Re: please post listing and status of NEW queue
On Thursday 17 February 2005 16:07, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's now redirected to http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html I will integrate per developer new queue in http://qa.d.o/developer.php soon Cheers -- Igor Genibel «Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro» Freedom is not sold for all the gold in the world. Dubrovnik motto pgpx8iWVJbjjl.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: please post listing and status of NEW queue
On Thursday 17 February 2005 20:56, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 10203 March 1977, Igor Genibel wrote: > > On Thursday 17 February 2005 16:07, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > >> Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > It's now redirected to http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > > > > I will integrate per developer new queue in > > http://qa.d.o/developer.phpsoon > > One purpose of the new.html on newraff is to have less (or none) > script running on merkel that wastes CPU cycles playing around with > .changes files. Merkel is the wrong place for such stuff. :) (And > merkel is updated only once a day, so it makes not much sense to run > scripts hourly there, just to have mentioned that). I have never said that I will recompute the page but only integrate a per developer extract from this result. As most of information provided by qa.d.o/developer.php :) -- Igor Genibel «Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro» Freedom is not sold for all the gold in the world. Dubrovnik motto pgpN2RhtB6U3K.pgp Description: PGP signature
new.html per-developer data inclusion in developer.php (Was: please post listing and status of NEW queue)
On Friday 18 February 2005 13:33, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: [...] > FWIW, I think developer.php gives a useful DDPO, but I'm a bit puzzled > why also some kinds of per-developer or even per-package information > is all also generated from developer.php. The file as it is is already > quite large, I think it can better be in a new 'new.php' or something, > if you really want to add it, as it probably hardly shares any code > from developer.php (and if it does, that should IMHO be refactored > into a include file). No information is generated from developer.php. But I agree with you about the large generated file (by backends). I need to rewrite the backends in order to have a relational schema located in several data files. But the lack of time, and probably the lack of outer investment implies that this rework has not already been done. > Similar for per-package popcon, per-maintainer wnpp, per-package > excuses: I think they are better off in separate files, and not in one > big php script behaving completely different depending on arguments. That's what I wanted to do. Parse the new.html file in order to provided excuse/popcon like data files that could be included with php. The popcon and the wnpp backend processes are standalone scripts that could be easily used out of the box. To recall the main goal of developer.php is to provide a unique place where all the spreaded debian developer related infomation will be nicely displayed. IMHO this kind of information (new queue process per-developer) might be useful for all developers. -- Igor Genibel «Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro» Freedom is not sold for all the gold in the world. Dubrovnik motto pgp5X1frCC6pO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2005
On Monday 28 February 2005 21:48, Nico Golde wrote: [...] > http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards Nico You can use the fullname with developer.php: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Matthew+Garrett Cheers -- Igor Genibel «Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro» Freedom is not sold for all the gold in the world. Dubrovnik motto pgpfC5pltsYBl.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#339760: ITP: phpmailer -- full featured email transfer class for PHP
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: phpmailer Version : 1.73 Upstream Author : Brent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://phpmailer.sourceforge.net/ * License : LGPL Description : full featured email transfer class for PHP PHPMailer is a class that has theses features: - Send emails with multiple TOs, CCs, BCCs and REPLY-TOs - Redundant SMTP servers - Multipart/alternative emails for mail clients that do not read HTML email - Support for 8bit, base64, binary, and quoted-printable encoding - Uses the same methods as the very popular AspEmail active server (COM) component - SMTP authentication - Native language support - Word wrap, and more! -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-igor-suspend2 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#303609: ITP: libdata-dumper-perl -- stringified perl data structures, suitable for both printing and eval
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libdata-dumper-perl Version : 2.121 Upstream Author : Gurusamy Sarathy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~ilyam/Data-Dumper-2.121/ * License : GPL or Artistic Description : stringified perl data structures, suitable for both printing and eval Given a list of scalars or reference variables, writes out their contents in perl syntax. The references can also be objects. The contents of each variable is output in a single Perl statement. Handles self-referential structures correctly. . The return value can be evaled to get back an identical copy of the original reference structure. . Any references that are the same as one of those passed in will be named $VARn (where n is a numeric suffix), and other duplicate references to substructures within $VARn will be appropriately labeled using arrow notation. You can specify names for individual values to be dumped if you use the Dump() method, or you can change the default $VAR prefix to something else. See $Data::Dumper::Varname and $Data::Dumper::Terse below. . This package is needed to build/use taskjuggler (#239047) -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
