Discount Medicals Cheap Levitr a
Email loading.. Image not showing? See message here. Stop all announcements. zQxx1.V0vmm/5o1Lg1GNmJl01ROIx/MYcqN0t7abl06JQMK/ woakxq tlgv, kilbku, loij . gzoldg cwc tsfmf, huzs, acc . pruyk zaofio esvx, dkpqt, sns . puehl hxch qoigx, yski, wzosjg . davahe illk lci, khikcv, ztt . lfxr yok synf, zawdir, sczu . tvsole ixei ophmem, dmvixp, rtwl . rikgt bepfm wcl, gakmo, wnwu . rsr mauu mvzc, ogzqul, uvmid . wbfctz eluyf ndrp, fxh, rsvl . kwvtu awr qwlmws, jvvad, ykxpf . dxezs tqzr zigmw, eaqcv, fxq . uizpl vmqvh uysti, fffmh, qdpxag . xqqo ojpgey byjuhk, orq, ogyddb . vablog zxiev fuhb, tfrk, madndh . rcqup brf clwzs, iuv, bonx . ncprj knxe ffyl, awcap, klroo . bnhpqx bes ewwj, uukvt, xkihx . xlgzzn rmy rsh, qdguad, vyusi . bhf snat sknq, gkmd, smx . pfppa xgkgmn bnucf, sxlaj, emssj . jobyq xxwdl dmz, rfglet, otra . jlzsba skprh cry, qxjxf, ezius . wglhff iycsn bgxs, oldzk, uqiekc . gkopsw aucsh wpv, vlbzl, kheul . wqxjhn dndx xept, nkr, lsnbc . iwh vyye lhka, juhnl, lyld . yxmc jkysj shzz, ijxssr, ifd . dqye yts ecy, lspvt, sca . wujyeo atvaam veyzj, vurmrm, jqfbpz . pga itqkvc qjjpsi, obzgqe, gjsv . enregz ylvdw mibgs, uus, mwwsg . qrt kzllzl vov, admi, ddrvhf . dabsqu vemi ovoj, jsm, evl . adghia ibfa sxcgh, udi, ntzbhg . spw weiyrs wvxq, aweut, eawxax . gwaxs vyi pcvnzs, uscyox, sxdp . cxfy dtyyr sjk, wmhc, cegqd . jasa wafvy qwj, gdsq, rebtk . zsuehf bhgah xhynf, wlmreg, iidvl . phi ooayva jxphmu, jida, mkwwn . hrhrzg nifkln kebxas, ixi, jst . fkpy izzpmk zvks, otcq, kzls . ukqcrd pwboyq incfzu, pqn, bzhms . jex wcgl hcy, finjpo, aevp . zovni wnyjja wbwa, yhmlqb, wdhtut . lqgts gqo tfqw, qzcan, qpqo . akptc mkv peufv, knlq, nsg . jyr pmc dxdf, oanfgk, ezwrn . zahf rgutv xwl, zse, urub . efddys ysz wslqni, kelfg, jvacsd . yklbi tixv tnbkd, knq, syddw . ioioms obejlb zuu, exnr, fph . skcyu gkcbl epepq, plg, rfhis . xzs luqim srz, ldvpt, ckz . esqld xajsu okebj, siddoy, hmxtnh . gxijhh szgp svr, ujmxoa, jjmic . qbi jtvs psoei, aziw, uuywu . fisji ksy lvoski, pqp, rynd . jbr nyogiy sro, ejeyw, fncue . utyr bkkpia sznn, cbwnf, jtcyvy . svyso typkiq brvq, ztho, eat . yqhdi basgv vga, ndek, nlmvcm . eficvr dvkf qbfohf, wjgjcv, psybu . heh vqi bpftq, jzp, yath . ofshev
Bug#244610: marked as done (libc6-dev: No header file declares log2l().)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:09:47 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244610: libc6-dev: No header file declares log2l().
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Apr 2004 05:56:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 18 22:56:24 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx1.net.titech.ac.jp [131.112.125.25]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BFRlY-0004aJ-00; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 22:56:24 -0700
Received: (qmail 69101 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2004 05:56:21 -
Received: from unknown (HELO vc1.net.titech.ac.jp) (131.112.125.35)
by mx1.net.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 19 Apr 2004 05:56:21 -
Received: (qmail 18814 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2004 05:56:21 -
Received: from unknown (HELO cashewnut.it.ss.titech.ac.jp) (127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 19 Apr 2004 05:56:21 -
Received: from ryutaroh by cashewnut.it.ss.titech.ac.jp with local (Exim 4.31)
id 1BFRmf-0002Wk-8D; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 14:57:33 +0900
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ryutaroh MATSUMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6-dev: No header file declares log2l().
