gcc-snapshot_20040110-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-01-10 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20040110-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20040110-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20040110-1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20040110-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20040110-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20040110-1_i386.deb
gcc-snapshot_20040110.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20040110.orig.tar.gz
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.




Bug#226975: gcc-3.3: Does not report version number

2004-01-10 Thread Matthias Klose
I'm wondering, if/why the version is derived from the version string
... what actually do you think is the bug?

David A. Bandel writes:
> Package: gcc-3.3
> Version: 1:3.3.2-4
> Severity: normal
> 
> Software that depends on versioning information from GCC doesn't work:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ openoffice
> OpenOffice.org for Debian - see
> /usr/share/doc/openoffice.org/README.Debian.gz
> running openoffice.org setup...
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/setup.bin:
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libgcc_s.so.1: version `GCC_3.3' not found
> (required by /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5)
> setup failed.. abort
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 3.3.2 (Debian)
>  ^^^
> note that line above doesn't include _3.3 expected by libgcc_s.so.1
> 
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
> Architecture: i386
> Kernel: Linux tole.pananix.com 2.6.0 #2 Fri Dec 19 12:27:27 EST 2003 i686
> Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
> 
> Versions of packages gcc-3.3 depends on:
> ii  binutils   2.14.90.0.7-3 The GNU assembler, linker and 
> bina
> ii  cpp-3.31:3.3.2-4 The GNU C preprocessor
> ii  gcc-3.3-base   1:3.3.2-4 The GNU Compiler Collection 
> (base 
> ii  libc6  2.3.2.ds1-10  GNU C Library: Shared libraries 
> an
> ii  libgcc11:3.3.2-4 GCC support library
> 
> -- no debconf information
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Processing of gcc-snapshot_20040110-1_i386.changes

2004-01-10 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-snapshot_20040110-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  gcc-snapshot_20040110-1.dsc
  gcc-snapshot_20040110.orig.tar.gz
  gcc-snapshot_20040110-1.diff.gz
  gcc-snapshot_20040110-1_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon




[Bug bootstrap/12371] [3.4 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap error in make compare

2004-01-10 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-10 
11:37 ---
It's been two months since someone looked at this.  Is the bug still there? 

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |WAITING
  Component|target  |bootstrap
   Keywords|wrong-code  |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12371

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




Incomplete upload found in Debian upload queue

2004-01-10 Thread Archive Administrator
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
  gcc-snapshot_20040110-1.dsc
  gcc-snapshot_20040110-1_i386.deb
  gcc-snapshot_20040110.orig.tar.gz
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.

If no .changes file arrives within 23:24:10, the files will be deleted.

If you didn't upload those files, please just ignore this message.

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon




[Bug c++/13544] [3.3.3 regression] "conflicting types" for enums in different scopes

2004-01-10 Thread gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-10 17:33 
---
Mine

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
   |dot org |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13544

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




[Bug target/13634] [3.3 regression] ICE in emit_move_insn_1

2004-01-10 Thread rosbacke at nada dot kth dot se

--- Additional Comments From rosbacke at nada dot kth dot se  2004-01-10 
19:00 ---
Good to see that the ICE got removed by the patch. But I'm afraid this might
lead us to cover the bug rather than fixing. I don't know much off gcc internals
but I can give you some notes from my work to create the second test case.

It seemed to be rather sensitive to acually perfoming floating point divisions.
For example replacing '1./3.' with '0.33' would remove the ICE. changing '* p /
3'  to '* p * 3' would remove the ICE. Also replacing 'pow( 1./ 3. )' with
'pow(1/3)' would remove the ICE.
Also it seemed important that 'while(i<6) ++i;' occured between 'p = ...' and
the return statement. Placing 'while(i<6) ++i;' above the assignment to p would
also remove the ICE.
>From these totally unscientific observations I would guess that we would have a
problem somewhere in the code that handles division of floating point numbers
with -ffast-math.
Maybe worth having a look at?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13634

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




[Bug optimization/11635] [3.3/3.4 regression] Unnecessary store onto stack

2004-01-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-10 
21:06 ---
Fixed for 3.4 by:
 2004-01-10  Jan Hubicka  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR opt/11635
* expr.c (expand_expr_real):  More curefully expand union casts.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11635

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




[Bug optimization/13634] [3.3 regression] ICE in emit_move_insn_1

2004-01-10 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

  Component|target  |optimization


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13634

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




Bug#226459: gcc returns "... might be used uninitialized in this function" where it shouldn't

2004-01-10 Thread Matthias Klose
Christian Neumair writes:
> On Fr, 2004-01-09 at 23:21 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > tags 226459 + moreinfo
> > thanks
> > 
> > Christian Neumair writes:
> > > Package: gcc-3.2
> > > Version: 3.2.3-9
> > > Severity: minor
> > > Tags: sid
> > > 
> > > the whole file can be found under:
> > > http://makeashorterlink.com/?S40724BF6
> > > 
> > > Do you need any additional information?
> > 
> > yes, please send the preprocessed source.
> 
> Attached.

Unable to reproduce this with gcc-3.2, gcc-3.3, gcc-snapshot on
current unstable. (using -Wall -W)




[Bug optimization/13634] [3.3 regression] ICE in emit_move_insn_1

2004-01-10 Thread rosbacke at nada dot kth dot se

--- Additional Comments From rosbacke at nada dot kth dot se  2004-01-10 
20:12 ---
My mistake. I thought the patch only covered integer operations. Good to see
this one is under control. Let us just hope it can appear in gcc 3.3.3. I can
live with gcc 3.2.3 until then.
 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13634

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




[Bug ada/13620] [3.3 regression] gcc -O3 -fprofile-arcs causes an array initalizer to be miscompiled

2004-01-10 Thread laurent at guerby dot net


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||laurent at guerby dot net


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13620

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




[Bug bootstrap/13562] [3.4 regression] bootstrap failure on m68k-linux

2004-01-10 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-10 
23:24 ---
Yeeech.  It would be sad to break m68k completely.  (Debian at least would 
probably not appreciate it.)  But I don't see any actual m68k maintainers in 
MAINTAINERS (except Jeff Law, who's undoubtedly too busy with other stuff). 
 
And now we have what, three bootstrap failures? 
 
Again, yeeech.  I don't know what to do here.  Maybe some m68k-linux hacker 
could volunteer to work on this? :-) 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13562

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




[Bug debug/11983] [3.4 Regression] ICE in dwarf-2 on code using altivec

2004-01-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords|patch   |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11983

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




[Bug bootstrap/13562] [3.4 regression] bootstrap failure on m68k-linux

2004-01-10 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-10 
22:50 ---
m68k is not a primary platform so this is not critical (agreed with pinskia). 

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|critical|normal


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13562

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




[Bug c++/13544] [3.3.3 regression] "conflicting types" for enums in different scopes

2004-01-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-11 
00:56 ---
Subject: Bug 13544

CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_3-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-01-11 00:56:02

Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog decl.c 
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup: enum1.C 

Log message:
PR c++/13544
* decl.c (build_enumerator): Set DECL_CONTEXT after the
enumerator
has been pushed.
(pushdecl): Don't use DECL_NAMESPACE_SCOPE_P to test whether a
decl has a namespace-scope; that isn't really what it means.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-branch&r1=1.3076.2.235&r2=1.3076.2.236
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/decl.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-branch&r1=1.965.2.70&r2=1.965.2.71
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/enum1.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13544

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




[Bug target/13634] [3.3 regression] ICE in emit_move_insn_1

2004-01-10 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-10 
17:39 ---
My patch for PR opt/13472 happens to make the ICE go away.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
   |dot org |org
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13634

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




[Bug ada/13620] would be nice if gnatmake passed -fprofile-arcs to gnatlink

2004-01-10 Thread charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-10 
21:46 ---
gnatmake not passing -fprofile-arcs is actually not a bug, but a
desirable enhancement.

Recategorizing accordingly.

Arno

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |enhancement
Summary|[3.3 regression] gcc -O3 -  |would be nice if gnatmake
   |fprofile-arcs causes an |passed -fprofile-arcs to
   |array initalizer to be  |gnatlink
   |miscompiled |
   Target Milestone|3.4.0   |---


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13620

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




[Bug bootstrap/12371] [3.4 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap error in make compare

2004-01-10 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-10 
22:49 ---
m68k is not a primary platform so this is not critical (agreed with pinskia). 

