Bug#100447: marked as done (gcc-3.0-doc: Installation fails)
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jun 2001 20:54:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 10 15:54:04 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vitelus.com [:::64.81.36.147] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 159CDj-0003br-00; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 15:54:04 -0500 Received: from endquote ([192.168.2.2]) by vitelus.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 159CDc-0007ZK-00; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 13:53:56 -0700 Received: by endquote (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 10 Jun 2001 13:53:56 -0700 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 13:53:56 -0700 From: Aaron Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gcc-3.0-doc: Installation fails To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-3.0-doc Version: 1:3.0-0pre010609 Severity: serious Setting up gcc-3.0-doc (3.0-0pre010609) ... sh: /usr/share/info/c-tree-300.info.gz: No such file or directory install-info: read gzip -d From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 15 02:03:00 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15AndD-0006pJ-00; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 02:02:59 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA23073; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5F6vtv01211; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) unstable; urgency=low * Update patches for recent (010613 23:13 +0200) CVS sources. * Fix packaging bugs (#100459, #100447, #100483). * Build-Depend on gawk, mawk doesn't work well with test_summary.
Bug#100459: marked as done (Installation of gcc-3.0-doc fails)
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jun 2001 23:16:12 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 10 18:16:11 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailhub.stusta.mhn.de) [:::141.84.69.5] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 159ERG-0004Mj-00; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 18:16:10 -0500 Received: (qmail 11505 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2001 23:16:05 - Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144) by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 10 Jun 2001 23:16:05 - Received: from bunk by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 159ER1-0001Zl-00; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 01:15:55 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Installation of gcc-3.0-doc fails X-Reportbug-Version: 1.17 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.17 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 01:15:55 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-3.0-doc Version: 1:3.0-0pre010609 Severity: grave Setting up gcc-3.0-doc (3.0-0pre010609) ... sh: /usr/share/info/c-tree-300.info.gz: No such file or directory install-info: read gzip -d From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 15 02:03:00 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15AndD-0006pJ-00; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 02:02:59 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA23073; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5F6vtv01211; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) unstable; urgency=low * Update patches for recent (010613 23:13 +0200) CVS sources. * Fix packaging bugs (#100459, #100447, #100483). * Build-Depend on gawk, mawk doesn't work well with test_summary.
Bug#100863: marked as done (Instalation problem: c-tree-300.info.gz don't exist)
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2001 15:44:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 14 10:44:15 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pb220.legnica.sdi.tpnet.pl (tavaiah) [:::213.25.230.220] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15AZI4-0002h1-00; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:44:15 -0500 Received: from taw by tavaiah with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15AZ9I-0001GS-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:35:08 +0200 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:35:06 +0200 From: Tomasz Wegrzanowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Instalation problem: c-tree-300.info.gz don't exist Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i Sender: Debian User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-3.0-doc Version: 3.0-0pre010609 Severity: important Setting up gcc-3.0-doc (3.0-0pre010609) ... sh: /usr/share/info/c-tree-300.info.gz: No such file or directory install-info: read gzip -d From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 15 02:03:00 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15AndD-0006pJ-00; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 02:02:59 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA23073; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5F6vtv01211; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) unstable; urgency=low * Update patches for recent (010613 23:13 +0200) CVS sources. * Fix packaging bugs (#100459, #100447, #100483). * Build-Depend on gawk, mawk doesn't work well with test_summary.
Bug#100483: marked as done (gcc-3.0-doc: dangling symbolic link)
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2001 08:09:01 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 03:09:01 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from urc1.cc.kuleuven.ac.be [:::134.58.10.3] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 159Mku-0007XX-00; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 03:09:00 -0500 Received: from debian (tvd-10-67-20-084.tvd.kotnet.kuleuven.ac.be [10.67.20.84]) by urc1.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.10.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id f5B88jw228972 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:08:45 +0200 Received: from debian ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost ident=michael) by debian with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 159Mke-0001Jv-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:08:44 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcc-3.0-doc: dangling symbolic link From: Michael Osamu Shiobara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.1 (AOI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:08:42 +0200 X-Dispatcher: imput version 2414(IM141) Lines: 25 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-3.0-doc Version: 1:3.0-0pre010609 Severity: normal Hello, This package creates a dangling symbolic link as follows: dangling: /usr/share/doc/gcc-3.0-base/gcc-300.info.gz -> ../../info/gcc-3.0.info.gz `/usr/share/info/gcc-3.0.info.gz' does not exist. This link should refer to `/usr/share/info/gcc-300.info.gz' instead. Thank you for your packaging efforts. Best regards, Michael -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux debian 2.4.5 #1 Wed May 30 12:03:16 CEST 2001 i686 unknown Versions of the packages gcc-3.0-doc depends on: ii gcc-3.0-base 3.0-0pre010609 The GNU compiler collection (base package). --- Received: (at 100483-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2001 07:03:00 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 15 02:03:00 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15AndD-0006pJ-00; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 02:02:59 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA23073; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5F6vtv01211; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) unstable; urgency=low * Update patches for recent (010613 23:13 +0200) CVS sources. * Fix packaging bugs (#100459, #100447, #100483). * Build-Depend on gawk, mawk doesn't work well with test_summary.
Re: gcc-3.0 update
severity 100696 normal retitle 100696 [m68k] official release won't work on m68k, bootstrap error thanks Roman Zippel writes: > Hi, > > Matthias Klose wrote: > > > m68k- status unknown, no build reports upstream (May, June) > > I will be very likely that the official release won't work on m68k, but > I can provide patches to get it working. > It's also important to note that it needs the very latest binutils > release (2.11.90.0.15). Thanks! I'll downgrade #100696, if it's known not to build on m68k.
Bug#100983: gcc-3.0-010613 refuses to compile programs
Package: libgcc0 Version: 3.0-0pre010613 Severity: critical Hi, gcc-3.0_3.0-0pre010613 contains lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2001-06-14 03:05:57 ./usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0/libgcc_s.so -> /lib/libgcc_s.so.0 while libgcc0_3.0-0pre010613 contains -rw-r--r-- root/root 27036 2001-06-14 03:04:26 ./lib/libgcc_s.so.1 So either symlink is wrong (in this case reassign it to gcc-3.0), or it should be libgcc_s.so.0, or this package should change name to libgcc1 to allow coexistence with old libgcc0... This change broke all programs compiled with gcc-3.0 on my box (I know, no backward compatibility...), and I could not compile anything new. So I renamed gcc_s.so.1 to gcc_s.so.0. I'm using critical severity as I just found that I cannot send this report because of sendmail depends on /lib/libgcc_s.so.0 :-( Thanks, Petr Vandrovec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#100988: libgcc_s.so points to nowhere
Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 1:3.0-0pre010613 /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0/libgcc_s.so -> /lib/libgcc_s.so.0 while libgcc0 contains: /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 Please fix the inconsistency. This results in a very unintuitive: $ gcj-3.0 Hello.java --main=Hello /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s collect2: ld returned 1 exit status -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GE d+ s:- a-- C+ UL P- L+++ E W++ N o-- K- w++ O- M- V-- PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP+ t-- 5 X-- R* tv- b+ DI- D++ G e h* r% !y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
New gcc-3.0 hppa patch
Hi debian-gcc, I have placed the latest hppa patch for gcc-3.0 at, http://www.parisc-linux.org/~taggart/0613/hppa-build.dpatch It applies ok(some offsets) against version 3.0.ds8-0pre010613 of the package. In addition to this patch I had to add hppa to the Java disable section of rules.defs. Could someone please add these things to the next version? BTW- This is a g++ abi event for hppa but we've got a plan to deal with it. Thanks, -- Matt TaggartLinux Development Lab [EMAIL PROTECTED] HP Linux Systems Operation
Bug#101069: ld cannot find -lgcc_s
Package: gcj-3.0
Version: 1:3.0-0pre010613
Taking a simple Java program as follows:
---8<---
public class Hello {
public static void main(String[] argv) {
System.out.println("Hello, World!");
}
}
---8<---
And trying to compile it with gcj-3.0 gives the following error:
---8<---
evan priss:~/tmp$ gcj-3.0 --main=Hello -o Hello Hello.java
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
---8<---
I thought there might be something wrong with the entire compilation
system, so I tried to compile a short C file:
---8<---
#include
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
printf("Hello, World!\n");
return 0;
}
---8<---
...which worked fine:
---8<---
evan priss:~/tmp$ gcc-3.0 -o hello hello.c
evan priss:~/tmp$ ./hello
Hello, World!
---8<---
By the way, there -is- a libgcc_s available:
---8<---
evan priss:~/tmp$ find /usr/lib -name *libgcc_s*
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0/libgcc_s.so
---8<---
Suggestions and/or a fix would be lovely. B-)
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