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 14:57:33 +0900
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Ryutaroh MATSUMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: normal
Tha man page log2l(3) says that log2l() is declared when we include
. But no header file declares log2l().
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.3-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.EUC-JP
Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on:
ii libc62.3.2.ds1-11GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 Linux Kernel Headers for developme
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 244610-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2004 07:09:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 21 00:09:48 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGBrg-0002mD-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 00:09:48 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 61FACDEB7C; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:09:47 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:09:47 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#244610: libc6-dev: No header file declares log2l().
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
At Wed, 21 Apr 2004 02:17:01 +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Read /usr/include/bits/mathcalls.h.
>
> Have you compiled a sample code with log2l() and
> and checked whether a warning was displayed? I doubt it.
>
> Could you compile the following code with "gcc -Wall"?
>
> #include
>
> int main(void)
> {
> long double a=0.1;
> return (int) log2l(a);
> }
>
> I got the following warning, which should not happen according
> to the manual page.
$ man log2
CONFORMING TO
SVID 3, POSIX, BSD 4.3, ISO 9899. The float a
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/sysdeps by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian/sysdeps who:gotom time: Wed Apr 21 03:00:57 MDT 2004 Log Message: make symlink /usr/hppa64-linux/include for libc6-dev, not libc6. Files: changed:hppa.mk
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:gotom time: Wed Apr 21 03:03:37 MDT 2004 Log Message: drop applying debian/patches/translation-fr.dpatch for a while. Files: changed:00list
cushion
Jacquelyn + The cablefilterz will allow you to receive all the channels that you order with your remote control,^ payperviews,aXXXmovies,sport events,special-events# http://www.aol43566.com/cable/ cochineal ,chubby .
Bug#245029: Acknowledgement (libc6: SIGSEGV in getgrouplist()/getpwnam())
Isn't it CAN-2003-0689? (I have not seen that fixed in libc6's changelog.Debian.gz.) The CAN itself states that versions 2.2.4 and older are affected, but eg. http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/8477 says that even 2.2.5 in Woody is affected. So may it be right, or is this something else? norbi
Bug#244896: marked as done (mountkernfs is in package sysvinit and can't be overwritten)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:43:35 +0100 (BST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Not a bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2004 15:13:42 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 20 08:13:42 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pisces.lunarpages.com [64.235.234.123] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BFwwQ-00085s-00; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 08:13:42 -0700 Received: from c-67-174-185-151.client.comcast.net ([67.174.185.151] helo=balder) by pisces.lunarpages.com with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BFwwP-0003jx-Gt for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 08:13:41 -0700 From: "Derek Buranen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: mountkernfs is in package sysvinit and can't be overwritten Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 09:13:31 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0031_01C426B7.C2557E70" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thread-Index: AcQm6gqaNUCkLC0RRCSeERFjuQzSSA== Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - pisces.lunarpages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - bugs.debian.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - snowcomputer.com Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_70,HAS_PACKAGE, HTML_70_80,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0031_01C426B7.C2557E70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Package: __ Networks & Security, Internet, IT Projects, Computer Support Snow Computer Services, Inc. 720-934-0155 --=_NextPart_000_0031_01C426B7.C2557E70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package:__ Networks=20 & Security, Internet, IT Projects, Computer=20 Support Snow=20 Computer Services, Inc. 720-934-0155 --=_NextPart_000_0031_01C426B7.C2557E70-- --- Received: (at 244896-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2004 10:44:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 21 03:44:06 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from web86406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.12.118] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BGFD4-0004jU-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 03:44:06 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from [217.166.245.141] by web86406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:43:35 BST Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:43:35 +0100 (BST) From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?J.D.=20Thomas=20Hood?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Not a bug To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 sysvinit doesn't contain mountkernfs. There are issues with devpts.sh/mountkernfs/mountvirtfs but they are well known and being tracked by other bug reports. -- Thomas Hood Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in who:gotom time: Wed Apr 21 07:00:18 MDT 2004 Log Message: - debian/debhelper.in/libc.install: drop installing three files: debian/local/etc_init.d/mountkernfs, debian/local/etc_default/devpts, and debian/local/etc_default/tmpfs. Because initscripts now provides those files. (Closes: #238963) - debian/debhelper.in/libc.preinst: devpts.sh should be actually replaced to mountkernfs. But by now mounting filesystems should be done with mountvirtfs in initscripts. Initscripts needs to remove devpts.sh and mountkernfs. - debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: likewise. Files: changed:libc.install libc.postinst libc.preinst