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|critical|normal


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12371

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




[Bug target/13634] [3.3 regression] ICE in emit_move_insn_1

2004-01-10 Thread gdr at integrable-solutions dot net

--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net  
2004-01-10 18:42 ---
Subject: Re:  [3.3 regression] ICE in emit_move_insn_1

"ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| My patch for PR opt/13472 happens to make the ICE go away.

Good! :-)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13634

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




[Bug target/13634] [3.3 regression] ICE in emit_move_insn_1

2004-01-10 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

  GCC build triplet||i686-pc-linux-gnu
   GCC host triplet||i686-pc-linux-gnu
 GCC target triplet||i686-pc-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13634

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




[Bug optimization/12441] [3.3 Regression] Can't spill register bug

2004-01-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
Summary|[3.3/3.4 Regression] Can't  |[3.3 Regression] Can't spill
   |spill register bug  |register bug


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12441

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




[Bug c++/13544] [3.3.3 regression] "conflicting types" for enums in different scopes

2004-01-10 Thread rschiele at uni-mannheim dot de

--- Additional Comments From rschiele at uni-mannheim dot de  2004-01-10 
16:57 ---
*** Bug 13639 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rschiele at uni-mannheim dot
   ||de


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13544

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




[Bug bootstrap/11060] [3.4 regression] [m68k] bootstrap error in libgcj

2004-01-10 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-10 
22:49 ---
m68k is not a primary platform so this is not critical (agreed with pinskia). 

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|critical|normal


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11060

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




[Bug c++/13544] [3.3.3 regression] "conflicting types" for enums in different scopes

2004-01-10 Thread gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-11 00:56 
---
just fixed

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13544

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




[Bug optimization/11635] [3.3/3.4 regression] Unnecessary store onto stack

2004-01-10 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-10 
13:03 ---
Not really ABI change.  GCC just overactively assign stack to cast into union. 
I am testing fix for this.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot
   |dot org |org
   Severity|critical|enhancement
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
  Component|middle-end  |optimization


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11635

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




[Bug ada/13620] [3.3 regression] gcc -O3 -fprofile-arcs causes an array initalizer to be miscompiled

2004-01-10 Thread laurent at guerby dot net

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net  2004-01-10 11:31 
---
A trivial workaround is to use "-largs -fprofile-arcs" when calling
gnatmake. The code generation bug is no longer present on mainline.

$ gnatls -v

GNATLS 3.4.0 20040105 (experimental) Copyright 1997-2004 Free Software
Foundation, Inc.

Source Search Path:
   
  
/home/guerby/work/gcc/install/install-20040105T165135/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.0/adainclude/


Object Search Path:
   
  
/home/guerby/work/gcc/install/install-20040105T165135/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.0/adalib/

$ gnatmake -f -O3 -fprofile-arcs drgnchss -largs -fprofile-arcs
gcc -c -O3 -fprofile-arcs drgnchss.adb
gcc -c -O3 -fprofile-arcs board_types.ads
gcc -c -O3 -fprofile-arcs print_board.adb
gnatbind -x drgnchss.ali
gnatlink drgnchss.ali -fprofile-arcs
$ ./drgnchss
--*---*---*-
-*-*-*-*-*-*




-*-*-*-*-*-*
--*---*---*-


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13620

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




Processed: [Bug ada/13620] [3.3 regression] gcc -O3 -fprofile-arcs causes an array initalizer to be miscompiled (forwarded from laurent at guerby dot net)

2004-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 226244 + fixed-upstream
Bug#226244: [PR 13620] [3.3 regression] gcc -O3 -fprofile-arcs causes an array 
initalizer to be miscompiled
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream

> retitle 226244 [fixed in 3.4] [3.3 regression] gcc -O3 -fprofile-arcs causes 
> an array initalizer to be miscompiled
Bug#226244: [PR 13620] [3.3 regression] gcc -O3 -fprofile-arcs causes an array 
initalizer to be miscompiled
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)




[Bug bootstrap/12371] [3.4 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap error in make compare

2004-01-10 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-10 
23:25 ---
can't debug this till the earlier one is fixed 

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

  BugsThisDependsOn||13562


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12371

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




Processing of gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds2-0pre2_i386.changes

2004-01-10 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds2-0pre2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds2-0pre2.dsc
  gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds2.orig.tar.gz
  gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds2-0pre2.diff.gz
  cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre2_all.deb
  libgcj-common_3.3.3-0pre2_all.deb
  libstdc++5-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre2_all.deb
  g77-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre2_all.deb
  gnat-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre2_all.deb
  gpc-2.1-3.3-doc_3.3.3.20030830-0pre2_all.deb
  gcc-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre2_all.deb
  gcc-3.3-base_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  libgcc1_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  cpp-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  protoize_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  fixincludes_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  gobjc-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  libobjc1_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  gij-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  libgcj4_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  gcj-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  libgcj4-dev_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  fastjar_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  libffi2_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  libffi2-dev_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  g++-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  libstdc++5_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  libstdc++5-3.3-dev_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  libstdc++5-3.3-pic_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  libstdc++5-3.3-dbg_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  libg2c0_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  g77-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  gnat-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  treelang-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  gpc-2.1-3.3_3.3.3.20030830-0pre2_i386.deb
  gcc-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon




[Bug optimization/11350] [3.3/3.4 regression] undefined labels with -Os -fPIC

2004-01-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-10 
22:07 ---
Patch here: .

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||patch


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11350

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds2-0pre2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-01-10 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre2_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre2_all.deb
cpp-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
fastjar_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
fixincludes_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fixincludes_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
g++-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/g++-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
g77-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre2_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/g77-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre2_all.deb
g77-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/g77-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
gcc-3.3-base_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-base_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
gcc-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre2_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre2_all.deb
gcc-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds2-0pre2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds2-0pre2.diff.gz
gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds2-0pre2.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds2-0pre2.dsc
gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds2.orig.tar.gz
gcj-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/gcj-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
gij-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/gij-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
gnat-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre2_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/gnat-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre2_all.deb
gnat-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/gnat-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
gobjc-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/gobjc-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
gpc-2.1-3.3-doc_3.3.3.20030830-0pre2_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/gpc-2.1-3.3-doc_3.3.3.20030830-0pre2_all.deb
gpc-2.1-3.3_3.3.3.20030830-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/gpc-2.1-3.3_3.3.3.20030830-0pre2_i386.deb
libffi2-dev_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/libffi2-dev_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
libffi2_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/libffi2_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
libg2c0_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/libg2c0_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
libgcc1_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/libgcc1_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
libgcj-common_3.3.3-0pre2_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/libgcj-common_3.3.3-0pre2_all.deb
libgcj4-dev_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/libgcj4-dev_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
libgcj4_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/libgcj4_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
libobjc1_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/libobjc1_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
libstdc++5-3.3-dbg_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/libstdc++5-3.3-dbg_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
libstdc++5-3.3-dev_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/libstdc++5-3.3-dev_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
libstdc++5-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre2_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/libstdc++5-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre2_all.deb
libstdc++5-3.3-pic_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/libstdc++5-3.3-pic_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
libstdc++5_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/libstdc++5_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
protoize_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/protoize_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
treelang-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/treelang-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 207516 224576 225663 226273 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.




[Bug bootstrap/13562] [3.4 regression] bootstrap failure on m68k-linux

2004-01-10 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO||12371
  nThis||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13562

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




[Bug bootstrap/11060] [3.4 regression] [m68k] bootstrap error in libgcj

2004-01-10 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-10 
23:20 ---
It was suggested that a similar fix to the one on ARM be implemented. 
 
Does anyone understand that code area well enough to try doing that?  If it 
works it would be nice and simple. 
 
(I don't.) 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11060

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




[Bug optimization/11635] [3.3/3.4 regression] Unnecessary store onto stack

2004-01-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords|ABI |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11635

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




[Bug target/12527] [3.4 regression] [arm] bootstrap error on arm-linux, miscompiling genconstants

2004-01-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|critical|normal


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12527

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




[Bug target/13634] [3.3 regression] ICE in emit_move_insn_1

2004-01-10 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-10 
20:05 ---
> Good to see that the ICE got removed by the patch. But I'm afraid this might
> lead us to cover the bug rather than fixing.

No, the patch is a valid fix: the compiler dies on a move between two FP
constants, which is generated because the reload pass generated a brain-damaged
move between a symbolic FP constant and its representation in memory!  My patch
fixes the reload pass.

> From these totally unscientific observations I would guess that we would have
> a problem somewhere in the code that handles division of floating point
> numbers with -ffast-math.

Optimization bugs are usually dependent upon the phase of the moon :-) so the
symptoms are in general not directly related to the cause.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13634

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.