Al-Manahel Newsletter List Unsubscription

2006-08-20 Thread munir

The removal of the email address:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

>From the mailing list: 

Al-Manahel Newsletter List 

is all set.

Date of this removal: Sun Aug 20 01:50:17 2006

Please save this email message for future reference.

---

You may automatically subscribe from this list at any time by 
visiting the following URL:



If the above URL is inoperable, make sure that you have copied the 
entire address. Some mail readers will wrap a long URL and thus break
this automatic unsubscribe mechanism. 

You may also change your subscription by visiting this list's main screen: 



If you're still having trouble, please contact the list owner at: 



The following physical address is associated with this mailing list: 



- 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Welcome to Al-Manahel Newsletter List

2006-08-20 Thread munir

The subscription of the email address: 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To the mailing list: 

Al-Manahel Newsletter List

is all set. Thanks for subscribing! 

Date of this subscription: Sun Aug 20 01:50:20 2006

Please save this email message for future reference. 

---

You may automatically unsubscribe from this list at any time by 
visiting the following URL:



If the above URL is inoperable, make sure that you have copied the 
entire address. Some mail readers will wrap a long URL and thus break
this automatic unsubscribe mechanism. 

You may also change your subscription by visiting this list's main screen: 



If you're still having trouble, please contact the list owner at: 



The following physical address is associated with this mailing list: 



- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug c++/28782] Internal compiler error on compiling SpiderMonkey project

2006-08-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-08-20 09:14 ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26881 ***


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28782

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug debug/26881] [4.1/4.2 Regression] internal compiler error in dwarf2out_finish

2006-08-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-08-20 09:14 
---
*** Bug 28782 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||yair at finjan dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26881

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug debug/26881] [4.1/4.2 Regression] internal compiler error in dwarf2out_finish

2006-08-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO||27036
  nThis||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26881

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug debug/26881] [4.1/4.2 Regression] internal compiler error in dwarf2out_finish

2006-08-20 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz


--- Comment #18 from hubicka at ucw dot cz  2006-08-20 12:47 ---
Subject: Re:  [4.1/4.2 Regression] internal compiler error in dwarf2out_finish

> (In reply to comment #14)
> Any news on the patch?

Sadly we are having just tip of the iceberg here.  The patch to deffer
output of debug symbols later sort of work, but I noticed there are
other PRs related to problem where optimized out static variable is
still referred to by debug info, so I attempted to move debug output
code to cgraph domain and failed to do so.  The problem is that we are
quite inconsistent in way we do handle the optimized out variables.  In
some cases we do emit debug output for them, in other we don't and
in another we ICE depending on case and forntend.

I guess I will back out and implement the deferring itself without
touching the whole issue for start.  THen we probably ought to teach
debug info output machinery to query cgraph about whether the particular
variable was output or not and output the location or optimized out info
and move the debug output to cgraph at last (for both local and external
stuff, so we will need new datastructure in cgraph holding all
declarations in program somehow, as this is for now maintained only by
frontends)

Honza


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26881

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#376602: fixed

2006-08-20 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

   g++-3.4 |3.4.6-1 | hppa
   g++-4.0 |4.0.3-3 | hppa
libstdc++6-4.0-dbg |4.0.3-3 | hppa
libstdc++6-4.0-dev |4.0.3-3 | hppa
libstdc++6-4.0-pic |4.0.3-3 | hppa
libstdc++6-dbg |3.4.6-1 | hppa
libstdc++6-dev |3.4.6-1 | hppa
libstdc++6-pic |3.4.6-1 | hppa

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are never removed from testing by hand.  Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jeroen van Wolffelaar (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug debug/26881] [4.1/4.2 Regression] internal compiler error in dwarf2out_finish

2006-08-20 Thread fang at csl dot cornell dot edu


-- 

fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot
   ||edu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26881

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#361707: marked as done (Causes FTBFS with GCC 4.2: '' has incomplete type)

2006-08-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:04:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: openal
Version: 1:0.0.8-1

Your package causes otehr packages to fail to build with GCC 4.2.
Version 4.2 has not been released yet but I'm building with a snapshot
in order to find errors and give people an advance warning.  The bug
below is in your package and not because I'm using a snapshot of the
compiler so please take a look at it.  You can reproduce this with the
gcc-snapshot package.


> Automatic build of osgal-cvs_20060215-5 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 1.112
...
>  x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"\" 
> -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" 
> -DPACKAGE=\"osgAL\" -DVERSION=\"0.3\" -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 
> -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 
> -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 
> -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 -DHAVE_LIBOPENAL=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -I. -I. -I../../include 
> -Wall -g -O2 -MT SoundManager.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/SoundManager.Tpo -c 
> SoundManager.cpp  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/SoundManager.o
> /usr/include/AL/alc.h:190: error: '' has incomplete type
> /usr/include/AL/alc.h:190: error: invalid use of 'ALCvoid'
> /usr/include/AL/alc.h:251: error: '' has incomplete type
> /usr/include/AL/alc.h:251: error: invalid use of 'ALCvoid'
> make[3]: *** [SoundManager.lo] Error 1

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
There has been some controversy whether this is a bug in the
application or the compiler.  The latest status is a GCC developer
pointing out that the C++ committee ruled that it's invalid code, see
http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_closed.html#18

Closing.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---


GCC bug# 180937

2006-08-20 Thread Maria Blagoeva
Hello,

i am running Ubuntu 5.10 and  gcc 4.0, trying to simulate BWA
network with ns 2. While installing the necessary modules i have
encountered an error. I have read about the bug in g++ and read the
work-around about it. But since i am running the latest gcc version, i
am wondering why i am getting this error. The error is:


satellite/sat-hdlc.cc:220: error: 'HDR_HDLC' was not declared in this scope

in every function it is being used.

I seem not to understand where to place the work-around about it, i.e.
where to add the curly brackets to delimit the scope? Thank you in
advance.


[Bug target/28574] [4.2 regression] switch statement points to unreferenced label at -O2

2006-08-20 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28574

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug target/28623] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2077 (nrecognizable insn) [alpha]

2006-08-20 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-08-20 22:30 
---
Alpha is not a primary or secondary platform.


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28623

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug tree-optimization/28624] [4.2 regression] latent segfault in remove_phi_node

2006-08-20 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-08-20 22:31 
---
Until a bug is demonstrated with the current sourcebase, this is not a
priority.


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P4


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28624

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#209152: how are you today?

2006-08-20 Thread Chester
Do not ignore me please,
bI found your email somewhere anad now decided to write you.
I am coming to ybour place in few weeks and thought we 
canb meet each other. Let me know if you do not mind.
I aam a nice pretty giral. Don't reply to this email. 
Email me direclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]