Bug#212085: Build-dependencies cannot be satisfied in unstable

[Philip Blundell]

On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 23:58, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> It is a problem for us to ship binary packages that we cannot build.  What
> happens if we needed to do an urgent update on this package (e.g.,
> security)?  Or if a user needs to patch and rebuild it?

>From what I recall, fixing libstdc++3 to build on a modern system would
be distinctly non-trivial, so all we can do is remove it.  We could
patch the source to not attempt to build that part of the package,
leaving gcc-3.0 itself available as a compiler alternative for hppa, if
the PA folks feel that this is important to them.

p.

Re: updating gcc-3.3 to the final gcc-3.3.2 release for sarge

[Anthony Towns]

On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:34:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> gcc-3.3.2 is supposed to be release in early October. Since the last
> snapshot in Debian, at least one wrong-code-gen bug and one regression
> reported to the Debian BTS is fixed upstream (besides 10 other
> regressions).
> 
> Although the toolchain packages are frozen, I want to update the
> gcc-3.3 packages towards the final 3.3.2 release, to release with a
> released upstream compiler once the current gcc-3.3 packages have been
> moved to testing.
> 
> Please let me know, if there are arguments against this procedure.

As long as the changes are minor and we're sure they won't cause new
breakage it's not an issue. Going from 3.3.2pre4 to 3.3.2 /should/ be
minor. If it bumps shlibs or similar, it's more of an issue, but still
probably not a major problem. If it changes a soversion, that does become
a problem.

HTH.

FYI: Note that I've forced the current version of gcc-3.3 into testing
for tomorrow's dinstall; in spite of it being broken on arm, and unbuilt
on m68k. This will ease a bunch of problems, but is still causing major
hassles for Qt and KDE, so we still need a properly fixed gcc-3.3 ASAP.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

Australian DMCA (the Digital Agenda Amendments) Under Review!
-- http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/copyright/digitalagenda


pgpqb1udzFZCm.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Processed: Re: Bug#212248: gcc-3.3: build fail for libobj not including boehm-gc include files

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 212248 wishlist
Bug#212248: gcc-3.3: build fail for libobj not including boehm-gc include files
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> tags 212248 - patch
Bug#212248: gcc-3.3: build fail for libobj not including boehm-gc include files
Tags were: patch sid
Tags removed: patch

> tags 212248 - sid
Bug#212248: gcc-3.3: build fail for libobj not including boehm-gc include files
Tags were: sid
Tags removed: sid

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

[Bug preprocessor/12375] [3.3/3.4 regression] cpp inserting a spurious newline

[drow at mvista dot com]

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12375



--- Additional Comments From drow at mvista dot com  2003-09-23 12:59 
---
Subject: Re:  New: [3.3/3.4 regression] cpp inserting a spurious newline

On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 08:56:29AM -, debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot 
org wrote:
> Bug still there in cpp 3.4 20030911.

Try a newer snapshot, Alexandre fixed this.




--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.

[Bug target/11793] [3.3.1 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175

[david at avoncliff dot com]

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11793



--- Additional Comments From david at avoncliff dot com  2003-09-23 17:11 
---
I get the following similar error on i386 setup as cross compile to i386 
I assume it is the same bug, but if not I can submit more info. 
 
/home/david/smart/tools/uClibc/bin/i386-uclibc-gcc -I./include -Wall 
-Wstrict-prototypes 
-Wshadow -Os -march=i386 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -falign-functions=0 
-falign-jumps=0 
-falign-loops=0 -fomit-frame-pointer -D_GNU_SOURCE -DNDEBUG -c -o 
libbb/dump.o 
libbb/dump.c 
libbb/dump.c: In function `rewrite': 
libbb/dump.c:307: error: unrecognizable insn: 
(insn:HI 1049 918 1050 33 0x402a6e70 (set (reg:CC 17 flags) 
(compare:CC (const:SI (plus:SI (symbol_ref:SI ("lcc")) 
(const_int 1 [0x1]))) 
(reg/f:SI 110))) -1 (nil) 
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg/f:SI 110) 
(nil))) 
libbb/dump.c:307: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175 
 
notebook:/home/david/smart/busybox-1.00-pre2 # gcc --ver 
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-suse-linux/3.3/specs 
Configured with: ../configure --enable-threads=posix --prefix=/usr 
--with-local-prefix=/usr/local 
--infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --libdir=/usr/lib 
--enable-languages=c,c++,f77,objc,java,ada --disable-checking --enable-libgcj 
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/g++ --with-slibdir=/lib --with-system-zlib 
--enable-shared 
--enable-__cxa_atexit i486-suse-linux 
Thread model: posix 
gcc version 3.3 20030226 (prerelease) (SuSE Linux) 
 



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.

Bug#211082: marked as done (treelang-3.3: treelang frontend not installed.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:55:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line AW: Bug#211082: treelang-3.3: treelang frontend not installed.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2003 19:03:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 15 14:02:21 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gate.hpi.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.225.129] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19yyc8-0003Xf-00; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:02:20 -0500
Received: from gate (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by gate.hpi.uni-potsdam.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.10.2) with SMTP id h8FIxXw10630
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 20:59:33 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from owa.hpi.uni-potsdam.de ([141.89.225.101]) by gate; Mon, 15 Sep 
2003 20:59:32 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from 3MXMA1R.hpi.uni-potsdam.de ([141.89.224.242]) by 
owa.hpi.uni-potsdam.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
 Mon, 15 Sep 2003 21:02:18 +0200
Received: from fra.dcl.hpi.uni-potsdam.de ([141.89.224.158]) by 
3MXMA1R.hpi.uni-potsdam.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
 Mon, 15 Sep 2003 21:02:18 +0200
Received: from loewis by fra.dcl.hpi.uni-potsdam.de with local (Exim 4.22)
id 19yyc6-00022n-Br; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 21:02:18 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin von Loewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: treelang-3.3: treelang frontend not installed.
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.28
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 21:02:18 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Martin von Loewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Sep 2003 19:02:18.0334 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[E25CCFE0:01C37BBB]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_14
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_14 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: treelang-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre3
Severity: normal

The treelang package only contains the tree1 backend, but is missing
the treelang frontend (which probably should be installed as treelang-3.3).


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux fra 2.4.22-1-686-smp #1 SMP Sat Sep 6 00:06:59 EST 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages treelang-3.3 depends on:
ii  gcc-3.31:3.3.2-0pre3 The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-3.3-base   1:3.3.2-0pre3 The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6  2.3.2-7   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 211082-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2003 17:55:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 23 12:55:44 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gate.hpi.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.225.129] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A1rO4-0006Mi-00; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 12:55:44 -0500
Received: from gate (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by gate.hpi.uni-potsdam.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.10.2) with SMTP id h8NHqqw00787
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:52:52 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from owa.hpi.uni-potsdam.de ([141.89.225.101]) by gate; Tue, 23 Sep 
2003 19:52:50 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from 3MXMA1R.hpi.uni-potsdam.de ([141.89.224.242]) by 
owa.hpi.uni-potsdam.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
 Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:55:40 +0200
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Subject: AW: Bug#211082: treelang-3.3: treelang frontend not installed.
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:55:39 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Bug#211082: treelang-3.3: treelang frontend not installed.
Thread-Index: AcOBsu2bdPbNsX50Tw6lRKQ+x3SsXgASJE5w
From: "Loewis Martin von" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthias Klose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
   "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2003 17:55:40.0654 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[E6DD40E0:01C381FB]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.2 required=4.0
tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_2

updating gcc-3.3 to the final gcc-3.3.2 release for sarge

[Matthias Klose]

gcc-3.3.2 is supposed to be release in early October. Since the last
snapshot in Debian, at least one wrong-code-gen bug and one regression
reported to the Debian BTS is fixed upstream (besides 10 other
regressions).

