Bug#362414: abs() returns a negative number
> Package: gcc-snapshot > Version: 20060325-1 > > I get the following build failure of libsndfile with gcc 4.2 > 20060325-1 and 20060408-1. Basically what happens is that abs() > returns a negative number. > >> Automatic build of libsndfile_1.0.15-2 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 1.112 > ... >> ./lossy_comp_test wav_ima >> lcomp_test_short : ima.wav . ok >> lcomp_test_int: ima.wav . >> >> Line 757: Signal is all zeros (-27260928, 0xFE600800). >> make[2]: *** [wav-tests] Error 1 > > The code basically does: > sum_abs = abs (sum_abs + abs (abs (data [k]) - 256)) ; > in a loop. > > With 4.2 snapshot I get negative numbers at some point, but with > 4.0/4.1 I don't: > > --- 1 2006-04-13 10:38:23.0 + > +++ 2 2006-04-13 10:39:39.0 + > @@ -110,6 +110,6 @@ > 1930663680 (data[k] = 72744960) > 2009241088 (data[k] = 78577664) > 2083755264 (data[k] = 74514432) > --2131848192 (data[k] = 79364096) > --2056350976 (data[k] = 75497472) > +2131848192 (data[k] = 79364096) > +2087621888 (data[k] = 75497472) Looks like you are working near limits of 'int' type, and different valid optimizations could change order of calculation, either causing data overflow or not. Try using long long instead of int. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug tree-optimization/27103] [4.2 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have symbol_memory_tag in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:466
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 12:00
---
Confirmed.
The original testcase compiles fine for me with today's compiler.
If I remove the (unused) typedef in the third line, I get the ICE.
Here's a reduced testcase:
=
struct A { int i; };
struct B { struct A a; };
int N;
void foo(struct B *p, char *q)
{
if (N)
bar(p->a, q);
q += p->a.i;
}
=
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords||monitored
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-04-13 12:00:20
date||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27103
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug tree-optimization/27103] [4.2 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have symbol_memory_tag in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:466
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 12:01 --- Forgot to mention that you have to compile the testcase from comment #5 with "-O2". -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27103 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/26757] [4.1 regression] ICE (Segmentation fault) building 3ddesktop source
-- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||27143 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26757 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c/27144] segfault with -O2 on x86_64
-- tbm at cyrius dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||debian-gcc at lists dot ||debian dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27144 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c/27144] [4.1 regression] segfault with -O2 on x86_64
-- tbm at cyrius dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|segfault with -O2 on x86_64 |[4.1 regression] segfault ||with -O2 on x86_64 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27144 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362414: abs() returns a negative number
* Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-14 10:55]: > > sum_abs = abs (sum_abs + abs (abs (data [k]) - 256)) ; > > > Looks like you are working near limits of 'int' type, and different > valid optimizations could change order of calculation, either > causing data overflow or not. Try using long long instead of int. Just changing sum_abs to long doesn't help. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362307: ICE on powerpc: error in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-13 12:03]: > > Preprocessed source is coming. > > Attached. Unfortunately I don't know how to run it through delta > because running gcc-4.0 over the preprocessed source gives me > "incompatible types in assignment" errors - which I don't get when I > run it over the .c file with proper -I parameters. What can I do > about this? That's interesting. Both 4.1 and 4.2 fail. They generate a ~300 K preprocessed source file. 4.0 works and generates a 86 MB (!) preprocessed source file. Is that (and that difference) normal? Anyway, 4.2 works when I remove -O3 so I'll run that through delta. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362414: abs() returns a negative number
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-14 11:08]: > > > sum_abs = abs (sum_abs + abs (abs (data [k]) - 256)) ; > > > > > Looks like you are working near limits of 'int' type, and different > > valid optimizations could change order of calculation, either > > causing data overflow or not. Try using long long instead of int. > > Just changing sum_abs to long doesn't help. Oh, long long. Right, that works. However, isn't this still a compiler problem since 4.0/4.1 works? Or can you not rely on it to work because of optimizations? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug libstdc++/19664] libstdc++ headers should have pop/push of the visibility around the declarations
-- simon dot strandman at telia dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simon dot strandman at telia ||dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362307: ICE on powerpc: error in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
forwarded 362307 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27158 tags 362307 + upstream thanks Minimal test case forwarded upstream. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#362307: ICE on powerpc: error in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 362307 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27158 Bug#362307: ICE on powerpc: error in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27158. > tags 362307 + upstream Bug#362307: ICE on powerpc: error in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084 There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362414: abs() returns a negative number & signed types are undefined on overflow
It seems the problem here is "signed types are undefined on overflow". abs (2083755264 + abs (abs (79364096) - 256)) Let express in hex on 32bit platform: abs (0x7c339500 + abs (abs (0x4bb) - 0x100)) abs (0x7c339500 + 0x4baff00) abs (undefined) Does help to change definition of sum_abs from "int" to "unsigned int" ? Does help to compile it with "-fwrapv" ? http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.0/gcc/Code-Gen-Options.html#Code-Gen-Options Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#361445: Log for failed build of zeroc-ice_3.0.1-3
PIC: > Automatic build of zeroc-ice_3.0.1-3 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 1.112 ... > c++ -shared -g -m64 -ftemplate-depth-128 -Wall -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -g > -L../../lib -o ../../lib/libFreeze.so.3.0.1 -Wl,-h,libFreeze.so.30 > CatalogData.o Catalog.o ConnectionF.o ConnectionI.o Connection.o DB.o > EvictorF.o EvictorI.o EvictorIteratorI.o Evictor.o EvictorStorage.o > Exception.o IndexI.o Index.o MapI.o ObjectStore.o PingObject.o SharedDbEnv.o > SharedDb.o TransactionHolder.o TransactionI.o Transaction.o Util.o -lIce > -lIceUtil -ldb_cxx -lpthread > /usr/bin/ld: SharedDb.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against > `Freeze::DatabaseException::DatabaseException(Freeze::DatabaseException > const&)' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC > /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make[3]: *** [../../lib/libFreeze.so.3.0.1] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/tbm/zeroc-ice-3.0.1/src/Freeze' > make[2]: *** [all] Error 1 -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362414: abs() returns a negative number & signed types are undefined on overflow (fwd)
It seems the problem here is "signed types are undefined on overflow". abs (2083755264 + abs (abs (79364096) - 256)) Let express in hex on 32bit platform: abs (0x7c339500 + abs (abs (0x4bb) - 0x100)) abs (0x7c339500 + 0x4baff00) abs (undefined) Does help to change definition of sum_abs from "int" to "unsigned int" ? Does help to compile it with "-fwrapv" ? http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.0/gcc/Code-Gen-Options.html#Code-Gen-Options Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362414: abs() returns a negative number & signed types are undefined on overflow (fwd)
* Petr Salinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-14 13:05]: > Does help to change definition of sum_abs from "int" to "unsigned int" ? Yes. > Does help to compile it with "-fwrapv" ? No. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug tree-optimization/26490] [4.2 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, with structs pointers and globals
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 16:35 --- *** Bug 27103 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||debian-gcc at lists dot ||debian dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26490 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug tree-optimization/27103] [4.2 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have symbol_memory_tag in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:466
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 16:35 --- This is the same as PR 26490. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26490 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27103 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/26757] [4.1 regression] ICE (Segmentation fault) building 3ddesktop source
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 16:37 --- *** Bug 27143 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26757 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug tree-optimization/27087] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in merge_alias_info
--- Comment #6 from law at redhat dot com 2006-04-13 16:38 --- Fixed a couple days ago. -- law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27087 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/26757] [4.1 regression] C++ front-end producing two DECLs with the same UID
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.1 regression] ICE|[4.1 regression] C++ front- |(Segmentation fault)|end producing two DECLs with |building 3ddesktop source |the same UID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26757 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/26757] [4.1/4.2 regression] C++ front-end producing two DECLs with the same UID
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 16:42 --- This is a latent bug as show by PR 16792 and PR 20357. Both show the same problem of two DECLs pointing to the same variable and having the same UID. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||20357 nThis|| Known to fail|4.0.2 | Known to work|4.2.0 | Summary|[4.1 regression] C++ front- |[4.1/4.2 regression] C++ |end producing two DECLs with|front-end producing two |the same UID|DECLs with the same UID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26757 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug tree-optimization/27087] [4.1 regression] ICE in merge_alias_info
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 16:51 --- But only fixed on the mainline for 4.2 and not for 4.1. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Known to fail||4.1.0 Known to work||4.0.3 4.2.0 Resolution|FIXED | Summary|[4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in |[4.1 regression] ICE in |merge_alias_info|merge_alias_info http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27087 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c/27144] [4.1 regression] segfault with -O2 on x86_64
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 16:55 --- ((unsigned int *) t1->p) is most likely giving it troubles. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27144 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug tree-optimization/27144] [4.2 regression] segfault with -O2 on x86_64
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 16:57 --- It is an ICE while doing scev. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Component|c |tree-optimization GCC build triplet|x86_64-linux-gnu| GCC host triplet|x86_64-linux-gnu| Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Summary|[4.1 regression] segfault |[4.2 regression] segfault |with -O2 on x86_64 |with -O2 on x86_64 Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27144 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug tree-optimization/27144] [4.2 regression] segfault with -O2 on x86_64
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 17:01 ---
Confirmed, here is a slightly reduced testcase:
typedef struct {unsigned *p; }
hvl_t;
test_vltypes_compound_vlen_vlen (void) {
typedef struct {
int i;
float f;
hvl_t v;
}
s1;
s1 wdata[128];
unsigned i, j, k;
hvl_t *t1, *t2;
for (i = 0; i < 128; i++)
{
wdata[i].i = i * 10;
wdata[i].f = (float) ((i * 20) / 3.0);
wdata[i].v.p = malloc ((i + 16) * sizeof (hvl_t));
for (t1 = (wdata[i].v).p, j = 0; j < (i + 16); j++, t1++)
{
for (k = 0; k < j + 8; k++)
t1->p[k] = i * 100 + j * 10 + k;
}
}
}
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-04-13 17:01:44
date||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27144
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug tree-optimization/27087] [4.1 regression] ICE in merge_alias_info
--- Comment #8 from law at redhat dot com 2006-04-13 17:05 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE in merge_alias_info On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 16:51 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > --- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 16:51 > --- > But only fixed on the mainline for 4.2 and not for 4.1. Feel free to backport the patch to 4.1; I'm not likely to get to it. jeff -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27087 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug tree-optimization/27087] [4.1 regression] ICE in merge_alias_info