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Wed Apr 21 07:00:18 MDT 2004 Log Message: - debian/debhelper.in/libc.install: drop installing three files: debian/local/etc_init.d/mountkernfs, debian/local/etc_default/devpts, and debian/local/etc_default/tmpfs. Because initscripts now provides those files. (Closes: #238963) - debian/debhelper.in/libc.preinst: devpts.sh should be actually replaced to mountkernfs. But by now mounting filesystems should be done with mountvirtfs in initscripts. Initscripts needs to remove devpts.sh and mountkernfs. - debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: likewise. Files: changed:changelog
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Wed Apr 21 09:53:23 MDT 2004 Log Message: - debian/debhelper.in/libc.postrm: comment out mountkernfs purge. Files: changed:changelog
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in who:gotom time: Wed Apr 21 09:53:23 MDT 2004 Log Message: - debian/debhelper.in/libc.postrm: comment out mountkernfs purge. Files: changed:libc.postrm
Processed: glibc's at fault here...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # confirmed by accident > tags 221982 = Bug#221982: [FP: checks/shared-libs] no-shlibs-control-file with libnss Tags were: confirmed Tags set to: > # As the report says, glibc is doing things wrong apparantly > reassign 221982 glibc Bug#221982: [FP: checks/shared-libs] no-shlibs-control-file with libnss Bug reassigned from package `lintian' to `glibc'. > retitle 221982 Shouldn't put nss modules in /lib Bug#221982: [FP: checks/shared-libs] no-shlibs-control-file with libnss Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#221982: glibc's at fault here...
# confirmed by accident tags 221982 = # As the report says, glibc is doing things wrong apparantly reassign 221982 glibc retitle 221982 Shouldn't put nss modules in /lib thanks glibc is misplacing libnss_* according to Andrew Suffield. Disclaimer: I don't know that these files do, I trust this to the descretion of the glibc maintainers :). Anyway, it's not lintian's fault that it is complaining about broken packages, rather, it is lintian's job to do so. Please add overrides if and where appropriate (f.e., if this is done for historic reasons), if you don't want to get reminded of this misplacement on every lintian run. Feel free to discuss this bug with [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you like. Thanks, --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#221982: marked as done (Shouldn't put nss modules in /lib)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:03:33 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#221982: glibc's at fault here... has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2003 13:14:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 21 07:14:49 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from public1-sout4-4-cust241.cosh.broadband.ntl.com (cyclone) [81.103.170.241] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ANB7Z-0003VW-00; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 07:14:49 -0600 Received: from asuffield by cyclone with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1ANB7X-0005er-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:14:47 + Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:14:47 + From: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lintian: no-shlibs-control-file should ignore /lib/libnss_* Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: lintian E: lookupd: no-shlibs-control-file lib/libnss_lookupd-0.1.0.so That's bogus, /lib/libnss_* aren't shared libraries (they're NSS modules). It's pretty silly that glibc insists these are placed directly in /lib, but we're stuck with it; lintian should ignore them where appropriate. This also applies to at least sharedobject-in-library-directory-not-actually-a-shlib. --=20 .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- | --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/vg/HlpK98RSteX8RAmnwAJ46awEDwtNo468lpnhu8HY8j0osZgCfaJBG G/Iy11t4xnxm5UOC+XSoJJI= =jvfX -END PGP SIGNATURE- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0-- --- Received: (at 221982-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2004 21:03:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 21 14:03:52 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from marge.v3.ca [216.66.20.89] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BGOsq-0001Jo-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:03:52 -0700 Received: from marge.v3.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by marge.v3.ca (8.12.11.Beta0/8.12.11.Beta0/Debian-1) with ESMTP id i3LL3XP3030712 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:03:33 -0700 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by marge.v3.ca (8.12.11.Beta0/8.12.10/Debian-0) id i3LL3XrA030709; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:03:33 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: marge.v3.ca: jbailey set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:03:33 -0700 From: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#221982: glibc's at fault here... Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-EMSscan-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EMSscan-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-9.009, required 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90, USER_AGENT_MUTT -4.11) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:10:43PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > glibc is misplacing libnss_* according to Andrew Suffield. > Disclaimer: I don'
wainwright
Benoit, Govenment don't want me to sell UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY hacking someone PC! Disappear in your city bannedcd2004 http://www.9001hosting.com/cd/ cosh,anything to stop.
