Bug#1027697: Every update kills system as library is not in /lib

2023-01-02 Thread Klaus Ethgen
Package: libpcre2-8-0
Version: 10.42-1
Severity: critical

Since libpcre2-8-0 was moved to /usr, every update kills my whole system
as nearly everything is depending on that library.

Every other library can be managed via dpkg-divert but not libpcre2-8-0.

So after every update, my system is unusable and unbootable until I boot
a rescue system and manually move everything from
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre2-8.so* to /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/.

Please move libpcre2-8-0 back to /lib where it belongs to.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (400, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
merged-usr: no
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.16.17 (SMP w/8 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages libpcre2-8-0 depends on:
ii  libc6  2.36-7

libpcre2-8-0 recommends no packages.

libpcre2-8-0 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Klaus Ethgen   http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1027697: marked as done (Every update kills system as library is not in /lib)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 09:20:27 +0100
with message-id <9b21dca5ed13396df48f420d11d93f181fc1a364.ca...@43-1.org>
and subject line Re: Every update kills system as library is not in /lib
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027697,
regarding Every update kills system as library is not in /lib
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1027697: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027697
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libpcre2-8-0
Version: 10.42-1
Severity: critical

Since libpcre2-8-0 was moved to /usr, every update kills my whole system
as nearly everything is depending on that library.

Every other library can be managed via dpkg-divert but not libpcre2-8-0.

So after every update, my system is unusable and unbootable until I boot
a rescue system and manually move everything from
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre2-8.so* to /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/.

Please move libpcre2-8-0 back to /lib where it belongs to.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (400, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
merged-usr: no
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.16.17 (SMP w/8 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages libpcre2-8-0 depends on:
ii  libc6  2.36-7

libpcre2-8-0 recommends no packages.

libpcre2-8-0 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Klaus Ethgen   http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 09:03:01 +0100 Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Since libpcre2-8-0 was moved to /usr, every update kills my whole system
> as nearly everything is depending on that library.

Having libraries in /usr is not a bug. The plan is to move all files to
/usr anyway (see "usrmerge" or "merged-/usr"); moving files from /usr
to / is therefore not useful.

Not having /usr available (after initramfs) hasn't been a supported
configuration in Debian for some time.

Ansgar--- End Message ---


Processed: Re: Bug#1027379: nfdump: FTBFS in bullseye (missing build-depends on tzdata)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #1027379 [src:nfdump] nfdump: FTBFS in bullseye (missing build-depends on 
tzdata)
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
1027379: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027379
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1027379: nfdump: FTBFS in bullseye (missing build-depends on tzdata)

2023-01-02 Thread Bernhard Schmidt

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

Hi Santiago,


During a rebuild of all packages in bullseye, your package failed to build:


[...]


Note: I'm using the "patch" tag because there is an obvious fix > (indicated in 
the subject).


That's an odd one. I cannot reproduce it in any version, because in all 
my attempts (1.6.22-2 in a bullseye sbuild, in an sid sbuild, as well as 
in the build logs of the official buildds for all of 1.6.22-2, 1.6.25-1 
and 1.7.1-1) tzdata is actually installed in the build environment, even 
without additional build-dep.


Bernhard



Bug#1027074: marked as done (ruby-grape: FTBFS with ruby-rspec 3.12: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: Failure/Error: namespace_inheritable(:version_options, options))

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 08:39:49 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1027074: fixed in ruby-grape 1.6.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027074,
regarding ruby-grape: FTBFS with ruby-rspec 3.12: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: 
 Failure/Error: namespace_inheritable(:version_options, options)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1027074: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027074
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-grape
Version: 1.6.2-2
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby-rspec-3.12

Hi,

I'm about to upload ruby-rspec 3.12. During a test rebuild with that version,
ruby-grape failed to build.

Relevant part of the build log (hopefully):
>  Failure/Error: namespace_inheritable(:version_options, options)
> 
>#<# (class)> received :namespace_inheritable 
> with unexpected arguments
>  expected: (:version_options, {:using=>:path}) (keyword arguments)
>   got: (:version_options, {:using=>:path}) (options hash)
>  # ./lib/grape/dsl/routing.rb:50:in `version'
>  # ./spec/grape/dsl/routing_spec.rb:25:in `block (3 levels) in 
> '
> 
> Finished in 4.2 seconds (files took 1.08 seconds to load)
> 2108 examples, 6 failures, 1 pending
> 
> Failed examples:
> 
> rspec ./spec/grape/dsl/request_response_spec.rb:164 # 
> Grape::DSL::RequestResponse.rescue_from list of exceptions is passed sets 
> hash of exceptions as rescue handlers
> rspec ./spec/grape/dsl/request_response_spec.rb:170 # 
> Grape::DSL::RequestResponse.rescue_from list of exceptions is passed rescues 
> only base handlers if rescue_subclasses: false option is passed
> rspec ./spec/grape/dsl/request_response_spec.rb:176 # 
> Grape::DSL::RequestResponse.rescue_from list of exceptions is passed sets 
> given proc as rescue handler for each key in hash
> rspec ./spec/grape/dsl/request_response_spec.rb:183 # 
> Grape::DSL::RequestResponse.rescue_from list of exceptions is passed sets 
> given block as rescue handler for each key in hash
> rspec ./spec/grape/dsl/request_response_spec.rb:190 # 
> Grape::DSL::RequestResponse.rescue_from list of exceptions is passed sets a 
> rescue handler declared through :with option for each key in hash
> rspec ./spec/grape/dsl/routing_spec.rb:21 # Grape::DSL::Routing.version sets 
> a version for route
> 
> [Coveralls] Outside the CI environment, not sending data.
> Stopped processing SimpleCov as a previous error not related to SimpleCov has 
> been detected
> /usr/bin/ruby3.1 
> -I/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-support-3.12.0/lib:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.12.0/lib
>  /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.12.0/exe/rspec 
> ./spec/grape/api/custom_validations_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/api/deeply_included_options_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/api/defines_boolean_in_params_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/api/inherited_helpers_spec.rb ./spec/grape/api/instance_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/api/invalid_format_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/api/namespace_parameters_in_route_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/api/nested_helpers_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/api/optional_parameters_in_route_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/api/parameters_modification_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/api/patch_method_helpers_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/api/recognize_path_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/api/required_parameters_in_route_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/api/required_parameters_with_invalid_method_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/api/routes_with_requirements_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/api/shared_helpers_exactly_one_of_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/api/shared_helpers_spec.rb ./spec/grape/api_remount_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/api_spec.rb ./spec/grape/config_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/dsl/callbacks_spec.rb ./spec/grape/dsl/configuration_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/dsl/desc_spec.rb ./spec/grape/dsl/headers_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/dsl/helpers_spec.rb ./spec/grape/dsl/inside_route_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/dsl/logger_spec.rb ./spec/grape/dsl/middleware_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/dsl/parameters_spec.rb ./spec/grape/dsl/request_response_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/dsl/routing_spec.rb ./spec/grape/dsl/settings_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/dsl/validations_spec.rb ./spec/grape/endpoint/declared_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/endpoint_spec.rb ./spec/grape/exceptions/base_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/exceptions/body_parse_errors_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/exceptions/invalid_accept_header_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/exceptions/invalid_formatter_spec.rb 
> ./spec/grape/exceptions/invalid_response_spec.rb 
> ./spec/

Bug#1027698: libclamav11: please move libfreshclam.so.2 to a separate package

2023-01-02 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: libclamav11
Version: 1.0.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.
This error may also be triggered by having a predecessor package from
'sid' installed while installing the package from 'experimental'.

See policy 7.6 at
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Preparing to unpack .../libclamav11_1.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb ...
  Unpacking libclamav11:amd64 (1.0.0+dfsg-1) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libclamav11_1.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfreshclam.so.2', which is 
also in package libclamav9:amd64 0.103.7+dfsg-1+b2
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/libclamav11_1.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb

Mixing libraries with different soversions in a single package is
not a good idea as can be seen here. Having to add Breaks+Replaces
between shared library packages also makes (future) transitions
more difficult.
Please move libfreshclam.so.2 to a new libfreshclam2 package and add
  Breaks+Replaces: libclamav9 (<< 1), libclamav11 (<< 1.0.0+dfsg-2)
there. (The transition to libclamav11 will be not smooth, but future
transitions will be.)


cheers,

Andreas


libclamav9=0.103.7+dfsg-1+b2_libclamav11=1.0.0+dfsg-1.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


Bug#1027601: marked as done (python-matplotlib-doc: not installable in Sid)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 08:49:06 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1027601: fixed in graph-tool 2.45+ds-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027601,
regarding python-matplotlib-doc: not installable in Sid
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1027601: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027601
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: graph-tool
Version: 2.45+ds-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230101 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> +--+
> | Install package build dependencies  
>  |
> +--+
> 
> 
> Setup apt archive
> -
> 
> Merged Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13), autoconf-archive, dh-python, 
> python3, libgmp-dev, libcgal-dev, libboost-thread-dev, libboost-system-dev, 
> libboost-iostreams-dev, libboost-regex-dev, libboost-coroutine-dev, 
> libboost-graph-dev, libboost-python-dev, libexpat1-dev, libsparsehash-dev, 
> libcairomm-1.0-dev, python3-dev, python3-numpy-dev, python3-cairo-dev, 
> python3-numpy, python3-scipy, python3-matplotlib, zstd, vpx-tools, 
> librsvg2-common, gir1.2-gtk-3.0, python3-gi, build-essential, fakeroot, 
> dh-sequence-sphinxdoc, python3-docutils, python3-sphinx, python3-doc, 
> python3-numpydoc, python-scipy-doc, python-matplotlib-doc, python3-cairo-doc, 
> python-ipython-doc, python-pandas-doc, texlive-latex-base, 
> texlive-latex-recommended, texlive-fonts-recommended, texlive-latex-extra, 
> cm-super-minimal, poppler-utils, latexmk
> Filtered Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13), autoconf-archive, dh-python, 
> python3, libgmp-dev, libcgal-dev, libboost-thread-dev, libboost-system-dev, 
> libboost-iostreams-dev, libboost-regex-dev, libboost-coroutine-dev, 
> libboost-graph-dev, libboost-python-dev, libexpat1-dev, libsparsehash-dev, 
> libcairomm-1.0-dev, python3-dev, python3-numpy-dev, python3-cairo-dev, 
> python3-numpy, python3-scipy, python3-matplotlib, zstd, vpx-tools, 
> librsvg2-common, gir1.2-gtk-3.0, python3-gi, build-essential, fakeroot, 
> dh-sequence-sphinxdoc, python3-docutils, python3-sphinx, python3-doc, 
> python3-numpydoc, python-scipy-doc, python-matplotlib-doc, python3-cairo-doc, 
> python-ipython-doc, python-pandas-doc, texlive-latex-base, 
> texlive-latex-recommended, texlive-fonts-recommended, texlive-latex-extra, 
> cm-super-minimal, poppler-utils, latexmk
> dpkg-deb: building package 'sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy' in 
> '/<>/apt_archive/sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy.deb'.
> Ign:1 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ InRelease
> Get:2 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ Release [963 B]
> Ign:3 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ Release.gpg
> Get:4 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ Sources [654 B]
> Get:5 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ Packages [736 B]
> Fetched 2353 B in 0s (142 kB/s)
> Reading package lists...
> Reading package lists...
> 
> Install main build dependencies (apt-based resolver)
> 
> 
> Installing build dependencies
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Reading state information...
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> 
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: python-matplotlib-doc but it is 
> not installable
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> apt-get failed.


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2023/01/01/graph-tool_2.45+ds-8_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20230101;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20230101&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, ple

Bug#1027699: llvm-toolchain-14: epoch missing in B-R for split -dev packages

2023-01-02 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Source: llvm-toolchain-14
Version: 1:14.0.6-10~exp5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.
This error may also be triggered by having a predecessor package from
'sid' installed while installing the package from 'experimental'.

See policy 7.6 at
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Preparing to unpack .../libclang-rt-14-dev_1%3a14.0.6-10~exp5_amd64.deb ...
  Unpacking libclang-rt-14-dev:amd64 (1:14.0.6-10~exp5) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libclang-rt-14-dev_1%3a14.0.6-10~exp5_amd64.deb 
(--unpack):
   trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/llvm-14/lib/clang/14.0.6/README.txt', which is 
also in package libclang-common-14-dev 1:14.0.6-9


Package: libclang-rt-14-dev
Source: llvm-toolchain-14
Version: 1:14.0.6-10~exp6
Replaces: libclang-common-14-dev (<< 14.0.6-10~exp4)
Breaks: libclang-common-14-dev (<< 14.0.6-10~exp4)
...

The Breaks+Replaces are there, but missing the epoch.

This bug seems to affect the following packages:
  libclang-rt-14-dev-wasm32
  libclang-rt-14-dev-wasm64
  libclang-rt-14-dev
  libpolly-14-dev

cheers,

Andreas

PS: If you want to get rid of the epoch in the llvm-toolchain-XX packages,
talk to me before packaging a snapshot of version 17, I have some ideas how
to achieve that.


libclang-common-14-dev=1:14.0.6-9_libclang-rt-14-dev=1:14.0.6-10~exp5.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


Bug#1027700: libcommons-vfs-java: missing Breaks+Replaces: libcommons-vfs-java-doc (<< 2.1-3)

2023-01-02 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: libcommons-vfs-java
Version: 2.1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.

See policy 7.6 at
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Preparing to unpack .../libcommons-vfs-java_2.1-3_all.deb ...
  Unpacking libcommons-vfs-java (2.1-3) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libcommons-vfs-java_2.1-3_all.deb (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc/libcommons-vfs-java/examples/pom.xml', 
which is also in package libcommons-vfs-java-doc 2.1-2
  dpkg-deb: error: paste subprocess was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/libcommons-vfs-java_2.1-3_all.deb


libcommons-vfs-java-doc has been merged into libcommons-vfs-java in 2.1-3
but no B+R were added.


cheers,

Andreas


libcommons-vfs-java-doc=2.1-2_libcommons-vfs-java=2.1-3.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


Bug#1027697: closed by Ansgar (Re: Every update kills system as library is not in /lib)

2023-01-02 Thread Klaus Ethgen
Hi,

> Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 09:20:27 +0100
> From: Ansgar 
> To: 1027697-d...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Every update kills system as library is not in /lib
> 
> On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 09:03:01 +0100 Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> > Since libpcre2-8-0 was moved to /usr, every update kills my whole system
> > as nearly everything is depending on that library.
> 
> Having libraries in /usr is not a bug. The plan is to move all files to
> /usr anyway (see "usrmerge" or "merged-/usr"); moving files from /usr
> to / is therefore not useful.
> 
> Not having /usr available (after initramfs) hasn't been a supported
> configuration in Debian for some time.

I have on purpose not installed usrmerge and in fact have blacklisted
that package as it would break the system up to a state that is not
recoverable!

My system is from early 2000 and always working but it gets more and
more a hassle with important libraries in /usr as /usr is not available
in early boot.

There is simply no reason to break such systems as mine on purpose with
moving libraries to /usr. But for a reason I cannot see, debian has
moved already several important libraries. Al I can handle with
dpkg-divert but not libprcre2-8.

Gruß
   Klaus
-- 
Klaus Ethgen   http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1027699: llvm-toolchain-14: epoch missing in B-R for split -dev packages

2023-01-02 Thread Sylvestre Ledru

Hello

Le 02/01/2023 à 09:54, Andreas Beckmann a écrit :

PS: If you want to get rid of the epoch in the llvm-toolchain-XX packages,
talk to me before packaging a snapshot of version 17, I have some ideas how
to achieve that.


Yes, I am quite interested :)

I tried a few years ago but failed

Cheers

S




Processed: reopening 1027697

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reopen 1027697
Bug #1027697 {Done: Ansgar } [libpcre2-8-0] Every update 
kills system as library is not in /lib
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1027697 to the same values 
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1027697: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027697
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1019626: marked as done (ruby-grape-entity: FTBFS with ruby3.1: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: RuntimeError:)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 2 Jan 2023 18:06:31 +0900
with message-id 
and subject line build successfully at now
has caused the Debian Bug report #1019626,
regarding ruby-grape-entity: FTBFS with ruby3.1: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: 
RuntimeError:
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1019626: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1019626
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-grape-entity
Version: 0.10.1-3
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.1

Hi,

We are about to start the ruby3.1 transition in unstable. While trying to
rebuild ruby-grape-entity with ruby3.1 enabled, the build failed.

Relevant part of the build log (hopefully):
> RuntimeError:
>   coverage measurement is already setup
> # 
> /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/simplecov-0.21.2/lib/simplecov.rb:354:in
>  `start'
> # 
> /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/simplecov-0.21.2/lib/simplecov.rb:354:in
>  `start_coverage_with_criteria'
> # 
> /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/simplecov-0.21.2/lib/simplecov.rb:343:in
>  `start_coverage_measurement'
> # 
> /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/simplecov-0.21.2/lib/simplecov.rb:59:in
>  `start'
> # ./spec/spec_helper.rb:12:in `'
> # ./spec/grape_entity/options_spec.rb:3:in `'
> No examples found.
> 
> Top 0 slowest examples (0 seconds, 0.0% of total time):
> 
> Finished in 0.5 seconds (files took 0.20813 seconds to load)
> 0 examples, 0 failures, 6 errors occurred outside of examples
> 
> [Coveralls] Outside the CI environment, not sending data.
> Stopped processing SimpleCov as a previous error not related to SimpleCov has 
> been detected
> /usr/bin/ruby3.1 
> -I/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-support-3.10.3/lib:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.10.1/lib
>  /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.10.1/exe/rspec 
> --pattern ./spec/\*\*/\*_spec.rb --format documentation failed
> ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: 


The full build log is available from:
https://people.debian.org/~terceiro/ruby3.1/17/ruby-grape-entity/ruby-grape-entity_0.10.1-3+rebuild1663007657_amd64-2022-09-12T18:34:18Z.build

To reproduce this, you need to install ruby-all-dev >= 1:3.0+2. Depending on
when you try this, it might mean installing ruby-all-dev from experimental, or
if the transition has already started, a normal build on unstable will be
enough.  If you fail to reproduce, please provide a build log and diff it with
mine so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
ruby-grape-entity/0.10.1-3 is built successfully at now.
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-grape-entity/-/pipelines/478006
-- 
Regards,
dai

GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---


Bug#1027701: python3-pairtools-examples: missing Breaks+Replaces: python3-pairtools (<< 1.0.2)

2023-01-02 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: python3-pairtools-examples
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.

See policy 7.6 at
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Preparing to unpack .../python3-pairtools-examples_1.0.2-1_amd64.deb ...
  Unpacking python3-pairtools-examples:amd64 (1.0.2-1) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/python3-pairtools-examples_1.0.2-1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite 
'/usr/share/doc/python3-pairtools/examples/example_pipeline.sh', which is also 
in package python3-pairtools 0.3.0-2+b2
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/python3-pairtools-examples_1.0.2-1_amd64.deb


Some more examples were moved to the -examples package in 1.0.2-1
but corresponding B+R were forgotten.


cheers,

Andreas


python3-pairtools=0.3.0-2+b2_python3-pairtools-examples=1.0.2-1.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


Bug#1025389: libgl1-mesa-dri: AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/i965_dri.so

2023-01-02 Thread Fabio Pedretti
Hi, i965 driver was removed, and replaced by iris, crocus and (gallium
version of) i915.

Did you have any reference to i965 in your configuration?

cd /etc/ && grep -ri i965

If so try to remove them, the system should be able to pick up the
proper driver.

Il giorno dom 1 gen 2023 alle ore 23:47 Eduard Bloch  ha scritto:
>
> So was THAT supposed to replace i965 support in mesa-22?



Bug#1025116: python-pybedtools: (autopkgtest) needs update for python3.11: No module named 'pysam.libchtslib'

2023-01-02 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Followup-For: Bug #1025116
Control: reopen -1

python3-pysam is now available for python3.11, please revert the "stick
to python3.10" changes.


Andreas



Processed: Re: python-pybedtools: (autopkgtest) needs update for python3.11: No module named 'pysam.libchtslib'

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> reopen -1
Bug #1025116 {Done: Étienne Mollier } 
[src:python-pybedtools] python-pybedtools: (autopkgtest) needs update for 
python3.11: No module named 'pysam.libchtslib'
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions python-pybedtools/0.9.0-3.

-- 
1025116: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025116
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1027703: indi-playerone: FTBFS: playerone_ccd.h:76:18: error: 'virtual void POACCD::addFITSKeywords(fitsfile*, INDI::CCDChip*)' marked 'override', but does not override

2023-01-02 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: indi-playerone
Version: 0.5+20220610020920-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source

Hi,

indi-playerone recently started to FTBFS after some (transitive)
build-dependency got updated:

/usr/bin/c++  -I/build/indi-playerone-0.5+20220610020920/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu 
-I/build/indi-playerone-0.5+20220610020920 -I/usr/include/libindi 
-I/usr/include/libplayerone -g -O2 
-ffile-prefix-map=/build/indi-playerone-0.5+20220610020920=. 
-fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time 
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector-all -fPIE -O1 
-Wa,--noexecstack  -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-but-set-variable 
-Wno-format-truncation -g -fPIE -std=gnu++14 -MD -MT 
CMakeFiles/indi_playerone_ccd.dir/playerone_ccd.cpp.o -MF 
CMakeFiles/indi_playerone_ccd.dir/playerone_ccd.cpp.o.d -o 
CMakeFiles/indi_playerone_ccd.dir/playerone_ccd.cpp.o -c 
/build/indi-playerone-0.5+20220610020920/playerone_ccd.cpp
In file included from 
/build/indi-playerone-0.5+20220610020920/playerone_ccd.cpp:26:
/build/indi-playerone-0.5+20220610020920/playerone_ccd.h:76:18: error: 'virtual 
void POACCD::addFITSKeywords(fitsfile*, INDI::CCDChip*)' marked 'override', but 
does not override
   76 | virtual void addFITSKeywords(fitsfile *fptr, INDI::CCDChip 
*targetChip) override;
  |  ^~~
/build/indi-playerone-0.5+20220610020920/playerone_ccd.cpp: In member function 
'virtual void POACCD::addFITSKeywords(fitsfile*, INDI::CCDChip*)':
/build/indi-playerone-0.5+20220610020920/playerone_ccd.cpp:1654:31: error: no 
matching function for call to 'POACCD::addFITSKeywords(fitsfile*&, 
INDI::CCDChip*&)'
 1654 | INDI::CCD::addFITSKeywords(fptr, targetChip);
  | ~~^~
In file included from 
/build/indi-playerone-0.5+20220610020920/playerone_ccd.h:34:
/usr/include/libindi/indiccd.h:508:22: note: candidate: 'virtual void 
INDI::CCD::addFITSKeywords(INDI::CCDChip*)'
  508 | virtual void addFITSKeywords(CCDChip * targetChip);
  |  ^~~
/usr/include/libindi/indiccd.h:508:22: note:   candidate expects 1 argument, 2 
provided
make[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/indi_playerone_ccd.dir/build.make:79: 
CMakeFiles/indi_playerone_ccd.dir/playerone_ccd.cpp.o] Error 1


Andreas


indi-playerone_0.5+20220610020920-1.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


Processed: reassign 1023323 to src:golang-github-cockroachdb-datadriven, fixed 1023323 in 1.0.2-6

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 1023323 src:golang-github-cockroachdb-datadriven 1.0.2-2
Bug #1023323 {Done: Shengjing Zhu } [cockroachdb-datadriven] 
cockroachdb-datadriven: missing Breaks+Replaces: 
golang-github-cockroachdb-datadriven-dev (<< 1.0.2-2)
Warning: Unknown package 'cockroachdb-datadriven'
Bug reassigned from package 'cockroachdb-datadriven' to 
'src:golang-github-cockroachdb-datadriven'.
No longer marked as found in versions 
golang-github-cockroachdb-datadriven/1.0.2-2 and 
golang-github-cockroachdb-datadriven/1.0.2-4.
No longer marked as fixed in versions 
golang-github-cockroachdb-datadriven/1.0.2-6.
Bug #1023323 {Done: Shengjing Zhu } 
[src:golang-github-cockroachdb-datadriven] cockroachdb-datadriven: missing 
Breaks+Replaces: golang-github-cockroachdb-datadriven-dev (<< 1.0.2-2)
Marked as found in versions golang-github-cockroachdb-datadriven/1.0.2-2.
> fixed 1023323 1.0.2-6
Bug #1023323 {Done: Shengjing Zhu } 
[src:golang-github-cockroachdb-datadriven] cockroachdb-datadriven: missing 
Breaks+Replaces: golang-github-cockroachdb-datadriven-dev (<< 1.0.2-2)
Marked as fixed in versions golang-github-cockroachdb-datadriven/1.0.2-6.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1023323: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023323
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: severity of 1006719 is serious, severity of 1014304 is serious

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 1006719 serious
Bug #1006719 [src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-390xx] 
nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-390xx: EoL (12/2022) driver should not be 
released with bookworm
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> severity 1014304 serious
Bug #1014304 [src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-450] 
nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-450: EoL (07/2023) driver should not be released 
with bookworm
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1006719: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006719
1014304: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014304
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1027704: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-460: transitional packages should not be released with bookworm

2023-01-02 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-460
Version: 460.106.00-9
Severity: serious

src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-460 driver has been turned into
transitional packages in bullseye and sid, there is no need to ship them
in bookworm. The tesla-470 driver series (targeted by the transitional
packages) will be in bookworm.


Andreas



Bug#1027705: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-510: transitional packages should not be released with bookworm

2023-01-02 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-510
Version: 510.108.03-1
Severity: serious

src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-510 driver has been turned into
transitional packages sid (it does not exist in bullseye), there is no
need to ship them in bookworm. The (unversioned) tesla driver series
(targeted by the transitional packages) will be in bookworm.


Andreas



Bug#1027697: marked as done (Every update kills system as library is not in /lib)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 2 Jan 2023 10:07:22 +
with message-id 
and subject line Re: Bug#1027697: Every update kills system as library is not 
in /lib
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027697,
regarding Every update kills system as library is not in /lib
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1027697: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027697
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libpcre2-8-0
Version: 10.42-1
Severity: critical

Since libpcre2-8-0 was moved to /usr, every update kills my whole system
as nearly everything is depending on that library.

Every other library can be managed via dpkg-divert but not libpcre2-8-0.

So after every update, my system is unusable and unbootable until I boot
a rescue system and manually move everything from
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre2-8.so* to /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/.

Please move libpcre2-8-0 back to /lib where it belongs to.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (400, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
merged-usr: no
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.16.17 (SMP w/8 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages libpcre2-8-0 depends on:
ii  libc6  2.36-7

libpcre2-8-0 recommends no packages.

libpcre2-8-0 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Klaus Ethgen   http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

Dear Klaus,

The Debian project has decided to remove support for not-usr-merged 
systems starting with the forthcoming Bookworm release (this was 
recently re-affirmed by the Technical Committee in #914897).


As the pcre2 maintainer, I cannot comply with your request, as that 
would put the pcre2 packages in breach of Debian policy. So I am going 
to close this bug (again); if you want to pursue your problem via the 
BTS, please reassign it to a more suitable place (maybe policy or general).


You are, of course, welcome to try and change this settled policy 
decision, but I must advise you that at this point you are very unlikely 
to succeed. I think you would have to get a GR to override the Technical 
Committee decision(s) on /usr-merge. If you wanted to do that, 
debian-devel would be the place to try and establish consensus.


I regret that I am unable to be of more assistance.

Regards,

Matthew--- End Message ---


Bug#1027707: patroni: autopkgtest fails with etcd 3.4 (v2 not enabled by default)

2023-01-02 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Source: patroni
Version: 2.1.5-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

I've uploaded etcd 3.4 to unstable. Your package's autopkgtest fails.
I believe it's because etcd 3.4 doesn't enable v2 API by default.
Please adjust your autopkgtest with ETCD_ENABLE_V2=true env, or --enable-v2
option.



Bug#1027648: marked as pending in net-cpp

2023-01-02 Thread Mike Gabriel
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1027648 in net-cpp reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/ubports-team/net-cpp/-/commit/ce35e451ad21bdb237746ba200ebb7d15f34c562


debian/patches: Add 
0004_CMakeLists.txt-Add-CMake-flag-ENABLE_WERROR-defaulti.patch. Disable 
-Werror for now via CMake option. (Closes: #1027648).


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1027648



Processed: Bug#1027648 marked as pending in net-cpp

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending
Bug #1027648 [src:net-cpp] net-cpp: FTBFS: easy.h:115:25: error: 
‘CURLOPT_PROGRESSFUNCTION’ is deprecated: since 7.32.0. Use 
CURLOPT_XFERINFOFUNCTION [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
1027648: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027648
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: cloning 1027707, reassign -1 to vip-manager ...

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> clone 1027707 -1
Bug #1027707 [src:patroni] patroni: autopkgtest fails with etcd 3.4 (v2 not 
enabled by default)
Bug 1027707 cloned as bug 1027708
> reassign -1 vip-manager 1.0.2-3
Bug #1027708 [src:patroni] patroni: autopkgtest fails with etcd 3.4 (v2 not 
enabled by default)
Bug reassigned from package 'src:patroni' to 'vip-manager'.
No longer marked as found in versions patroni/2.1.5-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1027708 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #1027708 [vip-manager] patroni: autopkgtest fails with etcd 3.4 (v2 not 
enabled by default)
Marked as found in versions vip-manager/1.0.2-3.
> retitle -1 vip-manager: autopkgtest fails with etcd 3.4 (v2 not enabled by 
> default)
Bug #1027708 [vip-manager] patroni: autopkgtest fails with etcd 3.4 (v2 not 
enabled by default)
Changed Bug title to 'vip-manager: autopkgtest fails with etcd 3.4 (v2 not 
enabled by default)' from 'patroni: autopkgtest fails with etcd 3.4 (v2 not 
enabled by default)'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1027707: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027707
1027708: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027708
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1027648: marked as done (net-cpp: FTBFS: easy.h:115:25: error: ‘CURLOPT_PROGRESSFUNCTION’ is deprecated: since 7.32.0. Use CURLOPT_XFERINFOFUNCTION [-Werror=deprecated-declarations])

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 10:50:26 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1027648: fixed in net-cpp 3.1.0+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027648,
regarding net-cpp: FTBFS: easy.h:115:25: error: ‘CURLOPT_PROGRESSFUNCTION’ is 
deprecated: since 7.32.0. Use CURLOPT_XFERINFOFUNCTION 
[-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1027648: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027648
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: net-cpp
Version: 3.0.0+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230101 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src && /usr/bin/c++ 
> -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB -DBOOST_ERROR_CODE_HEADER_ONLY 
> -DBOOST_SERIALIZATION_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_SYSTEM_DYN_LINK -Dnet_cpp_EXPORTS 
> -I/<>/include -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. 
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time 
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -std=c++11 -Werror -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing 
> -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wextra -fPIC -MD -MT 
> src/CMakeFiles/net-cpp.dir/core/net/http/impl/curl/easy.cpp.o -MF 
> CMakeFiles/net-cpp.dir/core/net/http/impl/curl/easy.cpp.o.d -o 
> CMakeFiles/net-cpp.dir/core/net/http/impl/curl/easy.cpp.o -c 
> /<>/src/core/net/http/impl/curl/easy.cpp
> In file included from /<>/src/core/net/http/impl/curl/curl.h:21,
>  from 
> /<>/src/core/net/http/impl/curl/client.h:24,
>  from /<>/src/core/net/http/client.cpp:20:
> /<>/src/core/net/http/impl/curl/easy.h:115:25: error: 
> ‘CURLOPT_PROGRESSFUNCTION’ is deprecated: since 7.32.0. Use 
> CURLOPT_XFERINFOFUNCTION [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
>   115 | progress_function = CURLOPT_PROGRESSFUNCTION,
>   | ^~~~
> In file included from /<>/src/core/net/http/impl/curl/easy.h:29:
> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/curl/curl.h:1295:3: note: declared here
>  1295 |   CURLOPTDEPRECATED(CURLOPT_PROGRESSFUNCTION, 
> CURLOPTTYPE_FUNCTIONPOINT, 56,
>   |   ^
> /<>/src/core/net/http/impl/curl/easy.h:128:16: error: 
> ‘CURLOPT_PUT’ is deprecated: since 7.12.1. Use CURLOPT_UPLOAD 
> [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
>   128 | http_put = CURLOPT_PUT,
>   |^~~
> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/curl/curl.h:1286:3: note: declared here
>  1286 |   CURLOPTDEPRECATED(CURLOPT_PUT, CURLOPTTYPE_LONG, 54,
>   |   ^
> -- Detecting C compiler ABI info - done
> -- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc - skipped
> -- Detecting C compile features
> -- Detecting C compile features - done
> -- Found Python: /usr/bin/python3 (found version "3.10.9") found components: 
> Interpreter 
> -- Performing Test CMAKE_HAVE_LIBC_PTHREAD
> -- Performing Test CMAKE_HAVE_LIBC_PTHREAD - Success
> -- Found Threads: TRUE  
> -- Configuring done
> -- Generating done
> -- Build files have been written to: 
> /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/gmock
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/gmock && /usr/bin/cmake -E 
> touch 
> /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/GMock-prefix/src/GMock-stamp/GMock-configure
> [ 56%] Performing build step for 'GMock'
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/gmock && make
> make[4]: Entering directory 
> '/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/gmock'
> /usr/bin/cmake -S/usr/src/googletest/googlemock 
> -B/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/gmock --check-build-system 
> CMakeFiles/Makefile.cmake 0
> /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_start 
> /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/gmock/CMakeFiles 
> /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/gmock//CMakeFiles/progress.marks
> make  -f CMakeFiles/Makefile2 all
> make[5]: Entering directory 
> '/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/gmock'
> make  -f 
> /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/googletest/CMakeFiles/gtest.dir/build.make
>  
> /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/googletest/CMakeFiles/gtest.dir/depend
> make[6]: Entering directory 
> '/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/gmock'
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/gmock && /usr/bin/cmake -E 
> cmake_depends "Unix Makefiles" /usr/src/googletest/googlemock 
> /usr/src/googletest/googletest 
> /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/gmock 
> /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/googletest 
> /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/googletest/CMakeFiles/gtest.dir/DependInfo.cmake
>  --color=
> make[6]: Leaving directory '/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/gmock'
> make  -f 
> /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/google

Bug#1027379: nfdump: FTBFS in bullseye (missing build-depends on tzdata)

2023-01-02 Thread Santiago Vila

El 2/1/23 a las 9:28, Bernhard Schmidt escribió:

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

Hi Santiago,


During a rebuild of all packages in bullseye, your package failed to build:


[...]


Note: I'm using the "patch" tag because there is an obvious fix > (indicated in 
the subject).


That's an odd one. I cannot reproduce it in any version, because in all my 
attempts (1.6.22-2 in a bullseye sbuild, in an sid sbuild, as well as in the 
build logs of the official buildds for all of 1.6.22-2, 1.6.25-1 and 1.7.1-1) 
tzdata is actually installed in the build environment, even without additional 
build-dep.


tzdata is not really build essential, you should not install it in a chroot 
used to build packages from scratch. It follows from this that if you want to 
be sure that you don't miss build-dependencies, you should not accept 
debootstrap defaults when creating a chroot, as it installs
several packages which are not build-essential.

To reproduce, try building the package in a chroot which does not contain 
tzdata.

I can also give you ssh access to a machine where this is easily reproducible, 
as I said in the bug report, but I trust that you should be able to create a 
chroot without tzdata.

Thanks.



Bug#968997: fwupdmgr: "Successfully" updates BIOS firmware, no effect on reboot

2023-01-02 Thread Laurent Bigonville

On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 21:48:42 +0100 Steve McIntyre  wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 09:22:02PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> >
> >shim-unsigned has been updated to 15.6 which has the right patches 
in. But

> >for some reason, shim-signed is still at 15.4.
>
> We've had problems in submitting shim 15.6 to Microsoft for
> signing. We're working on a solution, but it's going to take a little
> longer yet.

Hello Steven,

Sorry to insist (again), but do you have any news about this?

We are slowly approaching the freeze for bookworm and having a fix for 
this looks quite important to me.


Kind regards,

Laurent Bigonville



Bug#1027379: nfdump: FTBFS in bullseye (missing build-depends on tzdata)

2023-01-02 Thread Bernhard Schmidt

Hi,

That's an odd one. I cannot reproduce it in any version, because in 
all my attempts (1.6.22-2 in a bullseye sbuild, in an sid sbuild, as 
well as in the build logs of the official buildds for all of 1.6.22-2, 
1.6.25-1 and 1.7.1-1) tzdata is actually installed in the build 
environment, even without additional build-dep.


tzdata is not really build essential, you should not install it in a 
chroot used to build packages from scratch. It follows from this that if 
you want to be sure that you don't miss build-dependencies, you should 
not accept debootstrap defaults when creating a chroot, as it installs

several packages which are not build-essential.

To reproduce, try building the package in a chroot which does not 
contain tzdata.


Both the official buildds and schroots created using the documented 
sbuild-createchroot then apparently do not follow recommended procedure?


I have no problem fixing this up in unstable, but I think this does not 
warrant a stable update.


BTW, it is reproducible using "sbuild --add-conflicts=tzdata"

Bernhard



Bug#1020079: marked as done (netplan.io: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MESON_TESTTHREADS=8 meson test returned exit code 1)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 11:05:59 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1020079: fixed in netplan.io 0.105-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1020079,
regarding netplan.io: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && 
LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MESON_TESTTHREADS=8 meson test returned exit code 1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1020079: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020079
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: netplan.io
Version: 0.105-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
>  debian/rules binary
> dh binary --buildsystem=meson
>dh_update_autotools_config -O--buildsystem=meson
>dh_autoreconf -O--buildsystem=meson
>dh_auto_configure -O--buildsystem=meson
>   cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 meson .. 
> --wrap-mode=nodownload --buildtype=plain --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc 
> --localstatedir=/var --libdir=lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
> The Meson build system
> Version: 0.63.2
> Source dir: /<>
> Build dir: /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu
> Build type: native build
> Project name: netplan
> Project version: 0.105
> C compiler for the host machine: cc (gcc 12.2.0 "cc (Debian 12.2.0-2) 12.2.0")
> C linker for the host machine: cc ld.bfd 2.38.90.20220713
> Host machine cpu family: x86_64
> Host machine cpu: x86_64
> Found pkg-config: /usr/bin/pkg-config (0.29.2)
> Run-time dependency glib-2.0 found: YES 2.73.3
> Run-time dependency gio-2.0 found: YES 2.73.3
> Run-time dependency yaml-0.1 found: YES 0.2.5
> Run-time dependency uuid found: YES 2.38.1
> Run-time dependency libsystemd found: YES 251
> Run-time dependency systemd found: YES 251
> Run-time dependency bash-completion found: YES 2.11
> Program pyflakes3 found: YES (/usr/bin/pyflakes3)
> Program pycodestyle found: YES (/usr/bin/pycodestyle)
> Program nosetests3 found: YES (/usr/bin/nosetests3)
> Program pandoc found: YES (/usr/bin/pandoc)
> Program find found: YES (/usr/bin/find)
> Configuring io.netplan.Netplan.service using configuration
> Program tests/validate_docs.sh found: YES 
> (/<>/tests/validate_docs.sh)
> Program tests/cli.py found: YES (/<>/tests/cli.py)
> Build targets in project: 13
> 
> netplan 0.105
> 
>   User defined options
> buildtype: plain
> libdir   : lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
> localstatedir: /var
> prefix   : /usr
> sysconfdir   : /etc
> wrap_mode: nodownload
> 
> Found ninja-1.11.1 at /usr/bin/ninja
>dh_auto_build -O--buildsystem=meson
>   cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 ninja -j8 -v
> [1/29] cc -Isrc/libnetplan.so.0.0.p -Isrc -I../src -Iinclude -I../include 
> -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include 
> -I/usr/include/libmount -I/usr/include/blkid -I/usr/include/uuid 
> -fvisibility=hidden -fdiagnostics-color=always -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall 
> -Winvalid-pch -Werror -std=c99 -O0 '-DSBINDIR="/usr/sbin"' 
> -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=700 -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. 
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time 
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC -pthread -MD -MQ src/libnetplan.so.0.0.p/names.c.o 
> -MF src/libnetplan.so.0.0.p/names.c.o.d -o src/libnetplan.so.0.0.p/names.c.o 
> -c ../src/names.c
> [2/29] cc -Isrc/libnetplan.so.0.0.p -Isrc -I../src -Iinclude -I../include 
> -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include 
> -I/usr/include/libmount -I/usr/include/blkid -I/usr/include/uuid 
> -fvisibility=hidden -fdiagnostics-color=always -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall 
> -Winvalid-pch -Werror -std=c99 -O0 '-DSBINDIR="/usr/sbin"' 
> -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=700 -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. 
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time 
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC -pthread -MD -MQ 
> src/libnetplan.so.0.0.p/abi_compat.c.o -MF 
> src/libnetplan.so.0.0.p/abi_compat.c.o.d -o 
> src/libnetplan.so.0.0.p/abi_compat.c.o -c ../src/abi_compat.c
> [3/29] cc -Isrc/libnetplan.so.0.0.p -Isrc -I../src -Iinclude -I../include 
> -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include 
> -I/usr/include/libmount -I/usr/include/blkid -I/usr/include/uuid 
> -fvisibility=hidden -fdiagnostics-color=always -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall 
> -Winvalid-pch -Werror -std=c99 -O0 '-DSBINDIR="/usr/sbin"' 
> -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=700 -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. 
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security 

Bug#1027379: nfdump: FTBFS in bullseye (missing build-depends on tzdata)

2023-01-02 Thread Santiago Vila

El 2/1/23 a las 12:04, Bernhard Schmidt escribió:

Both the official buildds and schroots created using the documented 
sbuild-createchroot then apparently do not follow recommended procedure?


Yes, exactly. There is a bug in debootstrap asking for such 
required-but-not-build-essential packages
not to be installed by default.

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837060

Apparently, they have not agreed about the way to fix this. Some people suggest 
that debootstrap
explicitly should not install those packages. Others suggest that debootstrap 
keeps installing
all required packages not matter what, and instead we downgrade those packages 
to important.

In the meantime, it's 2023 and I still have to explain that priority required 
does not imply
build-essential. Believe me that this is also odd for me.


I have no problem fixing this up in unstable, but I think this does not warrant 
a stable update.


That would be unfortunate, as it means we will probably never have a stable 
release without FTBFS bugs.

I have rebuilt the entire bullseye archive from scratch, and I'm reporting 
every FTBFS bug I find,
because "packages in stable must build in stable". This is not only Policy but 
also Release Policy,
i.e. something that our users should take for granted because we promised it as 
a release goal.

The bugs I find are very diverse and in most cases they have been already 
reported in unstable and forgotten.
There are also bugs which happen in bookworm but had not been reported yet, 
like this one.
Since backporting those kind of bugs is completely trivial, I'm still aiming at 
having a stable distribution which is free from FTBFS bugs (of any kind). You 
are of course free not to help me in my goal, but it would
help immensely if every maintainer ensured that their own packages are free 
from FTBFS bugs in stable.

Thanks.



Bug#1026021: pytest-forked: FTBFS with pytest 7.2

2023-01-02 Thread Timo Röhling

* Timo Röhling  [2022-12-22 20:17]:

No problem. I found your PR in the mean time (better than my hotfix
btw), and pytest still has a few other regressions anyway, so I'm
fine waiting for upstream to have a proper release soon(ish).


Any progress with the release? The other pytest regressions have
been resolved now, so pytest-forked is the only remaining blocker.


Cheers
Timo

--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀   ╭╮
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁   │ Timo Röhling   │
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀   │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1  23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │
⠈⠳⣄   ╰╯


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1027379: nfdump: FTBFS in bullseye (missing build-depends on tzdata)

2023-01-02 Thread Santiago Vila

El 2/1/23 a las 12:04, Bernhard Schmidt escribió:

BTW, it is reproducible using "sbuild --add-conflicts=tzdata"


Yes (just tried).

Thanks.



Bug#968997: fwupdmgr: "Successfully" updates BIOS firmware, no effect on reboot

2023-01-02 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 11:57:42AM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
>
>Sorry to insist (again), but do you have any news about this?
>
>We are slowly approaching the freeze for bookworm and having a fix for this
>looks quite important to me.

Yes, I *know*.

I've been chasing on this regularly for months now. It seems that we
now finally have movement on the certificate front and I'm hoping
we'll be able to get stuff unblocked in the next couple of weeks.

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
“Rarely is anyone thanked for the work they did to prevent the
 disaster that didn’t happen.”
   -- Mikko Hypponen (https://twitter.com/mikko/)



Bug#1027379: nfdump: FTBFS in bullseye (missing build-depends on tzdata)

2023-01-02 Thread Bernhard Schmidt

Control: tags -1 + pending
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo

Hi,

I have no problem fixing this up in unstable, but I think this does 
not warrant a stable update.


That would be unfortunate, as it means we will probably never have a 
stable release without FTBFS bugs.


"Never" is too hard, I will fix it in unstable targetting bookworm, so 
the next release should have it.


Since backporting those kind of bugs is completely trivial, I'm still 
aiming at having a stable distribution which is free from FTBFS bugs (of 
any kind). You are of course free not to help me in my goal, but it would
help immensely if every maintainer ensured that their own packages are 
free from FTBFS bugs in stable.


I somehow have my doubt that the release-team would be happy to have a 
lot of stable updates fixing just a FTBFS that does not happen with the 
default buildd configuration. I totally agree about the severity of 
other FTBFS bugs in stable.


Bernhard



Processed: Re: Bug#1027379: nfdump: FTBFS in bullseye (missing build-depends on tzdata)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #1027379 [src:nfdump] nfdump: FTBFS in bullseye (missing build-depends on 
tzdata)
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #1027379 [src:nfdump] nfdump: FTBFS in bullseye (missing build-depends on 
tzdata)
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
1027379: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027379
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1027542: epl: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:6: build] Error 25

2023-01-02 Thread David Bremner
Lucas Nussbaum  writes:

> Source: epl
> Version: 0.9-5
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20230101 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>

This seems tricky to duplicate

- building on bare metal (sid/bookworm): works
- building in sbuild chroot by running dpkg-buildpackage: works
- building with sbuild: fails.

As a wild guess I tried adding

   export EMACS_INHIBIT_AUTOMATIC_NATIVE_COMPILATION=t

to debian/rules, but it did not help.



Bug#1027379: nfdump: FTBFS in bullseye (missing build-depends on tzdata)

2023-01-02 Thread Santiago Vila

El 2/1/23 a las 13:00, Bernhard Schmidt escribió:

I somehow have my doubt that the release-team would be happy to have a lot of 
stable updates fixing just a FTBFS that does not happen with the default buildd 
configuration. I totally agree about the severity of other FTBFS bugs in stable.


Please note that this was already serious in bullseye, as release policy has 
not changed between bullseye and bookworm regarding this.

https://release.debian.org/bullseye/rc_policy.txt

   Packages must list any packages they require to build beyond those
   that are "build-essential" in the appropriate Build-Depends: fields.
   Ref: 4.2

Thanks.



Bug#1024598: marked as done (bash: non-source file)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 12:19:22 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1024598: fixed in bash 5.2.15-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024598,
regarding bash: non-source file
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1024598: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024598
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Source: bash
Version: 5.2-2
Severity: serious

The bash source includes doc/aosa-bash-full.pdf which is a non-source file 
without corresponding source.
Please remove it additionally to doc/aosa-bash.pdf (already excluded).
You should also add a repack suffix to the upstream version.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: bash
Source-Version: 5.2.15-2
Done: Matthias Klose 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
bash, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1024...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matthias Klose  (supplier of updated bash package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 13:06:21 +0100
Source: bash
Architecture: source
Version: 5.2.15-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Matthias Klose 
Changed-By: Matthias Klose 
Closes: 1024598
Changes:
 bash (5.2.15-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Remove one more pdf file without source. Closes: #1024598.
Checksums-Sha1:
 1c8463de9b96f5e72d178a50c49f80242e48d8c7 2317 bash_5.2.15-2.dsc
 87f4eb879578479049306f3b721ff38aa17cfa1d 9997221 bash_5.2.15.orig.tar.gz
 d922d9f78e120a6068105ebfe7c15cbadddc31a0 97380 bash_5.2.15-2.debian.tar.xz
 48b1550e367132d0e35fe97570c16764ea5b958f 7114 bash_5.2.15-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 f51753e946af43eb58549c81e03b35a47af9fe6c6364179ccd4ef862b7c3b2d3 2317 
bash_5.2.15-2.dsc
 7a315bc0e9d90713159e4390ec1096a41e4f33cd8cc3d1a749a8e5ad56600f51 9997221 
bash_5.2.15.orig.tar.gz
 998f8ea5b754a734ae7d8306e149c43d713ddfcf49623a036004b729237dbcca 97380 
bash_5.2.15-2.debian.tar.xz
 343e873ae68267e40aa4cc0ab7e37de99e4c3dcd06620728a866d79dd9a694e7 7114 
bash_5.2.15-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 9c8dba99ddbcae19a3944a3fecfb2325 2317 base required bash_5.2.15-2.dsc
 c176d9fdbf0e3ad8dd769063a3f8130c 9997221 base required bash_5.2.15.orig.tar.gz
 3d6eb21d48a3a8a66e0a15d6bb732666 97380 base required 
bash_5.2.15-2.debian.tar.xz
 198328e6b8b1105c2be8de3df4e1b3ac 7114 base required 
bash_5.2.15-2_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=lxk+
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---


Bug#1025812: marked as done (elpa-haskell-mode: Tests fail against Emacs 28.2)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 12:20:38 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1025812: fixed in haskell-mode 17.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1025812,
regarding elpa-haskell-mode: Tests fail against Emacs 28.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1025812: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025812
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: elpa-haskell-mode
Version: 17.2-3
Severity: serious

Hello,

Dear maintainer,

Test haskell-generate-tags condition:
(file-missing "Searching for program" "No such file or directory" "git")
   FAILED  100/538  haskell-generate-tags (0.048838 sec)

See: 
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/h/haskell-mode/29137490/log.gz

-- 
Sean Whitton


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: haskell-mode
Source-Version: 17.2-5
Done: David Bremner 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
haskell-mode, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1025...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David Bremner  (supplier of updated haskell-mode package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 07:38:18 -0400
Source: haskell-mode
Architecture: source
Version: 17.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Emacsen Team 
Changed-By: David Bremner 
Closes: 1025812
Changes:
 haskell-mode (17.2-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload
   [ Nicholas D Steeves ]
   * Drop emacs24 and emacs25 from Build-Depends (packages do not exist
 in bullseye).
 .
   [ David Bremner ]
   * Add git as build-dep. Bug fix: "Tests fail against Emacs 28.2", thanks
 to Sean Whitton (Closes: #1025812).
Checksums-Sha1:
 e9fe171a249eb5add674c61889fd7da785dc6708 2143 haskell-mode_17.2-5.dsc
 4a9a6427638db49e0b1be0c262b6053226dc0106 6956 haskell-mode_17.2-5.debian.tar.xz
 f7a479b93a36c623d0bbfe7f2891c9921d38e42c 9841 
haskell-mode_17.2-5_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 43b60ac416cbac91ce8ea866765346e1c8b64abc8c58995bdd9e243fd2ca13a4 2143 
haskell-mode_17.2-5.dsc
 664b013c0034eb3f25f15c68a52dc6786fab793c517a037a8ae27899eef22125 6956 
haskell-mode_17.2-5.debian.tar.xz
 95d74b9a3124e5054c01dd833521aa746c5dd39ab727ba293feb912ce99a0308 9841 
haskell-mode_17.2-5_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 74feb954ab13e9191b3fa4618958018d 2143 lisp optional haskell-mode_17.2-5.dsc
 c1256a7a2ef4146c3f0e7015664adc7b 6956 lisp optional 
haskell-mode_17.2-5.debian.tar.xz
 b1274ce72069ae2ef36a5a75989d760a 9841 lisp optional 
haskell-mode_17.2-5_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEkiyHYXwaY0SiY6fqA0U5G1WqFSEFAmOyw98ACgkQA0U5G1Wq
FSHbMQ//bssdRGp2tg5V497IwKDsawQhtLlHlo1JrGYy++1dLY70RidtxQIhiOjH
d8Pj1XpPmIijYHqmjgZitbKg7/cH5zfa9RmtIch25thR58tx+GRyERqxxfHK8RvP
ckW7BlLJtyXkTPEs5MEjcka8r5a1JobCbjfeVAfE3o50u6nPxcbXOk8Wqifp4dZc
WIHlQzFN8fklZ2SLzaWrzQQfARjr8WZq2lAIppqR6yWvBxFFNin4YyX6hJ7eUoJU
QgOvttLzco9LI9qqh0PtFoTxfabSujmLfKUqo0yGpVDE4npf+NyVz3b6sZAa0EGA
os3DQBA0nBus96FsrERVF2YAgvzX5ofbn+kKc5Hc07piSK4CE0TESHNXqn17ZW2n
+BPvRKani+nFmeXRSLCzCvL1Uc9qasxu9+S4t7VEVOq/5OrT6irdltd6N4DUoyUZ
dmc0r8obO+6UeibMsHsQWXzzRDxu7fsuLBw3UOeXjxhjg4TjGGAsdO8J6fHkRXTY
4VfC7KsvyvZK6s2fOHmzUKYCE4HgISiKH7dZqqglcJyzvO29wQRQuja3Fx5uwYKJ
zyauvt9Jr3vzcOTM4JrQrFakiaOOrDRumDjoDN3OeQ155g07wD/nnxrNEyyIfdmf
7Fwlb7heqlIuS6/9CMr5qPmKgQZplHqOSXqZ3qeQx3rLgJE/D6c=
=lQPr
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---


Bug#1026817: marked as done (lomiri-indicator-network: FTBFS: Critical: getprop process failed: "execvp: No such file or directory" ((null):0, (null)))

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 12:20:50 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1026817: fixed in lomiri-indicator-network 
1.0.0~git20221216.698b753-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026817,
regarding lomiri-indicator-network: FTBFS: Critical: getprop process failed: 
"execvp: No such file or directory" ((null):0, (null))
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1026817: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026817
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lomiri-indicator-network
Version: 1.0.0~git20220718.2ca3619-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221221 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> [--] Global test environment tear-down
> [==] 66 tests from 6 test suites ran. (3020373 ms total)
> [  PASSED  ] 36 tests.
> [  FAILED  ] 30 tests, listed below:
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.BasicMenuContents
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.OneDisconnectedAccessPointAtStartup
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.OneConnectedAccessPointAtStartup
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.AddOneDisconnectedAccessPointAfterStartup
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.AddOneConnectedAccessPointAfterStartup
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.SecondModem
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.SimStates_NoSIM
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.SimStates_NoSIM2
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.SimStates_LockedSIM
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.SimStates_LockedSIM2
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.SimStates_UnlockedSIM
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.SimStates_UnlockedSIM2
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.FlightMode_NoSIM
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.FlightMode_LockedSIM
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.FlightMode_WifiOff
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.FlightMode_WifiOn
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.GroupedWiFiAccessPoints
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.WifiStates_SSIDs
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.WifiStates_Connect1AP
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.WifiStates_Connect2APs
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.WifiStates_AddAndActivate
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.EnterpriseWifiConnect
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.CellDataEnabled
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.CellDataDisabled
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.UnlockSIM_MenuContents
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.UnlockSIM_Cancel
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.UnlockSIM_CancelFirstUnlockSecond
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.UnlockSIM_CorrectPin
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.UnlockSIM_IncorrectPin
> [  FAILED  ] TestIndicator.UnlockSIM2_IncorrectPin
> 
> 30 FAILED TESTS
> 
> 
> 50% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 2
> 
> Total Test time (real) = 3020.58 sec
> 
> The following tests FAILED:
> 1 - integration-tests (Failed)
> Errors while running CTest
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:74: test] Error 8
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu'
> dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && make -j8 test 
> ARGS\+=--verbose ARGS\+=-j8 returned exit code 2


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/12/21/lomiri-indicator-network_1.0.0~git20220718.2ca3619-4_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20221221;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20221221&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lomiri-indicator-network
Source-Version: 1.0.0~git20221216.698b753-1
Done: Mike Gabriel 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lomiri-indicator-network, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP 
archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1026...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Mike Gabriel  (supplier of update

Processed: Bug#1027067 marked as pending in ruby-bunny

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending
Bug #1027067 [src:ruby-bunny] ruby-bunny: FTBFS with ruby-rspec 3.12: ERROR: 
Test "ruby3.1" failed:  Failure/Error: expect(ch).to 
receive(:exchange_bind).with(src1, dst, routing_key: "abc")
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
1027067: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027067
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1027067: marked as pending in ruby-bunny

2023-01-02 Thread HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai)
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1027067 in ruby-bunny reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-bunny/-/commit/2cda07cb2c2db739336dd0eb310e63b6356aa7bf


fix FTBFS with ruby-rspec-3.12 (Closes: #1027067)


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1027067



Bug#1025389: libgl1-mesa-dri: AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/i965_dri.so

2023-01-02 Thread Eduard Bloch
severity 1025389 normal
thanks

Hallo,
* Fabio Pedretti [Mon, Jan 02 2023, 10:10:24AM]:
> Hi, i965 driver was removed, and replaced by iris, crocus and (gallium
> version of) i915.
>
> Did you have any reference to i965 in your configuration?
>
> cd /etc/ && grep -ri i965
>
> If so try to remove them, the system should be able to pick up the
> proper driver.

Okay, the devil is in the details. Multiple issues were involved. First,
I had a custom config snippet in xorg.conf.d which has activated the
intel drivers. I had to add this in earlier times in order to get rid of
tearing.

Another part in the puzzle was an environment setting which I have added
some time ago to work around crashes (first VLC crashes, then all
applications crashes in the major driver loader fu*up a few weeks ago).
So it seems like it was the MESA_LOADER_DRIVER_OVERRIDE=i965 which
actually triggered the Xorg.0.log messages which I have mistakenly
attributed to the incorrect X configuration itself.

So after changing all that, it's now apparently loading the proper
driver (iris in the log), with no errors, and most GL using applications
also work properly. VLC is still crashing on certain video formats but
that is probably due to some internal bug of VLC's vaapi usage (there is
another bugreport for that). But mplayer works mostly fine, except for
some gamma problems.

So in the end, it would be good if there was at least some notice about
the driver configuration change, something in NEWS.Debian, for example.
Maybe with a longer explanation in README.Debian. I can imagine that
more users with customized configurations are affected like I was.

Best regards,
Eduard.



Processed: Re: libgl1-mesa-dri: AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/i965_dri.so

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 1025389 normal
Bug #1025389 [libgl1-mesa-dri] libgl1-mesa-dri: AIGLX error: dlopen of 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/i965_dri.so
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1025389: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025389
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1026628: pyro4: FTBFS: AssertionError: must fail

2023-01-02 Thread Bo YU
Source: pyro4
Version: 4.82-1
Followup-For: Bug #1026628

Hi,

From here: https://github.com/irmen/Pyro4 -- 
"Python 3.10 is the End of the Line for Pyro4",
I am not sure how to fix the issue correctly, is it time to package
pyro5[0]?

[0]: https://github.com/irmen/Pyro5

-- 
Regards,
--
  Bo YU



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1027699: marked as done (llvm-toolchain-14: epoch missing in B-R for split -dev packages)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 13:03:30 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1027699: fixed in llvm-toolchain-14 1:14.0.6-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027699,
regarding llvm-toolchain-14: epoch missing in B-R for split -dev packages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1027699: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027699
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: llvm-toolchain-14
Version: 1:14.0.6-10~exp5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.
This error may also be triggered by having a predecessor package from
'sid' installed while installing the package from 'experimental'.

See policy 7.6 at
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Preparing to unpack .../libclang-rt-14-dev_1%3a14.0.6-10~exp5_amd64.deb ...
  Unpacking libclang-rt-14-dev:amd64 (1:14.0.6-10~exp5) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libclang-rt-14-dev_1%3a14.0.6-10~exp5_amd64.deb 
(--unpack):
   trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/llvm-14/lib/clang/14.0.6/README.txt', which is 
also in package libclang-common-14-dev 1:14.0.6-9


Package: libclang-rt-14-dev
Source: llvm-toolchain-14
Version: 1:14.0.6-10~exp6
Replaces: libclang-common-14-dev (<< 14.0.6-10~exp4)
Breaks: libclang-common-14-dev (<< 14.0.6-10~exp4)
...

The Breaks+Replaces are there, but missing the epoch.

This bug seems to affect the following packages:
  libclang-rt-14-dev-wasm32
  libclang-rt-14-dev-wasm64
  libclang-rt-14-dev
  libpolly-14-dev

cheers,

Andreas

PS: If you want to get rid of the epoch in the llvm-toolchain-XX packages,
talk to me before packaging a snapshot of version 17, I have some ideas how
to achieve that.


libclang-common-14-dev=1:14.0.6-9_libclang-rt-14-dev=1:14.0.6-10~exp5.log.gz
Description: application/gzip
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: llvm-toolchain-14
Source-Version: 1:14.0.6-10
Done: Sylvestre Ledru 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
llvm-toolchain-14, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1027...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sylvestre Ledru  (supplier of updated llvm-toolchain-14 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2023 15:42:15 +0100
Source: llvm-toolchain-14
Architecture: source
Version: 1:14.0.6-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LLVM Packaging Team 
Changed-By: Sylvestre Ledru 
Closes: 1027699
Changes:
 llvm-toolchain-14 (1:14.0.6-10) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Upload to unstable
   * Add missing epoch (Closes: #1027699)
Checksums-Sha1:
 08d0d67b239530076bc488771e92ccf188f5a2d6 7720 llvm-toolchain-14_14.0.6-10.dsc
 870aa2ee6bf91d37dfe2616120ef9456e68125cb 159972 
llvm-toolchain-14_14.0.6-10.debian.tar.xz
 2ec0444a52997b725e07fb7b78badf841525d05d 13788 
llvm-toolchain-14_14.0.6-10_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 bc7ab9902b79f3e9b8cb9340356d8d03e7043607cadb36019e5ec3f11661b46c 7720 
llvm-toolchain-14_14.0.6-10.dsc
 5e4a53adbb0193d87040c8aa75bbb0074ae36b3cce60fa7f3b14102211de12e7 159972 
llvm-toolchain-14_14.0.6-10.debian.tar.xz
 de131c85cba5e81681d4ad860e74efed5093f200ef68def93c6847efad93a420 13788 
llvm-toolchain-14_14.0.6-10_source.buildinfo
Files:
 0948a55e9d18463b824709d30a444533 7720 devel optional 
llvm-toolchain-14_14.0.6-10.dsc
 b6a5b67d38171a8be163bb0d301b9ccb 159972 devel optional 
llvm-toolchain-14_14.0.6-10.debian.tar.xz
 ddf2c913e3f2148fd00c3bdb5028eda2 13788 devel optional 
llvm-toolchain-14_14.0.6-10_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEtg21mU05vsTRqVzPfmUo2nUvG+EFAmOy0IkVHHN5bHZlc3Ry
ZUBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEH5lKNp1LxvhDVgP/0LVNZ+QQ931I7C6+B98rcvZz/ib

Processed: Re: python-biopython: FTBFS: Test DSSP generation from MMCIF with non-standard residues.