-- law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|law at redhat dot com | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27087 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#361024: note on "2.4 is deprecated"
dann frazier wrote: > If for no other reason, upstream release process changes will likely > make this much more difficult. As I'm sure you know, 2.6 is being > actively developed indefinitely, as opposed to the previous method of > branching off and stabalising a development tree. Since there is no > existing plan for a 2.8, 2.4 would need to be maintained indefinitely > to continue a major + major-1 support model. Sure, I think there's something to the point someone else made in this thread that each 2.6.x is essentially a new major version now. Although clearly not quite the same as before. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#362638: gcc-4.1-base: package includes duplicate files
Package: gcc-4.1-base Version: 4.1.0-1 Severity: minor desktop:~# dpkg -L gcc-4.1-base /. /usr /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/TODO.Debian /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/copyright /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/README.Debian.gz /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/changelog.Debian.gz /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/changelog.gz /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/.copyright /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/.changelog.Debian.gz The last two files aren't needed, and can removed from the package since they are identical to the un-hidden files -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362638: marked as done (gcc-4.1-base: package includes duplicate files)
Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 21:55:57 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#362638: gcc-4.1-base: package includes duplicate files has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: gcc-4.1-base Version: 4.1.0-1 Severity: minor desktop:~# dpkg -L gcc-4.1-base /. /usr /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/TODO.Debian /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/copyright /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/README.Debian.gz /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/changelog.Debian.gz /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/changelog.gz /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/.copyright /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/.changelog.Debian.gz The last two files aren't needed, and can removed from the package since they are identical to the un-hidden files -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Lior Kaplan writes: > Package: gcc-4.1-base > Version: 4.1.0-1 > Severity: minor > > desktop:~# dpkg -L gcc-4.1-base > /. > /usr > /usr/share > /usr/share/doc > /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base > /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/TODO.Debian > /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/copyright > /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/README.Debian.gz > /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/changelog.Debian.gz > /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/changelog.gz > /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/.copyright > /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/.changelog.Debian.gz > > The last two files aren't needed, and can removed from the package since they > are identical to the un-hidden files yes, these are identical, because they are hard links, needed to solve an upgrade issue when upgrading from 4.0.2-9. --- End Message ---
[Bug target/27158] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in extract_insn with -maltivec
-- tbm at cyrius dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||debian-gcc at lists dot ||debian dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27158 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/27158] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in extract_insn with -maltivec
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-04-14 10:04 --- Created an attachment (id=11266) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11266&action=view) test case for 4.1 shows the ICE in gcc 4.1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27158 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/27158] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in extract_insn with -maltivec
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-04-14 10:31 --- Created an attachment (id=11267) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11267&action=view) test case for 4.2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27158 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/27158] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in extract_insn with -maltivec
--- Comment #3 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-04-14 10:33 --- Created an attachment (id=11268) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11268&action=view) preprocessed source Unfortunately, I don't get delta to generate a test case that shows the bug both in 4.1 and 4.2. The preprocessed file shows the ICE on 4.1 and 4.2 though. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27158 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/27158] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in extract_insn with -maltivec
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-04-14 10:33 --- Created an attachment (id=11269) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11269&action=view) preprocessed source Unfortunately, I don't get delta to generate a test case that shows the bug both in 4.1 and 4.2. The preprocessed file shows the ICE on 4.1 and 4.2 though. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27158 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/27158] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in extract_insn with -maltivec
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-14 16:57 --- Usually what is happening is that reload is doing the constant loading for some reason. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27158 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/27158] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in extract_insn with -maltivec
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-14 17:34 --- Thanks for the testcases. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target Milestone|--- |4.1.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27158 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
