[Bug c++/22551] [4.0/4.1 Regression] [ICE] in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:3843
-- nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |nathan at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2005-07-18 17:27:27 |2005-10-13 11:52:39 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22551 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333733: libgcj6-awt: gcj-4.0 / libgcj: Assertion error while painting JFrame
Package: libgcj6-awt
Version: 4.0.2-2
Severity: important
I've found this bug at gnu's bugzilla, it is marked as fixed, but it
isn't in fact.
If you compile this code:
class test{
public static void main(String[] args){
javax.swing.JFrame gg = new javax.swing.JFrame();
gg.setBounds(200, 200, 200,200);
gg.setVisible(true);
}
}
like this: gcj test.java --main=test -o test
and execute it, there would be an error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./test
** ERROR **: file
../../../src/libjava/jni/gtk-peer/gnu_java_awt_peer_gtk_GtkImage.c: line
572 (createRawData): assertion failed: (data_fid != 0)
aborting...
Abgebrochen
It prevents a lot of programms working...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=de_CH, LC_CTYPE=de_CH (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages libgcj6-awt depends on:
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libcairo2 1.0.0-3The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library
ii libgcj6 4.0.2-2Java runtime library for use with
ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.1-1The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.10-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-2Layout and rendering of internatio
ii libxtst6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System event recording an
ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System client libraries m
ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime
libgcj6-awt recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/23797] [3.4 Regression] ICE on typename outside template
--- Comment #12 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:14 --- probably should be backported to 3.4 -- nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | Summary|[3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE|[3.4 Regression] ICE on |on typename outside template|typename outside template Target Milestone|4.0.3 |3.4.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23797 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333100: hppa: Fails to build kdebluetooth
merge 333100 323686 thanks Michael Meskes writes: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:43:56PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: > > > dcopinterface_skel.cpp:51: internal compiler error: in cp_expr_size, at > > > cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101 > > > Please submit a full bug report, > > > > Please send the preprocessed source, as obtained by adding -save-temps. > > Sorry, cannot do this easily. I do not have access to an hppa machine where I > can install all the needed build-depends. That's why I just provided the > link to the autobuilder log. > > If you guys don't have access to an hppa machine either I guess we have > to involve Debian admin people. yes, that's what every developer usually does. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/24348] [4.1 regression] bootstrap failure building libgcc
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24348 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327849: cannot handle identifiers with '$' character
Greetings and thanks! I've put this in to gcl 2.6.7-10 -- we'll see ... Take care, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > severity 327849 important > thanks > > -fdollars-in-identifiers work can be used as a workaround. see > http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24111 for the upstream report. > > > -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330595: Miscompilation with -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -funroll-all-loops
Greetings! My apologies, but time is quite tight. I barely found the time to file the original bug. The overhead to the bug submitter implied by: Camm, thanks for the increasing number of bug reports ;-) - please make sure to test with recent compiler versions (currently 4.0.1-9). - please check with optimization levels suggested by policy (-O2) - please check using gcc-snapshot. At least I cannot reproduce this with 4.0.1-9. Thanks, Matthias is quite high. Nevertheless, I'll try to get to it. Take care, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > severity 330595 normal > thanks > > Camm Maguire writes: > > Package: gcc-4.0 > > Version: 4.0.1-5 > > Severity: serious > > > > The following preprocessed file is miscompiled when compiled as follows: > > > > + /usr/bin/gcc -o ATL_F77wrap_ctrsv.o -c -DL2SIZE=4194304 > > -I/fix/t1/camm/debian/atlas/atlas3-3.6.0/include > > -I/fix/t1/camm/debian/atlas/atlas3-3.6.0/include/Linux_base_shared > > -I/fix/t1/camm/debian/atlas/atlas3-3.6.0/include/contrib -DAdd__ > > -DStringSunStyle -DATL_OS_Linux -DATL_GAS_x8632 -DSCPLX > > ../f77wrap/ATL_F77wrap_trsv.c -fPIC -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 > > -funroll-all-loops > > workaround, no feedback, non standard options, unreproducible, maybe I > should just close it ... > > > -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333733: libgcj6-awt: gcj-4.0 / libgcj: Assertion error while painting JFrame
Hannes Diethelm writes: > Package: libgcj6-awt > Version: 4.0.2-2 > Severity: important > > > I've found this bug at gnu's bugzilla, it is marked as fixed, but it > isn't in fact. interesting, for 4.0.2? Please tell us the upstream PR. thanks, Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/24348] [4.1 regression] bootstrap failure building libgcc
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24348 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333733: libgcj6-awt: gcj-4.0 / libgcj: Assertion error while painting JFrame
What is the upstream PR? Here are the links to smillar Bugs: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=324502 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-classpath/2005-08/msg00128.html With gcj-3.4, the programm shows a small Window and there is no exception. Am Donnerstag, den 13.10.2005, 15:53 +0200 schrieb Matthias Klose: > Hannes Diethelm writes: > > Package: libgcj6-awt > > Version: 4.0.2-2 > > Severity: important > > > > > > I've found this bug at gnu's bugzilla, it is marked as fixed, but it > > isn't in fact. > > interesting, for 4.0.2? Please tell us the upstream PR. > > thanks, Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333733: libgcj6-awt: gcj-4.0 / libgcj: Assertion error while painting JFrame
forwarded 333733 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23503 tags 333733 + upstream tags 333733 + fixed-upstream severity 333733 normal retitle 333733 [fixed in 4.1] libgcj6-awt: gcj-4.0 / libgcj: Assertion error thanks Hannes Diethelm writes: > What is the upstream PR? > Here are the links to smillar Bugs: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=324502 > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-classpath/2005-08/msg00128.html > > With gcj-3.4, the programm shows a small Window and there is no > exception. > > Am Donnerstag, den 13.10.2005, 15:53 +0200 schrieb Matthias Klose: > > Hannes Diethelm writes: > > > Package: libgcj6-awt > > > Version: 4.0.2-2 > > > Severity: important > > > > > > > > > I've found this bug at gnu's bugzilla, it is marked as fixed, but it > > > isn't in fact. > > > > interesting, for 4.0.2? Please tell us the upstream PR. > > > > thanks, Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#333733: libgcj6-awt: gcj-4.0 / libgcj: Assertion error while painting JFrame
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 333733 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23503 Bug#333733: libgcj6-awt: gcj-4.0 / libgcj: Assertion error while painting JFrame Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23503. > tags 333733 + upstream Bug#333733: libgcj6-awt: gcj-4.0 / libgcj: Assertion error while painting JFrame There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > tags 333733 + fixed-upstream Bug#333733: libgcj6-awt: gcj-4.0 / libgcj: Assertion error while painting JFrame Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream > severity 333733 normal Bug#333733: libgcj6-awt: gcj-4.0 / libgcj: Assertion error while painting JFrame Severity set to `normal'. > retitle 333733 [fixed in 4.1] libgcj6-awt: gcj-4.0 / libgcj: Assertion error Bug#333733: libgcj6-awt: gcj-4.0 / libgcj: Assertion error while painting JFrame Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329820: marked as done (gcc-3.4: DEB_VERSION when binary-only NMU)
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:45:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329820: Acknowledgement (gcc-3.4: DEB_VERSION when
binary-only NMU)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2005 15:07:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 23 08:07:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from www.gniibe.org (zanshin.gniibe.org) [192.47.44.103] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EIp9J-0005OU-00; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 08:07:41 -0700
Received: from gniibe by zanshin.gniibe.org with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EIp9I-0005TH-Eu; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 00:07:40 +0900
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1001809047=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc-3.4: DEB_VERSION when binary-only NMU
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 00:07:40 +0900
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===1001809047==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: gcc-3.4
Version: 3.4.4-8
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
It would be good if gcc-3.4 supports binary-only NMU for porters.
Suppose that the version of gcc-3.4 is 3.4.4-8. If we do binary-only
NMU, say, for the port m32r-linux-gnu with version 3.4.4-8.0.1,
gcc-m32r-linux-gnu package will depend on gcc-3.4-base (= 3.4.4-8.0.1).
It means, we cannot do binary-only NMU (virtually).
How about following patch (or something like that)?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Versions of packages gcc-3.4 depends on:
ii binutils 2.16.1cvs20050902-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii cpp-3.4 3.4.4-8 The GNU C preprocessor
ii gcc-3.4-base 3.4.4-8 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc62.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-8 GCC support library
Versions of packages gcc-3.4 recommends:
ii libc6-dev 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Development Librari
--===1001809047==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="gcc-binary-only-nmu.patch"
* debian/rules.conf (DEB_VERSION): Support binary-only NMU.
* debian/rules.patch (DEB_VERSION): Likewise.
-- NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 23 Sep 2005 22:31:00 +0900
--- gcc-3.4-3.4.4/debian/rules.conf
+++ gcc-3.4-3.4.4/debian/rules.conf
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
SOURCE_VERSION := $(shell dpkg-parsechangelog | awk '/^Version:/ {print $$NF}')
DEB_VERSION := $(shell echo $(SOURCE_VERSION) \
- | sed -e 's/.*://' -e 's/ds[0-9]*//')
+ | sed -e 's/.*://' -e 's/ds[0-9]*//' -e
's/\.[0-9][^.-]*\.[0-9][^.-]*$$//')
# epoch used for gcc versions up to 3.3.x, now used for some remaining
# libraries: libgcc1, libobjc1, libffi2, libffi2-dev, libg2c0
EPOCH := 1
--- gcc-3.4-3.4.4/debian/rules.patch
+++ gcc-3.4-3.4.4/debian/rules.patch
@@ -192,8 +192,8 @@
# debian/rules.conf isn't yet sourced
SOURCE_VERSION := $(shell dpkg-parsechangelog | awk '/^Version:/ {print $$NF}')
-DEB_VERSION := $(shell echo $(SOURCE_VERSION) | sed 's/ds[0-9]*//')
-
+DEB_VERSION := $(shell echo $(SOURCE_VERSION) \
+ | sed -e 's/.*://' -e 's/ds[0-9]*//' -e
's/\.[0-9][^.-]*\.[0-9][^.-]*$$//')
$(patch_stamp)-%: $(patchdir)/%.dpatch
if [ -x $< ]; then true; else chmod +x $<; fi
if [ -f $@ ]; then \
--===1001809047==--
---
Received: (at 329820-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2005 15:45:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 13 08:45:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQ5HJ-0005pV-00; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:45:58 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [1
[Bug preprocessor/24202] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Segfault with #pragma once
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.0/4.1 Regression]|[3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] |Segfault with #pragma once |Segfault with #pragma once http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24202 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333733: libgcj6-awt: gcj-4.0 / libgcj: Assertion error while painting JFrame
Hi Matthias, Unfortunately i can confirm that this bug is still present in Breezy Badger to. See http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13942 Only libgcj6-awt exhibit this problem. Kaffe and jamvm with latest classpath runs the programs normally. I think this can be a showstopper for a lot of people who wants to use gij under debian/ubunttu. Sanyi 2005/10/13, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > forwarded 333733 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23503 > tags 333733 + upstream > tags 333733 + fixed-upstream > severity 333733 normal > retitle 333733 [fixed in 4.1] libgcj6-awt: gcj-4.0 / libgcj: Assertion error > thanks > > Hannes Diethelm writes: > > What is the upstream PR? > > Here are the links to smillar Bugs: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=324502 > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-classpath/2005-08/msg00128.html > > > > With gcj-3.4, the programm shows a small Window and there is no > > exception. > > > > Am Donnerstag, den 13.10.2005, 15:53 +0200 schrieb Matthias Klose: > > > Hannes Diethelm writes: > > > > Package: libgcj6-awt > > > > Version: 4.0.2-2 > > > > Severity: important > > > > > > > > > > > > I've found this bug at gnu's bugzilla, it is marked as fixed, but it > > > > isn't in fact. > > > > > > interesting, for 4.0.2? Please tell us the upstream PR. > > > > > > thanks, Matthias > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
[Bug rtl-optimization/23453] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompilation of PARI/GP on x86 with gcse after reload
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-08-18 21:15:51 |2005-10-13 20:55:16 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23453 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333733: libgcj6-awt: gcj-4.0 / libgcj: Assertion error while painting JFrame
Sandor Bodo-Merle writes: > Hi Matthias, > > Unfortunately i can confirm that this bug is still present in Breezy Badger > to. > See http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13942 did I say something else? > Only libgcj6-awt exhibit this problem. Kaffe and jamvm with latest > classpath runs the programs normally. > I think this can be a showstopper for a lot of people who wants to use > gij under debian/ubunttu. no, a feature, which was not present before, cannot be a showstopper, neither for debian nor ubuntu. we are happy that we do have a _free_ java alternative, which works well with major applications like openoffice or eclipse. The fix is upstream and will be in 4.1, so please be patient. Matthias PS: please don't CC control on replies. > > Sanyi > > 2005/10/13, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > forwarded 333733 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23503 > > tags 333733 + upstream > > tags 333733 + fixed-upstream > > severity 333733 normal > > retitle 333733 [fixed in 4.1] libgcj6-awt: gcj-4.0 / libgcj: Assertion error > > thanks > > > > Hannes Diethelm writes: > > > What is the upstream PR? > > > Here are the links to smillar Bugs: > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=324502 > > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-classpath/2005-08/msg00128.html > > > > > > With gcj-3.4, the programm shows a small Window and there is no > > > exception. > > > > > > Am Donnerstag, den 13.10.2005, 15:53 +0200 schrieb Matthias Klose: > > > > Hannes Diethelm writes: > > > > > Package: libgcj6-awt > > > > > Version: 4.0.2-2 > > > > > Severity: important > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've found this bug at gnu's bugzilla, it is marked as fixed, but it > > > > > isn't in fact. > > > > > > > > interesting, for 4.0.2? Please tell us the upstream PR. > > > > > > > > thanks, Matthias > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323512: Tested patch
Howdy,
I incorporated Lennert's suggestion and created a patch that fixes the
problem on at least i386.
--
Matt
diff -ru gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15-old/debian/rules2
gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/debian/rules2
--- gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15-old/debian/rules2 2005-10-13 06:58:48.0
-0700
+++ gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/debian/rules2 2005-10-13 07:03:06.0 -0700
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
#docdir= usr/doc
cxx_inc_dir= g++-$(LIBSTDCXX_IF)
-ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM), linux)
+ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM), linux-gnu)
lib_arlib= libstdc++-$(LIBSTDCXX_IF)$(LIBC_IF)$(CXX_IF)-$(lib_version).a
lib_marlink = libstdc++$(LIBC_IF)$(CXX_IF).a.$(LIBSTDCXX_IF)
lib_shlib= libstdc++-$(LIBSTDCXX_IF)$(LIBC_IF)$(CXX_IF)-$(lib_version).so
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@
endif
# MULTILIBS is one or more of "gcc g++ stdc++ chill objc g77"
# MULTIDIRS is in the format "32" or "{m68000,m68020,m68040}"
-ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE),sparc64-linux)
+ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE),sparc64-linux-gnu)
CONFARGS += --with-cpu=ultrasparc
MULTIDIRS := 32
MULTILIBS := gcc
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
MULTIDIRS := 64
MULTILIBS := gcc
endif
-ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE),alpha-linux)
+ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE),alpha-linux-gnu)
MULTIDIRS := ieee
MULTILIBS += g77
endif
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@
ifeq ($(with_check),yes)
rm -f test-protocol
- ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM),linux)
+ ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM),linux-gnu)
-echo "Running testsuite ..."; \
if [ -e /proc/meminfo ]; then \
m=`awk '/^((Mem|Swap)Free|Cached)/{m+=$$2}END{print int(m*.9)}' \
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@
check:
rm -f test-protocol
-ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM),linux)
+ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM),linux-gnu)
-echo "Running testsuite ..."; \
if [ -e /proc/meminfo ]; then \
m=`awk '/^((Mem|Swap)Free|Cached)/{m+=$$2}END{print int(m*.9)}' \
diff -ru gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15-old/debian/rules.conf
gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/debian/rules.conf
--- gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15-old/debian/rules.conf 2005-10-13 06:58:48.0
-0700
+++ gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/debian/rules.conf 2005-10-13 07:03:21.0
-0700
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
include debian/rules.defs
# FIRST_PRIMARY - first gcc version built as primary compiler
-ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE),i386-linux)
+ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE),i386-linux-gnu)
FIRST_PRIMARY = 2.91.63-1.1
endif
ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),sparc)
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
if_config := $(shell cd $(srcdir); \
topsrcdir=$(srcdir); \
- target_os=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM)-gnu; \
+ target_os=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM); \
target=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE); \
enable_libstdcxx_v3=$(with_libstdcxx_v3); \
. config.if >/dev/null 2>&1; \
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@
LGP_PKG_SONAME = $(LGPSONAME)
endif
else
- ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM),linux)
+ ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM),linux-gnu)
PKG_SONAME = $(SONAME)-glibc$(GLIBC_VER)
LGP_PKG_SONAME = $(LGPSONAME)-glibc$(GLIBC_VER)
else
diff -ru gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15-old/debian/rules.defs
gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/debian/rules.defs
--- gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15-old/debian/rules.defs 2005-10-13 06:58:48.0
-0700
+++ gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/debian/rules.defs 2005-10-13 07:00:38.0
-0700
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
# build the libg++ library (deprecated)
with_libgpp := no
ifeq ($(with_gplusplus),yes)
- ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM),linux)
+ ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM),linux-gnu)
with_libgpp := yes
endif
endif
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
