[Bug target/30919] [4.1 regression] unable to find a register to spill in class 'CREG'
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-22 09:41 --- Reducing. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.1.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30919 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/30919] [4.1 regression] unable to find a register to spill in class 'CREG'
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-22 11:04 ---
Confirmed. Whoever wrote that code should be
typedef long unsigned int size_t;
typedef signed int sal_Int32;
typedef unsigned int sal_uInt32;
typedef unsigned long int sal_uInt64;
extern "C" void *memcpy (void *__restrict __dest, __const void *__restrict
__src, size_t __n) throw () __attribute__ ((__nonnull__ (1, 2)));
void callVirtualMethod(void * pThis, sal_uInt64 *pStack, sal_uInt32 nStack)
{
sal_uInt64 *stack = (sal_uInt64 *) __builtin_alloca( nStack * 8 );
memcpy( stack, pStack, nStack * 8 );
register sal_uInt64 a0 asm("rdi");
register sal_uInt64 a1 asm("rsi");
register sal_uInt64 a2 asm("rdx");
register sal_uInt64 a3 asm("rcx");
register sal_uInt64 a4 asm("r8");
register sal_uInt64 a5 asm("r9");
sal_uInt64 pMethod = *((sal_uInt64 *)pThis);
typedef struct {} ReturnValue;
typedef ReturnValue (* FunctionCall )( sal_uInt64, sal_uInt64, sal_uInt64,
sal_uInt64, sal_uInt64, sal_uInt64 );
ReturnValue aRet = ( ( FunctionCall ) pMethod )( a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5 );
}
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-02-22 11:04:19
date||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30919
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/30919] [4.1 regression] unable to find a register to spill in class 'CREG'
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-22 11:25 --- > Confirmed. Whoever wrote that code should be You meant "whoever wrote a compiler which accepts that code...", right. :-) -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30919 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug libstdc++/19664] libstdc++ headers should have pop/push of the visibility around the declarations
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug libstdc++/30900] relocation R_X86_64_PC32 BUG
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-22 23:58 --- This is a bug in libstdc++ which was fixed in 4.2.0. But note the code uses "-fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fvisibility=hidden" without testing if the system library has been fixed. It only checks if those options work. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19664 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c++ |libstdc++ Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30900 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug libstdc++/19664] libstdc++ headers should have pop/push of the visibility around the declarations
--- Comment #102 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-22 23:58 --- *** Bug 30900 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||centi_riccardo at libero dot ||it http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
