Re: Bug#839860: gosa-plugin-netgroups: fails to add a system to a netgroup
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 09:07:17PM +0200, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> GOsa² throws an error about an undefined method 'plugin:plugin'; this is
> most probably due to the PHP 7.0 transition (the constructor issue is
> hidden by the methods issue).
These changes seem to fix it:
--- gosa-plugin-netgroups-0.1~svn652/admin/netgroups/class_netgroup.inc
2012-07-27 09:59:17.0 +0200
+++ plugins/admin/netgroups/class_netgroup.inc 2016-10-06 11:58:55.0
+0200
@@ -57,9 +57,9 @@
/* Constructor which load object attributes aso.
* */
-function netgroup(&$config, $dn= NULL) {
+function __construct(&$config, $dn= NULL) {
-plugin::plugin($config, $dn);
+plugin::__construct($config, $dn);
$this->objectInfo = array("triple" => array(), "groups" =>
array());
$this->orig_dn = $dn;
$this->orig_cn = $this->cn;
---
gosa-plugin-netgroups-0.1~svn652/admin/systems/netgroups/class_netgroupSystem.inc
2016-10-06 13:13:03.0 +0200
+++ plugins/admin/systems/netgroups/class_netgroupSystem.inc2016-10-06
12:03:50.0 +0200
@@ -48,12 +48,12 @@
/* Constructor: Prepare values, lists, ...
* */
- function netgroupSystem(&$config, $dn= NULL)
+ function __construct(&$config, $dn= NULL)
{
$this->config = $config;
/* Load bases attributes */
- plugin::plugin($config, $dn);
+ plugin::__construct($config, $dn);
/* Setting cn to default */
if (isset($this->attrs['cn'][0])) {
Please check.
Wolfgang
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Maintenance of xrdp and Guacamole
Hi Debian Edu team, the package xrdp is currently marked as team-maintained by the Debian Edu packaging team. I think this decision was never really discussed. So, the idea is to get a working, best-of-breed terminal server solution into Debian stretch, with the most recent releases of xrdp and Guacamole. Now the question is where these packages are best maintained. I think they should go into some team, but I do not know if Debian Edu is the right place. Does Debian Edu / Skolelinux benefit from having a great terminal server solution? Will xrdp and Guacamole become part of the default set of packages / recommended packages for Debian Edu networks? Is there any other interest in the packages? In short: Does Debian Edu want to assume maintainership for these packages, or are they better off maintained in some other team? Cheers, Nik signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Maintenance of xrdp and Guacamole
[Dominik George] > Hi Debian Edu team, > > the package xrdp is currently marked as team-maintained by the Debian > Edu packaging team. > > I think this decision was never really discussed. What do you mean? I saw lots of emails discussing how to handle xrdp on this list the last year? > Does Debian Edu / Skolelinux benefit from having a great terminal > server solution? Will xrdp and Guacamole become part of the default > set of packages / recommended packages for Debian Edu networks? Is > there any other interest in the packages? Debian Edu already install xrdp out of the box on terminal servers, see the thin-client-server task. I believe it was introduced in version 0.850 released in 2010. -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen
Re: Maintenance of xrdp and Guacamole
Hi Petter, > > the package xrdp is currently marked as team-maintained by the Debian > > Edu packaging team. > > > > I think this decision was never really discussed. > > What do you mean? I saw lots of emails discussing how to handle xrdp on > this list the last year? Yep, of course. But we just did that, and noone complaint. The team was never asked whether they want to assume maintainership ;). > > Does Debian Edu / Skolelinux benefit from having a great terminal > > server solution? Will xrdp and Guacamole become part of the default > > set of packages / recommended packages for Debian Edu networks? Is > > there any other interest in the packages? > > Debian Edu already install xrdp out of the box on terminal servers, see > the thin-client-server task. I believe it was introduced in version > 0.850 released in 2010. xrdp yes, but not Guacamole. So part of this question of course only applies to Guacamole. -nik signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Maintenance of xrdp and Guacamole
[Dominik George] > Yep, of course. > > But we just did that, and noone complaint. The team was never asked > whether they want to assume maintainership ;). I am not quite sure what kind of decision making process you are looking for here, but given people on the team willing to work on the packages under the Debian Edu umbrella, I so not really see the need for much more consulting as long as no-one complaints. There is not much formalities involved, and few formalities seem like a good idea. How do you envison asking the team and getting a definite answer, given our current team structure? If the packages should be maintained elsewhere, I believe that is a decision best made by the people currently working on the packages. I'm not one of those, so I do not really have much to say here. :) > xrdp yes, but not Guacamole. So part of this question of course only > applies to Guacamole. Ah, did not know what Guacamole was (besides the dish). I assume you are talking about http://guacamole.incubator.apache.org/>, after a quick search? -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen
Remate de 114 Camiones y 30 Gandolas + Maquinaria y Equipos
equipos para la venta en transmaquina estamos constantemente evolucionando buscando nuevas formas de prestarles servicios a nuestros clientes, es por esto que queremos presentarles nuestra división de venta de equipos. actualmente contamos a la fecha con una cartera importante de equipos disponibles para la venta. estos equipos estan disponibles para la venta inmediata y todos nuestros clientes pueden aceptar pagos de contado y crédito bancario. [1] solicitar listado de equipos camiones y remolques chuto 30 batea 11 cisterna de cemento 31 low boy 2 tara 11 volqueta 41 camion de mantenimiento mecanico 1 camion grua 5 camion mezclador (trompo) 2 camion volteo 41 volqueta 2 ambulancia 4 chevrolet 6 chrysler 2 ford 6 ford 1 jeep 5 torregruas y equipos de construcción grua 8 torre grua 10 silo de cemento 43 planta de concreto 3 buldozer 1 excavador (jumbo) 2 manipuladora 3 mini cargador 15 retroexcavadora 11 zambron 12 elevadora 1 montacarga 7 compresor 11 maquina de soldar 17 planta electrica 34 zorra 20 equipos varios compresor 11 maquina de soldar 17 planta electrica 34 zorra 20 en caso de estar interesados favor enviarnos un email a: [2] ventadeequi...@transmaquina.com.ve este mensaje fue enviado a t...@benchmarkemail.com por departamento venta de equipos transporte progaven , caracas, miranda, venezuela, caracas, miranda 1070, venezuela cancelar suscripción| administre su suscripción| remitir email| reportar abuso References: 1. mailto:ventadeequi...@transmaquina.com.ve 2. mailto:ventadeequi...@transmaquina.com.ve This message was sent to debian-edu@lists.debian.org by ventadeequip...@transmaquina.com.ve You can modify/update your subscription via the link below. Unsubscribe from all mailings http://lt.bmetrack.com/c/su?e=A26333&c=717D3&l=F5F284A&email=MOPmE1ny829eMPmAKYkzaI05dJGm1VnvhvLMc0HlFys%3D&relid=A0B0CA2 Transporte Progaven , Caracas, Miranda, Venezuela, Caracas, Miranda 1070, Venezuela Email Marketing BenchmarkEmail.com [http://lt.bmetrack.com]
Re: Maintenance of xrdp and Guacamole
Hi Dominik, On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 04:06:03PM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > But we just did that, and noone complaint. The team was never asked > whether they want to assume maintainership ;). that's not how our team works, instead, if you and me (or foo and bar who are Debian Edu team members) decide we want to packages $pkg under the Debian Edu umbrealla, we can do this, and it doesn't mean that other team members are expected to join the maintance of that package. most of us care or cared about the src:debian-edu* packages but not even that is mandatory. and if someone would like to maintain a software which is really not suited for Debian Edu (eg let's assume a war game here…) we would probably discuss this here and conclude to not do that. but we dont really have a formal process. (and sometimes its probably better to just form a new team, eg mate is maintained in the mate pkg team, and not in Debian Edu, even though we also support Mate desktops and Mike is in both teams.) -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Maintenance of xrdp and Guacamole
Hi, On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 06:53:28PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > I am not quite sure what kind of decision making process you are looking > for here, but given people on the team willing to work on the packages > under the Debian Edu umbrella, I so not really see the need for much > more consulting as long as no-one complaints. There is not much > formalities involved, and few formalities seem like a good idea. How do > you envison asking the team and getting a definite answer, given our > current team structure? On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 05:46:27PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > > But we just did that, and noone complaint. The team was never asked > > whether they want to assume maintainership ;). > > that's not how our team works, instead, if you and me (or foo and bar > who are Debian Edu team members) decide we want to packages $pkg under > the Debian Edu umbrealla, we can do this, and it doesn't mean that > other team members are expected to join the maintance of that package. I meant neither of that. I simply thought it would be kind to give room for objections/proposals/… before writing somone else's address into a Maintainer field, be it a single human being or a team. Cheers, Nik signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Maintenance of xrdp and Guacamole
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 07:56:36PM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > I meant neither of that. ok :) > I simply thought it would be kind to give room for > objections/proposals/… before writing somone else's address into a > Maintainer field, be it a single human being or a team. oh, I totally agree! :-) Thanks for pointing this out however. -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature
