Bug#319255: gcc-4.0: Please Include Fix for GCC Bug 22278

2005-07-21 Thread Matthias Klose
David Nusinow writes:
> Package: gcc-4.0
> Version: 4.0.1-2
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> 
> GCC bug http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22278 causes problems
> for the X.Org X server. We currently have a work around in place for the
> most noticeable issues, but code potentially displaying this problem is
> scattered throughout the X.Org codebase, particularly in different video
> drivers. If you would be so kind as to backport the patch in the bug above,
> we could re-build X.Org and avoid these problems. Thank you!

pending, waiting for the current package to enter testing.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319312: FTBFS: gcc-4.0 got ICE when compiling glibc 2.3.5-2 in experimental on m68k

2005-07-21 Thread Matthias Klose
GOTO Masanori writes:
> At Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:11:05 +0900,
> GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > The current gcc-4.0 can't compile the experimental glibc 2.3.5-2 with
> > unstable gcc-4.0 (4.0.1-2) on m68k, due to gcc-4.0's Internal Compiler
> > Error.  Note that this problem was not occured with gcc-3.4 (3.4.4-5)
> > with -O1/-O2/-O3.
> 
> You can test this problem with the attached source code which is
> generated by gcc-4.0 -E:
> 
>   gunzip 319312.c.gz
>   gcc-4.0 -O2 319312.c

I'm not going to fix that. Please see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2005/07/msg00033.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319328: [m68k] ICE: Segmentation fault with g++-4.0 -O2

2005-07-21 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-2
Severity: important

jigdo is failing to build with g++-4.0 on m68k with the following error:

g++ $cxx -c util/rsyncsum.cc -o util/rsyncsum.o
/usr/lib/gcc/m68k-linux-gnu/4.0.1/../../../../include/c++/4.0.1/bits/stl_bvector.h:
 In member function 'std::_Bit_type* 
std::_Bvector_base<_Alloc>::_M_allocate(size_t)':
/usr/lib/gcc/m68k-linux-gnu/4.0.1/../../../../include/c++/4.0.1/bits/stl_bvector.h:389:
 internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions,
see .
make[2]: *** [util/rsyncsum.o] Error 1

The full command being executed is

g++ -I. -I. -I./glibcurl -I./gtk -I./job -I./net -I./util \
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H \
-DPACKAGE_DATA_DIR="/usr/share/jigdo/" \
-DPACKAGE_LOCALE_DIR="/usr/share/locale" -DXTHREADS \
-I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include \
-I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 \
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -O2 -Wall -W \
-Wpointer-arith -Wconversion -Woverloaded-virtual -c util/rsyncsum.cc \
-o util/rsyncsum.o

so at least this bug appears to be unrelated to the other -O3 ICEs that
have been reported for m68k.

The unstable chroot on crest still has only g++-3.3 and g++-3.4
installed, with g++-3.3 as the default, so it would be a good idea if an
m68k porter could generate an appropriate test case for this bug.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #319087 to gcc-gnats as PR 22585

2005-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # submitted Debian report #319087 to gcc-gnats as PR 22585
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22585
> forwarded 319087 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22585
Bug#319087: internal compiler errors with -O and -mno-ieee-fp/-ffast-math while 
building xaos
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22585.

> retitle 319087 [PR 22585] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE with -O and 
> -mno-ieee-fp/-ffast-math while building xaos
Bug#319087: internal compiler errors with -O and -mno-ieee-fp/-ffast-math while 
building xaos
Changed Bug title.

> tags 319087 + upstream
Bug#319087: [PR 22585] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE with -O and 
-mno-ieee-fp/-ffast-math while building xaos
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #318534 to gcc-gnats as PR 22507

2005-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # submitted Debian report #318534 to gcc-gnats as PR 22507
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22507
> forwarded 318534 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22507
Bug#318534: GCJ segfaults building Apache Cocoon
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22507.