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 1027629 dssp 4.2.0a-1
Bug #1027629 [src:python-biopython] python-biopython: FTBFS: Test DSSP 
generation from MMCIF with non-standard residues.
Bug reassigned from package 'src:python-biopython' to 'dssp'.
No longer marked as found in versions python-biopython/1.80+dfsg-4.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1027629 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #1027629 [dssp] python-biopython: FTBFS: Test DSSP generation from MMCIF 
with non-standard residues.
Marked as found in versions dssp/4.2.0a-1.
> fixed 1027629 4.2.1-1
Bug #1027629 [dssp] python-biopython: FTBFS: Test DSSP generation from MMCIF 
with non-standard residues.
Marked as fixed in versions dssp/4.2.1-1.
> close 1027629
Bug #1027629 [dssp] python-biopython: FTBFS: Test DSSP generation from MMCIF 
with non-standard residues.
Marked Bug as done
> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1027629: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027629
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1027067: marked as done (ruby-bunny: FTBFS with ruby-rspec 3.12: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: Failure/Error: expect(ch).to receive(:exchange_bind).with(src1, dst, routing_key: "abc"))

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 13:22:19 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1027067: fixed in ruby-bunny 2.19.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027067,
regarding ruby-bunny: FTBFS with ruby-rspec 3.12: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: 
 Failure/Error: expect(ch).to receive(:exchange_bind).with(src1, dst, 
routing_key: "abc")
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1027067: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027067
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-bunny
Version: 2.19.0-1
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby-rspec-3.12

Hi,

I'm about to upload ruby-rspec 3.12. During a test rebuild with that version,
ruby-bunny failed to build.

Relevant part of the build log (hopefully):
>  Failure/Error: expect(ch).to receive(:exchange_bind).with(src1, dst, 
> routing_key: "abc")
> 
># received :exchange_bind 
> with unexpected arguments
>  expected: (# @channel=#, 
> @name="s...nowait=>false}, @durable=nil, @auto_delete=nil, @internal=nil, 
> @arguments=nil, @bindings=#>, # @channel=#, 
> @name="d...o_delete=nil, @internal=nil, @arguments=nil, @bindings=# {}>>, :opts=>{:routing_key=>"jkl"}}}>>, {:routing_key=>"abc"}) (keyword 
> arguments)
>   got: (# @channel=#, 
> @name="s...nowait=>false}, @durable=nil, @auto_delete=nil, @internal=nil, 
> @arguments=nil, @bindings=#>, # @channel=#, 
> @name="d...o_delete=nil, @internal=nil, @arguments=nil, @bindings=# {}>>, :opts=>{:routing_key=>"jkl"}}}>>, {:routing_key=>"abc"}) (1 time)
>(# @channel=#, 
> @name="s...nowait=>false}, @durable=nil, @auto_delete=nil, @internal=nil, 
> @arguments=nil, @bindings=#>, # @channel=#, 
> @name="d...o_delete=nil, @internal=nil, @arguments=nil, @bindings=# {}>>, :opts=>{:routing_key=>"jkl"}}}>>, {:routing_key=>"ghi"}) (1 time)
>(# @channel=#, 
> @name="s...nowait=>false}, @durable=nil, @auto_delete=nil, @internal=nil, 
> @arguments=nil, @bindings=#>, # @channel=#, 
> @name="d...o_delete=nil, @internal=nil, @arguments=nil, @bindings=# {}>>, :opts=>{:routing_key=>"jkl"}}}>>, {:routing_key=>"jkl"}) (1 time) 
> (options hash)
>  # ./spec/unit/exchange_recovery_spec.rb:31:in `block (3 levels) in 
> '
> 
> Finished in 4 minutes 0.2 seconds (files took 0.24523 seconds to load)
> 324 examples, 1 failure
> 
> Failed examples:
> 
> rspec ./spec/unit/exchange_recovery_spec.rb:7 # Bunny::Exchange recovery 
> recovers exchange bindings, unless already unbound
> 
> /usr/bin/ruby3.1 
> -I/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-support-3.12.0/lib:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.12.0/lib
>  /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.12.0/exe/rspec 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/basic_ack_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/basic_cancel_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/basic_consume_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/basic_consume_with_objects_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/basic_get_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/basic_nack_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/basic_publish_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/basic_qos_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/basic_reject_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/basic_return_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/channel_close_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/channel_open_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/consumer_cancellation_notification_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/dead_lettering_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/exchange_bind_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/exchange_declare_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/exchange_delete_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/exchange_unbind_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/exclusive_queue_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/heartbeat_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/predeclared_exchanges_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/publisher_confirms_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/publishing_edge_cases_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/queue_bind_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/queue_delete_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/queue_purge_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/queue_unbind_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/read_only_consumer_spec.rb 
> spec/higher_level_api/integration/sender_selected_distribution_spec.rb 

Bug#1026648: marked as done (parole: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:22: override_dh_missing] Error 25)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 13:36:55 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1026648: fixed in parole 4.16.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026648,
regarding parole: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:22: override_dh_missing] 
Error 25
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1026648: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026648
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: parole
Version: 4.16.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> dh_missing --fail-missing -X .la
> dh_missing: warning: usr/parole/pixmaps/no-cover.png exists in debian/tmp but 
> is not installed to anywhere 
> dh_missing: warning: usr/parole/pixmaps/play.png exists in debian/tmp but is 
> not installed to anywhere 
> dh_missing: warning: usr/parole/pixmaps/replay.png exists in debian/tmp but 
> is not installed to anywhere 
> dh_missing: error: missing files, aborting
>   The following debhelper tools have reported what they installed (with 
> files per package)
>* dh_install: parole (5), parole-dev (1)
>* dh_installdocs: parole (0), parole-dev (0)
>* dh_installman: parole (1), parole-dev (0)
>   If the missing files are installed by another tool, please file a bug 
> against it.
>   When filing the report, if the tool is not part of debhelper itself, 
> please reference the
>   "Logging helpers and dh_missing" section from the "PROGRAMMING" guide 
> for debhelper (10.6.3+).
> (in the debhelper package: /usr/share/doc/debhelper/PROGRAMMING.gz)
>   Be sure to test with dpkg-buildpackage -A/-B as the results may vary 
> when only a subset is built
>   If the omission is intentional or no other helper can take care of this 
> consider adding the
>   paths to debian/not-installed.
> make[1]: *** [debian/rules:22: override_dh_missing] Error 25


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/12/20/parole_4.16.0-1_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20221220;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20221220&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: parole
Source-Version: 4.16.0-2
Done: Yves-Alexis Perez 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
parole, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1026...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Yves-Alexis Perez  (supplier of updated parole package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 13:59:11 +0100
Source: parole
Architecture: source
Version: 4.16.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers 
Changed-By: Yves-Alexis Perez 
Closes: 1026648
Changes:
 parole (4.16.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Debian Janitor ]
   * Apply multi-arch hints. + parole-dev: Add Multi-Arch: same.
 .
   [ Yves-Alexis Perez ]
   * d/patches: include upstream patch to replace DATADIRNAME in configure.ac
 (Closes: #1026648)
   * d/control: update standards version to 4.6.1
Checksums-Sha1:
 dcff438ae96308d7a0b4eabb0db3553306c7ad48 1896 parole_4.16.0-2.dsc
 6e4d593ceb28b94b8080a6a1d71f090148a78379 6560 parole_4.16.0-2.debian.tar.x

Bug#1027078: marked as pending in ruby-jira

2023-01-02 Thread HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai)
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1027078 in ruby-jira reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-jira/-/commit/82fa1b4392755046858eb7d76a2e20a803a0a155


fix FTBFS with ruby-rspec-3.12 (Closes: #1027078)


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1027078



Processed: Bug#1027078 marked as pending in ruby-jira

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending
Bug #1027078 [src:ruby-jira] ruby-jira: FTBFS with ruby-rspec 3.12: ERROR: Test 
"ruby3.1" failed:  Failure/Error: result.push(client.Issue.build(issue))
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
1027078: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027078
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: your mail

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 1027628 https://github.com/openSUSE/snapper/issues/762
Bug #1027628 [src:snapper] snapper: FTBFS: regex_compiler.tcc:179:19: error: 
expected unqualified-id before ‘=’ token
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://github.com/openSUSE/snapper/issues/762'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1027628: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027628
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1027558: marked as pending in wagon

2023-01-02 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1027558 in wagon reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/wagon/-/commit/f43786cd4abd57d579b173ee6a24f5538f0723d6


Set the target release to Java 8 (Closes: #1027558)


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1027558



Processed: Bug#1027558 marked as pending in wagon

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending
Bug #1027558 [src:wagon] wagon: FTBFS: make[1]: svnadmin: No such file or 
directory
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
1027558: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027558
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: tagging 1022496

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 1022496 + pending
Bug #1022496 [src:pulsemixer] pulsemixer: FTBFS: error: Multiple top-level 
packages discovered in a flat-layout: ['snap', 'debian'].
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1022496: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022496
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1027558: marked as done (wagon: FTBFS: make[1]: svnadmin: No such file or directory)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 14:43:55 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1027558: fixed in wagon 3.5.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027558,
regarding wagon: FTBFS: make[1]: svnadmin: No such file or directory
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1027558: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027558
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: wagon
Version: 3.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230101 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> mkdir -p /<>/wagon-providers/wagon-scm/target/test-classes/
> svnadmin create 
> /<>/wagon-providers/wagon-scm/target/test-classes/test-repo-svn
> make[1]: svnadmin: No such file or directory
> make[1]: [debian/rules:10: override_dh_auto_build] Error 127 (ignored)
> dh_auto_build
>   /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/java -noverify -cp 
> /usr/share/maven/boot/plexus-classworlds-2.x.jar 
> -Dmaven.home=/usr/share/maven 
> -Dmaven.multiModuleProjectDirectory=/<> 
> -Dclassworlds.conf=/etc/maven/m2-debian.conf 
> -Dproperties.file.manual=/<>/debian/maven.properties 
> org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher 
> -s/etc/maven/settings-debian.xml -Ddebian.dir=/<>/debian 
> -Dmaven.repo.local=/<>/debian/maven-repo --batch-mode package 
> -DskipTests -Dnotimestamp=true -Dlocale=en_US
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: Options -Xverify:none and -noverify were 
> deprecated in JDK 13 and will likely be removed in a future release.
> [INFO] Scanning for projects...
> [WARNING] 
> [WARNING] Some problems were encountered while building the effective model 
> for org.apache.maven.wagon:wagon-http:jar:3.5.2
> [WARNING] 'build.plugins.plugin.(groupId:artifactId)' must be unique but 
> found duplicate declaration of plugin 
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin @ line 168, column 12
> [WARNING] 
> [WARNING] It is highly recommended to fix these problems because they 
> threaten the stability of your build.
> [WARNING] 
> [WARNING] For this reason, future Maven versions might no longer support 
> building such malformed projects.
> [WARNING] 
> [INFO] 
> 
> [INFO] Reactor Build Order:
> [INFO] 
> [INFO] Apache Maven Wagon 
> [pom]
> [INFO] Apache Maven Wagon :: API  
> [jar]
> [INFO] Apache Maven Wagon :: Provider Test
> [jar]
> [INFO] Apache Maven Wagon :: Providers
> [pom]
> [INFO] Apache Maven Wagon :: Providers :: File Provider   
> [jar]
> [INFO] Apache Maven Wagon :: Providers :: FTP Provider
> [jar]
> [INFO] Apache Maven Wagon :: Providers :: HTTP Shared Library 
> [jar]
> [INFO] Apache Maven Wagon :: Test Compatibility Kits  
> [pom]
> [INFO] Apache Maven Wagon :: HTTP Test Compatibility Kit  
> [jar]
> [INFO] Apache Maven Wagon :: Providers :: HTTP Provider   
> [jar]
> [INFO] Apache Maven Wagon :: Providers :: Lightweight HTTP Provider   
> [jar]
> [INFO] Apache Maven Wagon :: Providers :: SSH Common Library  
> [jar]
> [INFO] Apache Maven Wagon :: Providers :: SSH External Provider   
> [jar]
> [INFO] Apache Maven Wagon :: Providers :: SSH Provider
> [jar]
> [INFO] 
> [INFO] < org.apache.maven.wagon:wagon 
> >
> [INFO] Building Apache Maven Wagon 3.5.2 
> [1/14]
> [INFO] [ pom 
> ]-
> [INFO] 
> [INFO] --- plexus-component-metadata:2.1.1:generate-metadata (generate) @ 
> wagon ---
> [INFO] 
> [INFO] -< org.apache.maven.wagon:wagon-provider-api 
> >--
> [INFO] Building Apache Maven Wagon :: API 3.5.2  
> [2/14]
> [INFO] [ jar 
> ]-
> [WARNING] The artifact 
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin:jar:2.6 has been relocated to 
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin:jar:3.3.0
> [WARNING] The artifact org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:jar:3.1 
> has been relocated to org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:jar:3.8.1
> [WARNI

Bug#1027078: marked as done (ruby-jira: FTBFS with ruby-rspec 3.12: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: Failure/Error: result.push(client.Issue.build(issue)))

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 14:43:00 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1027078: fixed in ruby-jira 2.1.5-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027078,
regarding ruby-jira: FTBFS with ruby-rspec 3.12: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed:  
Failure/Error: result.push(client.Issue.build(issue))
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1027078: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027078
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-jira
Version: 2.1.5-3
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby-rspec-3.12

Hi,

I'm about to upload ruby-rspec 3.12. During a test rebuild with that version,
ruby-jira failed to build.

Relevant part of the build log (hopefully):
>  Failure/Error: result.push(client.Issue.build(issue))
> 
># received :build with unexpected arguments
>  expected: ({"id"=>"1", "summary"=>"Bugs Everywhere"}) (keyword 
> arguments)
>   got: ({"id"=>"1", "summary"=>"Bugs Everywhere"}) (options hash)
>  # ./lib/jira/resource/issue.rb:59:in `block (2 levels) in all'
>  # ./lib/jira/resource/issue.rb:58:in `map'
>  # ./lib/jira/resource/issue.rb:58:in `block in all'
>  # ./lib/jira/resource/issue.rb:53:in `loop'
>  # ./lib/jira/resource/issue.rb:53:in `all'
>  # ./spec/jira/resource/issue_spec.rb:52:in `block (2 levels) in  (required)>'
> 
> Deprecation Warnings:
> 
> The implicit block expectation syntax is deprecated, you should pass a block 
> rather than an argument to `expect` to use the provided block expectation 
> matcher or the matcher must implement `supports_value_expectations?`. e.g  
> `expect { value }.to raise ArgumentError with "Required option :deadbeef 
> missing"` not `expect(value).to raise ArgumentError with "Required option 
> :deadbeef missing"`
> 
> The implicit block expectation syntax is deprecated, you should pass a block 
> rather than an argument to `expect` to use the provided block expectation 
> matcher or the matcher must implement `supports_value_expectations?`. e.g  
> `expect { value }.to raise JIRA::HTTPError` not `expect(value).to raise 
> JIRA::HTTPError`
> 
> 
> If you need more of the backtrace for any of these deprecations to
> identify where to make the necessary changes, you can configure
> `config.raise_errors_for_deprecations!`, and it will turn the
> deprecation warnings into errors, giving you the full backtrace.
> 
> 2 deprecation warnings total
> 
> Finished in 0.14389 seconds (files took 0.80057 seconds to load)
> 221 examples, 2 failures
> 
> Failed examples:
> 
> rspec ./spec/jira/oauth_client_spec.rb:57 # JIRA::OauthClient authenticating 
> with oauth the access token initializes
> rspec ./spec/jira/resource/issue_spec.rb:37 # JIRA::Resource::Issue should 
> find all issues
> 
> /usr/bin/ruby3.1 
> -I/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-support-3.12.0/lib:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.12.0/lib
>  /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.12.0/exe/rspec 
> ./spec/jira/base_factory_spec.rb ./spec/jira/base_spec.rb 
> ./spec/jira/has_many_proxy_spec.rb ./spec/jira/http_client_spec.rb 
> ./spec/jira/http_error_spec.rb ./spec/jira/jwt_uri_builder_spec.rb 
> ./spec/jira/oauth_client_spec.rb ./spec/jira/request_client_spec.rb 
> ./spec/jira/resource/agile_spec.rb ./spec/jira/resource/attachment_spec.rb 
> ./spec/jira/resource/board_spec.rb ./spec/jira/resource/createmeta_spec.rb 
> ./spec/jira/resource/field_spec.rb ./spec/jira/resource/filter_spec.rb 
> ./spec/jira/resource/issue_spec.rb ./spec/jira/resource/issuelink_spec.rb 
> ./spec/jira/resource/project_factory_spec.rb 
> ./spec/jira/resource/project_spec.rb ./spec/jira/resource/sprint_spec.rb 
> ./spec/jira/resource/user_factory_spec.rb 
> ./spec/jira/resource/worklog_spec.rb --format documentation failed
> ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: 


The full build log is attached.

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects


ruby-jira.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-jira
Source-Version: 2.1.5-4
Done: HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ruby-jira, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporti

Bug#1027624: marked as done (netavark: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/share/cargo/bin/cargo build returned exit code 101)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 15:06:20 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1027624: fixed in netavark 1.4.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027624,
regarding netavark: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/share/cargo/bin/cargo 
build returned exit code 101
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1027624: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027624
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: netavark
Version: 1.0.3-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230101 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> printf '{"package":"%s","files":{}}\n' $(sha256sum Cargo.toml | grep -Po 
> '^\S+') > debian/cargo-checksum.json;
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
>dh_auto_configure -O--buildsystem=cargo
> debian cargo wrapper: options, profiles, parallel: ['parallel=8'] [] ['-j8']
> debian cargo wrapper: rust_type, gnu_type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, 
> x86_64-linux-gnu
> debian cargo wrapper: linking /usr/share/cargo/registry/* into 
> /<>/debian/cargo_registry/
>dh_auto_build -O--buildsystem=cargo
>dh_auto_test -O--buildsystem=cargo
> debian cargo wrapper: options, profiles, parallel: ['parallel=8'] [] ['-j8']
> debian cargo wrapper: rust_type, gnu_type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, 
> x86_64-linux-gnu
> debian cargo wrapper: running subprocess (['env', 'RUST_BACKTRACE=1', 
> '/usr/bin/cargo', '-Zavoid-dev-deps', 'build', '--verbose', '--verbose', 
> '-j8', '--target', 'x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu'],) {}
> error: failed to select a version for the requirement `nix = "^0.25"`
> candidate versions found which didn't match: 0.26.1
> location searched: directory source `/<>/debian/cargo_registry` 
> (which is replacing registry `crates-io`)
> required by package `netavark v1.0.3 (/<>)`
> perhaps a crate was updated and forgotten to be re-vendored?
> dh_auto_test: error: /usr/share/cargo/bin/cargo build returned exit code 101


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2023/01/01/netavark_1.0.3-4_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20230101;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20230101&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: netavark
Source-Version: 1.4.0-1
Done: Reinhard Tartler 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
netavark, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1027...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Reinhard Tartler  (supplier of updated netavark package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 08:45:36 -0500
Source: netavark
Architecture: source
Version: 1.4.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler 
Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler 
Closes: 1025361 1027624
Changes:
 netavark (1.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release
   * Allow cross-compilation by relaxing build-dep on libstd-rust-dev,
 Closes: #1025361
   * Bug fix: "FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/share/cargo/bin/cargo build
 returned exit code 101", thanks to Lucas Nussbaum (Closes: #1027624).
   * Break on older versions of aardvark-dns, the must match minor versions.
   * Invoke test suite
Checksums-Sha1:
 1c6891c98e296a5f361b68ca6cc9f0ea1

Bug#1026628: pyro4: FTBFS: AssertionError: must fail

2023-01-02 Thread Bo YU
Source: pyro4
Version: 4.82-1
Followup-For: Bug #1026628
Tags: ftbfs patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: Bo YU 

Dear Maintainer,

Although skip failed test cases are not perfect solution to fix such
issues, but upstream has decided to end pyro4's life on python3.10. I
think it is ok to skip these failed test cases on python 3.10. There is
no sense to patch test files if in order to pass these failed cases. If
to fix pyro4's core code, I am not sure if how many work need to be
finished.

I have tested the patch attached. 

PS: I would like to package pyro5 if it makes sense.:)

-- 
Regards,
--
  Bo YU

diff -Nru pyro4-4.82/debian/changelog pyro4-4.82/debian/changelog
--- pyro4-4.82/debian/changelog 2022-01-12 05:19:07.0 +0800
+++ pyro4-4.82/debian/changelog 2023-01-02 22:46:19.0 +0800
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+pyro4 (4.82-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Add patch to fix ftbfs on python3.11. (Closes: #1026628)
+
+ -- Bo Yu   Mon, 02 Jan 2023 22:46:19 +0800
+
 pyro4 (4.82-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * New upstream release.
diff -Nru pyro4-4.82/debian/patches/fix-ftbfs-python3.11.patch 
pyro4-4.82/debian/patches/fix-ftbfs-python3.11.patch
--- pyro4-4.82/debian/patches/fix-ftbfs-python3.11.patch1970-01-01 
07:30:00.0 +0730
+++ pyro4-4.82/debian/patches/fix-ftbfs-python3.11.patch2023-01-02 
22:46:19.0 +0800
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+Description: skip test failed on python3.11
+  This is workround to fix such issue, but upstream has decided to end pyro4's 
life
+  on python3.10.
+Author: Bo YU 
+Bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026628
+Forwarded: no
+Last-Update: 2023-01-02
+---
+This patch header follows DEP-3: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
+--- a/tests/PyroTests/test_serialize.py
 b/tests/PyroTests/test_serialize.py
+@@ -324,6 +324,7 @@
+ with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+ self.serializer.register_type_replacement(42, lambda: None)
+ 
++@unittest.skip("skip tetes on python3.11")
+ def testCustomClassFail(self):
+ if self.SERIALIZER in ("pickle", "cloudpickle", "dill"):
+ self.skipTest("pickle, cloudpickle and dill simply serialize 
custom classes")
+@@ -335,6 +336,7 @@
+ except Pyro4.errors.ProtocolError:
+ pass
+ 
++@unittest.skip("skip tetes on python3.11")
+ def testCustomClassOk(self):
+ if self.SERIALIZER in ("pickle", "cloudpickle", "dill"):
+ self.skipTest("pickle, cloudpickle and dill simply serialize 
custom classes just fine")
+@@ -841,6 +843,7 @@
+ self.assertRaises(Pyro4.errors.SerializeError, lambda: 
Pyro4.util.get_serializer_by_id(0))
+ self.assertRaises(Pyro4.errors.SerializeError, lambda: 
Pyro4.util.get_serializer_by_id(8))
+ 
++@unittest.skip("skip tetes on python3.11")
+ def testDictClassFail(self):
+ o = pprint.PrettyPrinter(stream="dummy", width=42)
+ d = Pyro4.util.SerializerBase.class_to_dict(o)
+@@ -889,6 +892,7 @@
+ self.assertEqual(uri, x)
+ self.assertEqual("/tmp/socketname", x.sockname)
+ 
++@unittest.skip("skip tetes on python3.11")
+ def testCustomDictClass(self):
+ o = MyThingPartlyExposed("test")
+ 
Pyro4.util.SerializerBase.register_class_to_dict(MyThingPartlyExposed, 
mything_dict)
diff -Nru pyro4-4.82/debian/patches/series pyro4-4.82/debian/patches/series
--- pyro4-4.82/debian/patches/series2022-01-12 05:19:07.0 +0800
+++ pyro4-4.82/debian/patches/series2023-01-02 21:00:46.0 +0800
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 skip_networked_tests.patch
+fix-ftbfs-python3.11.patch


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1027488: marked as done (qutip: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'packaging.version' has no attribute 'LegacyVersion')

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 15:20:47 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1027488: fixed in qutip 4.7.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027488,
regarding qutip: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'packaging.version' has no 
attribute 'LegacyVersion'
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1027488: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027488
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: qutip
Version: 4.7.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230101 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
>  fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh clean --with python3,sphinxdoc --buildsystem=pybuild
>dh_auto_clean -O--buildsystem=pybuild
> I: pybuild base:240: python3.11 setup.py clean 
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/<>/setup.py", line 247, in 
> options = process_options()
>   ^
>   File "/<>/setup.py", line 46, in process_options
> options = _determine_version(options)
>   ^^^
>   File "/<>/setup.py", line 130, in _determine_version
> if isinstance(version, packaging.version.LegacyVersion):
>^^^
> AttributeError: module 'packaging.version' has no attribute 'LegacyVersion'
> E: pybuild pybuild:388: clean: plugin distutils failed with: exit code=1: 
> python3.11 setup.py clean 
> dh_auto_clean: error: pybuild --clean -i python{version} -p "3.11 3.10" 
> returned exit code 13
> make: *** [debian/rules:30: clean] Error 25


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2023/01/01/qutip_4.7.0-3_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20230101;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20230101&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: qutip
Source-Version: 4.7.1-1
Done: Drew Parsons 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
qutip, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1027...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Drew Parsons  (supplier of updated qutip package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 13:43:00 +0100
Source: qutip
Architecture: source
Version: 4.7.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers 

Changed-By: Drew Parsons 
Closes: 1017768 1027488
Changes:
 qutip (4.7.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release.
 - updated for Python 3.11. Closes: #1027488
   * Build-Depends: pybuild-plugin-pyproject to use pyoproject.toml
 Apply --with-openmp build option in wheels (PEP517) build via
 --config-setting="--build-option=--with-openmp". Closes: #1017768.
   * run debian/tests over all supported python versions
   * Standards-Version: 4.6.2
Checksums-Sha1:
 2f5b2d00e275a1a4c22e71dcb10bb490c796baab 2519 qutip_4.7.1-1.dsc
 56553423b4dfaadc5b96369c41d701ffeb8a3074 4810561 qutip_4.7.1.orig.tar.gz
 d2121e8670f094153a29b10f94af3589ce11cfa5 12144 qutip_4.7.1-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 75e4b84e7827ee1e9141908ca15839461abd3b0c18ec604012606b8670dc5937 2519 
qutip_4.7.1-1.dsc
 9b40ce42e881061c3fe4f0484bc049d4dc9afc1931826836231313c4f8ab321d 4810561 
qutip_4.7.1.orig.tar.gz
 bae38b11a80533c68828526684091b677521b6a

Processed: owner 1027700

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> owner 1027700 !
Bug #1027700 [libcommons-vfs-java] libcommons-vfs-java: missing 
Breaks+Replaces: libcommons-vfs-java-doc (<< 2.1-3)
Owner recorded as tony mancill .
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1027700: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027700
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1027733: libc6: new libc6 breaks GNU Screen handling of some Unicode characters

2023-01-02 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: libc6
Version: 2.36-7
Severity: serious

The new libc6 appears to have some change related to Unicode that
yields display issues in screen 4.9.0-3, such as horizontal and/or
vertical text shifting. A consequence of this text shifting is that
in Mutt (in particular with arrow_cursor), one may select a message
to be deleted, but a different message is actually deleted.

There is no such issue under bullseye (Debian 11.6), which also has
GNU Screen 4.09.00, so the breakage appears to be due to libc6.

If the change has been done on purpose, then there are missing
dependency relationships that should prevent the installation
of incompatible software until such software has been updated
to support this change.

Example to reproduce the issue with the U+1FAF6 HEART HANDS character
under Debian/unstable:

1. Run "screen" in a 80-column terminal.

2. Open this mailbox with "mutt -F /dev/null -f heart-hands.mbox".
   Result: line 10 is shifted 1 column to the right, and character "v"
   appears on the following line.

3. Create a new Screen window and switch back to the original window.
   Result: messages 1 to 9 are shifted upward.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 
'stable-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
merged-usr: no
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.0.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libgcc-s1  12.2.0-12

Versions of packages libc6 recommends:
ii  libidn2-0  2.3.3-1+b1

Versions of packages libc6 suggests:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.81
ii  glibc-doc  2.36-7
ii  libc-l10n  2.36-7
pn  libnss-nis 
pn  libnss-nisplus 
ii  locales2.36-7

-- debconf information:
  glibc/disable-screensaver:
* glibc/restart-services: postfix ssh cups cron atd
  glibc/kernel-too-old:
* libraries/restart-without-asking: false
  glibc/restart-failed:
  glibc/kernel-not-supported:
  glibc/upgrade: true

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre  - Web: 
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: 
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)


heart-hands.mbox
Description: application/mbox


Bug#1027734: prometheus-blackbox-exporter: FTBFS: inconsistent test failures

2023-01-02 Thread Mathias Gibbens
Source: prometheus-blackbox-exporter
Version: 0.23.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs

  There appear to be inconsistent test failures in prometheus-blackbox-
exporter, specifically TestGRPCTLSConnection and TestNoTLSConnection. I
noticed this while rebuilding the package as a rdep of another golang
library I'm updating. I'm not quite sure what is causing these tests to
fail, as on my development box with a clean sid schroot sbuilder, three
runs in a row all passed, yet in a clean sid pbuilder,
TestNoTLSConnection always fails. I personally haven't seen
TestGRPCTLSConnection fail locally, but it's failing in pretty much all
the reproducible build tests.

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rbuild/unstable/amd64/prometheus-blackbox-exporter_0.23.0-1.rbuild.log.gz

> === RUN   TestGRPCTLSConnection
> grpc_test.go:239: GRPC probe failed
> --- FAIL: TestGRPCTLSConnection (1.20s)
> === RUN   TestNoTLSConnection
> panic: Fail in goroutine after TestGRPCTLSConnection has completed
> 
> goroutine 470 [running]:
> testing.(*common).Fail(0xc00052b860)
>   /usr/lib/go-1.19/src/testing/testing.go:824 +0xe5
> testing.(*common).Errorf(0xc00052b860, {0xc5d97f?, 0xc00043f080?}, 
> {0xc000314fc0?, 0x129ce70?, 0xc0002a2230?})
>   /usr/lib/go-1.19/src/testing/testing.go:941 +0x65
> github.com/prometheus/blackbox_exporter/prober.TestGRPCTLSConnection.func1()
>   
> /build/1st/prometheus-blackbox-exporter-0.23.0/build/src/github.com/prometheus/blackbox_exporter/prober/grpc_test.go:220
>  +0x6e
> created by 
> github.com/prometheus/blackbox_exporter/prober.TestGRPCTLSConnection
>   
> /build/1st/prometheus-blackbox-exporter-0.23.0/build/src/github.com/prometheus/blackbox_exporter/prober/grpc_test.go:218
>  +0x805
> FAIL  github.com/prometheus/blackbox_exporter/prober  1.539s

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rbuild/unstable/armhf/prometheus-blackbox-exporter_0.23.0-1.rbuild.log.gz

> === RUN   TestGRPCTLSConnection
> grpc_test.go:239: GRPC probe failed
> grpc_test.go:220: failed to serve: grpc: the server has been stopped
> --- FAIL: TestGRPCTLSConnection (1.59s)
> === RUN   TestNoTLSConnection
> utils_test.go:48: Expected: probe_grpc_status_code: 14, got: 
> probe_grpc_status_code: 0
> --- FAIL: TestNoTLSConnection (0.00s)


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#1027469: FTBFS fixed by 0.2020.10.27-1.3

2023-01-02 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
Version: 0.2020.10.27-1.3

Hello.
I have uploaded an NMU without delay, because
* this blocks the gnat-12 transition
* he has already reviewed these changes in the VCS while we were
  preparing the next upload.



Bug#1027469: marked as done (whitakers-words: FTBFS: dh: error: Unknown sequence /usr/share/ada/debian_packaging-12.mk (choose from: binary binary-arch binary-indep build build-arch build-indep clean

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 2 Jan 2023 16:43:12 +0100
with message-id 
and subject line FTBFS fixed by 0.2020.10.27-1.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027469,
regarding whitakers-words: FTBFS: dh: error: Unknown sequence 
/usr/share/ada/debian_packaging-12.mk (choose from: binary binary-arch 
binary-indep build build-arch build-indep clean install install-arch 
install-indep)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1027469: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027469
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: whitakers-words
Version: 0.2020.10.27-1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=whitakers-words&arch=amd64&ver=0.2020.10.27-1.2%2Bb1&stamp=1672519332&raw=0

 debian/rules clean
dh /usr/share/ada/debian_packaging-12.mk
dh: error: Unknown sequence /usr/share/ada/debian_packaging-12.mk (choose from: 
binary binary-arch binary-indep build build-arch build-indep clean install 
install-arch install-indep)
debian/rules:11: /usr/share/ada/debian_packaging-12.mk: No such file or 
directory
make: *** [debian/rules:14: /usr/share/ada/debian_packaging-12.mk] Error 25

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.2020.10.27-1.3

Hello.
I have uploaded an NMU without delay, because
* this blocks the gnat-12 transition
* he has already reviewed these changes in the VCS while we were
  preparing the next upload.--- End Message ---


Bug#1025986: marked as done (FTBFS: install: cannot change owner and permissions of ‘/<>/debian/.debhelper/generated/_source/home’: Operation not permitted)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 15:50:22 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1025986: fixed in runawk 1.6.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1025986,
regarding FTBFS: install: cannot change owner and permissions of 
‘/<>/debian/.debhelper/generated/_source/home’: Operation not 
permitted
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1025986: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025986
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: runawk
Version: 1.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

Hi,

Your package fails to build with:

| dh build-arch --buildsystem=mkcmake
| dh: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 9 in use)
|dh_update_autotools_config -a -O--buildsystem=mkcmake
|dh_auto_configure -a -O--buildsystem=mkcmake
| dh_auto_configure: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated 
(level 9 in use)
| install: cannot change owner and permissions of 
‘/<>/debian/.debhelper/generated/_source/home’: Operation not 
permitted
| dh_auto_configure: error: install -m0755 -o 0 -g 0 -d 
/<>/debian/.debhelper/generated/_source/home returned exit code 1
| make: *** [debian/rules:6: build-arch] Error 25
| dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-arch subprocess returned exit 
status 2

The full build log is available from:
  
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=runawk&arch=riscv64&ver=1.6.0-2%2Bb1&stamp=1670843999&raw=0
  
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rbuild/unstable/amd64/runawk_1.6.0-2.rbuild.log.gz

Regards
Aurelien
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: runawk
Source-Version: 1.6.0-3
Done: Andrej Shadura 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
runawk, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1025...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andrej Shadura  (supplier of updated runawk package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2023 16:24:59 +0100
Source: runawk
Architecture: source
Version: 1.6.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Andrej Shadura 
Changed-By: Andrej Shadura 
Closes: 1025986
Changes:
 runawk (1.6.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Update debian/watch.
   * Fix Maintainer field.
   * Wrap and sort.
   * Use secure URI in Homepage field.
   * Bump debhelper from deprecated 9 to 13 (Closes: #1025986).
   * Set debhelper-compat version in Build-Depends.
   * Set upstream metadata fields: Bug-Database, Bug-Submit, Name, Repository, 
Repository-Browse.
   * Set Rules-Requires-Root: no.
Checksums-Sha1:
 274c3a0309497287bb168e83ecb5379f751dd7e8 1244 runawk_1.6.0-3.dsc
 a741c00639a8b8982827369ad06abd749182c24f 2800 runawk_1.6.0-3.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 e926e4e95dea41d4b2e411448148d02987e7b4f98a4d605ed2807aae5137ddd5 1244 
runawk_1.6.0-3.dsc
 a9888000ccf6168db2dc7a3f517ae02bc6c532d4a56944e2ea38ad048d06319c 2800 
runawk_1.6.0-3.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 cc24135a896c8e8a1081799877e2598f 1244 devel optional runawk_1.6.0-3.dsc
 73ff074013e0dff6416366a520182196 2800 devel optional 
runawk_1.6.0-3.debian.tar.xz

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iHUEARYIAB0WIQSD3NF/RLIsyDZW7aHoRGtKyMdyYQUCY7L6eAAKCRDoRGtKyMdy
YTFcAQCfwu6ZW7mT0Ai6qJPCGthdfLCHpl+8u0aNBjcGuquLMwD/cmwSp4S5PL9A
qt6KzMvAmD3niqCyRe7k6nsDy3sQXwc=
=aHO+
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---


Bug#1026718: lazpaint: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld.bfd: cannot find -lpangocairo-1.0: No such file or directory

2023-01-02 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Juliette,

On 31/12/22 at 01:13 +0100, Juliette DAMON-ELSASS wrote:
> Hello Lucas,
> 
> Just to check, are you building using debuild or a similar tool, not calling 
> make directly?
> 
> Normally all needed packages determined by the build tool or are specified in 
> the control file.

As shown in the build log, I use sbuild (with a fairly standard
invocation).

Did you try to rebuild your package with pbuilder or sbuild? What was
the result?

Lucas



Bug#1027551: golang-github-hashicorp-go-plugin: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 8 github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin/internal/p

2023-01-02 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 01/01/23 at 23:14 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
> 
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2023 at 10:43 PM Lucas Nussbaum  wrote:
> >
> > Source: golang-github-hashicorp-go-plugin
> > Version: 1.0.1-3
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: FTBFS
> > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> > User: lu...@debian.org
> > Usertags: ftbfs-20230101 ftbfs-bookworm
> >
> 
> This failure in golang-github-hashicorp-go-plugin seems to be caused
> by flaky tests.
> Could you try again? At least it succeeds on my computer currently.
> 
> If it fails too frequently, I probably need to disable them.

Hi,

I tried again on two different machines.

First machine (bare metal): worked three times in a row
Second machine (VM, similar to the one used for the bug report): failed
twice in a row

Lucas



Processed: bug 1027656 is forwarded to https://github.com/meetecho/janus-gateway/issues/3131

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 1027656 https://github.com/meetecho/janus-gateway/issues/3131
Bug #1027656 [src:janus] janus: FTBFS: turnrest.c:168:9: error: void value not 
ignored as it ought to be
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://github.com/meetecho/janus-gateway/issues/3131'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1027656: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027656
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1023674: marked as done (astra-toolbox build depends on gcc-10 that should not be in bookworm)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 16:49:10 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1023674: fixed in astra-toolbox 2.1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023674,
regarding astra-toolbox build depends on gcc-10 that should not be in bookworm
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1023674: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023674
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: astra-toolbox
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: block 1023666 by -1

#1003037 might contain some background information on how to fix this.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: astra-toolbox
Source-Version: 2.1.0-2
Done: Bastian Germann 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
astra-toolbox, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1023...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Germann  (supplier of updated astra-toolbox package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 17:26:13 +0100
Source: astra-toolbox
Architecture: source
Version: 2.1.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers 

Changed-By: Bastian Germann 
Closes: 1023674
Changes:
 astra-toolbox (2.1.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload
   * Switch to nvidia-cuda-toolkit-gcc (Closes: #1023674)
   * d/control: use Freexian Packaging Team in Uploaders
Checksums-Sha1:
 57f0d828132b2f804c5dc5a9a9e72bf0637c5221 2191 astra-toolbox_2.1.0-2.dsc
 8e354cc27c0beb3d9ff35c672176ce0051761723 5680 
astra-toolbox_2.1.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 be1991bb8efed1828cd280da78b8cfb6f1f1970d 6955 
astra-toolbox_2.1.0-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 43ae19543de1f801e9573cff4914b8d0bcf6e98964432432eeda41a0dcda67ce 2191 
astra-toolbox_2.1.0-2.dsc
 a8b523c81f43280fb8ba0e337532000b9f6680168cb20ec823e0b52b294ab5b4 5680 
astra-toolbox_2.1.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 5abdc872d678891260e63d95604169f76b017a4acf82f2bd96949e74d1c6f152 6955 
astra-toolbox_2.1.0-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 42734e9c70a18ccd1a87bf20a452d9e8 2191 contrib/python optional 
astra-toolbox_2.1.0-2.dsc
 c7eac4620517c193dceaecc8b1dac03a 5680 contrib/python optional 
astra-toolbox_2.1.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 dd3a1f93f2441237a4509ad39f4837c1 6955 contrib/python optional 
astra-toolbox_2.1.0-2_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=2XHW
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---


Bug#1027733: libc6: new libc6 breaks GNU Screen handling of some Unicode characters

2023-01-02 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2023-01-02 16:34 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:

> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.36-7
> Severity: serious
>
> The new libc6 appears to have some change related to Unicode that
> yields display issues in screen 4.9.0-3, such as horizontal and/or
> vertical text shifting. A consequence of this text shifting is that
> in Mutt (in particular with arrow_cursor), one may select a message
> to be deleted, but a different message is actually deleted.
>
> There is no such issue under bullseye (Debian 11.6), which also has
> GNU Screen 4.09.00, so the breakage appears to be due to libc6.

Without having looked at the problem: this appears to be a rather bold
conclusion.  There are also newer versions of mutt, ncurses and a few
other libraries which mutt or screen depend upon that could be
responsible.

> Example to reproduce the issue with the U+1FAF6 HEART HANDS character
> under Debian/unstable:
>
> 1. Run "screen" in a 80-column terminal.
>
> 2. Open this mailbox with "mutt -F /dev/null -f heart-hands.mbox".
>Result: line 10 is shifted 1 column to the right, and character "v"
>appears on the following line.

I failed to reproduce that step, the 'v' appears on the last column for
me.

Cheers,
   Sven



Bug#1027700: marked as done (libcommons-vfs-java: missing Breaks+Replaces: libcommons-vfs-java-doc (<< 2.1-3))

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 17:20:00 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1027700: fixed in commons-vfs 2.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027700,
regarding libcommons-vfs-java: missing Breaks+Replaces: libcommons-vfs-java-doc 
(<< 2.1-3)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1027700: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027700
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libcommons-vfs-java
Version: 2.1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.

See policy 7.6 at
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Preparing to unpack .../libcommons-vfs-java_2.1-3_all.deb ...
  Unpacking libcommons-vfs-java (2.1-3) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libcommons-vfs-java_2.1-3_all.deb (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc/libcommons-vfs-java/examples/pom.xml', 
which is also in package libcommons-vfs-java-doc 2.1-2
  dpkg-deb: error: paste subprocess was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/libcommons-vfs-java_2.1-3_all.deb


libcommons-vfs-java-doc has been merged into libcommons-vfs-java in 2.1-3
but no B+R were added.


cheers,

Andreas


libcommons-vfs-java-doc=2.1-2_libcommons-vfs-java=2.1-3.log.gz
Description: application/gzip
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: commons-vfs
Source-Version: 2.1-4
Done: tony mancill 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
commons-vfs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1027...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
tony mancill  (supplier of updated commons-vfs package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 07:36:10 -0800
Source: commons-vfs
Architecture: source
Version: 2.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 

Changed-By: tony mancill 
Closes: 1027700
Changes:
 commons-vfs (2.1-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * Remove examples from libcommons-vfs-java (Closes: #1027700)
Checksums-Sha1:
 7fa13d44256b0c9f1d1ba45813ff364b10097877 2301 commons-vfs_2.1-4.dsc
 bf5d9edadbe7dbfc61598912bbf10bc25e9bd5e0 5548 commons-vfs_2.1-4.debian.tar.xz
 368708c6acf25e37309053c01ea2d10cdb85e991 14824 
commons-vfs_2.1-4_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 d6e0e815f6cc40c2963df66dfd783b255d62703309954ceb4330ddc76c3c3fbf 2301 
commons-vfs_2.1-4.dsc
 229d69779b06d934081c48550cdfa47ddfa1322c54b754325c8a1f23c1ca 5548 
commons-vfs_2.1-4.debian.tar.xz
 a5c12a1901ffc6002597b61af431ae2fe283dfea0e5abc2b4538ac2880b0a5df 14824 
commons-vfs_2.1-4_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 497832598af69284e5930608cc32c4c3 2301 java optional commons-vfs_2.1-4.dsc
 2d696efbe7d9d5bf3a4ef1742c7896bf 5548 java optional 
commons-vfs_2.1-4.debian.tar.xz
 5781dd139f29615b675c8d5ea44cfa3a 14824 java optional 
commons-vfs_2.1-4_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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Bug#1027743: elpa-elscreen: elscreen_1.4.6-8 fails to compile with emacs 28.2

2023-01-02 Thread Leo Butler
Subject: elpa-elscreen: elscreen_1.4.6-8 fails to compile with emacs 28.2
Package: elpa-elscreen
X-Debbugs-Cc: leo.but...@umanitoba.ca
Version: 1.4.6-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Tags: ftbfs

Dear Maintainer,

Upgrading my testing installation produced the following:

#+begin_example
Install elpa-elscreen for emacs
install/elscreen-1.4.6: Handling install of emacsen flavor emacs
install/elscreen-1.4.6: byte-compiling for emacs

In toplevel form:
elscreen-color-theme.el:25:1: Error: Wrong number of arguments: 
make-obsolete-variable, 2

In toplevel form:
elscreen-dired.el:26:1: Error: Wrong number of arguments: 
make-obsolete-variable, 2

In toplevel form:
elscreen-dnd.el:26:1: Error: Wrong number of arguments: make-obsolete-variable, 
2

In toplevel form:
elscreen-gf.el:28:1: Error: Wrong number of arguments: make-obsolete-variable, 2

In toplevel form:
elscreen-goby.el:26:1: Error: Wrong number of arguments: 
make-obsolete-variable, 2

In toplevel form:
elscreen-howm.el:26:1: Error: Wrong number of arguments: 
make-obsolete-variable, 2

In toplevel form:
elscreen-server.el:27:1: Error: Wrong number of arguments: 
make-obsolete-variable, 2

In toplevel form:
elscreen-speedbar.el:25:1: Error: Wrong number of arguments: 
make-obsolete-variable, 2

In toplevel form:
elscreen-w3m.el:26:1: Error: Wrong number of arguments: make-obsolete-variable, 
2

In toplevel form:
elscreen.el:155:4: Warning: make-obsolete-variable called with 2 arguments,
but requires 3-4
elscreen.el:201:13: Warning: custom-declare-variable
`elscreen-tab-display-kill-screen' docstring wider than 80 characters

In elscreen-get-alist-to-nickname:
elscreen.el:630:8: Warning: ‘mapcar’ called for effect; use ‘mapc’ or ‘dolist’
instead

In elscreen-get-screen-to-name-alist:
elscreen.el:666:21: Warning: ‘mapcar’ called for effect; use ‘mapc’ or
‘dolist’ instead
elscreen.el:666:21: Warning: ‘mapcar’ called for effect; use ‘mapc’ or
‘dolist’ instead

In elscreen-find-screens:
elscreen.el:769:11: Warning: ‘mapcar’ called for effect; use ‘mapc’ or
‘dolist’ instead

In elscreen-find-screen-by-major-mode:
elscreen.el:818:15: Warning: ‘mapcar’ called for effect; use ‘mapc’ or
‘dolist’ instead

In elscreen-find-screen-by-major-mode:
elscreen.el:818:15: Warning: ‘mapcar’ called for effect; use ‘mapc’ or
‘dolist’ instead

In elscreen-kill-others:
elscreen.el:927:14: Warning: ‘interactive-p’ is an obsolete function (as of
23.2); use ‘called-interactively-p’ instead.
elscreen.el:929:5: Warning: ‘interactive-p’ is an obsolete function (as of
23.2); use ‘called-interactively-p’ instead.
elscreen.el:929:5: Warning: ‘interactive-p’ is an obsolete function (as 
of
23.2); use ‘called-interactively-p’ instead.
elscreen.el:926:45: Warning: ‘interactive-p’ is an obsolete 
function (as of
23.2); use ‘called-interactively-p’ instead.

In elscreen-select-and-goto:
elscreen.el:1170:8: Warning: ‘mapcar’ called for effect; use ‘mapc’ or
‘dolist’ instead
elscreen.el:1183:43: Warning: ‘mapcar’ called for effect; use ‘mapc’ or
‘dolist’ instead

In elscreen-find-and-goto-by-buffer:
elscreen.el:1193:30: Warning: ‘interactive-p’ is an obsolete function (as of
23.2); use ‘called-interactively-p’ instead.

In elscreen-find-file-read-only:
elscreen.el:1220:4: Warning: ‘toggle-read-only’ is an obsolete function (as of
24.3); use ‘read-only-mode’ instead.

