Re: 8.2 and 7.9 planning
On 2015-08-24 23:19, Joerg Jaspert wrote: On 14037 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: We're somewhat overdue for both 8.2 and 7.9 now (in that order). Some potential September dates: 5/6th - okay for me 12/13th - the 12th doesn't work for me until at least mid-afternoon 19th/20th - looks okay 26th/27th - looks okay All dates do seem to work for me currently, assuming the ftpmaster foo is done on Saturday (one right after the other?!), otherwise the 13th won't work out. If it's not too much of a pain for people, then one after the other seemed the most sure way of making sure we get both done closer together - the longer we leave things between 8.2 and 7.9, the more likely the latter is to be awkward due to version skew. On the 5th I would be available only about 2 hours later than usual starting times. That seems like the favoured date so far, particularly given it's the only one that really works for Steve. Adam
Re: What package is in charge for bugs in netboot/mini.iso ?
Hi, Thomas Schmitt (2015-08-25): > i wrote: > > http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/mini.iso You'll need a new debian-installer upload to unstable to get an updated file here. > Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2015/08/msg00286.html > > I am daily looking for a new amd64 mini.iso to show up, > in order to close the bug as soon as it boots. > But today there is still the non-booting ISO of august 13. Dailies are pushed here: http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/ Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: What package is in charge for bugs in netboot/mini.iso ?
Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Dailies are pushed here: > http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/ I can confirm that http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/netboot/mini.iso boots in qemu to the graphical screen. > You'll need a new debian-installer upload to unstable to get an updated > file here. Who can make it happen ? Have a nice day :) Thomas
Re: What package is in charge for bugs in netboot/mini.iso ?
Thomas Schmitt (2015-08-25): > I can confirm that > http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/netboot/mini.iso > boots in qemu to the graphical screen. Great (even if I had little doubts). > > You'll need a new debian-installer upload to unstable to get an > > updated file here. > > Who can make it happen ? Usually me. But we don't normally do that outside releases. If you don't trust stuff on d-i.d.o (which is entirely reasonable), rebuilding the debian-installer source package locally is easy enough. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: What package is in charge for bugs in netboot/mini.iso ?
Hi, > > > You'll need a new debian-installer upload to unstable > > Who can make it happen ? > Usually me. But we don't normally do that outside releases. If you don't > trust stuff on d-i.d.o (which is entirely reasonable), rebuilding the > debian-installer source package locally is easy enough. The broken mini is mentioned in https://wiki.debian.org/InstallFAQ as one of the ways to get a Sid installation: Use netboot "mini.iso" image. You will find it on any of the Debian mirrors under debian/dists/unstable/main/installer-*/current/images/netboot/mini.iso. During the installation choose "Advanced options" -> "Expert install". In the step "Choose a mirror of the Debian archive" choose version "sid - unstable". I got a Sid VM meanwhile via upgrade-dist from stable to testing to unstable. The statement from the FAQ turned out to be true: This method is the most sure to work of those presented here. Have a nice day :) Thomas
Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 05:09:19PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >Hey folks, > >We called our main installer images distribution site >cdimage.debian.org a long time ago, when that was all it published and >most people downloaded images of CDs. Ummm. Things have moved on in >the intervening years, and this name is looking more silly over time: > > * lots of people are using USB sticks > * we're providing live images that don't fit on CD > * we're providing cloud images (Openstack so far, with others coming > soon!) > >So, I'm looking for suggestions. What should we call it? I had >initially thought that images.debian.org is more generic, but it's >also likely to confuse people into looking there for pictures... :-) > >Please reply and let's see if we can come up with a better name. Thanks for all the excellent suggestions folks! As announced at the Debian-CD BoF lat last week, I've made the decision to go with *drumroll* ... get.debian.org The DNS is already updated and we'll start moving over to advertising the new URLs shortly. We'll also need to update the landing pages etc. to match - help with that also welcome! -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "Since phone messaging became popular, the young generation has lost the ability to read or write anything that is longer than one hundred and sixty characters." -- Ignatios Souvatzis
Upcoming oldstable point release (7.9)
Hi, The next point release for "wheezy" (7.9) is scheduled for Saturday, September 5th. Processing of new uploads into wheezy-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Upcoming stable point release (8.2)
Hi, The next point release for "jessie" (8.2) is scheduled for Saturday, September 5th. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
