per5.004

1997-12-26 Thread Tim Sailer
Has anyone mad a perl 5.004 package for a bo system? I need to
upgrade a box running mysql to the latest DBI version, but it requires
perl5.004, and I can't chance taking the box to hamm at this point.
If no one has it, I'll just grab the source from hamm and try the
build myself.

Tim

-- 
 (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] / (home) [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.buoy.com/~tps
   "Management decisions have no effect on the laws of physics."
  -- anon
** Disclaimer: My views/comments/beliefs, as strange as they are, are my own.**


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: per5.004

1997-12-26 Thread Fumitoshi UKAI
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Sailer)
Subject: per5.004
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 1997 23:39:57 -0500 (EST)

> Has anyone mad a perl 5.004 package for a bo system? I need to

You can find perl_5.004-04 for bo in
 ftp://ftp.debian.or.jp/pub/linux/debian-jp/project-jp/experimental/

-- 
Fumitoshi UKAI / Debian JP Project


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



New mysql package

1997-12-26 Thread Scott Hanson
Hello,

I've now uploaded the new upstream version (3.21.17-beta) of mysql. I
did not yet create subpackages, since there were a number of issues to
be resolved with the upgrade that I want to make sure are OK (before I
introduce more new bugs by creating the subpackages).

Since I'm still a fairly new maintainer, and since I made a number of
changes in packaging the upgrade, I'd appreciate any comments and
suggestions on the package. I've tried to mention all the issues
involved with the upgrade in README.debian. (Note that the DBD perl
interface to mysql is now included, and thus the package conflicts
with libdbd-mysql-perl.)

Does anyone see the need to keep a package of the the old version? If
so, would 'mysql320' be the correct name?

Thanks,

Scott

-- 
Scott Hanson  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Johmsweg 9a, D-21266 Jesteburg, GermanyPGP Key ID: 90A8A14D


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



new developer

1997-12-26 Thread Adam Heath
Looking for someone in the Lansing, Michigan, USA area willing to sign my PGP
key.

Get a maintainable operating system:  http://www.debian.org

Adam Heath of Borg-Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] Join the H.323 effort.  Email
http://www.debian.org - Get Your Own Linux! [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
http://wwp.mirabilis.com/3375265 - Page Me  the word subscribe in the body.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: ever heard of ftwalk?

1997-12-26 Thread Oliver Elphick
"tom hull" wrote:
  >dear debian-developers,
  >
  >i've written a freeware package, an awk-like script programming language.
  >it was originally developed for file tree search/maintenance applications,
  >so i called it "ftwalk". a more awk-like mode also exists, called "hawk". it
  >has a rich type system, scads of built-in functions, etc. it does pretty muc
  >h
  >everything perl does, except of course it doesn't have millions of users or
  >their libraries. it can be used interactively, like a super-calculator. it c
  >omes
  >with full on-line doc, and there is a huge postscript file that you can prin
  >t
  >out. i even have an o'reilly-like pocket guide. it has been ported to severa
  >l
  >unix systems (linux, irix, solaris, ultrix, aix).
  >
  >the problem is: nobody has heard of ftwalk, nobody uses it, and i've grown
  >weary of trying to do it all myself. but i still think it's too good to just
  >walk
  >away from, so please take a look at it. let me know what you think. and if
  >you have any interest in helping to work on it, i'm game for at least one mo
  >re
  >release. please take a look at:
  >
  > http://www.contex.com/ftwalk
  >
  >thanks. you can write me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

It looks nice, and I would package it for Debian if you don't want to do so,
but I'm not entirely sure that the license conforms to Debian policy.  Why
not just use GPL 2?  WIll it make any practical difference to you?

(For other readers, this is the licence:

   SOFTWARE LICENSE FOR FTWALK

PREAMBLE

The intent of this document is to state the conditions under which a Package
(Ftwalk) may be copied, such that the Copyright Holder (Tom Hull, unless
stated otherwise) maintains some semblance of artistic control over the
development of the Package, while giving the users of the Package the right
to use and distribute the Package in more-or-less customary fashion, plus
the right to make reasonable modifications.

