Bug#479115: libffi4 is stopping the upgrade to gcc 4.3 4.3.0-4
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:23:38AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote: > the original submitter of this bug marked it as wontfix. > But I think that this bug should be addressed somehow. Indeed, I think it should be as well > There are 25 packages that directly rdepend on libffi4, and removing > libffi4 has a huge usability impact on a 'unstable' install ... > thru all dependencies, you have to uninstall almost all of gnome. > > I see two solutions to this lock. > > 1) Upload a new, separate version of libffi4 that would not > depend on gcc-4.3-base (= 4.3.0-3) > > 2) BINNMU of all above 25 packages. > In this latter case, you must be sure that all bbuildds > are running 4.3.0-4 - when I uploaded mplayer on2008-05-03, > this was not the case yet. > IN particular, I am worried: maybe there is some > rdependecy that is stopping bbuildd's from upgrading to 4.3.0-4 ; > in that case, the only way to solve this lock is (1). I don't know about the strict requirement of gcc-4.3-base but there are some packages build-depending on libffi4-dev and not on libffi5-dev thus a binNMU would not be sufficient, namely: $ grep-dctrl -i -sPackage -FBuild-Depends libffi4-dev /var/lib/apt/lists/mi.mirror.garr.it_mirrors_debian_dists_sid_*_Sources Package: gauche-c-wrapper Package: jamvm Package: sablevm Package: squeak-vm these should be fine though: $ grep-dctrl -i -sPackage -FBuild-Depends libffi-dev /var/lib/apt/lists/mi.mirror.garr.it_mirrors_debian_dists_sid_*_Sources Package: ctypes Package: g-wrap Package: gambas2 Package: gnu-smalltalk Package: gnustep-base Package: gtk-vnc Package: lua-gtk Package: miro Package: pygobject Package: python2.5 filippo -- Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net PGP key: 0x6B79D401 random quote follows: Beware of the Turing tar-pit in which everything is possible but nothing of interest is easy. -- Alan Perlis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#479115: libffi4 is stopping the upgrade to gcc 4.3 4.3.0-4
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:40:14PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > I don't know about the strict requirement of gcc-4.3-base but there are some > packages build-depending on libffi4-dev and not on libffi5-dev thus a binNMU > would not be sufficient, namely: > > $ grep-dctrl -i -sPackage -FBuild-Depends libffi4-dev > /var/lib/apt/lists/mi.mirror.garr.it_mirrors_debian_dists_sid_*_Sources > Package: gauche-c-wrapper > Package: jamvm > Package: sablevm > Package: squeak-vm Nevermind, those bugs have been already filed by Raphael. Regarding packages Depending on binary libffi4 but source not build-depending libffi-dev those should be: Source: chicken Package: chicken-bin Package: libchicken0 Package: exaile Source: guile-gnome-platform Package: guile-gnome0-canvas Package: guile-gnome0-gconf Package: guile-gnome0-glib Package: guile-gnome0-gnome Package: guile-gnome0-gnome-ui Package: guile-gnome0-gtk Package: guile-gnome0-vfs Package: medit Package: papaya Source: pygtksourceview Package: python-gtksourceview2 Source: nautilus-python (0.4.3-2) Package: python-nautilus Source: notify-python Package: python-notify Source: vte Package: python-vte Source: quodlibet Package: quodlibet-ext Package: streamtuner note for example that simply rebuilding notify-python results in libffi dependency dropped HTH, filippo -- Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net PGP key: 0x6B79D401 random quote follows: At the source of every error which is blamed on the computer you will find at least two human errors, including the error of blaming it on the computer. Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -- Donald Knuth -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#479115: libffi4 is stopping the upgrade to gcc 4.3 4.3.0-4
On Tue, 06 May 2008, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > Nevermind, those bugs have been already filed by Raphael. > > Regarding packages Depending on binary libffi4 but source not build-depending > libffi-dev those should be: binnmus have been filed already, see thread on debian-release: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/05/msg00024.html guile-gnome-platform can't be rebuilt until some other g-wrap bugs are fixed however. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#479115: libffi4 is stopping the upgrade to gcc 4.3 4.3.0-4
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:40:14PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:23:38AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote: > > the original submitter of this bug marked it as wontfix. > > But I think that this bug should be addressed somehow. > > Indeed, I think it should be as well There is no libffi4 or libffi4-dev package in unstable anymore. There is nothing to fix in the gcc-4.3 package. It's all other pacakges that either depend or build depend on either need to get changed. There might be some time that old binary packages are in unstable, but that's only until ftp-master removes them. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #356316 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR7302 # * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED usertags 356316 + status-ASSIGNED # remote status report for #397341 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR30131 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> WONTFIX usertags 397341 + status-RESOLVED resolution-WONTFIX # remote status report for #400484 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR30132 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 400484 + status-NEW # remote status report for #401496 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31639 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED usertags 401496 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED # remote status report for #405065 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29534 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 405065 + status-NEW # remote status report for #417542 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28508 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 417542 + status-NEW # remote status report for #440287 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR34815 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED usertags 440287 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED # remote status report for #440287 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR34815 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED usertags 440287 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED # remote status report for #327346 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24791 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED usertags 327346 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED # remote status report for #327346 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24791 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED usertags 327346 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED # remote status report for #355909 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24791 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED usertags 355909 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED # remote status report for #396745 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29443 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 396745 + status-NEW # remote status report for #406324 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28705 # * remote status changed: (?) -> REOPENED usertags 406324 + status-REOPENED thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[bts-link] source package gcc-4.2
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.2 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #443028 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31947 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 443028 + status-NEW # remote status report for #427124 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32182 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 427124 + status-NEW # remote status report for #440046 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29478 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> WONTFIX usertags 440046 + status-RESOLVED resolution-WONTFIX # remote status report for #443028 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31947 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 443028 + status-NEW # remote status report for #447284 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29209 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 447284 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #452811 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR34493 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 452811 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #458745 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR34652 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> INVALID usertags 458745 + status-RESOLVED resolution-INVALID # remote status report for #464344 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR35100 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 464344 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #464344 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR35100 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 464344 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #466613 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR35311 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 466613 + status-NEW # remote status report for #431608 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR30052 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED usertags 431608 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[bts-link] source package gcj-4.2
