removal of obsolete gcc packages

2001-05-24 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: important

please remove the following gcc packages for all architecures in
testing and unstable. The package names changed.

libgcc300
libobjc300
libstdc3.0
libstdc3.0-dev
libstdc3.0-dbg
libgcj300
libgcj300-dev




Re: missing build-depends

2001-05-24 Thread Matthias Klose
Philip Blundell writes:
 > >I think you need to add "libgc5-dev" to the gcc build-depends.  
 > >Without that package installed, the package build fails in objc.
 > 
 > gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds1-0.010506 has:
 > 
 > Build-Depends: dejagnu (>= 1.3-19990614), bzip2, binutils (>= 
 > 2.11.90.0.1-1), deb
 > helper (>= 2), gperf (>= 2.7-3), autoconf (>= 2.13), bison, flex, gettext, 
 > texinf
 > o, libgc5-dev [!avr !hurd-i386 !m68k], awk
 > 
 > I don't know why libgc5 is inhibited for AVR, Hurd and 68k -- are you using 
 > one of those platforms?

The Boehm garbage collector doesn't work on these architectures.

Btw, gobjc-3.0 still needs the external libgc5-dev, although gcc has a 
copy of gc5 for building libjava.




Bug#97796: marked as done (gpc 'include file bug')

2001-05-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 May 2001 19:30:41 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#97796: gpc 'include file bug'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 2001 13:06:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 17 08:06:15 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cassis-gw.univ-brest.fr [195.83.247.29] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 150NTq-00034z-00; Thu, 17 May 2001 08:06:14 -0500
Received: from univ-brest.fr (euphrosine.univ-brest.fr [194.167.225.104])
  by cassis-gw.univ-brest.fr (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3.3) with ESMTP id PAA03771
  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 17 May 2001 15:06:08 +0200 (MET DST)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 13:07:29 +
From: Fred JEAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Universite de Bretagne Occidentale / IUEM
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i686)
X-Accept-Language: fr, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gpc 'include file bug'
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by cassis-gw.univ-brest.fr 
id PAA03771
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: gpc-2.95
Version: 19991030, based on 2.95.2 2220

Hi,

It seems that instruction '#include anyfile' only works on first invocati=
on.
Here is the simplest thing I did which fails :

cd /tmp
mkdir inc
touch inc/h1.def
touch inc/h2.def
cat > htest.p
program ht(input,output);

#include "h1.def"
#include "h2.def"

begin
writeln("hello");
end.
CTRL-D

When I compile with:
gpc -I/tmp/inc -o htest htest.p

or with :
gpc -I/tmp/inc -lchill -o htest htest.p**see #47453

it returns :
htest.p:4: h2.def: No such file or directory


-- System information
Potato
Linux version 2.2.14
gcc version 2.95.2 19991103
Architecture: i386

ii  libc6   2.1.3-13
ii  gpc 2.95.2-13
ii  gcc 2.95.2-13

Can you help ? - Thanks


-- C'est curieux chez les marins, ce besoin de faire des phrases (M.A.) -=
-
Dr Fred JEAN - UMR CNRS 6539 / LEMAR / Univ. Bretagne Occidentale
Institut Universitaire Europ=E9en de la Mer. F-29280 PLOUZANE
Pho:+33 (0)2 98 49 86 38 // Fax:+33 (0)2 98 49 86 45
http://www.univ-brest.fr/IUEM/UMR6539/




---
Received: (at 97796-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2001 17:35:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 24 12:35:07 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 152z0t-0004SM-00; Thu, 24 May 2001 12:35:07 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA15145;
Thu, 24 May 2001 19:30:41 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id TAA21680;
Thu, 24 May 2001 19:30:41 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 19:30:41 +0200 (MEST)
To: Fred JEAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#97796: gpc 'include file bug'
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs  Lucid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fred JEAN writes:
 > Package: gpc-2.95
 > Version: 19991030, based on 2.95.2 2220
 > 
 > Hi,
 > 
 > It seems that instruction '#include anyfile' only works on first invocation.
 > Here is the simplest thing I did which fails :
 > 
 > cd /tmp
 > mkdir inc
 > touch inc/h1.def
 > touch inc/h2.def
 > cat > htest.p
 > program ht(input,output);
 > 
 > #include "h1.def"
 > #include "h2.def"
 > 
 > begin
 > writeln("hello");
 > end.
 > CTRL-D
 > 
 > When I compile with:
 > gpc -I/tmp/inc -o htest htest.p
 > 
 > or with :
 > gpc -I/tmp/inc -lchill -o htest htest.p**see #47453
 > 
 > it returns :
 > htest.p:4: h2.def: No such file or directory
 > 
 > 
 > -- System information
 > Potato
 > Linux version 2.2.14
 > gcc version 2.95.2 19991103
 > Architecture: i386
 > 
 > ii  libc6   2.1.3-13
 > ii  gpc 2.95.2-13
 > ii  gcc 2.95.2-13
 > 
 > Can you help ? - Thanks

Fixed in the current gpc-2.95.[34] ver

Processed: Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code

2001-05-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 97030 normal
Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code
Severity set to `normal'.

> retitle 97030 [fixed in gcc-3.0] wrong code generation
Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)




Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code

2001-05-24 Thread Matthias Klose
severity 97030 normal
retitle 97030 [fixed in gcc-3.0] wrong code generation
thanks

severity lowered:

- works ok with -O1
- works ok with 3.0

Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS writes:
 > I tried this with gcc-2_95-branch and gcc-3_0-branch from CVS today.
 > The latest gcc-2.95 has the same problem, but the latest gcc-3.0
 > doesn't.
 > 
 > I expect gcc-3.0 will be out well before woody, but I don't know
 > whether that means you might use gcc-3.0 for building woody ...
 > 
 > Edmund
 > 
 > 
 > --  
 > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: gcc question

2001-05-24 Thread Matthias Klose
Andrew 'ashridah' Pilley writes:

 > which reminds me. when gcc 3.0 gets released, (which is supposed to be
 > the 15th of june, surprisingly.) how will debian go about switching to it?
 > (for x86 at least.) just changing the default compiler, and letting packages
 > get upgraded as they go? or are there are few packages that, when 
 > recompiled (the dynamic linker?) that will mean that everyone who doesn't
 > want their packages to break have to compile them again? or is there a 
 > plan to get around that?

the gcc-3.0 release is scheduled for the middle of June. I think we
don't have the time to rebuild and test all packages with the new
compiler, especially libraries. So if a package is compiled with the
3.0 compiler, it has to explicitely depend on 3.0.