[Bug libstdc++/19664] libstdc++ headers should have pop/push of the visibility around the declarations
--- Comment #86 from bero at arklinux dot org 2005-11-03 09:38 --- Created an attachment (id=10120) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10120&action=view) Updated version of the patch to apply on current SVN -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug java/24572] [4.0 regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:3983
--- Comment #1 from mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 09:41 --- Confirmed, this prevents gjdoc from building, which used the build just fine with earlier gcj 4.0.x releases. -- mark at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-11-03 09:41:22 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24572 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/23797] [3.4 Regression] ICE on typename outside template
--- Comment #14 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 11:29 --- Since Mark's patch for PR19253 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg00141.html this is an error again. -- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23797 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways.
tags 336167 +patch
thanks
Sven Luther wrote:
[snip]
> > The appended patch reverts a single line of the diff between 4.0.2-2
> > and 4.0.2-3 and lets the testcase succeed. I don't know that part of
> > gcc enough to judge if it is a valid fix for the problem.
> >
> > Sven, could you test if this fixes also the problem you see?
>
> Ok, i will, altough i would need to rebuild gcc, so it will not be before
> tomorrow that i can test it.
The appended patch fixes the problems for mips-linux, tested with a
kernel build and builds of ncpfs and mypasswordsafe.
Sven, can you test this patch?
Thiemo
2005-11-02 Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR rtl-optimization/23585
* rtlanal.c (rtx_addr_can_trap_p_1) : Return 0 for an address
that can't trap plus a constant integer, if the mode has zero size.
Index: rtlanal.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/rtlanal.c,v
retrieving revision 1.221
diff -u -p -r1.221 rtlanal.c
--- rtlanal.c 20 Oct 2005 12:14:29 - 1.221
+++ rtlanal.c 2 Nov 2005 09:32:05 -
@@ -267,7 +267,9 @@ rtx_addr_can_trap_p_1 (rtx x, enum machi
{
HOST_WIDE_INT offset;
- if (!STRICT_ALIGNMENT || !unaligned_mems)
+ if (!STRICT_ALIGNMENT
+ || !unaligned_mems
+ || GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) == 0)
return 0;
offset = INTVAL (XEXP (x, 1));
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 336167 +patch Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways.
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 01:28:57PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > tags 336167 +patch > thanks > > Sven Luther wrote: > [snip] > > > The appended patch reverts a single line of the diff between 4.0.2-2 > > > and 4.0.2-3 and lets the testcase succeed. I don't know that part of > > > gcc enough to judge if it is a valid fix for the problem. > > > > > > Sven, could you test if this fixes also the problem you see? > > > > Ok, i will, altough i would need to rebuild gcc, so it will not be before > > tomorrow that i can test it. > > The appended patch fixes the problems for mips-linux, tested with a > kernel build and builds of ncpfs and mypasswordsafe. > > Sven, can you test this patch? Do i need to apply the above mentioned patch too or just this one ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways.
Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 01:28:57PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > tags 336167 +patch > > thanks > > > > Sven Luther wrote: > > [snip] > > > > The appended patch reverts a single line of the diff between 4.0.2-2 > > > > and 4.0.2-3 and lets the testcase succeed. I don't know that part of > > > > gcc enough to judge if it is a valid fix for the problem. > > > > > > > > Sven, could you test if this fixes also the problem you see? > > > > > > Ok, i will, altough i would need to rebuild gcc, so it will not be before > > > tomorrow that i can test it. > > > > The appended patch fixes the problems for mips-linux, tested with a > > kernel build and builds of ncpfs and mypasswordsafe. > > > > Sven, can you test this patch? > > Do i need to apply the above mentioned patch too or just this one ? Only this one (it is already in upstream, btw.), the previous one was wrong. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways.
