Bug#157416: _Pragma() from macros - bug
Zack Weinberg wrote:-
> This was reported to the Debian bug-tracking system:
>
> $ cat foo.c
> _Pragma("foo"); int y;
> #define FOO _Pragma("foo"); int x;
> FOO
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cpp-3.2 foo.c
> # 1 "foo.c"
> # 1 ""
> # 1 ""
> # 1 "foo.c"
>
> # 1 "foo.c"
> #pragma foo
> # 1 "foo.c"
> ; int y;
>
>
> # 3 "foo.c"
> #pragma ; int x;foo
>
> > The first line is expanded correctly; the third is not (rendering
> > _Pragma almost completely useless).
>
> Do you have time to look into this, Neil?
I'll try to have a look this weekend.
Neil.
Re: GNAT and related packages
Phil Brooke writes: > Sam Tardieu recently orphaned a number of GNAT-related packages. > > I've posted ITAs on three of them: adacgi, adasockets and libgtkada. All > three have new upstream versions (and I need to remind myself what is in > the Debian policy regarding libraries). > > I might post ITAs on asis, gnat-glade and gnat-glade-doc. Less likely, I > might also take up gnat and gnat-doc. (Oh, and gvd. Long day.) > > Before I go any further, can anyone suggest what might happen to the > current gnat and gnat-doc packages, given that the source package gcc-3.2 > includes binaries gnat-3.2, libgnat3.15a and gnat-3.2-doc? > > What I'm really after here is some advice on where things might go with > the packages I'm considering. (I consider myself to be a very new > developer, so I'm trying to tread very carefully indeed!) you may want to take gnat and gnat-doc, as these are unmaintained. You are welcome to take care of gnat-3.2 and gnat-3.2-doc. For the latter two you would have to send patches to the gcc-3.2 source package.
gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb cpp-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb fastjar_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fastjar_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb fixincludes_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fixincludes_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb g++-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g++-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb g77-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb g77-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gcc-3.2-base_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-base_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gcc-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb gcc-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1.diff.gz gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1.dsc gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0.orig.tar.gz gcj-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcj-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gij-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gij-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gnat-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gnat-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb gnat-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gnat-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gobjc-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gobjc-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libffi2-dev_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libffi2-dev_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libffi2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libffi2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libg2c0_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libg2c0_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libgcc1_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libgcc1_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libgcj-common_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libgcj-common_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libgcj3-dev_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libgcj3-dev_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libgcj3_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libgcj3_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libgnat3.15a_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libgnat3.15a_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libobjc1_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libobjc1_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libstdc++5-dbg_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libstdc++5-dbg_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libstdc++5-dev_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libstdc++5-dev_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libstdc++5-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libstdc++5-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb libstdc++5-pic_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libstdc++5-pic_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libstdc++5_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libstdc++5_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb protoize_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/protoize_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 156734 157004 157982 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
gcc-3.2 override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libg2c0_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb: section is overridden from libs to devel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Bug#156734: marked as done (Build-Depends should accept gnat-3.2)
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:32:34 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#156734: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.1ds0-0pre1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2002 01:08:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 14 20:08:58 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mx3.fuse.net (mta03.fuse.net) [216.68.1.123] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17f98E-0002OM-00; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:08:58 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([216.196.128.205]) by mta03.fuse.net (InterMail vM.5.01.03.01 201-253-122-118-101-20010319) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 21:09:50 -0400 Subject: Build-Depends should accept gnat-3.2 From: Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7 Date: 14 Aug 2002 21:08:47 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 3.2ds0-0pre4 The Build-Depends in debian/control should have gnat-3.1 [!arm !hurd-i386 !m68k] | .gnat-3.2 [!arm !hurd-i386 !m68k] since gcc-3.2 might already be installed. --- Received: (at 156734-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Aug 2002 16:38:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 30 11:38:56 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17konP-0003ck-00; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:38:56 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 17kohG-0003H2-00; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:32:34 -0400 From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $ Subject: Bug#156734: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.1ds0-0pre1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:32:34 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gcc-3.2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb cpp-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb fastjar_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fastjar_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb fixincludes_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fixincludes_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb g++-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g++-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb g77-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb g77-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gcc-3.2-base_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-base_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gcc-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb gcc-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1.diff.gz gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1.dsc gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0.orig.tar.gz gcj-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcj-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gij-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gij-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gnat-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gnat-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb gnat-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gnat-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gobjc-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gobjc-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libffi2-dev_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libffi2-dev_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libffi2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libffi2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libg2c0_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libg2c0_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libgcc1_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libgcc1_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libgcj-common_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libgcj-common_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libgcj3-dev_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libgcj3-dev_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libgcj3_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libgcj3_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libgnat3.15a_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libgnat3.15a_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.de