> retitle 318534 [PR 22507] GCJ segfaults building Apache Cocoon
Bug#318534: GCJ segfaults building Apache Cocoon
Changed Bug title.

> tags 318534 + upstream
Bug#318534: [PR 22507] GCJ segfaults building Apache Cocoon
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #318488 to gcc-gnats as PR 22132

2005-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # submitted Debian report #318488 to gcc-gnats as PR 22132
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22132
> forwarded 318488 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22132
Bug#318488: [PR 22132] upcasting a const class pointer to struct the class 
derives from generates wrong code
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22132.

> retitle 318488 [PR 22132] upcasting a const class pointer to struct the class 
> derives from generates wrong code
Bug#318488: [PR 22132] upcasting a const class pointer to struct the class 
derives from generates wrong code
Changed Bug title.

> tags 318488 + upstream
Bug#318488: [PR 22132] upcasting a const class pointer to struct the class 
derives from generates wrong code
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#315033: marked as done (dependency: libstdc++6-4.0-doc conflicts with libstdc++5*-doc)

2005-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:08:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315033: dependency: libstdc++6-4.0-doc conflicts with 
libstdc++5*-doc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2005 07:15:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 20 00:15:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.kapp-coburg.de [217.24.55.52] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DkGVG-0006xX-00; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:15:30 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.kapp-coburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 7C96886024; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:14:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.kapp-coburg.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.kapp-coburg.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 02228-04; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:14:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (l305.niles.de [192.168.105.236])
by mail.kapp-coburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 2690D8234B; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:14:58 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alexander Mader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dependency: libstdc++6-4.0-doc conflicts with libstdc++5*-doc
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:15:00 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at kapp-coburg.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libstdc++6-4.0-doc
Version: 4.0.0-9
Severity: normal


Hello,

first of all many thanks for packaging and maintaining the GCC!

libstdc++6-4.0-doc conflicts with libstdc++5*-doc while I feel they
should coexist like the according gcc-*-base.

Best regards,

Alexander Mader.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages libstdc++6-4.0-doc depends on:
ii  gcc-4.0-base  4.0.0-9The GNU Compiler Collection (base 

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 315033-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2005 12:08:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 21 05:08:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DvZrA-0001zc-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 05:08:52 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA02397;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:08:50 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999D3F2DC;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:08:49 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 01189-02; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:08:48 +0200 (MEST) 11349
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:08:48 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j6LC8mju001004;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:08:48 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:08:47 +0200
To: Alexander Mader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#315033: dependency: libstdc++6-4.0-doc conflicts with 
libstdc++5*-doc
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #307207 to gcc-gnats as PR 22587

2005-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # submitted Debian report #307207 to gcc-gnats as PR 22587
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22587
> forwarded 307207 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22587
Bug#307207: g++-4.0 - shared libraries built with -fvisibility=hidden likes to 
segfault
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22587.

> retitle 307207 [PR 22587] shared libraries built with -fvisibility=hidden 
> segfaults
Bug#307207: g++-4.0 - shared libraries built with -fvisibility=hidden likes to 
segfault
Changed Bug title.

> tags 307207 + upstream
Bug#307207: [PR 22587] shared libraries built with -fvisibility=hidden segfaults
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#317318: marked as done (gcc-4.0: objects compiled with -march=pentium4 unlinkable)

2005-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:44:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317318: gcc-4.0: objects compiled with -march=pentium4 
unlinkable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jul 2005 16:22:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 07 09:22:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ktown.kde.org [131.246.103.200] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DqZ8f-0001DW-00; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 09:22:13 -0700
Received: (qmail 26754 invoked by uid 1075); 7 Jul 2005 16:22:01 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Oswald Buddenhagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc-4.0: objects compiled with -march=pentium4 unlinkable
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:11:45 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.0-12
Severity: normal

about anything i try to compile fails at link time with a message like
this one if the objects are compiled with -march=pentium4:

/usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.a(Xinerama.o)(.gnu.linkonce.t.__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx+0x0):
In function `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx':
: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx'
../../src/common/.libs/libcommon.a(utils.o)(.gnu.linkonce.t.__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx+0x0):
first defined here
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.11
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages gcc-4.0 depends on:
ii  binutils2.15-7   The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  cpp-4.0 4.0.0-12 The GNU C preprocessor
ii  gcc-4.0-base4.0.0-12 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1 1:4.0.0-12   GCC support library

Versions of packages gcc-4.0 recommends:
ii  libc6-dev   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  libmudflap0-dev 4.0.0-12 GCC mudflap support libraries (dev

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 317318-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2005 12:44:40 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 21 05:44:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DvaPo-0003VT-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 05:44:40 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA10684;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:44:38 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233FAF2DC;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:44:37 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 11475-42; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:44:35 +0200 (MEST) 11348
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:44:35 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j6LCiZE9027251;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:44:35 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:44:35 +0200
To: Oswald Buddenhagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#317318: gcc-4.0: objects compiled with -march=pentium4 
unlinkable
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amav

Bug#316759: marked as done (Please add support for GNU/kFreeBSD)

2005-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:47:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316759: Please add support for GNU/kFreeBSD
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 16:27:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 03 09:27:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from farad.aurel32.net [82.232.2.251] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dp7JG-0007Ac-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:27:10 -0700
Received: from hertz.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:fc13:250:fcff:fe4c:da07])
by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1Dp7JE-GY-F5; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 18:27:08 +0200
Received: from aurel32 by hertz.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.51)
id 1Dp7Iz-0009Vu-VW; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 18:26:53 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Please add support for GNU/kFreeBSD
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 18:26:53 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.22
Severity: important
Tags: patch

Hi,

Please find below a patch to support GNU/kFreeBSD. Could you please
include it in the next version?

Thanks in advance,
Aurelien


diff -Nur gcc-defaults-1.22.orig/debian/rules gcc-defaults-1.22/debian/rules
--- gcc-defaults-1.22.orig/debian/rules 2005-06-27 15:36:46.0 +0200
+++ gcc-defaults-1.22/debian/rules  2005-07-03 18:15:40.0 +0200
@@ -126,6 +126,10 @@
 OS_NAME:= NetBSD
 endif
 
+ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),kfreebsd-i386)
+OS_NAME:= kFreeBSD
+endif
+
 # derived version number (without release)
 V_CPP  := $(shell echo $(CV_CPP)   | sed 's/-[^-]*$$//')
 V_GCC  := $(shell echo $(CV_GCC)   | sed 's/-[^-]*$$//')


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i586)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.3-11
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 316759-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2005 13:47:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 21 06:47:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DvbOO-00086m-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:47:17 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA24775;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:47:14 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45159F2DC;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:47:14 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 27089-43; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:47:13 +0200 (MEST) 11357
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:47:12 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j6LDlCHA019458;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:47:12 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:47:12 +0200
To: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#316759: Please add support for GNU/kFreeBSD
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0

[Bug libstdc++/22587] shared libraries built with -fvisibility=hidden segfaults

2005-07-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-07-21 
16:17 ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19664 ***

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22587

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug libstdc++/19664] libstdc++ headers should have pop/push of the visibility around the declarations

2005-07-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-07-21 
16:17 ---
*** Bug 22587 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
   ||debian dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319372: /usr/share/doc/libgcj5-common symlinks to gcc-3.4-base without dependency

2005-07-21 Thread Bryan Donlan
Package: libgcj5-common
Version: 3.4.4-5
Severity: normal

libgcj5-common creates a symlink from /usr/share/doc/libgcj5-common to
/usr/share/doc/gcc-3.4-base, but does not depend on any packages which
create /usr/share/doc/gcc-3.4-base, in violation of Debian policy,
section 12.3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-bd1
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libgcj5-common depends on:
ii  libgcj5   3.4.4-5Java runtime library for use with 

libgcj5-common recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319293: marked as done (bug in Package: gfortran)

2005-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:57:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319293: bug in Package: gfortran
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 2005 23:41:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 20 16:41:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from web32906.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.53] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DvOCN-0002HA-00; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:41:59 -0700
Received: (qmail 57750 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Jul 2005 23:41:28 -
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  
h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  
b=LxTJSADzMhd5p05qndFOrbMeXmepxxDhVQI3mO2nBq0HWPgxDSDYgLdT+9XbzzP3teT4vDZwBjmdvcW302lYxbpIx4xJQXldZcIeMPiGT8wSaTBBdR2ePzs1o6dWvfTB0FXAHyrGQNIsnA5JeQBrPj8JogFcWoTzTlKdrASdah0=
  ;
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [132.248.209.137] by web32906.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 
20 Jul 2005 18:41:28 CDT
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 18:41:28 -0500 (CDT)
From: Carlos Pineda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bug in Package: gfortran
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,
FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gfortran
Version: 4.0.0-2



Hello
its my first time reporting a bug. I started trying
the new

gfortran-4.0

and it seems to have some problem when executing a
code with a "SPREAD" function:


*
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/entanglement$ cat p.f90
program hey
  print*,spread((/5/),1,3)  
end program hey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/entanglement$ ifort p.f90 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/entanglement$ ./a.out 
   5   5   5
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/entanglement$ gfortran-4.0 p.f90 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/entanglement$ ./a.out 
Segmentation fault
*

or even

*
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/investigacion/entanglement$ cat
p.f90
program hey
  print*,spread(5,1,3)  
end program hey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/entanglement$ ifort p.f90 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/entanglement$ ./a.out 
   5   5   5
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/entanglement$ gfortran-4.0 p.f90 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/entanglement$ ./a.out 


(and stays there forever)


i am using debian testing. 



__
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis! 
Regístrate ya - http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com/ 

---
Received: (at 319293-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2005 16:57:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 21 09:57:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DveME-0008Rs-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:57:14 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA03791;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:57:12 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F93F2DC;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:57:11 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 27798-43; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:57:10 +0200 (MEST) 11365
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:57:10 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j6LGvAja016333;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:57:10 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:57:10 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#319293: bug in Package: gfortran
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reference

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #319309 to gcc-gnats as PR 22595

2005-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # submitted Debian report #319309 to gcc-gnats as PR 22595
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22595
> forwarded 319309 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22595
Bug#319309: g++-4.0 regression
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22595.

> retitle 319309 [fixed in 4.1, PR 22595] wrong warning: control may reach end 
> of non-void function
Bug#319309: g++-4.0 regression
Changed Bug title.

> tags 319309 + upstream
Bug#319309: [fixed in 4.1, PR 22595] wrong warning: control may reach end of 
non-void function
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> tags 319309 + fixed-upstream
Bug#319309: [fixed in 4.1, PR 22595] wrong warning: control may reach end of 
non-void function
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream

> reassign 319309 g++-4.0
Bug#319309: [fixed in 4.1, PR 22595] wrong warning: control may reach end of 
non-void function
Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `g++-4.0'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug target/22585] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in redirect_branch_edge

2005-07-21 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-07-21 
17:05 ---
Confirmed (at least the ICE in redirect_branch_edge and extract_insn,
I cannot reproduce the one in expand_simple_unop).

Reduced testcase:

=
struct A
{
  long double d;
};

int foo(struct A *p)
{
  if (p->d)
return 1;
}
=

This is related to PR22576.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed||1
   Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, monitored
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-07-21 17:05:45
   date||
Summary|[4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in |[4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in
   |expand_simple_unop  |redirect_branch_edge
   Target Milestone|--- |4.0.2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22585

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug c++/22595] [4.0 regression] wrong warning: control may reach end of non-void function

2005-07-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-07-21 
17:10 ---
This was already decided against being fixed for 4.0.x series.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22595

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#284793: marked as done (Undocumented "-profile" switch doesn't work)

2005-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 21 Jul 2005 19:15:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#284793: libc6-prof: Running programs compiled with 
-profile fails
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2004 20:18:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 08 12:18:11 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pc-3531.ethz.ch (kom-pc-aw.ethz.ch) [129.132.66.20] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cc8GI-ee-00; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 12:18:11 -0800
Received: (qmail 20166 invoked by uid 9289); 8 Dec 2004 20:17:39 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Arno Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6-prof: Running programs compiled with -profile fails
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 21:17:39 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6-prof
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-18
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

When compiling even only a hello.c with -profile, the executable does 
exit with an error message immediately. This makes the profile-library
completely unusable as far as I can tell. 

I did try to google for this problem (no applicable results) and 
had a look into  /usr/share/doc/libc6-prof/ (no information there).

Example:

E ~/exp/c/misc>cat hello.c
#include 

int  main() {
  printf(" hello \n");
}

E ~/exp/c/misc>gcc -profile hello.c 
E ~/exp/c/misc>a.out
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-version.c: 230: _dl_check_map_versions: 
Assertion `needed != ((void *)0)' failed!
E ~/exp/c/misc>

gcc is gcc version 3.3.4 (Debian 1:3.3.4-13)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages libc6-prof depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 284793-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2005 17:15:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 21 10:15:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DveeB-0004Cq-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:15:47 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA07205;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 19:15:44 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDE0F2DC;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 19:15:44 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 10242-32; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 19:15:41 +0200 (MEST) 11338
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 19:15:41 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j6LHFfSw027780;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 19:15:41 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 19:15:41 +0200
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Arno Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#284793: libc6-prof: Running programs compiled with -profile 
fails
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn

[Bug target/22585] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in redirect_branch_edge

2005-07-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
   GCC host triplet|i486-linux  |
 GCC target triplet||i486-linux


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22585

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319312: FTBFS: gcc-4.0 got ICE when compiling glibc 2.3.5-2 in experimental on m68k

2005-07-21 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:33:22 +0200,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> GOTO Masanori writes:
> > At Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:11:05 +0900,
> > GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > The current gcc-4.0 can't compile the experimental glibc 2.3.5-2 with
> > > unstable gcc-4.0 (4.0.1-2) on m68k, due to gcc-4.0's Internal Compiler
> > > Error.  Note that this problem was not occured with gcc-3.4 (3.4.4-5)
> > > with -O1/-O2/-O3.
> > 
> > You can test this problem with the attached source code which is
> > generated by gcc-4.0 -E:
> > 
> > gunzip 319312.c.gz
> > gcc-4.0 -O2 319312.c
> 
> I'm not going to fix that. Please see
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2005/07/msg00033.html

OK, should I submit bug reports to upstream directly?

Regards,
-- gotom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug target/22585] [4.0 only] ICE in redirect_branch_edge

2005-07-21 Thread uros at kss-loka dot si

--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si  2005-07-22 05:46 
---
I was trying to trigger the "unrecognizable insn" bug with gcc-4.1, because 
this bug should be fixed by the patch in PR22576.

I have tested:
gcc -O2 -mno-ieee-fp fractal.c
gcc -O2 -ffast-math fractal.c
gcc -O2 fractal.c
gcc -mno-ieee-fp fractal.c
gcc -ffast-math fractal.c
gcc fractal.c

And the same pack of compile options with testcase from comment #1.

In all cases, compilation was successful. The compiler was:
gcc version 4.1.0 20050716 (experimental), patched with patch from PR22576.

I'm updating the summary to reflect this.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

  Known to work||4.1.0
Summary|[4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in |[4.0 only] ICE in
   |redirect_branch_edge|redirect_branch_edge


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22585

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]