This License is similar to (modified from) the "Artistic License" that Perl
is distributed with.

DEFINITIONS:

"Package" refers to the collection of files distributed by the Copyright
Holder, and derivatives of that collection of files created through
textual modification.

"Standard Version" refers to such a Package if it has not been
modified, or has been modified in accordance with the wishes of
the Copyright Holder as specified below.

"Copyright Holder" is whoever is named in the copyright or copyrights
for the Package.

"You" is you, if you're thinking about copying or distributing this
Package.

"Reasonable copying fee" is whatever you can justify on the basis of
media cost, duplication charges, time of people involved, and so on.
(You will not be required to justify it to the Copyright Holder, but
only to the computing community at large as a market that must bear
the fee.)

"Freely Available" means that no fee is charged for the item itself,
though there may be fees involved in handling the item. It also means
that recipients of the item may redistribute it under the same conditions
they received it.

LICENSE TERMS:

1. You may make and give away verbatim copies of the source form of the
Standard Version of this Package without restriction, provided that you
duplicate all of the original copyright notices and associated disclaimers.

2. You may apply bug fixes, portability fixes and other modifications derived
from the Public Domain or from the Copyright Holder. A Package modified in
such a way shall still be considered the Standard Version.

3. You may otherwise modify your copy of this Package in any way, provided
that you insert a prominent notice in each changed file stating how and when
you changed that file, and provided that you do at least ONE of the following:

 a) Place your modifications in the Public Domain or otherwise make them
Freely Available, such as by posting said modifications to Usenet or an
equivalent medium, or placing the modifications on a major archive site
such as uunet.uu.net, or by allowing the Copyright Holder to include
your modifications in the Standard Version of the Package.

 b) Use the modified Package only within your corporation or organization.

 c) Rename any non-standard executables so the names do not conflict with
standard executables, which must also be provided, and provide separate
documentation for each non-standard executable that clearly documents
how it differs from the Standard Version.

 d) Make other distribution arrangements with the Copyright Holder.

4. You may distribute the programs of this Package in object code or executble
form, provided that you do at least ONE of the following:

 a) Distribute a Standard Version of the executables and library files,
together with instructions on where to get the Standard Version.

 b) Accompany the distribution wi

Re: new developer

1997-12-26 Thread Ben Pfaff
   Looking for someone in the Lansing, Michigan, USA area willing to sign my PGP
   key.

I am in DeWitt, MI, near Lansing.  I'm willing to sign PGP keys.  Get
in touch with me for a time and place.

Can someone remind me of what the secure protocol for exchanging keys
is?  I don't seem to see it in my PGP documentation.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



newt packaged

1997-12-26 Thread Enrique Zanardi
I have packaged newt (Not Erik's Windowing Toolkit), a LGPLed text mode
windowing toolkit built with SLang by Erik Troan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. 

That toolkit is being used for our new boot-floppies "dinstall" tool,
that is being rewritten in C.

The sources generate two packages: newt0.10, that contains the libnewt
shared library and a "dialog" replacement called "whiptail", and
newt0.10-dev that contains the static library and header file.

If nobody objects I will upload them to master this weekend.

-- 
Enrique Zanardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dpto. Fisica Fundamental y Experimental
Univ. de La Laguna


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: New required base packages for Amiga, Atari, ... detection

1997-12-26 Thread Hartmut Koptein
> > No, the CPUs are the same in this instance, but the hardware architectures
> > are different. The types of programs that need this systen are hardware
> 
> I seem to recall that the case in question (it _was_ Atari vs. Amiga,  
> right?) still allowed you to run _the_very_same_kernel_ on both systems.

Yes, but then you have both systems included in one kernel and such kernels
are big. And i don't know if its always possible (as for two or three years).

Bye,

Hartmut



-- 
 Hartmut Koptein   EMail:
 Friedrich-van-Senden-Str. 7   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 26603 Aurich   
 Tel.: +49-4941-10390  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .