[RFS] golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt
Hello Team, Requesting sponsorship/upload access for the package golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt [1] updated it to v5.0.0 Required for gitlab-shell [2], but the pipeline failed here [3] [1] https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt/-/jobs/4437386#L394 [2] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/blob/main/go.mod#L6 [3] https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt/-/jobs/4437386#L394 Thanks Vinay OpenPGP_0xD3FDE3D93A1FCF50.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [RFS] golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt
On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 3:53 PM Vinay wrote: > > Hello Team, > > Requesting sponsorship/upload access for the package > golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt [1] updated it to v5.0.0 > Required for gitlab-shell [2], but the pipeline failed here [3] > > > [1] > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt/-/jobs/4437386#L394 > > [2] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/blob/main/go.mod#L6 > > [3] > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt/-/jobs/4437386#L394 You didn't push the upstream/5.0.0 tag, so the pipeline fails. Besides, could you run `ratt` test locally as it's a major version bump up. https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ratt -- Shengjing Zhu
Re: [RFS] golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt
On 16/07/23 13:49, Shengjing Zhu wrote: On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 3:53 PM Vinay wrote: Hello Team, Requesting sponsorship/upload access for the package golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt [1] updated it to v5.0.0 Required for gitlab-shell [2], but the pipeline failed here [3] [1] https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt/-/jobs/4437386#L394 [2] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/blob/main/go.mod#L6 [3] https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt/-/jobs/4437386#L394 You didn't push the upstream/5.0.0 tag, so the pipeline fails. Thanks pushed the tag Besides, could you run `ratt` test locally as it's a major version bump up. some package FTBFS 2023/07/16 14:13:17 Figuring out reverse build dependencies using dose-ceve(1). This might take a while 2023/07/16 14:14:04 Setting -sbuild_dist=unstable (from .changes file) 2023/07/16 14:14:04 Building package 1 of 58: golang-github-openshift-imagebuilder 2023/07/16 14:19:48 Building package 2 of 58: crowdsec 2023/07/16 14:23:28 building crowdsec failed: exit status 2 2023/07/16 14:23:28 Building package 3 of 58: golang-github-duo-labs-webauthn 2023/07/16 14:25:14 building golang-github-duo-labs-webauthn failed: exit status 2 2023/07/16 14:25:14 Building package 4 of 58: golang-github-containers-image 2023/07/16 14:29:01 Building package 5 of 58: prometheus-postfix-exporter 2023/07/16 14:32:12 Building package 6 of 58: nomad-driver-lxc 2023/07/16 14:37:51 Building package 7 of 58: golang-github-crowdsecurity-go-cs-bouncer 2023/07/16 14:40:42 Building package 8 of 58: golang-github-containers-psgo 2023/07/16 14:43:33 Building package 9 of 58: hugo 2023/07/16 14:47:59 building hugo failed: exit status 2 2023/07/16 14:47:59 Building package 10 of 58: etcd 2023/07/16 14:53:59 building etcd failed: exit status 2 2023/07/16 14:53:59 Building package 11 of 58: oci-seccomp-bpf-hook 2023/07/16 14:56:36 Building package 12 of 58: gitaly 2023/07/16 15:01:49 building gitaly failed: exit status 2 2023/07/16 15:01:49 Building package 13 of 58: golang-gocloud 2023/07/16 15:04:08 building golang-gocloud failed: exit status 2 2023/07/16 15:04:08 Building package 14 of 58: nomad-driver-podman 2023/07/16 15:06:42 building nomad-driver-podman failed: exit status 2 2023/07/16 15:06:42 Building package 15 of 58: crowdsec-firewall-bouncer 2023/07/16 15:09:32 Building package 16 of 58: golang-github-crewjam-saml 2023/07/16 15:11:05 building golang-github-crewjam-saml failed: exit status 2 2023/07/16 15:11:05 Building package 17 of 58: lxd 2023/07/16 15:17:45 Building package 18 of 58: libpod 2023/07/16 15:24:42 Building package 19 of 58: golang-github-containers-storage 2023/07/16 15:29:59 Building package 20 of 58: restic 2023/07/16 15:32:35 building restic failed: exit status 2 2023/07/16 15:32:35 Building package 21 of 58: golang-github-containerd-stargz-snapshotter 2023/07/16 15:37:52 Building package 22 of 58: golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient 2023/07/16 15:40:34 Building package 23 of 58: golang-github-hashicorp-go-discover 2023/07/16 15:43:34 Building package 24 of 58: golang-github-samalba-dockerclient 2023/07/16 15:46:53 Building package 25 of 58: packer 2023/07/16 15:50:06 building packer failed: exit status 2 2023/07/16 15:50:06 Building package 26 of 58: nomad 2023/07/16 15:53:00 building nomad failed: exit status 2 2023/07/16 15:53:00 Building package 27 of 58: docker-libkv 2023/07/16 15:55:28 Building package 28 of 58: vip-manager2 2023/07/16 15:58:23 Building package 29 of 58: golang-github-azuread-microsoft-authentication-library-for-go 2023/07/16 15:59:45 building golang-github-azuread-microsoft-authentication-library-for-go failed: exit status 2 2023/07/16 15:59:45 Building package 30 of 58: gitlab-shell 2023/07/16 16:01:30 building gitlab-shell failed: exit status 2 2023/07/16 16:01:30 Building package 31 of 58: consul (ratt running still) https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ratt OpenPGP_0xD3FDE3D93A1FCF50.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: seeking review of pat v0.15.0-1
On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 04:16:08PM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > Hello Federico, > > On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 03:44:19PM -0400, Federico Grau wrote: > > I've updated the `pat' Debian package to v0.15.0 and pushed to salsa.d.o > > git. > > Upstream changes since v0.13.1 include improvements to VARA and AX25 > > (AGWPE). > While testing the package, I noticed a couple of minor issues. > > 1) The binary package installs a manpage for pat-winlink-configure, but > there is no binary with that name in the package. Perhaps this moved in > this new version? I am able to edit my configuration with "pat-winlink > configure" (that is, using the default binary with the verb "configure". > > 2) The manpages for pat-winlink and for pat-winlink-configure refer to > /home/USER/.wl2k/config.json, which is the legacyDataDir according to > the sources (see internal/directories/directories.go). I believe the > correct path ~/.config/pat/config.json. That's where my configuration > file exists. > > Otherwise, the packaging looks good and the software works fine. I > tested it in telnet mode and also exercised the http UI. > > Cheers, > tony Many thanks again for your feedback tony, Pardon my delays as I was addressing some RL items. Below are some attempted responses. If realtime chat may help, I'd be glad to make myself available on IRC (OFTC, donfede, UTC -4). 1) The two man pages included with the `pat' Debian package follow the two pages provided by upstream, with the binary name "pat" replaced with "pat-winlink" per Debian bug #994822 (and d/patches/04-update_man_pages_for_renamed_binary_994822.patch circa 2021-Nov). The second man page "pat-configure" or "pat-winlink-configure", as you noted, provides information on the default binary and functionality using the verb or argument "configure". This is similar to man pages like "git help" / "git-help". I'm not clear what change if any is needed here, but subjectively I might leave things the way they are given upstream and other similar man page examples (though of course constructive dialog and direction is welcome). $ git remote -v origin https://github.com/la5nta/pat (fetch) origin https://github.com/la5nta/pat (push) $ ls -1 man/ pat.1 pat-configure.1 $ https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994822 2) Thanks for the good eyes. I've refreshed d/patches/04-update_man_pages_for_renamed_binary_994822.patch to use the updated configuration file locations documented by upstream. Standing by for next steps as cycles are available. regards, donfede signature.asc Description: PGP signature