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 02:01:18PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 01:28:57PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > > tags 336167 +patch > > > thanks > > > > > > Sven Luther wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > > The appended patch reverts a single line of the diff between 4.0.2-2 > > > > > and 4.0.2-3 and lets the testcase succeed. I don't know that part of > > > > > gcc enough to judge if it is a valid fix for the problem. > > > > > > > > > > Sven, could you test if this fixes also the problem you see? > > > > > > > > Ok, i will, altough i would need to rebuild gcc, so it will not be > > > > before > > > > tomorrow that i can test it. > > > > > > The appended patch fixes the problems for mips-linux, tested with a > > > kernel build and builds of ncpfs and mypasswordsafe. > > > > > > Sven, can you test this patch? > > > > Do i need to apply the above mentioned patch too or just this one ? > > Only this one (it is already in upstream, btw.), the previous one was wrong. Ok, will do, but don't expect result soon, i think my box uses days to run all the gcc test cases (failing over all the ppc64 ones obviously). Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug java/24441] [4.1 regression] ICE's when building the ecj compiler 3.1.1
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 14:25 --- *** Bug 24652 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bero at arklinux dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24441 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337263: gij-4.0: segfaults on arm
Package: gij-4.0
Version: 4.0.2-2
Severity: important
On armeb (and the same thing appears to be happening on regular arm),
gij doesn't seem to work at all -- trying to run any .class file just
results in a interpreter segfault accessing memory location ,
which is caught and reported as a java.lang.NullPointerException.
This prevents a successful build of db4.2 in sid.
# cat hello.java
public class hello {
public static void main(String args[]) {
}
}
# gcj -C hello.java
# gij hello
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(java.lang.String, byte[],
int, int, java.security.CodeSource) (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(java.lang.String)
(/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(java.lang.String, boolean)
(/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(java.lang.String)
(/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0)
at gnu.java.lang.MainThread.run() (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0)
#
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: armeb (armv5teb)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-git4
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages gij-4.0 depends on:
ii gcc-4.0-base 4.0.2-2The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.3.5-6.1armeb GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcj6 4.0.2-2Java runtime library for use with
ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-6 compression library - runtime
gij-4.0 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multiple static inline functions
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Akim Demaille
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: Multiple static inline functions accepted
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: c
>Class: accepts-illegal
>Release: 4.0.2 (Debian 4.0.2-2) (Debian testing/unstable)
>Environment:
System: Linux nostromo 2.4.27-2-686-smp #1 SMP Tue Aug 16 15:57:25 JST 2005
i686 GNU/Linux
Architecture: i686
host: i486-pc-linux-gnu
build: i486-pc-linux-gnu
target: i486-pc-linux-gnu
configured with: ../src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,java,f95,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr
--enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib
--without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls
--program-suffix=-4.0 --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=mt
--enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-java-gc=boehm
--enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-gtk-cairo
--with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.0-1.4.2.0/jre --enable-mpfr
--disable-werror --enable-checking=release i486-linux-gnu
>Description:
GCC accepts that a function is defined several times under the same
name, provided it is static inline. It seems to rely on the assembler
to check this kind of issues.
>How-To-Repeat:
The following compiles fine.
static inline
int
one ()
{
return 1;
}
static inline
int
one ()
{
return 2;
}
int
main ()
{
return one ();
}
>Fix:
No idea.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337263: gij-4.0: segfaults on arm
please could you (or Phil) take this upstream directly and link the
upstream and Debian reports? I currently do not have any access to arm
hardware (and hardly the time to do anything with it). We are
currently considering disabling the java support for m68k on request
by one of the m68k porters, so we could do the same for arm.
Matthias
Lennert Buytenhek writes:
> Package: gij-4.0
> Version: 4.0.2-2
> Severity: important
>
> On armeb (and the same thing appears to be happening on regular arm),
> gij doesn't seem to work at all -- trying to run any .class file just
> results in a interpreter segfault accessing memory location ,
> which is caught and reported as a java.lang.NullPointerException.
>
> This prevents a successful build of db4.2 in sid.
>
> # cat hello.java
> public class hello {
> public static void main(String args[]) {
> }
> }
> # gcj -C hello.java
> # gij hello
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
>at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(java.lang.String, byte[],
> int, int, java.security.CodeSource) (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0)
>at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(java.lang.String)
> (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0)
>at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(java.lang.String, boolean)
> (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0)
>at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(java.lang.String)
> (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0)
>at gnu.java.lang.MainThread.run() (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0)
> #
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
> APT prefers stable
> APT policy: (500, 'stable')
> Architecture: armeb (armv5teb)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-git4
> Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
>
> Versions of packages gij-4.0 depends on:
> ii gcc-4.0-base 4.0.2-2The GNU Compiler Collection
> (base
> ii libc6 2.3.5-6.1armeb GNU C Library: Shared libraries
> an
> ii libgcj6 4.0.2-2Java runtime library for use
> with
> ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-6 compression library - runtime
>
> gij-4.0 recommends no packages.
>
> -- no debconf information
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug java/24572] [4.0 regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:3983
--- Comment #2 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 20:16 --- Todays gcc-svn HEAD compiles the jar fine. On ppc darwin. Todays gcc-svn-gcc-4_0-branch fails with the below bt. Also on darwin. wolfram:~/Desktop] andreast% gdb /Volumes/export/gcc/gcc-svn/branch/testbin/libexec/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8.3.0/4.0.3/jc1 GNU gdb 6.1-20040303 (Apple version gdb-384) (Mon Mar 21 00:05:26 GMT 2005) Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "powerpc-apple-darwin"...Reading symbols for shared libraries . done (gdb) set args antlr-2.7.5.jar -fhash-synchronization -fuse-divide-subroutine -fuse-boehm-gc -fnon-call-exceptions -fkeep-inline-functions -feliminate-unused-debug-symbols -fPIC -quiet -dumpbase antlr-2.7.5.jar -auxbase-strip antlr.so -g -O2 -version -fclasspath= -fassume-compiled -o /var/tmp//cchNKeYh.s (gdb) r Starting program: /Volumes/export/gcc/gcc-svn/branch/testbin/libexec/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8.3.0/4.0.3/jc1 antlr-2.7.5.jar -fhash-synchronization -fuse-divide-subroutine -fuse-boehm-gc -fnon-call-exceptions -fkeep-inline-functions -feliminate-unused-debug-symbols -fPIC -quiet -dumpbase antlr-2.7.5.jar -auxbase-strip antlr.so -g -O2 -version -fclasspath= -fassume-compiled -o /var/tmp//cchNKeYh.s Reading symbols for shared libraries . done GNU Java version 4.0.3 20051103 (prerelease) (powerpc-apple-darwin8.3.0) compiled by GNU C version 4.0.3 20051103 (prerelease). GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072 Class path starts here: ./ /Volumes/export/gcc/gcc-svn/branch/testbin/share/java/libgcj-4.0.3.jar/ (system) (zip) Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. Reason: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at address: 0x0010 add_insn_after (insn=0x4b841ea0, after=0x0) at /Volumes/export/gcc/gcc-svn/branch/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/emit-rtl.c:3377 3377 rtx next = NEXT_INSN (after); (gdb) bt #0 add_insn_after (insn=0x4b841ea0, after=0x0) at /Volumes/export/gcc/gcc-svn/branch/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/emit-rtl.c:3377 #1 0x00131208 in emit_note_after (subtype=-84, after=0x0) at /Volumes/export/gcc/gcc-svn/branch/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/emit-rtl.c:4156 #2 0x002a0178 in tree_expand_cfg () at /Volumes/export/gcc/gcc-svn/branch/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/cfgexpand.c:1076 #3 0x0006d7d0 in execute_pass_list (pass=0x47c15c) at /Volumes/export/gcc/gcc-svn/branch/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/tree-optimize.c:526 #4 0x0006dae0 in tree_rest_of_compilation (fndecl=0x4a9b7080) at /Volumes/export/gcc/gcc-svn/branch/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/tree-optimize.c:661 #5 0x002c53dc in cgraph_expand_function (node=0x4c586780) at /Volumes/export/gcc/gcc-svn/branch/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/cgraphunit.c:835 #6 0x002c54d0 in cgraph_assemble_pending_functions () at /Volumes/export/gcc/gcc-svn/branch/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/cgraphunit.c:307 #7 0x002c5c00 in cgraph_finalize_function (decl=0x4a9b7080, nested=0 '\0') at /Volumes/export/gcc/gcc-svn/branch/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/cgraphunit.c:399 #8 0x00032690 in end_java_method () at /Volumes/export/gcc/gcc-svn/branch/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/java/decl.c:2048 #9 0x0004c184 in parse_class_file () at /Volumes/export/gcc/gcc-svn/branch/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/java/jcf-parse.c:925 #10 0x0004ebbc in java_parse_file (set_yydebug=1266949792) at /Volumes/export/gcc/gcc-svn/branch/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/java/jcf-parse.c:1423 #11 0x0027c454 in toplev_main (argc=1078864652, argv=0xb73f) at /Volumes/export/gcc/gcc-svn/branch/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/toplev.c:1010 #12 0x2348 in _start (argc=21, argv=0xb5c4, envp=0xb61c) at /SourceCache/Csu/Csu-57/crt.c:272 #13 0x21e8 in start () (gdb) [wolfram:gcc-svn/branch/objdir] andreast% ./gcc/xgcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: powerpc-apple-darwin8.3.0 Configured with: /Volumes/export/gcc/gcc-svn/branch/gcc-4_0-branch/configure --prefix=/Volumes/export/gcc/gcc-svn/branch/testbin --enable-java-awt=gtk,xlib --enable-gtk-cairo --disable-checking --enable-languages=c,c++,java --disable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 4.0.3 20051103 (prerelease) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24572 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug java/24572] [4.0 regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:3983
--- Comment #3 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 20:35 --- Forgot to add where it bombs w/o gdb involved: antlr/Parser.java: In class 'antlr.Parser': antlr/Parser.java: In method 'antlr.Parser.consumeUntil(int)': antlr/Parser.java:0: internal compiler error: Bus error Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24572 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug rtl-optimization/23567] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] if-conversion causes wrong code
--- Comment #7 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 21:00 --- Jakub, ping! What's up with this one? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337340: sentinel attribute should support non-NULL sentinels
Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.2-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream The sentinel attribute tells GCC to ensure that the argument list of a variadic function always ends with a final NULL argument. It should be possible to use this attribute for a variadic function where the sentinel is some constant other than NULL, as long as the value of the constant can be determined at compile time and supplied as a parameter to the sentinel attribute. - Josh Triplett signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Bug preprocessor/24202] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Segfault with #pragma once
--- Comment #14 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 02:10 --- Subject: Bug 24202 Author: wilson Date: Fri Nov 4 02:10:19 2005 New Revision: 106472 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106472 Log: Fix failure with pragma once where buffer is NULL and buffer_valid is true. PR preprocessor/24202 * files.c (_cpp_pop_file_buffer): Set buffer_valid to false. Modified: trunk/libcpp/ChangeLog trunk/libcpp/files.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24202 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug preprocessor/24202] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Segfault with #pragma once
--- Comment #15 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 02:12 --- Subject: Bug 24202 Author: wilson Date: Fri Nov 4 02:12:48 2005 New Revision: 106473 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106473 Log: Fix pragma once bug where buffer is NULL and buffer_valid is true. PR preprocessor/24202 * files.c (_cpp_pop_file_buffer): Set buffer_valid to false. Modified: branches/gcc-4_0-branch/libcpp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_0-branch/libcpp/files.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24202 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug preprocessor/24202] [3.4 Regression] Segfault with #pragma once
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 04:42 --- Fixed on the mainline and the 4.0 branch for 4.0.3 but is waiting for a back port for 3.4.x. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|3.3.3 4.0.1 4.0.0 |3.3.3 4.0.1 4.0.0 4.0.3 ||4.1.0 Summary|[3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression]|[3.4 Regression] Segfault |Segfault with #pragma once |with #pragma once Target Milestone|4.0.3 |3.4.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24202 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