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.2 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #399833 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32863 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 399833 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #445930 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33891 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 445930 + status-UNCONFIRMED thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[bts-link] source package gcj-4.1
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #255525 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16122 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 255525 + status-NEW # remote status report for #388505 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29206 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 388505 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #388505 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29206 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 388505 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #390982 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29207 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 390982 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #415109 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32861 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 415109 + status-UNCONFIRMED thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #336511 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24619 # * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED usertags 336511 + status-ASSIGNED # remote status report for #374410 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28102 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 374410 + status-NEW # remote status report for #413967 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31081 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED usertags 413967 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED # remote status report for #439616 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32305 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 439616 + status-NEW # remote status report for #439620 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR34123 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED usertags 439620 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED # remote status report for #447710 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33869 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED usertags 447710 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED # remote status report for #449561 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR34005 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED usertags 449561 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED # remote status report for #451630 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33453 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED usertags 451630 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED # remote status report for #451764 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR34138 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED usertags 451764 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED # remote status report for #452565 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR34206 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED usertags 452565 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#479115: libffi4 is stopping the upgrade to gcc 4.3 4.3.0-4
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 07:17:03PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:40:14PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:23:38AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote: > > > the original submitter of this bug marked it as wontfix. > > > But I think that this bug should be addressed somehow. > > > > Indeed, I think it should be as well > > There is no libffi4 or libffi4-dev package in unstable anymore. There > is nothing to fix in the gcc-4.3 package. It's all other pacakges that > either depend or build depend on either need to get changed. > > There might be some time that old binary packages are in unstable, > but that's only until ftp-master removes them. as discussed in debian-release, binNMUs are scheduled on all packages that depend on libffi-dev (that is one of the two solutions I was hypothesizing) a. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[bts-link] source package gcc-3.3
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-3.3 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #361637 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12245 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 361637 + status-NEW thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[bts-link] source package gcj-4.3
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.3 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #192035 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR10632 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 192035 + status-NEW # remote status report for #195344 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1427 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 195344 + status-NEW # remote status report for #240550 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14759 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 240550 + status-NEW # remote status report for #340651 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1373 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 340651 + status-NEW # remote status report for #386443 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28977 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 386443 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #397817 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29783 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 397817 + status-NEW # remote status report for #397853 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR35091 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 397853 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #401948 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR30436 # * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED usertags 401948 + status-ASSIGNED # remote status report for #422569 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31900 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 422569 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #464156 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33263 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 464156 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #464160 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR35090 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 464160 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #466538 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR35253 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 466538 + status-UNCONFIRMED thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[bts-link] source package gcc-4.3
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.3 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #36600 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14990 # * remote status changed: (?) -> SUSPENDED usertags 36600 + status-SUSPENDED # remote status report for #140201 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21334 # * remote status changed: (?) -> SUSPENDED usertags 140201 + status-SUSPENDED # remote status report for #438791 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR6257 # * remote status changed: (?) -> SUSPENDED usertags 438791 + status-SUSPENDED # remote status report for #466791 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR35079 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 466791 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #466911 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR35658 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 466911 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #466948 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR35659 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 466948 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #469517 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR35965 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 469517 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #472867 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR36124 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 472867 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #476460 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR35964 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 476460 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #351786 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16006 # * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED usertags 351786 + status-ASSIGNED thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[bts-link] source package gcj-4.1
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #255525 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16122 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 255525 + status-NEW # remote status report for #388505 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29206 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 388505 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #388505 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29206 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 388505 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #390982 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29207 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 390982 + status-UNCONFIRMED # remote status report for #415109 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32861 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 415109 + status-UNCONFIRMED thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