popcon files are corrupted (Was Re: gluck available again / filesystem shaked)
On Thursday 07 April 2005 19:06, Martin Schulze wrote: Hi all, [...] > popcon.debian.org verified qa.d.o/developer.php gathers information directly from popcon.d.o and the backend crashed today. At least the by_inst file is seriously corrupted Cheers. -- Igor Genibel ÂNon bene pro toto libertas venditur auro Freedom is not sold for all the gold in the world. Dubrovnik motto pgppT4RcHlLgH.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: problems with public keys
* Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-08 10:25:44 +0100]: > developer.php is currently configured not to check against any external > keyservers. > > See #307461 and http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2005/05/msg2.html I will try to fix this (and some other issues) soon. Cheers. -- Igor Genibel «Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro» Freedom is not sold for all the gold in the world. Dubrovnik motto pgpa6TBhPPhFf.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: problems with public keys
* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-28 13:10:04 +0200]: > Hello Igor, > > * Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-09 15:48]: > > * Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-08 10:25:44 +0100]: > > > > > developer.php is currently configured not to check against any external > > > keyservers. > > > > > > See #307461 and http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2005/05/msg2.html > > > > I will try to fix this (and some other issues) soon. > > Any progress here? > My public key is still not found! No more progress, I'm still too busy to fix this for the moment. Cheers -- Igor Genibel «Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro» Freedom is not sold for all the gold in the world. Dubrovnik motto pgpcNOtKyqQAi.pgp Description: PGP signature
[ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
Hi all, I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your packages such as: - the pts related page about packages (Thanks a lot to Raphaël Hertzog); - the section; - the priority; - the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...); - the different package versions for each branch (stable, testing, unstable, experimental); - the different binary package pages; - the archs where packages are not installable on each branch; - the pool; - the broken dependencies for each branch (stable, testing, unstable). These are all the informations about package. You can also have some informations about about you, developer: - the gpg key; - a link for all bugs related to you; - a link for all RC bugs related to you; - a link for all bugs you submited; - a link for your lintian reports; - a link for your buildd reports. You can access this «tools» different ways. By maintainer e-mail address: http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?login= By gpg id: http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?gpg_key=0x By source package name: http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?package= I waiting for you comments, advices, insults or other things. Cheers. -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F pgpGNsu9bxtRS.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:11:40PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > OK, things seem to have suddenly got quite a lot more nifty while I > wasn't watching. Thanks! Thanks a lot to. > I notice one slight glitch; following a PTS link to a lib* package takes > you to e.g. http://pts.debian.net/l/libfilter-perl.html when it should > take you to http://pts.debian.net/libf/libfilter-perl.html. Otherwise > it's behaving excellently. This fixed now. -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:08:44AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: > Hm, am I supposed to get hundreds of kilobytes of this? Surely not ! ;) > Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9 > in /home/igenibel/public_html/html.php on line 349 > > Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9 > in /home/igenibel/public_html/html.php on line 349 It is now fixed (regexp with ++ in vars...) > Look nice, aside from that. Thanks. -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote: Hi, > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in > stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package. > According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists. It is now fixed. As Colin said, it was a regexp problem. Thanks > Otherwise, looks great. Thanks for your work! Thanks a lot. -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:18:58PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > > Looks like confusion with aewm++, which in turn seems to provoke the bug > > Daniel Burrows mentioned, so there's probably some additional regexp > > metacharacter escaping needed somewhere. > > Yes, very similar problem for kimwitu and kimwitu++. Sorry for the weird > package names, but that's the names from upstream![1] This is now fixed. -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:02:24PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > Am 27.08.02 um 14:24:57 schrieb Igor Genibel: > > - the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...); > > Either I don't understand the statistics, or it's not correct. For > instance, on http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?login=nick you > can see there is 1 bug for the file package. But in fact there's dozens. > How come? It is now fixed. Thanks a lot for the report ;) -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:53:11AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Igor, Hi, > > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). > > The site looks great! One request, is it possible to add submit buttons > for each of the various forms on the page? At first glance, it is not at > all obvious to me that the one submit button on the page has nothing to > do with the box where I typed in my email address. :) There are now submit buttons. Regards -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:57:14AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > Although, I have one request -- please skip the ampersand in URLs like > > 'build.php?&pkg=foo', they are redundant and they waste bytes :) > > On the same note, please add the missing / in pool URLs, to skip the > redirect and follow the spec, thus also conserving bytes :) The two requests were applied ;) Cheers. -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: Hi, > Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a listing of my > packages and also those maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've had issues of > my being mistaken for Daniel Stone in the past, and I don't appreciate it :) > (Neither does he I should imagine :) Sorry for the mistake... This is now fixed Regards -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:26:44PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: Hi, > Am 28.08.02 um 10:15:45 schrieb Raphael Hertzog: > > Packages in blue are packages where you're listed as co-maintainers (cf > > the Uplpoaders field in the control file). > > Alright, but the description "uploaded by developer" is a little > misleading. > > > I guess it detects the NMU with a regexp in the version number. What's > > the version number in question that is badly detected ? > > For instance 10a-1.1 for package kimwitu-doc. Or 3.37-3.1 for file. I don't use a regexp for this stuff but the Uploader: field in the Sources.gz file. For those packages there are no Uploader field so *you* are not considered as a NMUer. The blue color appears only if you are the uploader not the maintainer of NMUed package. For example: http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?package=apt-proxy show us that Chris Halls is the maintainer of apt-proxy (apt-proxy displayed in black) but Manuel Estrada Sainz is the uploader. I don't know why there is no Uploader field for those packages. -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:31:51PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > Because packages are not required to have an "Uploaders" field. I'm > afraid I don't quite understand your algorithm. For which package will > there ever be a red markup? I'm sorry I confused the NMU and the uploader field. There was a bug, fixed for now. http://qa.debian.org/developer/ Thanks a lot. -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 11:52:49AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does > > "Packages in blue" refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many > > "Packages version in red" either, even when I'm sure it's an NMU. > > It's talking about the color of the package version number. > > Oh and it also thinks that debconf, debhelper, and presumably any debian > native package is a NMU. Whoops. ;) It is now fixed but cannot yet inform that native packages are NMUed or not. I had to parse all the .changes (to compare the Changed-By: field with the Maintainer field) files in order to really know if a package was NMUed or not. > > I don't have any problems. 1600 pixels is enough in my font :-) > > Tiny little laptop screen, I will not let galeon drop below 14 point > fonts. I have reorganised all the columns in to display from the left to the right the most important information. On my laptop 1024 all important informations for most pages fits without scrolling. Regards. -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: gpg error at developer.php after the fire
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:17:09PM +0100, Thorsten Sauter wrote: > Hi all, Hi, > don't know if anyone has noticed, but the qa.debian.org/developer.php > doesn't found any gpg keys from public keyservers. > > It always report: GPG key id not found! > > Seems to be a problem after the move of satie. > Maybe the better way is to write an bug report agains qa, but I try it > anyway on this list. This was du to a lack of response from the public key server I ask. This is fixed now. -- Igor Genibel http://www.eds.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Bug#111462: ITP: prelude -- Prelude is a new innovative Network Intrusion Detection system designed to be very modular, evolutive, rock solid and fast.
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2001-09-06 Severity: wishlist * Package name: prelude Version : 0.4.2 Upstream Author : Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://prelude.sourceforge.net/ * License : (GPL) Description : Prelude is a new innovative Network Intrusion Detection system designed to be very modular, evolutive, rock solid and fast. Prelude is a general-purpose hybrid intrusion detection system, written entirely from scratch, in C. Right now, it handles all of the TCP/IP stack over Ethernet. Prelude is divided into several parts : * Prelude, the NIDS sensor, responssible for real time packet capture and analysis. * The signature engine, designed to be completly generic and evolutive, it is currently able to read Snort rulesets. By simply adding parser, it should permit to load rulesets from any NIDS easily. * The protocol plugins, which can handle packet at a higher level than prelude do, ie: you got a tcp packet, and a Protocol plugin detect that packet data contain an rpc header, so it will decode the rpc header, and ask to the associated Detection plugin to analyze the decoded header. * A set of detection plugins which job is to analyze the data they are interested in (they register the protocol they are interested in at initialisation time), and will eventually emmit a security warning. Dection plugin should only be used for complex intrusion detection that can't be done using the signature engine. * A report server, which sensors contacts in order to report an intrusion, that generate user readable reports using plugins. * The reporting plugins, which job is to decode the reports issued by Detection plugin, and translate them in an user readable form (ex: syslog report, html report, etc). -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux tass 2.4.9 #1 mer aoû 29 19:24:43 CEST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR
