Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#397276: libc6-i386: file conflicts with lib32gfortran0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 397276 lib32gfortran0 Bug#397276: libc6-i386: file conflicts with lib32gfortran0 Bug reassigned from package `libc6-i386' to `lib32gfortran0'. > found 397276 lib32gfortran0 4.0.3-3 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug libstdc++/16006] Conversions of numbers in fi_FI.UTF-8 produces incorrect UTF-8
-- bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-11-06 11:24:16 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16006 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c/29739] -Wconversion produces invalid warnings.
--- Comment #1 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-11-06 13:55 --- The warning works as intended. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 6614 *** -- schwab at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29739 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c/6614] [-Wconversion] incorrect conversion warning for function taking a short
--- Comment #10 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-11-06 13:55 --- *** Bug 29739 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- schwab at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jaco at kroon dot co dot za http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6614 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c/29739] -Wconversion produces invalid warnings.
--- Comment #2 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-11-06 16:30 --- (a bit more explanation won't hurt) The GCC documentation says: -Wconversion: Warn if a prototype causes a type conversion that is different from what would happen to the same argument in the absence of a prototype. In your program, in the absence of prototype, d would be promoted to int, thus the warning is correct. Wconversion is only useful for translating very old C code to ANSI/ISO C. Since this behaviour is not very useful in the present day, and Wconversion also warns for unsigned i = -1, we are going to move the above behaviour to Wtraditional-conversion and make Wconversion warn for implicit conversions that may change a value. This is planned for GCC 4.3 . For more info, please check http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Wcoercion and don't hesitate to contact me. (That wiki page is work in progress, not definitive, actually, it is a bit outdated). Testing and comments are welcome. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29739 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c/29739] -Wconversion produces invalid warnings.
--- Comment #3 from jaco at kroon dot co dot za 2006-11-06 16:46 --- Awesome. That would be a good move. The implicit conversions are very handy for catching certain types of bugs early one, however, the function prototype thing is a pain. Unfortunately I won't be able to assist with testing etc in this regard, but I need to say that I truly appreciate the quick response to my bug reports (both here, and in general). You guys are doing awesome work. Keep it up. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29739 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ptex-bin FTBFS on hppa, ICE
severity 390199 serious retitle 390199 ptex-bin FTBFS on hppa: ICE clone 390199 -1 reassign -1 gcc-4.1 # probably there's an underlying code error in ptex-bin? severity -1 important thanks The latest upstream version of ptex-bin FTBFS on hppa: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppa&pkg=ptex-bin The relevant part of the log is: srcdir=. /bin/sh ./jconvert pdvitomp gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../.. -I../../.. -g -O2 -I.. -c pdvitomp.c -o pdvitomp.o pdvitomp.c: In function 'parsearguments': pdvitomp.c:174: error: Attempt to delete prologue/epilogue insn: (insn/f 421 420 422 0 pdvitomp.c:99 (set (mem:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 30 %r30) (const_int -120 [0xff88])) [0 S4 A32]) (reg:SI 8 %r8)) -1 (nil) (nil)) pdvitomp.c:174: internal compiler error: in propagate_one_insn, at flow.c:1699 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see . Preprocessed source stored into /tmp/ccbfmxpR.out file, please attach this to your bugreport. I don't have a hppa machine available, so I can't recreate the out file. Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Processed: ptex-bin FTBFS on hppa, ICE
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 390199 serious Bug#390199: Unsatisfied on hppa Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > retitle 390199 ptex-bin FTBFS on hppa: ICE Bug#390199: Unsatisfied on hppa Changed Bug title. > clone 390199 -1 Bug#390199: ptex-bin FTBFS on hppa: ICE Bug 390199 cloned as bug 397341. > reassign -1 gcc-4.1 Bug#397341: ptex-bin FTBFS on hppa: ICE Bug reassigned from package `ptex-bin' to `gcc-4.1'. > # probably there's an underlying code error in ptex-bin? > severity -1 important Bug#397341: ptex-bin FTBFS on hppa: ICE Severity set to `important' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c/29739] -Wconversion produces invalid warnings.
--- Comment #4 from pepster at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-11-06 17:45 --- Quick response? you must be joking. I reported this in "Opened: 2002-05-09 14:46" against 2.95.3. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29739 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c/29739] -Wconversion produces invalid warnings.
--- Comment #5 from jaco at kroon dot co dot za 2006-11-06 18:21 --- I'm refering to the response to the bug, not the actual fix. I've had the "priviledge" of filing bugs against other projects where I forgot about the bug by the time somebody responded (two years down the line). I reckon having an explanation of what is going in in less that 5 hours is good. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29739 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c/29739] -Wconversion produces invalid warnings.
--- Comment #6 from pepster at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-11-06 18:49 --- 4 years to agree there is an issue here. maybe we will have a fix in 2010. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29739 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#397276: Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#397276: libc6-i386: file conflicts with lib32gfortran0
> Yes, libc6-i386 is the package that "owns" /usr/lib32, so I believe this is > a bug in lib32gfortran0. It looks like this bug can be fixed for etch > simply by letting the new version of gcc-4.0 in, which no longer builds > lib32gfortran0 at all; the lib32gfortran1 package from gcc-4.1 does not have > this bug. yes, letting gcc-4.0 into testing would be appreciated. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/29206] [4.2/4.3 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
--- Comment #6 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-06 19:33 --- Created an attachment (id=12553) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12553&action=view) Potential patch. This hasn't been tested yet; when it has I can add a changelog and post it. That's in progress now. Ranjit's patch to enable prologue analysis on i386 changed the behavior for other SJLJ targets. They used to call the no-op fallback_backtrace from sysdep/generic/backtrace.h; afterwards they called _Unwind_Backtrace. This links for SJLJ, but does not work, and when the trace function is called for _URC_END_OF_STACK, _Unwind_GetIP segfaults. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c/29739] -Wconversion produces invalid warnings.
--- Comment #7 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-11-06 19:51 --- I think 4.3 will be released on 2007 or early 2008. Fixing bugs on 4.2 and 4.3 will speed up things, of course. In addition, anyone could take the patches and apply them to their preferred stable version. I think they will apply more or less cleanly to any 4.X version. On the other hand, there is no issue at all in the sense that Wconversion works as documented and it was probably very useful when it was implemented. Now, the desire for a "different" Wconversion has been acknowledged by GCC developers since a long long time ago and they would have welcomed any implementation the very same day that you opened your bug. Just nobody (not only GCC devs, I mean no person on earth, not even you) had enough free time, resources or interest to implement it or they had higher priorities. Finally, I understand your frustration. I have done the same when I have been frustrated with software. (I may still do it sometimes without being fully aware and I always regret it) But I have learnt that negative comments (such as #6) are pointless, on the contrary, they tend to hurt and offend developers that have put endless nights, tears and blood on it. Even if you are completely right and correct, offending someone before asking for a favour simply doesn't work. -- lopezibanez at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|lopezibanez at gmail dot com| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29739 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#159838: Give us a call when you get a chance
Please give us a call to see if we can help you qualify for the degree you are interested in. For the next 2 weeks we will be qualifying select applicants based on 2 Criterion: Criteria for our Degree program: 1. Have the work experience Or 2. Already have a degree and would like to receive a Masters or Doctorate Qualification Office Number: (773)-509-4920 Margaret George Donatus Online University *Due to the high amount of calls we suggest leaving a message with your name and number. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c/29739] -Wconversion produces invalid warnings.
--- Comment #8 from pepster at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-11-06 20:34 --- I spent a considerable amount of my personal time on open source projects, so I am not particularily ashamed of not fixing this bug myself (I tried, but gave up after I realized the learnign curve is too steep). I consider gcc to be one of the most important open source projects there is, as it is a prerequiste for most other projects, and greatly appreciate everyone contributing to this monumental project. However, unless the situation has dramatically changed, given the state of gcc code only the most determined non-maintainer would be able to fix bugs/problems. This probably explains my personal dismay regarding the fate of my bug reports. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29739 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/29206] [4.2/4.3 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
--- Comment #7 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-11-06 21:09 --- Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults > Ranjit's patch to enable prologue analysis on i386 changed the behavior for > other SJLJ targets. They used to call the no-op fallback_backtrace from > sysdep/generic/backtrace.h; afterwards they called _Unwind_Backtrace. This > links for SJLJ, but does not work, and when the trace function is called for > _URC_END_OF_STACK, _Unwind_GetIP segfaults. >From the PR, I had no idea that debian was still using the SJLJ exception support on this target. I switched to only building and testing with DWARF2 exceptions a long time ago. Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/29206] [4.2/4.3 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
--- Comment #8 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-06 21:47 --- I'm not sure, but I think that our hppa port hasn't switched over yet. As for ARM, I'm not sure what to do to fix the issue. ARM old ABI is stuck with SJLJ. And the EABI can't implement _Unwind_Backtrace either. I have been speaking with someone at ARM about the ABI implications of this, on and off, but I don't have a lot of hope for it working out without a GNU extension. -- drow at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drow at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcj-4.1 4.1.1-17 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the gcj-4.1 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 4.1.1-13 Current version: 4.1.1-17 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
