[Bug tree-optimization/26757] [4.1 regression] ICE (Segmentation fault) building 3ddesktop source

2006-03-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-20 07:57 ---
I could not reduce this to a good point (at least today).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26757

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#356896: FTBFS with GCC 4.1: test suite failure

2006-03-20 Thread Martin Buck
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 11:13:13PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> severity 356896 important

I would have thought that a compiler that miscompiles trivial for loops and
thus inserts bugs in lots of programs compiled with it is unsuitable for
release, i.e. severity serious.

> Do you have a test case for this error?  If it's a different bug/test
> case, I can try on ARM with 4.1 to see if it's still there.

Unfortunately, no. On arm, the apcalc testsuite simply segfaulted just as
with the new gcc 4.1 bug. But since the 4.1 bug causes a segfault very
early in the testsuite, it will probably hide the gcc 4.0 one.

Martin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug tree-optimization/26763] [4.1 Regression] wrong final value of induction variable calculated

2006-03-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-20 10:15 ---
Confirmed.  -fno-tree-loop-optimize makes it work.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-03-20 10:15:36
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug tree-optimization/26757] [4.1 regression] ICE (Segmentation fault) building 3ddesktop source

2006-03-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26757

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#356896: FTBFS with GCC 4.1: test suite failure

2006-03-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-20 10:03]:
> I would have thought that a compiler that miscompiles trivial for loops and
> thus inserts bugs in lots of programs compiled with it is unsuitable for
> release, i.e. severity serious.

I don't know... I compiled >5000 packages and none showed a problem.
Then again, most of them probably don't have a test suite as good as
your package (or a test suite at all); so they might compile and be
broken.

> > Do you have a test case for this error?  If it's a different bug/test
> > case, I can try on ARM with 4.1 to see if it's still there.
> Unfortunately, no. On arm, the apcalc testsuite simply segfaulted just as
> with the new gcc 4.1 bug. But since the 4.1 bug causes a segfault very
> early in the testsuite, it will probably hide the gcc 4.0 one.

Once a fixed GCC is out, maybe someone can remind me and I can compile
your package on ARM to see if there are other problems.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: forwarded

2006-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> forwarded 356569 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26757
Bug#356569: ICE on 4.1 that doesn't happen with 4.0 (3ddesktop_0.2.9-5.1)
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26757.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug tree-optimization/26757] [4.1 regression] ICE (Segmentation fault) building 3ddesktop source

2006-03-20 Thread halcy0n at gentoo dot org


-- 

halcy0n at gentoo dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||toolchain at gentoo dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26757

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#357944: g++-4.0: g++ compiles invalid code for object instantiation like "MyClass obj(obj); "

2006-03-20 Thread Michael Weitzel
Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0.3-1
Severity: normal

g++ compiles the following wrong C++ code without complaining:

   #include 
   class A {
   public:
  A() {}
   };

   int main()
   {
  std::complex bla(bla);
  A blubb(blubb);
   }

This bug also affects g++-3.4. g++-3.3 correctly complaints:

test.cc: In function `int main()':
test.cc:12: error: `bla' undeclared (first use this function)
test.cc:12: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for
each
   function it appears in.)
test.cc:13: error: `a' undeclared (first use this function)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages g++-4.0 depends on:
ii  gcc-4.0   4.0.3-1The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-4.0-base  4.0.3-1The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libstdc++6-4.0-dev4.0.3-1The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d

g++-4.0 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#357944: g++-4.0: g++ compiles invalid code for object instantiation like "MyClass obj(obj); "

2006-03-20 Thread Falk Hueffner
Michael Weitzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Package: g++-4.0
> Version: 4.0.3-1
> Severity: normal
>
> g++ compiles the following wrong C++ code without complaining:
>
>#include 
>class A {
>public:
>   A() {}
>};
>
>int main()
>{
>   std::complex bla(bla);
>   A blubb(blubb);
>}
>
> This bug also affects g++-3.4. g++-3.3 correctly complaints:
>
> test.cc: In function `int main()':
> test.cc:12: error: `bla' undeclared (first use this function)

Why do you think g++-3.3 is correct? Looks rather like a bug in 3.3 to
me.


-- 
Falk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#340965: acknowledged by developer (Re: gij-4.1 memory leak with JAP)

2006-03-20 Thread Philipp Klaus Krause
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #340965: gij-4.1 memory leak with JAP,
> which was filed against the gij-4.1 package.
> 
> It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> 
> Their explanation is attached below.  If this explanation is
> unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
> message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email.
> 
> Debian bug tracking system administrator
> (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Subject:
> Re: gij-4.1 memory leak with JAP
> From:
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date:
> Sun, 19 Mar 2006 14:31:48 +0100
> To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> Version: 4.1.0-0

What do you mean by "Version: 4.1.0-0" as a reason for closing the bug?
I see the bug with that version, too.

Philipp


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#340965: acknowledged by developer (Re: gij-4.1 memory leak with JAP)

2006-03-20 Thread Matthias Klose
Philipp Klaus Krause writes:
> > Version: 4.1.0-0
> 
> What do you mean by "Version: 4.1.0-0" as a reason for closing the bug?
> I see the bug with that version, too.

I didn't see that memory leak in this version. If it's still there,
please add instructions how to see/measure it.

  Matthias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#340965: acknowledged by developer (Re: gij-4.1 memory leak with JAP)

2006-03-20 Thread Philipp Klaus Krause
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Philipp Klaus Krause writes:
>>> Version: 4.1.0-0
>> What do you mean by "Version: 4.1.0-0" as a reason for closing the bug?
>> I see the bug with that version, too.
> 
> I didn't see that memory leak in this version. If it's still there,
> please add instructions how to see/measure it.
> 
>   Matthias
> 

gij-4.1 --version
gives:

java version "1.4.2"
gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.1.0 (Debian 4.1.0-0)

I see the problem with:
gij-4.1 -jar JAP.jar
It starts allocating memory on startup and fills my 2GB of memory within
seconds, then continues with the swap file.

The JAP version is 00.05.022

Philipp


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#356435: g++-4.1: may fail to generate code for base destructor defined inline

2006-03-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-20 23:10]:
> Falk, even without a minimal test case, do you think you can forward
> this upstream.  Maybe someone there'll have a good idea.  I can also
> produce pregenerated code for xbsql (the package that fails in
> #356245) if you want.

Oh, and please do look at #356245 since it contains some more
information about this bug.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#356435: g++-4.1: may fail to generate code for base destructor defined inline

2006-03-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-12 01:41]:
> Where a base class has a destructor defined inline, g++ may generate
> code for a derived class's destructor that calls an non-inline version
> of the base class destructor, but without generating code for the
> latter.  This is normally masked by the fact that g++ 4.1 now
> generates the base-class destructor (aka the non-in-charge destructor)
> along with the whole-object destructor (aka the in-charge
> destructor), but becomes a problem when linking with code generated by
> g++ 4.0.
> 
> See bug #356245 for an example of this.  Unfortunately I have not yet
> succeeded in writing a simple test case.

Falk, even without a minimal test case, do you think you can forward
this upstream.  Maybe someone there'll have a good idea.  I can also
produce pregenerated code for xbsql (the package that fails in
#356245) if you want.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#358050: line number in extra qualification error not ideal (end of declaration)

2006-03-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: g++-4.1
Version: 4.1.0-0
Severity: minor

The line number mentioned in the "extra qualification" error is not
ideal.  Instead of showing the line number on which the extra
qualification actually occurs, or should the last line of the
declaration.


(sid)6102:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] cat > test.cpp
class foo {
foo::foo(int a,
 int b,
 int c);
};

int main() {
}
(sid)6103:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] g++ test.cpp
test.cpp:4: error: extra qualification ‘foo::’ on member ‘foo’

I'd like to see "test.cpp:2: ..." here.

Presumably it checks things like that after reading a complete
declaration.  I would have thought it could track what the first line
of the declaration was though.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-rc5-486
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/



Results for 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-13) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnu

2006-03-20 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: 
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu

=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===


Running target unix
XPASS: 22_locale/collate_byname.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/collate_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/collate_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/ctype_is_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/ctype_is_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/members.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/messages_byname.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/messages_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/money_get_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/money_get_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/money_put_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/money_put_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/moneypunct_byname.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/moneypunct_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/moneypunct_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/num_get_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/num_get_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/num_put_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/num_put_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/numpunct_byname.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/numpunct_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/numpunct_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/time_get_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/time_get_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/time_put_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/time_put_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: 27_io/filebuf_members.cc execution test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: thread/pthread5.cc execution test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: thread/pthread6.cc execution test

=== libstdc++-v3 Summary ===

# of expected passes450
# of unexpected failures3
# of unexpected successes   26
# of expected failures  2
=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/empty6.C  (test for warnings, line 6)
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/vbase10.C  (test for warnings, line 6)
FAIL: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution test
XPASS: g++.dg/other/packed1.C execution test
FAIL: 258: expected branch percentages not found: 25
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C gcov: 0 failures in line counts, 1 in branch 
percentages, 0 in return percentages
XPASS: g++.brendan/union1.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.oliva/linkage1.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.pt/repo3.C (test for excess errors)

=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes8183
# of unexpected failures6
# of unexpected successes   4
# of expected failures  95
# of untested testcases 23
# of unsupported tests  30
/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/build/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.3.6 (Debian 
1:3.3.6-13)

=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c,  -O3 -g  
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020720-1.c compilation,  -O1 
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020720-1.c compilation,  -O2 
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020720-1.c compilation,  -O3 
-fomit-frame-pointer 
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020720-1.c compilation,  -O3 -g 
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020720-1.c compilation,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution,  -O3 
-fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution,  -O3 
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution,  -O3 
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution,  -O3 
-fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution,  -O3 
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution,  -O3 
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-3.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-3.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-3.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-3.c execution,  -O3 
-fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-3.c execution,  -O3 
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
FAIL: gcc.c-tor

Results for 4.1.0 (Debian 4.1.0-1) testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

2006-03-20 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_1_0_release revision 111560

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2316
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test

=== g++ Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes11935
# of unexpected successes   2
# of expected failures  66
# of unsupported tests  104

Running target unix/-m64
FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t026 cp_compat_x_tst.o compile
FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t026 cp_compat_y_tst.o compile
UNRESOLVED: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t026 
cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o link 
UNRESOLVED: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t026 
cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute 
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
FAIL: g++.dg/tls/static-1.C execution test
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test

=== g++ Summary for unix/-m64 ===

# of expected passes11876
# of unexpected failures3
# of unexpected successes   2
# of expected failures  66
# of unresolved testcases   2
# of unsupported tests  117

=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes23811
# of unexpected failures3
# of unexpected successes   4
# of expected failures  132
# of unresolved testcases   2
# of unsupported tests  221
/home/doko-local/gcc/4.1/gcc-4.1-4.1.0/build/gcc/testsuite/../g++  version 
4.1.0 (Debian 4.1.0-1)

=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c  -O3 -g  (test for excess errors)
XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/pr20122.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 2
XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/vect-105.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1
XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/vect-75.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1

=== gcc Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes37446
# of unexpected failures1
# of unexpected successes   3
# of expected failures  108
# of untested testcases 28
# of unsupported tests  354

Running target unix/-m64
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c  -O2  (test for excess errors)
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  (test for 
excess errors)
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c  -O3 -g  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/opt-11.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/pr24428-2.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/pr24428.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11c.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 0 loops 1
XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/pr20122.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 2
XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/vect-105.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1
XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/vect-75.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1
FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/linkage.c link

=== gcc Summary for unix/-m64 ===

# of expected passes37405
# of unexpected failures8
# of unexpected successes   3
# of expected failures  108
# of untested testcases 28
# of unsupported tests  369

=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes74851
# of unexpected failures9
# of unexpected successes   6
# of expected failures  216
# of untested testcases 56
# of unsupported tests  723
/home/doko-local/gcc/4.1/gcc-4.1-4.1.0/build/gcc/xgcc  version 4.1.0 (Debian 
4.1.0-1)

=== gfortran tests ===


Running target unix

=== gfortran Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes11521
# of expected failures  14
# of unsupported tests  79

Running target unix/-m64
FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90  -O0  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90  -O1  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90  -O2  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  
execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
-funroll-loops  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90  -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90  -Os  execution test

=== gfortran Summary for unix/-m64 ===

# of expected passes11623
# of unexpected failures8
# of expected failures  15
# of unsupported tests  23

=== gfortran Summary ===

# of expected passes23144
# of unexpe

Results for 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-13) testsuite on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

2006-03-20 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: 
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
XPASS: g++.brendan/union1.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.oliva/linkage1.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.pt/repo3.C (test for excess errors)

=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes8212
# of unexpected failures1
# of unexpected successes   3
# of expected failures  95
# of untested testcases 23
# of unsupported tests  29
/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/build/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.3.6 (Debian 
1:3.3.6-13)

=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/debug-1.c -gstabs -O3 scan-assembler xyzzy
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/debug-1.c -gstabs3 -O3 scan-assembler xyzzy
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/debug-1.c -gstabs+ -O3 scan-assembler xyzzy
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/debug-1.c -gstabs+3 -O3 scan-assembler xyzzy
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/debug-2.c -gstabs -O3 scan-assembler xyzzy
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/debug-2.c -gstabs3 -O3 scan-assembler xyzzy
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/debug-2.c -gstabs+ -O3 scan-assembler xyzzy
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/debug-2.c -gstabs+3 -O3 scan-assembler xyzzy
FAIL: gcc.dg/duff-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/voidparam-1.c  -O0  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/voidparam-1.c  -O1  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/voidparam-1.c  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  (test for 
excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/voidparam-1.c  -O3 -g  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/voidparam-1.c  -Os  (test for excess errors)

=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes21223
# of unexpected failures14
# of expected failures  70
# of unsupported tests  196
/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/build/gcc/xgcc version 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-13)

=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===


Running target unix
XPASS: 22_locale/collate_byname.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/collate_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/collate_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/ctype_is_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/ctype_is_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/members.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/messages_byname.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/messages_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/money_get_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/money_get_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/money_put_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/money_put_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/moneypunct_byname.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/moneypunct_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/moneypunct_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/num_get_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/num_get_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/num_put_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/num_put_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/numpunct_byname.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/numpunct_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/numpunct_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/time_get_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/time_get_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/time_put_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/time_put_members_wchar_t.cc execution test

=== libstdc++-v3 Summary ===

# of expected passes453
# of unexpected successes   26
# of expected failures  2

Compiler version: 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-13) 
Platform: s390-ibm-linux-gnu
configure flags: --host=s390-linux-gnu -v --enable-languages=c,c++ 
--prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info 
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/3.3 --enable-shared 
--enable-__cxa_atexit --with-system-zlib --enable-nls 
--without-included-gettext --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-debug
BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O2 


Build Dependencies:
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   Version Description
+++-==-===-==
ii  binutils   2.16.1cvs20060117-1 The GNU assembler, linker and binary 
utilities
ii  libc6-dev  2.3.6-3 GNU C Library: Development Libraries and 
Heade


Patches that Debian applied in this version:

pr14925:
  Backport of PR14925 to the gcc-3.3 branch

pr17684:
  Backport of PR17684 to the gcc-3.3 branch

pr18153:
  Backport of PR18153 to the gcc-3.3 branch

pr18380:
  Backport of PR18380 to the gcc-3.3 branch

pr18508:
  Backport of PR18508 to the gcc-3.3 branch

pr10692:
  2005-01-05  Richard Henderson  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  
  PR rtl-opt/10692
  * reload1.c (do_input_reload): Restrict the optimization deleteing
  a previous output reload to 

Bug#358076: g++-4.0: fails to locate std C++ headers (eg, typeinfo)

2006-03-20 Thread Christian E. Boehme
Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


g++ (or cpp, for that matter) is not able to find the standard C++
headers and terminates with (example: typeinfo) ``error: typeinfo:
No such file or directory'' although /usr/include/c++/4.0.3/typeinfo
clearly exists and is luser readable.  It turns out that the typical
``--with-gxx-include-dir'' configure option (as is present in the
g++-3.3 executable, for example) is missing.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15.6-lombard-xfs
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages g++-4.0 depends on:
ii  gcc-4.0   4.0.3-1The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-4.0-base  4.0.3-1The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libstdc++6-4.0-dev4.0.3-1The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d

g++-4.0 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#358076: g++-4.0: fails to locate std C++ headers (eg, typeinfo)

2006-03-20 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 358076 normal
tags 358076 unreproducible
thanks

On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 04:29:14AM +0100, Christian E. Boehme wrote:

> g++ (or cpp, for that matter) is not able to find the standard C++
> headers and terminates with (example: typeinfo) ``error: typeinfo:
> No such file or directory'' although /usr/include/c++/4.0.3/typeinfo
> clearly exists and is luser readable.  It turns out that the typical
> ``--with-gxx-include-dir'' configure option (as is present in the
> g++-3.3 executable, for example) is missing.

Huh?  Are you really suggesting that the standard C++ compiler has been
unable to find any of its own header files for over a week in unstable, and
no one noticed?

I think you will need to provide more detail about what it is you're doing;
g++-4.0 is certainly not unable to find its header files in the general
case, so this bug doesn't qualify as "rendering the package unusable".

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#358076: g++-4.0: fails to locate std C++ headers (eg, typeinfo)

2006-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 358076 normal
Bug#358076: g++-4.0: fails to locate std C++ headers (eg, typeinfo)
Severity set to `normal'.

> tags 358076 unreproducible
Bug#358076: g++-4.0: fails to locate std C++ headers (eg, typeinfo)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]