Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#754551: ITP: node-ms -- milliseconds conversion utility

2014-08-06 Thread Andrew Kelley
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Andrew Kelley  wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Marco d'Itri  wrote:
>
>> If it makes sense to bundle multiple libraries in the same package which
>> other packages may depend on then go for it.
>>
>
> I understand. Here is an example of doing exactly this:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-chalk.git/tree/debian/watch
>
> However let me re-iterate that ms has 104 other modules depending on it:
> https://www.npmjs.org/package/ms
>
> 111 LOC is small but not trivial. I think this is not an example of a
> package that should be blocked.
>

Looking at the NEW queue, I see that I have 2 packages that are trivially
small and could be bundled with the project that depends on them:

node-deflate-crc32-stream
node-crc32-stream

These packages are very small and the only thing that depends on them is
node-zip-stream (which also depends on node-debug which is waiting on
node-ms).

Please delete these from the NEW queue and I will bundle them with
node-zip-stream.

The other packages of mine that are in there are *not* trivially small,
and/or have many other packages depending on them. For these I believe the
proper action is to accept the upload:

node-connect-static - so far has only groovebasin depending on it. I can
bundle it with groovebasin, but it's really an independent module.
node-errno - has 27 completely unrelated modules depending on it. clearly
should be separate
node-groove - contains C++ bindings to libgroove and has lots of LOC. You
should be happy about this one.
node-music-library-index - separate from groovebasin because both client
side code and server side code depend on it. trying to bundle this one
would make it confusing or impossible to work with browserify, which
groovebasin uses at build-time.
node-mv  - has 30 completely unrelated modules depending on it. clearly
should be separate
node-prr - node-errno and node-levelup both depend on this, both of which I
am trying to get packaged up.


Please tell me what further action I can take to move this process along.
I've been working hard to package up a large application with many
dependencies in accordance with Debian guidelines, and now it seems that I
have hit an invisible wall and it's not clear who is responsible for it or
what they want from me.


Bug#757227: ITP: memcacheq -- Simple queue service over memcache

2014-08-06 Thread Carl Chenet
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carl Chenet 

* Package name: memcacheq
  Version : 0.2.0
  Upstream Author : Steve Chu 
* URL : http://memcachedb.org/memcacheq/
* License : BSD
  Programming Lang: C
  Description : Simple queue service over memcache

Memcacheq is a very fast, simple queue service over
memcache. It manages multiple queues, concurrent well
and is compatible with the memcache protocol.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140806110443.11742.54134.reportbug@laptop



Bug#757229: ITP: dh-dist-zilla -- debhelper add-on to call dzil build and clean up after the build

2014-08-06 Thread Elmar S. Heeb
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Elmar S. Heeb" 

* Package name: dh-dist-zilla
  Version : 1
  Upstream Author : Elmar S. Heeb ,
Axel Beckert 
* URL : https://github.com/elmar/dh-dist-zilla
* License : GPL v3+
  Programming Lang: Perl
  Description : debhelper add-on to call dzil build and clean up after the 
build

dh-dist-zilla provides a debhelper sequence addon named 'dist_zilla'.

The intention is to be able to build directly from a Dist::Zilla based
package without generating the CPAN package manually first.  It is
analogous to using autoreconf to generate the configure script.

The orig.tar.gz file must only contain the dist.ini and source files but
not the generated files like META.yaml, README, etc.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/2014080632.587.58785.report...@harstena.heebs.ch



Re: Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-08-06 Thread Thorsten Alteholz


On Tue, 5 Aug 2014, Michael Gilbert wrote:

The problem is an undermanned ftpmaster team [0], so help there is


I have to object here. If I read something like:
   please reject YYY
   forgot to add the full MPL 2.0 text..
I wonder why this hadn't been checked before the upload.
If all maintainers would do their homework, the situation of NEW might be 
much better. I estimate that 80% of all packages in NEW, that are older 
than two weeks, do have a problem like above.
So dear fellow maintainers, although it is quite boring, please pay more 
attention to the Debian Policy.


 Thorsten


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.02.1408060907090.9...@jupiter.server.alteholz.net



Re: Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-08-06 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:28:02PM +0200, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit :
> 
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2014, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> >The problem is an undermanned ftpmaster team [0], so help there is
> 
> I have to object here. If I read something like:
>please reject YYY
>forgot to add the full MPL 2.0 text..
> I wonder why this hadn't been checked before the upload.
> If all maintainers would do their homework, the situation of NEW
> might be much better. I estimate that 80% of all packages in NEW,
> that are older than two weeks, do have a problem like above.
> So dear fellow maintainers, although it is quite boring, please pay
> more attention to the Debian Policy.

Hi Thorsten,

I fully agree.

A few years ago, I made a proposal for peer-reviewing copyright files in the
NEW queue.

https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReview

The goal is not to substitute for the inspection by the FTP Master team, but to
correct defects before their review, therefore saving their time.

I have done a few dozens of these reviews and share Thorsten's impression in
general (althouth in my opinion 80 % is quite an upper-range estimate…).

I encourage everybody who uploads to the NEW queue to review some packages in
exchange.  To help people reviewing your package, please make sure that a
copy is accessible (source packages in the NEW queue are not accessible outside
the FTP Master team).

(Regarding the requests for removal from the NEW queue, perhaps somebody can
write a patch to DAK so that it can be dealt with a DAK command file ?)

Have a nice day,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140806115506.gb13...@falafel.plessy.net



Re: First steps towards source-only uploads

2014-08-06 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Ansgar Burchardt  (2014-08-01):
> as a first step towards source-only uploads, the archive will now accept
> source-only uploads provided the following conditions are met:
> 
>  * The source package is not NEW and does not build NEW binaries.
>  * Architecture-independent (arch:all) packages must be included in
>uploads.
>  * The source package includes a Package-List field that also has
>an arch=* column. dpkg (>= 1.17.7) will include this.
> 
> We will allow not including arch:all packages in uploads once we have
> sorted out how to get them built. Source-only uploads to NEW might also
> come in the future, but dak needs a bit more work to be able to handle
> them.

This is absolutely awesome. Many many thanks.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#757249: ITP: fonts-ekmukta -- humanist, mono-linear typeface for Devanagari and Latin scripts

2014-08-06 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vasudev Kamath 

* Package name: fonts-ekmukta
  Version : 1.2.2
  Upstream Author : Girish Dalvi 
* URL : https://github.com/girish-dalvi/Ek-Mukta
* License : OFL-1.1
  Programming Lang: fonts
  Description : humanist, mono-linear typeface for Devanagari and Latin 
scripts

 Ek Mukta is a Unicode compliant, versatile, contemporary, humanist,
 mono-linear typeface available in seven weights, supporting Devanagari
 and Latin scripts.

You can get look and feel of this font at [1]

[1] http://www.idc.iitb.ac.in/~girish/demo/

Please also include as much relevant information as possible.

This package provides new mono-linear font with 7 weights for Devanagari
script, It provides new font for Devanagari script which is used by
multiple Indian languages as script. Currently there are very limited
FOSS fonts for devanagari.

Package will be maintained as part of Debian-IN (Debian India) team.

Cheers,
-- 
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyni...@samsargika.copyninja.info
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4  C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#757279: ITP: neurodebian -- integrated software platform for neuroscience research

2014-08-06 Thread NeuroDebian Team
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: NeuroDebian Team 

* Package name: neurodebian
  Version : 0.33
  Upstream Author : NeuroDebian Team 
* URL : http://neuro.debian.net
* License : GPL
  Programming Lang: Bash, Python, etc
  Description : integrated software platform for neuroscience research

NeuroDebian aims to make Debian the ideal platform for research in
neuroscience.  NeuroDebian team participates in Debian pure blends
(e.g. Debian Med and Science) and maintenance teams (e.g. Debian Python
Modules) to enhance stock Debian distribution.  Besides that it provides
backport builds of relevant software for all supported Debian and Ubuntu
releases from the project's website.
.
This source package contains the sources of the project's website, and
delivers binary packages with development tools and user-systems
customizations (e.g. artwork, popcon submissions settings, etc).


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20140806204621.507.53794.report...@novo.onerussian.com



Bug#757284: ITP: php-proxy-manager -- library providing utilities to operate with Object Proxies

2014-08-06 Thread David Prévot
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Prévot 
Control: block 513646 by -1

* Package name: php-proxy-manager
  Version : 0.3.6
  Upstream Author : Marco Pivetta 
* URL : https://github.com/Ocramius/ProxyManager
* License : Expat
  Programming Lang: PHP
  Description : library providing utilities to operate with Object Proxies

 This library aims at providing abstraction for generating various
 kinds of proxy classes.
 .
 Currently, this project supports generation of Virtual Proxies and
 Smart References. Additionally, it can generate a small
 high-performance Hydrator class to optimize transition of data from
 and into your objects.


This package is needed for the Symfony package currently being worked
on, and will be maintained inside the PHP PEAR (and Composer)
Maintainers team.

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature