[Bug optimization/14700] [3.3.3/3.4/3.5 regression ] ICE in verify_wide_reg with global registers
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-29 10:27 --- The regression was introduced by: 2003-05-14 Eric Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * combine.c: Fix header comments. (distribute_notes): Remove usage of elim_i1, elim_i2. Propagate to all calls and prototype. which was backported to the 3.3 branch by: 2003-12-16 Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Backport the following patches from mainline. The assignment (MR_mr2) = 0; is wrongly deleted by the combiner. This probably means that global register variables are still broken. -- What|Removed |Added CC||echristo at redhat dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14700 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug optimization/14700] [3.3.3/3.4/3.5 regression ] ICE in verify_wide_reg with global registers
-- What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14700 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug optimization/14700] [3.3.3/3.4/3.5 regression ] ICE in verify_wide_reg with global registers
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-29 09:15 --- And even from 3.3.2. -- What|Removed |Added Known to fail|3.4.0 3.5.0 |3.3.3 3.3.4 3.4.0 3.5.0 Known to work|3.2.3 3.3.1 |3.2.3 3.3 3.3.1 3.3.2 Last reconfirmed|2004-03-23 22:55:17 |2004-03-29 09:15:29 date|| Summary|[3.3?/3.4/3.5 regression ] |[3.3.3/3.4/3.5 regression ] |ICE in verify_wide_reg with |ICE in verify_wide_reg with |global registers|global registers http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14700 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug optimization/14700] [3.3.3/3.4/3.5 regression ] ICE in verify_wide_reg with global registers
-- What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |critical http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14700 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug optimization/14640] [3.3 regression] miscompilation of mozilla-firefox (deallocator problems?)
--- Additional Comments From trentalg at aston dot ac dot uk 2004-03-29 16:09 --- I confirm the same problem when building Mozilla 1.7 (CVS) using gcc 3.4.0 2004-03-29 (CVS). The problem disappears after reverting the backport for PR10776 and re-building Mozilla. Unfortunately, this bug appears still unassigned maybe I'll file a new bug report specifically for gcc3.4.0 -- What|Removed |Added CC||trentalg at aston dot ac dot ||uk http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14640 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug optimization/14640] [3.3/3.4/3.5 regression] miscompilation of mozilla-firefox (deallocator problems?)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-29 16:29 --- We just did not know if this was also a 3.4 (or 3.5) regression at all, please do NOT file another bug. -- What|Removed |Added Summary|[3.3 regression]|[3.3/3.4/3.5 regression] |miscompilation of mozilla- |miscompilation of mozilla- |firefox (deallocator|firefox (deallocator |problems?) |problems?) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14640 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug optimization/14640] [3.3/3.4/3.5 regression] miscompilation of mozilla-firefox (deallocator problems?)
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-03-29 16:33 --- Gaby: are you aware of this regression on the 3.3 branch due to a backported patch? We could avoid this is we undo the regression by reverting the backport and simply stick with the breakage of PR 10776. Debian maintainers: I think this PR is enough in itself, we don't gain by opening more bug reports about the same problem. However, you could aid us some more by identifying which part of the file you named is miscompiled. For this you'd split up the file into multiple files that each have only one function, and do the same procedure you had for identifying which of the original files was the problem on the new one-function-only files. Thanks Wolfgang -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14640 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug optimization/14640] [3.3/3.4/3.5 regression] miscompilation of mozilla-firefox (deallocator problems?)
--- Additional Comments From trentalg at aston dot ac dot uk 2004-03-29 16:40 --- Andrew, I already submitted another bug and then got your reply sorry. Anyway, the application are different, although the behaviour is similar: this bug is about compiling Firefox while the new one I opened is about compiling the standard Mozilla browser. Actually, I haven't tried to compile Firefox. Maybe we'd better keep them separate. What do you say ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14640 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug optimization/14640] [3.3/3.4/3.5 regression] miscompilation of mozilla-firefox (deallocator problems?)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-29 16:37 --- *** Bug 14772 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14640 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
Bug#240550: libgcj4: Two sockets are created.
Package: libgcj4 Version: 1:3.3.3-5 Severity: normal Followup-For: Bug #240550 Running the program with strace shows that two sockets are created (fd 5 and 6). The second socket (fd 6) is the one that is later given an address with bind(2), the first socket (fd 5) is the one that is used in the select(2) call. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.20-xfs Locale: LANG=sv_SE, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE Versions of packages libgcj4 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.3.3-1GCC support library ii libgcj-common 1:3.3.3-1Java runtime library (common files ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.3-1The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii xlibs 4.2.1-12.1 X Window System client libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1-5compression library - runtime -- no debconf information
[Bug optimization/14640] [3.3/3.4/3.5 regression] miscompilation of mozilla-firefox (deallocator problems?)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-29 18:32 --- Since firefox and mozilla are so close in that they share so many files, the bug is the same as the same file exhibits the bug in both applications as they are very closely related programs. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14640 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug bootstrap/13562] [3.4 regression] bootstrap failure on m68k-linux
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-29 19:03 --- Subject: Bug 13562 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_3-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-29 19:03:24 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/m68k: m68k.c Log message: 2004-03-29 Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Backport: 2004-01-15 Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR bootstrap/13562 * config/m68k/m68k.c (output_move_const_into_data_reg): Clear cc status for NOTB/NOTW/NEGW methods. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-branch&r1=1.16114.2.957&r2=1.16114.2.958 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/m68k/m68k.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-branch&r1=1.76.2.2&r2=1.76.2.3 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13562 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug optimization/14700] [3.3.3/3.4/3.5 regression ] ICE in verify_wide_reg with global registers
--- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2004-03-29 19:25 --- Strange since the code I deleted was, in fact, optimization code for combine. So, my patch did _less_ than we did before. This is probably exposing a bug somewhere else in the compiler, but I'll take a look and see what i can find. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2004-03-29 09:15:29 |2004-03-29 19:25:55 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14700 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
Building gcc-3.3 package.
I'm trying to build the gcc-3.3 package but I seem to have a dependency problem building it. gcc-3.3 depends on gnat-3.3 | gnat-3.2 gnat-3.2 (gcc-3.2) depends on gnat-3.2 gnat (3.15p) depends on gnat (>= 3.14) gnat (<< 3.16) And I don't have any version of gnat. What I do have is gcc-3.3 version 3.3.3-0pre3. I can also build the gcc 3.3.3 source myself without package but that doesn't contain gnat either. Any suggestion on how I start building this without gnat. Kurt PS: I'm not on the list, please CC me.
Re: Building gcc-3.3 package.
Kurt Roeckx writes: > I'm trying to build the gcc-3.3 package but I seem to have a > dependency problem building it. > > gcc-3.3 depends on gnat-3.3 | gnat-3.2 > gnat-3.2 (gcc-3.2) depends on gnat-3.2 > gnat (3.15p) depends on gnat (>= 3.14) gnat (<< 3.16) > > And I don't have any version of gnat. > > What I do have is gcc-3.3 version 3.3.3-0pre3. > I can also build the gcc 3.3.3 source myself without package but > that doesn't contain gnat either. > > Any suggestion on how I start building this without gnat. there are gnat packages available in the archives, or: - edit debian/rules.defs, disable ada - debian/rules control then build the package.
[Bug optimization/14640] [3.3/3.4/3.5 regression] miscompilation of mozilla-firefox (deallocator problems?)
--- Additional Comments From 1319 at bot dot ru 2004-03-29 21:52 --- Why this bug is still UNCONFIRMED? I cannot compile mozilla using 3.3.4 20040328 too. Also 3.4.0 never compiles working mozilla (I tried many times from early 2004). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14640 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug optimization/14640] [3.3/3.4/3.5 regression] miscompilation of mozilla-firefox (deallocator problems?)
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-03-29 22:33 --- Uncomfirmed here only means that we have no small testcase, which is one of our requirements to put something into "confirmed" mode. It is certainly on our radar! W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14640 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
Re: Building gcc-3.3 package.
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 11:37:20PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Kurt Roeckx writes: > > I'm trying to build the gcc-3.3 package but I seem to have a > > dependency problem building it. > > > > gcc-3.3 depends on gnat-3.3 | gnat-3.2 > > gnat-3.2 (gcc-3.2) depends on gnat-3.2 > > gnat (3.15p) depends on gnat (>= 3.14) gnat (<< 3.16) > > > > And I don't have any version of gnat. > > > > What I do have is gcc-3.3 version 3.3.3-0pre3. > > I can also build the gcc 3.3.3 source myself without package but > > that doesn't contain gnat either. > > > > Any suggestion on how I start building this without gnat. > > there are gnat packages available in the archives, or: If there was one for this port (amd64) I would using it. > - edit debian/rules.defs, disable ada Doesn't that prevent me from building it the next time too? How do I also get gnat compiled? Kurt
[Bug bootstrap/12371] [3.4/3.5 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap error in make compare
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-30 00:51 --- So closing as fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|3.4.1 |3.4.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12371 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