Bug#157004: marked as done (versioned dependency on libc6-dev breaks install on the Hurd)
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:32:34 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#157004: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.1ds0-0pre1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2002 00:08:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 16 19:08:58 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from porta.u64.de [194.77.88.106] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17fr9F-0004rZ-00; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 19:08:58 -0500 Received: from (ulysses) [212.23.136.22] by porta.u64.de with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17fs2w-0003vn-00; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 03:06:30 +0200 Received: from marcus by ulysses with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17fr9B-kC-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 02:08:53 +0200 Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 02:08:53 +0200 From: Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: versioned dependency on libc6-dev breaks install on the Hurd Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libstdc++5-dev Version: n/a Hi, there is a versioned dependency on libc6-dev, but we have libc0.3-dev in Debian GNU/Hurd. This breaks installation of the package (we provide libc6-dev, but that doesn't work with versioned dependencies). Thanks, Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/ --- Received: (at 157004-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Aug 2002 16:38:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 30 11:38:08 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17komb-0003VO-00; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:38:05 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 17kohG-0003H5-00; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:32:34 -0400 From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $ Subject: Bug#157004: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.1ds0-0pre1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:32:34 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gcc-3.2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb cpp-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb fastjar_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fastjar_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb fixincludes_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fixincludes_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb g++-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g++-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb g77-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb g77-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gcc-3.2-base_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-base_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gcc-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb gcc-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1.diff.gz gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1.dsc gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0.orig.tar.gz gcj-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcj-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gij-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gij-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gnat-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gnat-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb gnat-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gnat-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gobjc-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gobjc-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libffi2-dev_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libffi2-dev_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libffi2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libffi2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libg2c0_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libg2c0_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb libgcc1_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/mai
Bug#157982: marked as done (gcj-3.2: bashism in gcj-wrapper-3.2)
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:32:34 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#157982: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.1ds0-0pre1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2002 20:40:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 23 15:40:04 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.19] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17iLDt-0003uE-00; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 15:40:02 -0500 Received: from fwd08.sul.t-online.de by mailout06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 17iLDq-000150-01; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 22:39:58 +0200 Received: from the-merlin.admingilde.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by fmrl08.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 17iLDp-04zM1IC; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 22:39:57 +0200 Received: from pergament.admingilde.org (pergament.talinet [192.168.69.5]) by the-merlin.admingilde.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD51FD5A; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 22:39:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pergament.admingilde.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D29D4F43B; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 22:39:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: gcj-3.2: bashism in gcj-wrapper-3.2 From: "Martin Waitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.50 Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 22:39:55 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcj-3.2 Version: 1:3.2-0pre4 Severity: normal hi :) gcj-wrapper-3.2 uses '==' in test expressions. Please use a single '=' instead See test(1) for details. thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux pergament 2.4.19 #1 Don Aug 15 23:16:31 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages gcj-3.2 depends on: ii gcc-3.2 1:3.2-0pre4 The GNU C compiler. ii gcc-3.2-base 1:3.2-0pre4 The GNU Compiler Collection (base ii java-common 0.14Base of all Java packages ii libc62.2.5-14GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.2-0pre4 GCC support library. ii libgcj3 1:3.2-0pre4 Java runtime library for use with ii libgcj3-dev 1:3.2-0pre4 Java development headers and stati ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-3 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 157982-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Aug 2002 16:38:57 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 30 11:38:57 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17konQ-0003cz-00; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:38:56 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 17kohG-0003H8-00; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:32:34 -0400 From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $ Subject: Bug#157982: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.1ds0-0pre1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:32:34 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gcc-3.2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb cpp-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb fastjar_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fastjar_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb fixincludes_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fixincludes_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb g++-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g++-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb g77-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb g77-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gcc-3.2-base_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-base_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gcc-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-doc_3.2.1-0pre1_all.deb gcc-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_i386.deb gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1.diff.gz gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1.dsc gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0.orig.tar.gz to pool
Re: GNAT and related packages
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: > The current gnat (3.14p) has passed validation tests This is not correct. The Debian version hasn't passed *any* validation tests. > and it is the latest stable release of gnat. It is the latest public ACT release. > And it is likely to be official one for a long time until the one > from the GCC tree become as stable as the current one. The latest FSF release (and the most stable one, I believe, both GCC 3.1 and 3.1.1 are very similar to it) is GCC 3.2.
