Bug#175353: Many are architecture independent

2003-05-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Anthony DeRobertis writes:
> severity 175353 important
> thanks
> 
> On Wednesday, May 14, 2003, at 08:20 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> 
> >
> > Why is this filed as a serious bug? It causes harm (at least in theory,
> > if there are people who really share /usr/share with Debian) to have a
> > file incorrectly in /usr/share; it causes no harm to have a file
> > unnecessarily in /usr/lib.
> 
> Well, it causes lost disk space. That's really the only harm I can see.

Please don't forget to file reports against all packages not putting
headers in /usr/share/include, and one extra report for gcc not to
include this directory in the standard include path. Hmm, but only do
this for arch independent headers only.

Please can you close this report?

Thanks, Matthias




Bug#175353: marked as done (general: *-pic packages violate FHS)

2003-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2003 08:19:41 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#175353: Many are architecture independent
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2003 22:20:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 04 16:20:35 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ip68-100-128-98.nv.nv.cox.net (mx02.derobert.net) 
[68.100.128.98] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Uweh-000872-00; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 16:20:35 -0600
Received: from bohr.local ([192.168.65.5])
by mx02.derobert.net with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
id 18Uwef-00048e-00; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 17:20:33 -0500
Received: from anthony by bohr.local with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18Uwec-00061H-00; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 17:20:33 -0500
From: Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: general: *-pic packages violate FHS
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 17:20:30 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0
tests=PGP_SIGNATURE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: general
Version: N/A; reported 2003-01-04
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.1.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

mklibs expects _pic.map files to be stored in /usr/lib alongside the
library. These files appear to be architecture independent, and are
plain text (indeed, they are build scripts for the GNU linker). 

/lib is allowed to contain:
o object files,
o libraries,
o internal binaries that are not intended to be executed directly by 
users or shell scripts.
o subdirectories with architecture-dependent data exclusively used an 
application

The correct place for these files is /usr/share or /usr/src:
[/usr/share]
"The /usr/share hierarchy is for all read-only architecture
 independent data files."
[/usr/src]
"Any non-local source code should be placed in this
 subdirectory."

I'd suggest /usr/share as best; while they are source code, they're
pretty small snippets of it. I suggest putting them all in a common
directory like "/usr/share/mklibs", "/usr/share/ldmaps",
"/usr/share/picmap", etc.

mklibs would, of course, need to be modified to look in the new
location.

- -- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bohr 2.4.16 #2 SMP Wed Nov 28 05:25:00 EST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+F14x+z+IwlXqWf4RAsbdAJ4gpGtI5jz9v0rKFD2UWN+/eWRlUwCcDBRi
iUIlYN/ow1Vltz5fUK0VyCw=
=FoNo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---
Received: (at 175353-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2003 12:19:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 16 07:19:44 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 52.c1bccf.client.atlantech.net (Maxwell.local) [207.188.193.82] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19GeBc-00038m-00; Fri, 16 May 2003 07:19:44 -0500
Received: from fermi.vpn.local ([192.168.67.6] helo=suespammers.org)
by Maxwell.local with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19GeBb-0005Yk-00; Fri, 16 May 2003 08:19:43 -0400
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 08:19:41 -0400
Subject: Re: Bug#175353: Many are architecture independent
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,USER_AGENT_APPLEMAIL
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


On Friday, May 16, 2003, at 03:38 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:

> Please can you close this report?

OK; I'll accept that it's just a coincidence that some packages have 
this file the same on all architectures, and close this bug

Re: Processed: reassign: gcc -> glibc

2003-05-16 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 15 May 2003 16:33:10 -0500,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > reassign 25824 glibc
> Bug#25824: [PR other/6903] gcc could give better error message when /tmp gets 
> full
> Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `glibc'.

I don't understand why this bug is assigned to glibc.  Please explain
what the problem is.

Regards,
-- gotom




Processed: reassign

2003-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 180505 gcc
Bug#180505: kdelibs causes C programs' dlopen() to crash
Bug reassigned from package `kdelibs4-dev' to `gcc'.

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)




Bug#85468: gcc is correct

2003-05-16 Thread Herbert Xu
reassign 85468 fping
notforwarded 85468
quit

It looks like I miscalculated the alignment of the source argument.  Sorry
for the noise.
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt




Processed: gcc is correct

2003-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 85468 fping
Bug#85468: [PR target/9082] [alpha] memcpy makes unaligned access
Bug#169004: [PR target/9082] [ia64] fping makes unaligned mem accesses, 
emulated by ia64 kernel
Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `fping'.

> notforwarded 85468
Bug#85468: [PR target/9082] [alpha] memcpy makes unaligned access
Bug#169004: [PR target/9082] [ia64] fping makes unaligned mem accesses, 
emulated by ia64 kernel
Removed annotation that Bug had been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9082.

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)




no anonymous cvs access for debian-gcc

2003-05-16 Thread Jack Howarth
 Does anyone know if the anonymous cvs access to the
different branches of debian-gcc on cvs.debian.org has
been disabled on purpose? I am trying to checkout the
current gcc-3.3 package with...

cvs -z 9 -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/debian-gcc login

cvs -z 9 -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/debian-gcc co gcc-3.3

...which fails with...

? gcc-3.3/debian
cvs server: warning: cannot write to history file 
/cvs/debian-gcc/CVSROOT/history: Permission denied
cvs server: Updating gcc-3.3
cvs server: failed to create lock directory for `/cvs/debian-gcc/gcc-3.3' 
(/cvs/debian-gcc/gcc-3.3/#cvs.lock): Permission denied
cvs server: failed to obtain dir lock in repository `/cvs/debian-gcc/gcc-3.3'
cvs [server aborted]: read lock failed - giving up

Thanks in advance for any information.
Jack