Hurd and the archive
Hi From our FTPMaster meeting 2011 minutes[1]: --88--- - In a discussion with the Debian Hurd porters it was decided that the Hurd port stays on FTPMaster until Wheezy is released. Should they have managed to get the port into a state that it is released together with all the others (probably as a technology preview), it is kept in the archive. Should they not manage this the port will be removed from the main archive and move fully to debian-ports.org. It may then reenter the main archive whenever it is ready to get released with the next release. (Obviously when we say "move to debian-ports" this does not mean we expect the debian-ports people to "just eat it". They are running their archive and may have their own needs and pre-conditions prior to accepting a port, like getting help with the work that needs to be done or with the hardware for it, so any port who has to look for new place should ensure to coordinate with the involved people.) In case it does not work out with debian-ports.org, the removal from main will still be done, but we are confident that the teams can work out something acceptable. --8 8--- Well. I don't see it in Wheezy. Though I remember something along the lines of "if it enters testing (aka jessie) right after wheezy is out, it's fine too". I don't know if it will, and it is not my call. Thats why -release is CCed. So, release people: How likely is it that Hurd gets added to jessie? Within the next one or two months I mean, not "maybe in a years time". :) [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/03/msg00015.html -- bye, Joerg You tried your best and failed miserably. The lesson is: never try. pgp7uZtVNj8He.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Imminent Debian GNU/Hurd release
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 05:32:28PM +0100, Miguel Figueiredo wrote: > Em 02-05-2013 00:56, Samuel Thibault escreveu: > >Hello, > > > >So, as you may have read, Debian 7.0 is to be released this week-end. > >The plan was to make our own Debian-unofficial, but GNU/Hurd-official > >release. We can't really call it "wheezy", as it contains a couple > >packages from debian-ports, and some packages from unstable which are > >not in wheezy. > > > >So how should we call it? > > > >"wheesid" was suggested at some point ;) > > > >Samuel > > > > > > 2013.1 I like that (not sure about the .1, it might be confusing WRT Ubuntu's month-as-digit naming scheme), and we could call it "Based on wheezy". Personally, making puns out of wheezy and/or sid look kinda misplaced to me. OTOH, those who do the work get to decide, so it's really Samuel's call. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130505152251.gd5...@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org
Re: Bug#669647: ITP: hurd-cvsfs -- CVS virtual filesystem for the GNU Hurd
Hello, Roger Leigh, le Mon 10 Dec 2012 22:38:12 +, a écrit : > Just to touch back on this topic. I would definitely like to remove > the initscripts support for mtab generation for jessie. As we discussed on IRC, please go ahead. Thinking about it more told me that it should not break too badly, and we'll have to deal with it anyway. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130505193935.gw7...@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr
Re: Bug#669647: ITP: hurd-cvsfs -- CVS virtual filesystem for the GNU Hurd
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 09:39:35PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Roger Leigh, le Mon 10 Dec 2012 22:38:12 +, a écrit : > > Just to touch back on this topic. I would definitely like to remove > > the initscripts support for mtab generation for jessie. > > As we discussed on IRC, please go ahead. Thinking about it more told me > that it should not break too badly, and we'll have to deal with it > anyway. OK. This probably won't happen until util-linux is updated, which is needed to fix a few corner-case mtab issues. But that really depends on how responsive the util-linux maintainer is. Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools `-GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130505195109.gi21...@codelibre.net
Re: GCC for GNU Hurd: MACH built-in preprocessor macro (was: gdb: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (for review))
Thomas Schwinge, le Thu 07 Feb 2013 00:17:02 +0100, a écrit : > Committed to trunk as r195826. Samuel, please port to active Debian GCC > branches. Commited to gcc-4.7 and gcc-4.8 debian packages. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130505202004.gz7...@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr
