weekly live build ISOs missing for 8/12/24 cycle
All, https://get.debian.org/images/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid/ There doesn't seem to be anything but, logs and checksums i.e. no ISO files? Is there some way to build these ISOs via jigdo? I download these all the time (especially when a new build e.g. trixie is months away). I don't think there's an easy way to update the kernel live (maybe kpatch, but, I don't know). Anyway, just thought I'd let you know that something different has happened during this weekly cycle. Thanks in any case, Steve Cariglia
Re: weekly live build ISOs missing for 8/12/24 cycle
Hello Steve, list, On 14/08/2024 15:15, Steven Cariglia wrote: https://get.debian.org/images/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid/ There doesn't seem to be anything but, logs and checksums i.e. no ISO files? Is there some way to build these ISOs via jigdo? The ISO files were generated, but due to zsync missing in trixie (#1075710 and #1078442) they were not published. Next Monday a new batch will be available automatically. @Steve: There is (from my point of view) no direct reason to enforce a re-trigger now. The cause has been fixed, so a new run will be OK, next Monday. With kind regards, Roland Clobus OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Weekly ARM64 live image not yet available
Hello Steve, list, The weekly build of the GNOME live image for arm64 has not seen a website update since 2024-07-26. There have been 2 Mondays since then, so at least the logs should have been updated. (Or is arm64 on a different time schedule( Are the newer (unpublished) logs informative? At least last Monday, they should have bailed out due to the zsync-issue, but the older logs are still published. With kind regards, Roland Clobus OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: weekly live build ISOs missing for 8/12/24 cycle
Hey Roland, On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 05:57:46PM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: >Hello Steve, list, > >On 14/08/2024 15:15, Steven Cariglia wrote: >> https://get.debian.org/images/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid/ >> >> There doesn't seem to be anything but, logs and checksums i.e. no ISO >> files? Is there some way to build these ISOs via jigdo? > >The ISO files were generated, but due to zsync missing in trixie (#1075710 >and #1078442) they were not published. > >Next Monday a new batch will be available automatically. > >@Steve: There is (from my point of view) no direct reason to enforce a >re-trigger now. The cause has been fixed, so a new run will be OK, next >Monday. Lovely, thanks for checking! :-) -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Google-bait: https://www.debian.org/CD/free-linux-cd Debian does NOT ship free CDs. Please do NOT contact the mailing lists asking us to send them to you.
Re: Live-Image for Debian Junior (trixie)
On Sa, 03.08.2024 10:25:52, Roland Clobus wrote: > On 29/07/2024 21:20, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 06:51:44PM +, Stefan Kropp wrote: > > > is it possible to add "Debian Junior" to the live-images? Hello Roland, > @Stefan, I assume you mean the weekly images that are published on > https://get.debian.org/images/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid/ > and are based on Trixie? Correct. > About 6 months ago I created a branch in live-build. Now I made it more > visible as a MR [1], and it can be integrated in the live-setup and > images-team/setup repositories. > When that is done, they will be re-generated every week. About CONFIGURATION_FROM_GIT https://salsa.debian.org/live-team/live-build/-/merge_requests/360/diffs#9221863742451e920c978c9e0eb2f9bd58bf2777_212_214 I recommend to build the image like all others. Debian Junior is also part of live-tasks: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/live-tasks live-task-debian-junior Maybe like this: "debian-junior") INSTALLER="live" PACKAGES="live-task-debian-junior" In this case, we also following the "upload" process and the image will be build of files which are part of Debian already. > I've had a quick peek at the git-repo that has the configuration for the > blend, it has not been updated since 2023-04-30. Is the development speeding > up and do you need the images to be generated on a weekly basis? No, from my side it's not required to have a weekly build, yet. First, I would like to see if everything is working as expected. > There is also a chicken-egg issue here from the QA perspective. Should there > be more tests (reproducible image, openQA functionality tests, ...) before > the image is spread more widely? Or will the test be created afterwards? Good question. :) The package is a meta package,.. I'm not sure about functional tests on meta packages. Be honest, I didn't think about openQA. Sure, when the image would be build based on the CONFIGURATION_FROM_GIT, it would be important. But I think it shouldn't be build bases on the repository itself. > At least I was able to confirm that the current image will be reproducible > (for trixie). Thanks a lot for you help. > With kind regards, > Roland Clobus > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/live-team/live-build/-/merge_requests/360 -- Stefan
