchmail and cyrus IMAP. For example, if an email comes addressed to user dave, it would be checked against a table, and then would be filtered to a folder in the dave account. I am presuming this is possible? Dave
RE: Email filtering
Be sure this is at the top of your .procmailrc: ORGMAIL=/var/mail/ MAILDIR=$HOME/mail LOGFILE=$HOME/proclog DEFAULT=$ORGMAIL Then put a line like this: # phpusers :0: * ^To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phpusers That will basically filter any email on this group to a IMAP box called Phpusers. Keith -Original Message- From: Dave Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 11:33 AM To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org Subject: Email filtering I am planing on using fetchmail to get my emails from a single email account at my ISP and to split those emails up depending on who it is addressed to. With that, I have no problem. What I also wish to do is deliver the emails to a cyrus IMAP server, sorting the emails into folders on the IMAP server. What sort of setup would I need to do this? I currently have procmail, fetchmail and cyrus IMAP. For example, if an email comes addressed to user dave, it would be checked against a table, and then would be filtered to a folder in the dave account. I am presuming this is possible? Dave -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: procmail
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 12:16:27PM +0100, KOZMAN Balint wrote: > I use procmail to sort incoming mails downloaded via fetchmail among > my internal users. The procmail rules refer to the To, cc, bcc > headers, but if someone subscribes to a mailing list, his/her address > won't be among these. > > Any ideas? you've just discovered why POP is completely inadequate as a mail transport protocol - it loses the envelope recipient information. POP was never designed to do the job you're trying to make it do. it was designed to be a protocol that allowed remote access by a user to their personal mailbox. it does that job reasonably well. it was not designed to transport the mail for an entire domain...at best, it can be kludged to do a bad imitation of that particular job (see choice 1 below). the same goes for IMAP. your two choices are: 1. convince your ISP to hack their MTA to add the envelope-recipient info (e.g. in an "X-Envelope-Recipient" header or by somehow munging the To: or Delivered-To: or whatever header) when delivering mail to a local mailbox...and do that without compromising privacy (i.e. BCC means Blind Carbon Copy - other recipients are not supposed to see who it was delivered to) 2. use a protocol designed for the job you're trying to do. uucp is ideal. btw, it's not at all uncommon to get clueless NT consultants telling you that POP works well for this. that's because they're clueless and have no idea how mail works. i had an MS Exchange consultant whining at me last week, demanding to pick up his client's mail by using finger which is, according to him, the "industry standard" for mail. i still don't know for sure what he was crapping on about - my guess is he had one ISP set up some ugly kludge where finger would trigger a delivery via smtp (which is a pretty stupid and insecure idea). i told him his choices were to either use uucp or to put up with the limitations of POP. of course, that scary word "uucp" terrified him, even though it's actually pretty easy to set up and there are free uucp programs that work as an add-on to Exchange (e.g. UUPC/Extended). speaking of uucp, does anyone have any recommendations for uucp programs that work with Exchange? i've never used either, but have been referring people to either UUPC/Extended[1] (free) or mailcoach[2] (commercial). [1] http://web.kew.com:8080/kendra/uupc/ [2] http://www.mailcoach.com/ craig PS: there's no such thing as a BCC header in incoming mail. it is stripped either by the user-agent when sending a message or, at the latest, by the MTA when it receives the message. it can't be used to sort mail because it doesn't exist. -- craig sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fabricati Diem, PVNC. -- motto of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch
Re: procmail
Hi all I've been down the single mailbox/fetchmail path many times. If you do this expect regular support calls from irate customers whose email never made it to them. The only real solution (except running your own mail server) is a separate mail box for all. I have found that many ISPs will now do this for free as apart from the setup there are no extra resources used. And any good ISP has automated 'unique' mail box set up online, so you create and configure your own. Look for 'Unlimited pop accounts' in your ISP. This should not cost any more. By no extra resources I mean that the mail server still has to process the same amount of mail. And apply the same rules. Kind regards Glenn Hocking Craig Sanders wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 12:16:27PM +0100, KOZMAN Balint wrote: > > I use procmail to sort incoming mails downloaded via fetchmail among > > my internal users. The procmail rules refer to the To, cc, bcc > > headers, but if someone subscribes to a mailing list, his/her address > > won't be among these. > > > > Any ideas?