Although the toolchain packages are frozen, I want to update the
gcc-3.3 packages towards the final 3.3.2 release, to release with a
released upstream compiler once the current gcc-3.3 packages have been
moved to testing.

Please let me know, if there are arguments against this procedure.

Thanks, Matthias

[Bug preprocessor/12375] [3.3/3.4 regression] cpp inserting a spurious newline

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12375


pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING


--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-09-23 
21:25 ---
Already fixed in 3.3 branch and the mainline, try again.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.

Results for 3.3.2 20030908 (Debian prerelease) testsuite on m68k-unknown-linux-gnu

[Matthias Klose]

LAST_UPDATED: Mon Sep  8 19:46:09 UTC 2003

Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/empty6.C  (test for warnings, line 6)
FAIL: g++.eh/spec3.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.eh/spec4.C  Execution test
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C  Execution test

=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes8052
# of unexpected failures4
# of unexpected successes   1
# of expected failures  94
# of untested testcases 23
# of unsupported tests  28
/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.2ds2/build/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.3.2 
20030908 (Debian prerelease)

=== g77 tests ===


Running target unix

=== g77 Summary ===

# of expected passes1686
# of unsupported tests  8
/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.2ds2/build/gcc/testsuite/../g77 version 3.3.2 
20030908 (Debian prerelease)

=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c,  -O1  
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c,  -O2  
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c,  -O3 -g  
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c,  -Os  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020418-1.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020418-1.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2f.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2f.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2f.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2f.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2f.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
-funroll-loops 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2f.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2f.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2f.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2g.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2g.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2g.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2g.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2g.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
-funroll-loops 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2g.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2g.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2g.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/string-opt-10.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/string-opt-17.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/string-opt-17.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/string-opt-17.c execution,  -O3 
-fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/string-opt-17.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/string-opt-17.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/string-opt-9.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.dg/20020312-2.c (test for excess errors)
WARNING: gcc.dg/20020312-2.c compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: gcc.dg/bitfld-3.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/bitfld-4.c execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/c99-flex-array-4.c sizeof != offsetof (test for bogus messages, 
line 24)
FAIL: gcc.dg/duff-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pack-test-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-A.c uninitialized variable warning (test for bogus 
messages, line 52)
FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-A.c uninitialized variable warning (test for bogus 
messages, line 53)
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/typeof-2.c scan-assembler baz3.*baz3.*baz3.*baz3.*baz3.*baz3

=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes21316
# of unexpected failures38
# of unexpected successes   1
# of expected failures  68
# of unsupported tests  177
/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.2ds2/build/gcc/xgcc version 3.3.2 20030908 (Debian 
prerelease)

=== objc tests ===


Running target unix

=== objc Summary ===

# of expected passes1153
/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.2ds2/build/gcc/xgcc version 3.3.2 20030908 (Debian 
prerelease)

=== treelang tests ===


Running target unix

=== treelang Summary ===

# of expected passes1
=== libjava tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: Array_3 -O execution - source compiled test
FAIL: Invoke_1 -O execution - source compiled test
FAIL: Invoke_1 -O execution - bytecode->native test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: SyncTest execution - bytecode->native test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: SyncTest -O execution - bytecode->native test
FAIL: TestProxy execution - source compiled test
FAIL: TestProxy execution - bytecode->native test
FAIL: TestProxy -O execution - source compiled test
FAIL: TestProxy -O executio

[Bug preprocessor/12375] [3.3/3.4 regression] cpp inserting a spurious newline

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12375


pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-09-24 
04:02 ---
Closing as fixed.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.

[Bug target/12371] [3.4 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap error in make compare

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12371


pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING


--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-09-24 
04:24 ---
Can you try again as the 9th is two weeks ago?



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.