Re: GNAT and related packages
Phil Brooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What I'm really after here is some advice on where things might go with > the packages I'm considering. GNAT 3.14p and GNAT in GCC 3.2 are not ABI compatible. GNAT in GCC 3.2 is not complete, ASIS and GLADE are missing. GNAT in GCC 3.2 has bugs which prevents it from compiling other packages which are in Debian (e.g. the currently packaged version of GtkAda). I don't think packaging libraries for GNAT in GCC 3.2 is worth the trouble. Developers who want to use GCC 3 technology should upgrade to GCC 3.3, which contains an updated version of GNAT, and I've read reports that this version is more close to being usable than previous GCC 3 versions (but still no comparison to GNAT 3.14p). There is no indication on the timeframe in which GCC 3 GNAT will be complete (ASIS, GLADE and Florist support), GDB support will arrive in the GDB CVS, and the many open bugs in the GCC BTS will be even looked at by the maintainers.
Re: GNAT and related packages
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: > >> The current gnat (3.14p) has passed validation tests > > This is not correct. The Debian version hasn't passed *any* > validation tests. I don't get it. The debian package is built from the ACT source. >> and it is the latest stable release of gnat. > > It is the latest public ACT release. Yes. >> And it is likely to be official one for a long time until the one >> from the GCC tree become as stable as the current one. > > The latest FSF release (and the most stable one, I believe, both GCC > 3.1 and 3.1.1 are very similar to it) is GCC 3.2. The most stable one? There are many annoying bugs IIRC. -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org
Re: GNAT and related packages
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: >> This is not correct. The Debian version hasn't passed *any* >> validation tests. > > I don't get it. The debian package is built from the ACT > source. Yes, but it links against a different libc version. This *can* make a difference, especially in tasking. The bootstrapping process can introduce additional errors, too. In addition, there were known bugs in the pthreads-based tasking support which prevents successful conpletation of all ACATS tests. AFAIK, these problems remain in 3.14p, and only the run-time library based FSU Threads was ever validated. >> The latest FSF release (and the most stable one, I believe, both GCC >> 3.1 and 3.1.1 are very similar to it) is GCC 3.2. > > The most stable one? There are many annoying bugs IIRC. There aren't any other FSF releases (besides 3.1 and 3.1.1), so it is the most stable one. ;-)
Re: GNAT and related packages
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: > >>> This is not correct. The Debian version hasn't passed *any* >>> validation tests. >> >> I don't get it. The debian package is built from the ACT >> source. > > Yes, but it links against a different libc version. This *can* make a > difference, especially in tasking. The bootstrapping process can > introduce additional errors, too. Sure. But the source was at least very well tested. This is all we can guarantee. > In addition, there were known bugs in the pthreads-based tasking > support which prevents successful conpletation of all ACATS tests. > AFAIK, these problems remain in 3.14p, and only the run-time library > based FSU Threads was ever validated. Ah OK. >>> The latest FSF release (and the most stable one, I believe, both GCC >>> 3.1 and 3.1.1 are very similar to it) is GCC 3.2. >> >> The most stable one? There are many annoying bugs IIRC. > > There aren't any other FSF releases (besides 3.1 and 3.1.1), so it is > the most stable one. ;-) The problem is that ACT people have never really told about what they plan for the FSF release. -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org
arm-tune.dpatch
Hmm, where did this change come from? * debian/patches/arm-tune.dpatch: Increase stack limit for configure. It seems to be breaking the build: I can't find any version of autoconf that actually understands the -L option. Matthias, any idea? p.