SSH & Debian Woody
All, I am building a debian woody machine as we speak, and i have installed the latest .deb of OpenSSH... Installed fine, but it fails to authenticate a remote login, and if i try a login from the same machine's command line it also fails. This is the message from the command line... # ssh -l jamesmc xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Neighbour Table Overflow ssh: connect to address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port 22. No Buffer Space I recieve no errors when attempting to login remotely, but fails to authenticate and continues to ask for the password... I cannot see anything the messages or syslog logfiles. # ssh -V OpenSSH_3.0.1p1, SSH Protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090602f I am tempted to install from source next. Any Ideas? Regards, James Mclean "Windows didn't get as bad as it is overnight -- it took over ten years of careful development."
Re: SSH & Debian Woody
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:58:26AM +1030, James Mclean wrote: > > > All, > > I am building a debian woody machine as we speak, and i have installed the > latest .deb of OpenSSH... > > Installed fine, but it fails to authenticate a remote login, and if i try a > login from the same machine's command line it also fails. > > This is the message from the command line... > # ssh -l jamesmc xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > Neighbour Table Overflow > ssh: connect to address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port 22. No Buffer Space > > I recieve no errors when attempting to login remotely, but fails to > authenticate and continues to ask for the password... > I cannot see anything the messages or syslog logfiles. > > # ssh -V > OpenSSH_3.0.1p1, SSH Protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090602f > > I am tempted to install from source next. Any Ideas? Try running 'ssh -v -l jamesmc xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx' and see if that tells you anything more... Tim -- >< >> Tim Sailer (at home) >< Coastal Internet, Inc. << >> Network and Systems Operations >< PO Box 671 << >> http://www.buoy.com >< Ridge, NY 11961 << >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED] >< (631) 924-3728 << ><
Re: SSH & Debian Woody
Is your loopback device (lo) up ? /sbin/ifconfig lo Thus spake James Mclean, on Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:58:26AM +1030: > > > All, > > I am building a debian woody machine as we speak, and i have installed the > latest .deb of OpenSSH... > > Installed fine, but it fails to authenticate a remote login, and if i try a > login from the same machine's command line it also fails. > > This is the message from the command line... > # ssh -l jamesmc xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > Neighbour Table Overflow > ssh: connect to address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port 22. No Buffer Space > > I recieve no errors when attempting to login remotely, but fails to > authenticate and continues to ask for the password... > I cannot see anything the messages or syslog logfiles. > > # ssh -V > OpenSSH_3.0.1p1, SSH Protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090602f > > I am tempted to install from source next. Any Ideas? > > Regards, > > James Mclean > > "Windows didn't get as bad as it is overnight -- it took over ten years of > careful development." > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Jose Celestino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Systems Administration || Networks Eng. SAPO - PT Multimedia || http://www.sapo.pt
Re: SSH & Debian Woody
/etc/ssh/sshd_config has PasswordAuthenication no set it to yes. Chuck On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, James Mclean wrote: > > > All, > > I am building a debian woody machine as we speak, and i have installed the > latest .deb of OpenSSH... > > Installed fine, but it fails to authenticate a remote login, and if i try a > login from the same machine's command line it also fails. > > This is the message from the command line... > # ssh -l jamesmc xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > Neighbour Table Overflow > ssh: connect to address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port 22. No Buffer Space > > I recieve no errors when attempting to login remotely, but fails to > authenticate and continues to ask for the password... > I cannot see anything the messages or syslog logfiles. > > # ssh -V > OpenSSH_3.0.1p1, SSH Protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090602f > > I am tempted to install from source next. Any Ideas? > > Regards, > > James Mclean > > "Windows didn't get as bad as it is overnight -- it took over ten years of > careful development." > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