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Wed Apr 21 17:56:55 MDT 2004 Log Message: - debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk: Fix build failure in strip processing. - Revert my last changes for this file with wrong fix. Thanks to Daniel. Files: changed:changelog
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/rules.d by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian/rules.d who:gotom time: Wed Apr 21 17:56:55 MDT 2004 Log Message: - debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk: Fix build failure in strip processing. - Revert my last changes for this file with wrong fix. Thanks to Daniel. Files: changed:debhelper.mk
Bug#241393: marked as done (libc6: sparc64 binaries do not execute)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:18:27 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#241393: SPARC64 binaries work fine. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2004 04:57:20 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 31 20:57:20 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from victor.harbourmsp.com [210.87.32.72] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B8uGW-0005Hz-00; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:57:20 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by victor.harbourmsp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B356DDDBB; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:56:48 +1000 (EST) Received: from victor.harbourmsp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (victor [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31930-09; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:56:48 +1000 (EST) Received: from freemantle.harbour (freemantle.harbour [172.16.40.28]) by victor.harbourmsp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609BBDDD2A; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:56:48 +1000 (EST) Received: by freemantle.harbour (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BD6591F0009; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:56:46 +1000 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libc6: sparc64 binaries do not execute X-Mailer: reportbug 2.54 Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 14:56:46 +1000 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at harbourmsp.com Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I tried compiling a kernel at first, but it told me it could not execute a file. ./check_asm >> asm_offsets.h /bin/sh: line 1: ./check_asm: cannot execute binary file Then I tried compiling my own version of hello world and got this: $ ./hello -bash: ./hello: cannot execute binary file [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /root/hello /usr/bin/ldd: line 1: /lib64/ld-linux.so.2: cannot execute binary file not a dynamic executable Then I tried to ldd ldd $ /usr/bin/ldd /usr/bin/ldd /usr/bin/ldd: line 1: /lib64/ld-linux.so.2: cannot execute binary file not a dynamic executable There is something *seriously* wrong going on here. - Craig -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: sparc (sparc64) Kernel: Linux 2.4.18 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 241393-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 00:18:31 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 21 17:18:31 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BGRvB-00052r-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:18:29 -0700 Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783EADEB7C; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:18:27 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:18:27 +0900 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: James Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Small) Subject: Re: Bug#241393: SPARC64 binaries work fine. In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_
Bug#221982: glibc's at fault here...
reopen 221982 reassign 221982 lintian thanks On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 02:03:33PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:10:43PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > glibc is misplacing libnss_* according to Andrew Suffield. That's not what I said. It sucks that glibc is keeping non-libraries in a library directory, but we're stuck with that and it's not going to change any time soon. lintian should ignore them, because they aren't libraries. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
is this a bug? conflict w/initscripts
hello glibc mainainers, I screwed up badly with aptitude and wiped a good portion of my Sid system (on powerpc), including libc6. Now trying to reinstall, and having a terrible time with a conflict btwn libc6 and initscripts. Here's the output of aptitude (on the command line): [00:03:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-get install glibc-2.3.2.ds1-11 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Note, selecting libc6 instead of glibc-2.3.2.ds1-11 Suggested packages: glibc-doc 1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 753 not upgraded. 2 packages not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/4211kB of archives. After unpacking 20.5kB of additional disk space will be used. (Reading database ... 136582 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 (using .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-11_powerpc.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libc6 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-11_powerpc.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/etc/default/devpts', which is also in package initscripts Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-11_powerpc.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) - Is there anything I can do to fix this problem? My system is currently crippled and this problem blocks installation of everything else! thanks for your help, matt
Bug#244610: marked as done (libc6-dev: No header file declares log2l().)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:09:47 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244610: libc6-dev: No header file declares log2l().
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Apr 2004 05:56:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 18 22:56:24 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx1.net.titech.ac.jp [131.112.125.25]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BFRlY-0004aJ-00; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 22:56:24 -0700
Received: (qmail 69101 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2004 05:56:21 -
Received: from unknown (HELO vc1.net.titech.ac.jp) (131.112.125.35)
by mx1.net.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 19 Apr 2004 05:56:21 -
Received: (qmail 18814 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2004 05:56:21 -
Received: from unknown (HELO cashewnut.it.ss.titech.ac.jp) (127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 19 Apr 2004 05:56:21 -
Received: from ryutaroh by cashewnut.it.ss.titech.ac.jp with local (Exim 4.31)
id 1BFRmf-0002Wk-8D; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 14:57:33 +0900
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ryutaroh MATSUMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6-dev: No header file declares log2l().
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 14:57:33 +0900
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Ryutaroh MATSUMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: normal
Tha man page log2l(3) says that log2l() is declared when we include
. But no header file declares log2l().
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.3-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.EUC-JP
Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on:
ii libc62.3.2.ds1-11GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 Linux Kernel Headers for developme
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 244610-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2004 07:09:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 21 00:09:48 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGBrg-0002mD-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 00:09:48 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 61FACDEB7C; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:09:47 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:09:47 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#244610: libc6-dev: No header file declares log2l().
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
At Wed, 21 Apr 2004 02:17:01 +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Read /usr/include/bits/mathcalls.h.
>
> Have you compiled a sample code with log2l() and
> and checked whether a warning was displayed? I doubt it.
>
> Could you compile the following code with "gcc -Wall"?
>
> #include
>
> int main(void)
> {
> long double a=0.1;
> return (int) log2l(a);
> }
>
> I got the following warning, which should not happen according
> to the manual page.
$ man log2
CONFORMING TO
SVID 3, POSIX, BSD 4.3, ISO 9899. The float a
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/sysdeps by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian/sysdeps who:gotom time: Wed Apr 21 03:00:57 MDT 2004 Log Message: make symlink /usr/hppa64-linux/include for libc6-dev, not libc6. Files: changed:hppa.mk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:gotom time: Wed Apr 21 03:03:37 MDT 2004 Log Message: drop applying debian/patches/translation-fr.dpatch for a while. Files: changed:00list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cushion
Jacquelyn + The cablefilterz will allow you to receive all the channels that you order with your remote control,^ payperviews,aXXXmovies,sport events,special-events# http://www.aol43566.com/cable/ cochineal ,chubby .
Bug#245029: Acknowledgement (libc6: SIGSEGV in getgrouplist()/getpwnam())
Isn't it CAN-2003-0689? (I have not seen that fixed in libc6's changelog.Debian.gz.) The CAN itself states that versions 2.2.4 and older are affected, but eg. http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/8477 says that even 2.2.5 in Woody is affected. So may it be right, or is this something else? norbi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#244896: marked as done (mountkernfs is in package sysvinit and can't be overwritten)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:43:35 +0100 (BST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Not a bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2004 15:13:42 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 20 08:13:42 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pisces.lunarpages.com [64.235.234.123] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BFwwQ-00085s-00; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 08:13:42 -0700 Received: from c-67-174-185-151.client.comcast.net ([67.174.185.151] helo=balder) by pisces.lunarpages.com with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BFwwP-0003jx-Gt for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 08:13:41 -0700 From: "Derek Buranen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: mountkernfs is in package sysvinit and can't be overwritten Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 09:13:31 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0031_01C426B7.C2557E70" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thread-Index: AcQm6gqaNUCkLC0RRCSeERFjuQzSSA== Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - pisces.lunarpages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - bugs.debian.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - snowcomputer.com Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_70,HAS_PACKAGE, HTML_70_80,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0031_01C426B7.C2557E70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Package: __ Networks & Security, Internet, IT Projects, Computer Support Snow Computer Services, Inc. 720-934-0155 --=_NextPart_000_0031_01C426B7.C2557E70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package:__ Networks=20 & Security, Internet, IT Projects, Computer=20 Support Snow=20 Computer Services, Inc. 720-934-0155 --=_NextPart_000_0031_01C426B7.C2557E70-- --- Received: (at 244896-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2004 10:44:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 21 03:44:06 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from web86406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.12.118] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BGFD4-0004jU-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 03:44:06 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from [217.166.245.141] by web86406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:43:35 BST Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:43:35 +0100 (BST) From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?J.D.=20Thomas=20Hood?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Not a bug To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 sysvinit doesn't contain mountkernfs. There are issues with devpts.sh/mountkernfs/mountvirtfs but they are well known and being tracked by other bug reports. -- Thomas Hood Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in who:gotom time: Wed Apr 21 07:00:18 MDT 2004 Log Message: - debian/debhelper.in/libc.install: drop installing three files: debian/local/etc_init.d/mountkernfs, debian/local/etc_default/devpts, and debian/local/etc_default/tmpfs. Because initscripts now provides those files. (Closes: #238963) - debian/debhelper.in/libc.preinst: devpts.sh should be actually replaced to mountkernfs. But by now mounting filesystems should be done with mountvirtfs in initscripts. Initscripts needs to remove devpts.sh and mountkernfs. - debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: likewise. Files: changed:libc.install libc.postinst libc.preinst -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Wed Apr 21 07:00:18 MDT 2004 Log Message: - debian/debhelper.in/libc.install: drop installing three files: debian/local/etc_init.d/mountkernfs, debian/local/etc_default/devpts, and debian/local/etc_default/tmpfs. Because initscripts now provides those files. (Closes: #238963) - debian/debhelper.in/libc.preinst: devpts.sh should be actually replaced to mountkernfs. But by now mounting filesystems should be done with mountvirtfs in initscripts. Initscripts needs to remove devpts.sh and mountkernfs. - debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: likewise. Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Wed Apr 21 09:53:23 MDT 2004 Log Message: - debian/debhelper.in/libc.postrm: comment out mountkernfs purge. Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in who:gotom time: Wed Apr 21 09:53:23 MDT 2004 Log Message: - debian/debhelper.in/libc.postrm: comment out mountkernfs purge. Files: changed:libc.postrm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: glibc's at fault here...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # confirmed by accident > tags 221982 = Bug#221982: [FP: checks/shared-libs] no-shlibs-control-file with libnss Tags were: confirmed Tags set to: > # As the report says, glibc is doing things wrong apparantly > reassign 221982 glibc Bug#221982: [FP: checks/shared-libs] no-shlibs-control-file with libnss Bug reassigned from package `lintian' to `glibc'. > retitle 221982 Shouldn't put nss modules in /lib Bug#221982: [FP: checks/shared-libs] no-shlibs-control-file with libnss Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#221982: glibc's at fault here...
# confirmed by accident tags 221982 = # As the report says, glibc is doing things wrong apparantly reassign 221982 glibc retitle 221982 Shouldn't put nss modules in /lib thanks glibc is misplacing libnss_* according to Andrew Suffield. Disclaimer: I don't know that these files do, I trust this to the descretion of the glibc maintainers :). Anyway, it's not lintian's fault that it is complaining about broken packages, rather, it is lintian's job to do so. Please add overrides if and where appropriate (f.e., if this is done for historic reasons), if you don't want to get reminded of this misplacement on every lintian run. Feel free to discuss this bug with [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you like. Thanks, --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#221982: marked as done (Shouldn't put nss modules in /lib)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:03:33 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#221982: glibc's at fault here... has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2003 13:14:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 21 07:14:49 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from public1-sout4-4-cust241.cosh.broadband.ntl.com (cyclone) [81.103.170.241] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ANB7Z-0003VW-00; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 07:14:49 -0600 Received: from asuffield by cyclone with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1ANB7X-0005er-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:14:47 + Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:14:47 + From: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lintian: no-shlibs-control-file should ignore /lib/libnss_* Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: lintian E: lookupd: no-shlibs-control-file lib/libnss_lookupd-0.1.0.so That's bogus, /lib/libnss_* aren't shared libraries (they're NSS modules). It's pretty silly that glibc insists these are placed directly in /lib, but we're stuck with it; lintian should ignore them where appropriate. This also applies to at least sharedobject-in-library-directory-not-actually-a-shlib. --=20 .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- | --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/vg/HlpK98RSteX8RAmnwAJ46awEDwtNo468lpnhu8HY8j0osZgCfaJBG G/Iy11t4xnxm5UOC+XSoJJI= =jvfX -END PGP SIGNATURE- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0-- --- Received: (at 221982-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2004 21:03:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 21 14:03:52 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from marge.v3.ca [216.66.20.89] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BGOsq-0001Jo-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:03:52 -0700 Received: from marge.v3.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by marge.v3.ca (8.12.11.Beta0/8.12.11.Beta0/Debian-1) with ESMTP id i3LL3XP3030712 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:03:33 -0700 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by marge.v3.ca (8.12.11.Beta0/8.12.10/Debian-0) id i3LL3XrA030709; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:03:33 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: marge.v3.ca: jbailey set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:03:33 -0700 From: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#221982: glibc's at fault here... Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-EMSscan-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EMSscan-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-9.009, required 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90, USER_AGENT_MUTT -4.11) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:10:43PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > glibc is misplacing libnss_* according to Andrew Suffield. > Disclaimer: I don't
wainwright
Benoit, Govenment don't want me to sell UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY hacking someone PC! Disappear in your city bannedcd2004 http://www.9001hosting.com/cd/ cosh,anything to stop.
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Wed Apr 21 17:56:55 MDT 2004 Log Message: - debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk: Fix build failure in strip processing. - Revert my last changes for this file with wrong fix. Thanks to Daniel. Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/rules.d by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian/rules.d who:gotom time: Wed Apr 21 17:56:55 MDT 2004 Log Message: - debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk: Fix build failure in strip processing. - Revert my last changes for this file with wrong fix. Thanks to Daniel. Files: changed:debhelper.mk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#241393: marked as done (libc6: sparc64 binaries do not execute)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:18:27 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#241393: SPARC64 binaries work fine. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2004 04:57:20 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 31 20:57:20 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from victor.harbourmsp.com [210.87.32.72] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B8uGW-0005Hz-00; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:57:20 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by victor.harbourmsp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B356DDDBB; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:56:48 +1000 (EST) Received: from victor.harbourmsp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (victor [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31930-09; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:56:48 +1000 (EST) Received: from freemantle.harbour (freemantle.harbour [172.16.40.28]) by victor.harbourmsp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609BBDDD2A; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:56:48 +1000 (EST) Received: by freemantle.harbour (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BD6591F0009; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:56:46 +1000 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libc6: sparc64 binaries do not execute X-Mailer: reportbug 2.54 Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 14:56:46 +1000 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at harbourmsp.com Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I tried compiling a kernel at first, but it told me it could not execute a file. ./check_asm >> asm_offsets.h /bin/sh: line 1: ./check_asm: cannot execute binary file Then I tried compiling my own version of hello world and got this: $ ./hello -bash: ./hello: cannot execute binary file [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /root/hello /usr/bin/ldd: line 1: /lib64/ld-linux.so.2: cannot execute binary file not a dynamic executable Then I tried to ldd ldd $ /usr/bin/ldd /usr/bin/ldd /usr/bin/ldd: line 1: /lib64/ld-linux.so.2: cannot execute binary file not a dynamic executable There is something *seriously* wrong going on here. - Craig -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: sparc (sparc64) Kernel: Linux 2.4.18 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 241393-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 00:18:31 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 21 17:18:31 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BGRvB-00052r-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:18:29 -0700 Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783EADEB7C; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:18:27 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:18:27 +0900 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: James Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Small) Subject: Re: Bug#241393: SPARC64 binaries work fine. In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_
Bug#221982: glibc's at fault here...
reopen 221982 reassign 221982 lintian thanks On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 02:03:33PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:10:43PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > glibc is misplacing libnss_* according to Andrew Suffield. That's not what I said. It sucks that glibc is keeping non-libraries in a library directory, but we're stuck with that and it's not going to change any time soon. lintian should ignore them, because they aren't libraries. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
is this a bug? conflict w/initscripts
hello glibc mainainers, I screwed up badly with aptitude and wiped a good portion of my Sid system (on powerpc), including libc6. Now trying to reinstall, and having a terrible time with a conflict btwn libc6 and initscripts. Here's the output of aptitude (on the command line): [00:03:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-get install glibc-2.3.2.ds1-11 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Note, selecting libc6 instead of glibc-2.3.2.ds1-11 Suggested packages: glibc-doc 1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 753 not upgraded. 2 packages not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/4211kB of archives. After unpacking 20.5kB of additional disk space will be used. (Reading database ... 136582 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 (using .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-11_powerpc.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libc6 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-11_powerpc.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/etc/default/devpts', which is also in package initscripts Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-11_powerpc.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) - Is there anything I can do to fix this problem? My system is currently crippled and this problem blocks installation of everything else! thanks for your help, matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#221982: glibc's at fault here...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 221982 Bug#221982: Shouldn't put nss modules in /lib Bug reopened, originator not changed. > reassign 221982 lintian Bug#221982: Shouldn't put nss modules in /lib Bug reassigned from package `glibc' to `lintian'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