In elscreen-e21-tab-update:
elscreen.el:1533:38: Warning: ‘mapcar’ called for effect; use ‘mapc’ or
‘dolist’ instead

In elscreen-command-line-funcall:
elscreen.el:1676:10: Warning: reference to free variable ‘file-count’
elscreen.el:1676:10: Warning: assignment to free variable ‘file-count’

In elscreen-command-line-find-file:
elscreen.el:1693:20: Warning: ‘goto-line’ is for interactive use only; use
‘forward-line’ instead.
elscreen.el:1728:13: Warning: reference to free variable ‘file-count’
elscreen.el:1728:28: Warning: assignment to free variable ‘file-count’
elscreen.el:1732:50: Warning: reference to free variable ‘orig-argi’
elscreen.el:1751:16: Warning: reference to free variable ‘dir’
elscreen.el:1777:54: Warning: reference to free variable ‘line’
elscreen.el:1717:13: Warning: reference to free variable ‘column’
elscreen.el:1778:21: Warning: assignment to free variable ‘line’
elscreen.el:1778:21: Warning: assignment to free variable ‘column’
elscreen.el:1733:16: Warning: reference to free variable ‘cl1-dir’
elscreen.el:1734:58: Warning: reference to free variable ‘cl1-line’
elscreen.el:1734:67: Warning: reference to free variable ‘cl1-column’
elscreen.el:1735:13: Warning: assignment to free variable ‘cl1-line’
elscreen.el:1736:13: Warning: assignment to free variable ‘cl1-column’

In elscreen-start:
elscreen.el:1813:4: Warning: ‘mapcar’ called for effect; use ‘mapc’ or
‘dolist’ instead

In end of data:
elscreen.

Bug#1023579: marked as done (lomiri-clock-app: autopkgtest depends on non-existing packages)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 17:37:25 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1023579: fixed in lomiri-clock-app 
3.13~git20221230.b2aca5c-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023579,
regarding lomiri-clock-app: autopkgtest depends on non-existing packages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1023579: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023579
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lomiri-clock-app
Version: 3.13~git20221027.60c85a4-1
Severity: serious

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/l/lomiri-clock-app/27859719/log.gz

...
E: Unable to locate package autopilot-touch
E: Unable to locate package libautopilot-qt
E: Unable to locate package python3-autopilot
E: Package 'qt5-default' has no installation candidate
E: Unable to locate package lomiri-ui-toolkit-autopilot
make-testFAIL badpkg


qt5-default was removed some time ago,
I do not know the situation regarding the other packages.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lomiri-clock-app
Source-Version: 3.13~git20221230.b2aca5c-1
Done: Mike Gabriel 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lomiri-clock-app, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1023...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Mike Gabriel  (supplier of updated lomiri-clock-app 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 15:42:05 +0100
Source: lomiri-clock-app
Architecture: source
Version: 3.13~git20221230.b2aca5c-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian UBports Team 
Changed-By: Mike Gabriel 
Closes: 1023579
Changes:
 lomiri-clock-app (3.13~git20221230.b2aca5c-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream Git snapshot.
   * debian/patches:
 + Add 1001_reenable-tests.patch,
   0001_tests-unit-tst_alarmSound.qml-Adjust-to-internal-API.patch.
   Fix autopkgtest runs.
 + Add 0002_backend-modules-Alarm-settings.cpp-Use-DBus-interfac.patch.
   Use ayatana-indicator-datetime DBus interface rather than
   Ubuntu's indicator-datetime's.
   * debian/tests:
 + Drop autopilot autopkgtest. Autopilot is not available in Debian.
   (Closes: #1023579).
   * debian/tests/control:
 + Drop qt5-default. Virtual package.
 + Update Depends: field, now this provides all required dependencies for
   running the unit tests as autopkgtest.
   * debian/rules:
 + Drop autopilot test files before running dh_install.
 .
   [ Marius Gripsgard ]
   * debian/control:
 + Add missing runtime dep
Checksums-Sha1:
 905f191c9049eed4c513a6c75824a4bf71f363b7 3017 
lomiri-clock-app_3.13~git20221230.b2aca5c-1.dsc
 ca1c77eacf608794025b534e825bea83615686eb 413108 
lomiri-clock-app_3.13~git20221230.b2aca5c.orig.tar.xz
 5c940b3482e0f7d555004db63161c1f20a700e3f 7148 
lomiri-clock-app_3.13~git20221230.b2aca5c-1.debian.tar.xz
 62c37e1f9c15ddca12c447b9ba80845e5eda0439 15089 
lomiri-clock-app_3.13~git20221230.b2aca5c-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 28f19ba0c69407e3b1187681dc2b4a38a3918effbce10398408a4964d605057a 3017 
lomiri-clock-app_3.13~git20221230.b2aca5c-1.dsc
 eb1fee25f77de520918fab06f37c191f205d9e6d0274ba857ae1912a003006fb 413108 
lomiri-clock-app_3.13~git20221230.b2aca5c.orig.tar.xz
 f199f266a228e7a70569eafa2372d623c13ebb4cf8d5e7478841e69954b2ba3b 7148 
lomiri-clock-app_3.13~git20221230.b2aca5c-1.debian.tar.xz
 bd5f91b81c0da55f014f9761de222e5961be6cbd461f2cee0a85a292a00350cb 15089 
lomiri-clock-app_3.13~git20221230.b2aca5c-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 a1224e658ea8ffa66a53d596c5d8604a 3017 misc optional 
lomiri-clock-app_3.13~git20221230.b2aca5c-1.dsc
 c4ef168d3c6c0f3edad8cac799c099ff 413108 misc optional 
lomiri-clock-app_3.13~git20221230.b2aca5c.orig.tar.xz
 5f47f8bd1984ca97882d064adedd987d 7148 misc optional 
lomiri-clock-app_3.13~git20221230.b2aca5c-1.debian.tar.xz
 8b9e97692decc099d6488269739302ea 15089 misc optional 
lomiri-clock-app_3.13~git20221230.b2aca5c-1_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEm/uu6GwKpf+/IgeCmvRrMCV3GzEFAmOzEusVHHN1bndlYXZl
ck

Processed: fixed 1027743 in 1.4.6-9

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> fixed 1027743 1.4.6-9
Bug #1027743 [elpa-elscreen] elpa-elscreen: elscreen_1.4.6-8 fails to compile 
with emacs 28.2
Marked as fixed in versions elscreen/1.4.6-9.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1027743: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027743
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1027698: marked as done (libclamav11: please move libfreshclam.so.2 to a separate package)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 17:50:04 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1027698: fixed in clamav 1.0.0+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027698,
regarding libclamav11: please move libfreshclam.so.2 to a separate package
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1027698: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027698
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libclamav11
Version: 1.0.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.
This error may also be triggered by having a predecessor package from
'sid' installed while installing the package from 'experimental'.

See policy 7.6 at
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Preparing to unpack .../libclamav11_1.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb ...
  Unpacking libclamav11:amd64 (1.0.0+dfsg-1) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libclamav11_1.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfreshclam.so.2', which is 
also in package libclamav9:amd64 0.103.7+dfsg-1+b2
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/libclamav11_1.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb

Mixing libraries with different soversions in a single package is
not a good idea as can be seen here. Having to add Breaks+Replaces
between shared library packages also makes (future) transitions
more difficult.
Please move libfreshclam.so.2 to a new libfreshclam2 package and add
  Breaks+Replaces: libclamav9 (<< 1), libclamav11 (<< 1.0.0+dfsg-2)
there. (The transition to libclamav11 will be not smooth, but future
transitions will be.)


cheers,

Andreas


libclamav9=0.103.7+dfsg-1+b2_libclamav11=1.0.0+dfsg-1.log.gz
Description: application/gzip
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: clamav
Source-Version: 1.0.0+dfsg-2
Done: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
clamav, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1027...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior  (supplier of updated clamav 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 18:38:42 +0100
Source: clamav
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.0+dfsg-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: ClamAV Team 
Changed-By: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 
Closes: 1027698
Changes:
 clamav (1.0.0+dfsg-2) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Scott Kitterman ]
   * Add libclamav11 replaces libclamav9 since the libfreshclam so name did not
 change (Closes: #1027698).
 .
   [ Sebastian Andrzej Siewior ]
   * Use a version-script and limit the exported symbols of libclamav and
 libfreshclam.
Checksums-Sha1:
 306b5275245a389f2e3b383288a96c0a0f92e4d5 3014 clamav_1.0.0+dfsg-2.dsc
 0077b5601fd6376c178cf9f3217810a48a8a4301 223192 
clamav_1.0.0+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 51595a442340a269a00f759889e6fe560dff0e4bb15f8ed6787537ddadfccb61 3014 
clamav_1.0.0+dfsg-2.dsc
 f75ada1a3cfd061c2da958fd6f59fc8015a1c59509274fdc1d5edb8b5edb7b12 223192 
clamav_1.0.0+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 1b53ea876ea7c5dcf8f00c90387b7a1f 3014 utils optional clamav_1.0.0+dfsg-2.dsc
 918521a70f8dd013627f8c38dc7f6d40 223192 utils optional 
clamav_1.0.0+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEZCVGlf/wqkRmzBnme5boFiqM9dEFAmOzFtAACgkQe5boFiqM
9dFpFxAAhFIHhO/m3gy+80Gi0yh6VC6bczgLNeFq0Ab4Zyp1T8NcqB5zvlw8qbBQ
TFCOyO/442wYgj+WNnFqLWfvvBqPeshLcuqeO9yPi0fmjKQs03I8gUZfhgQCLmLL
xo5bT1babjzMVLbgor+zVTtUxWp2+zSkYwLQegoZThiua02c7q6eW/1cl276+In3
LWetyVVjEfnl+of5UknrLcYHmd47YJ0WnZSS5QiSm3qoG4TvkmCcZMSU83/ncjYN
0eTE2hUjo7l6r6yp52psfhOcSWaFIfOcxpx2jKJDNPT/3JI1YUS3ie85x/Hoa8B0
81/Te+Z

Bug#1015772: marked as done (curry-frontend FTBFS: error: Suffix occurrence of @)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 18:13:29 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1027711: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1015772,
regarding curry-frontend FTBFS: error: Suffix occurrence of @
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1015772: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1015772
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: curry-frontend
Version: 2.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=curry-frontend&suite=sid

...
src/Curry/Syntax/Type.hs:1005:17: error:
Suffix occurrence of @. For an as-pattern, remove the leading whitespace.
 |
1005 |   updateEndPos f@ (Field _ _ _) = f
 | ^
 at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Buildsystem/Haskell/Recipes.pm line 107.

Debian::Debhelper::Buildsystem::Haskell::Recipes::run_quiet("debian/hlibrary.setup",
 "build", "--builddir=dist-ghc") called at 
/usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Buildsystem/Haskell/Recipes.pm line 131

Debian::Debhelper::Buildsystem::Haskell::Recipes::run("debian/hlibrary.setup", 
"build", "--builddir=dist-ghc") called at 
/usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Buildsystem/Haskell/Recipes.pm line 642
Debian::Debhelper::Buildsystem::Haskell::Recipes::build_recipe() called 
at -e line 1
make: *** [/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk:160: build-ghc-stamp] Error 25
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.0.0-2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package curry-frontend has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1027711

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---


Bug#1027733: libc6: new libc6 breaks GNU Screen handling of some Unicode characters

2023-01-02 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2023-01-02 18:07:52 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2023-01-02 16:34 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > There is no such issue under bullseye (Debian 11.6), which also has
> > GNU Screen 4.09.00, so the breakage appears to be due to libc6.
> 
> Without having looked at the problem: this appears to be a rather bold
> conclusion.  There are also newer versions of mutt, ncurses and a few
> other libraries which mutt or screen depend upon that could be
> responsible.

I've tested with the same version of Mutt (from Git). However, indeed,
ncurses is different. I doubt that other libraries matter.

> > Example to reproduce the issue with the U+1FAF6 HEART HANDS character
> > under Debian/unstable:
> >
> > 1. Run "screen" in a 80-column terminal.
> >
> > 2. Open this mailbox with "mutt -F /dev/null -f heart-hands.mbox".
> >Result: line 10 is shifted 1 column to the right, and character "v"
> >appears on the following line.
> 
> I failed to reproduce that step, the 'v' appears on the last column for
> me.

Sorry, I did the test with my own version of Mutt. So, for this
particular behavior at step 2, you need

  mutt -n -F /dev/null -f heart-hands.mbox

i.e. with the -n option so that the system-wide Muttrc configuration
file is not read.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre  - Web: 
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: 
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)



Bug#1013866: marked as done (curry-base FTBFS: error: Suffix occurrence of @. For an as-pattern, remove the leading whitespace.)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 18:14:45 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1027715: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013866,
regarding curry-base FTBFS: error: Suffix occurrence of @. For an as-pattern, 
remove the leading whitespace.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1013866: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1013866
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: curry-base
Version: 1.1.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=curry-base&suite=sid

...
src/Curry/Syntax/Type.hs:985:17: error:
Suffix occurrence of @. For an as-pattern, remove the leading whitespace.
|
985 |   updateEndPos f@ (Field _ _ _) = f
| ^
 at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Buildsystem/Haskell/Recipes.pm line 107.

Debian::Debhelper::Buildsystem::Haskell::Recipes::run_quiet("debian/hlibrary.setup",
 "haddock", "--builddir=dist-ghc", "--with-haddock=/usr/bin/haddock", 
"--with-ghc=ghc", "--verbose=2", "--html", "--hoogle", ...) called at 
/usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Buildsystem/Haskell/Recipes.pm line 131

Debian::Debhelper::Buildsystem::Haskell::Recipes::run("debian/hlibrary.setup", 
"haddock", "--builddir=dist-ghc", "--with-haddock=/usr/bin/haddock", 
"--with-ghc=ghc", "--verbose=2", "--html", "--hoogle", ...) called at 
/usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Buildsystem/Haskell/Recipes.pm line 707
Debian::Debhelper::Buildsystem::Haskell::Recipes::haddock_recipe() 
called at -e line 1
make: *** [/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk:153: build-ghc-stamp] Error 25
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.1.1-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package curry-base has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1027715

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---


Processed: forcibly merging 1025529 1027639

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forcemerge 1025529 1027639
Bug #1025529 {Done: Sylvestre Ledru } 
[src:llvm-toolchain-14] llvm-toolchain-14: FTBFS with grpc 1.51+
Bug #1027639 [src:llvm-toolchain-14] llvm-toolchain-14: FTBFS: 
lib/libclangdMonitoringServiceProto.a(MonitoringService.grpc.pb.cc.o):MonitoringService.grpc.pb.cc:function
 grpc::internal::BlockingUnaryCallImpl::BlockingUnaryCallImpl(grpc::ChannelInterface*, 
grpc::internal::RpcMethod const&, grpc::ClientContext*, 
google::protobuf::MessageLite const&, google::protobuf::MessageLite*): error: 
undefined reference to 'absl::debian3::Mutex::~Mutex()'
Marked Bug as done
Marked as fixed in versions llvm-toolchain-14/1:14.0.6-10~exp4.
Added tag(s) sid, experimental, and bookworm.
Merged 1025529 1027639
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1025529: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025529
1027639: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027639
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1027733: libc6: new libc6 breaks GNU Screen handling of some Unicode characters

2023-01-02 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2023-01-02 19:08:17 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > Example to reproduce the issue with the U+1FAF6 HEART HANDS character
> > > under Debian/unstable:
> > >
> > > 1. Run "screen" in a 80-column terminal.
> > >
> > > 2. Open this mailbox with "mutt -F /dev/null -f heart-hands.mbox".
> > >Result: line 10 is shifted 1 column to the right, and character "v"
> > >appears on the following line.
> > 
> > I failed to reproduce that step, the 'v' appears on the last column for
> > me.
> 
> Sorry, I did the test with my own version of Mutt. So, for this
> particular behavior at step 2, you need
> 
>   mutt -n -F /dev/null -f heart-hands.mbox
> 
> i.e. with the -n option so that the system-wide Muttrc configuration
> file is not read.

Hmm... This also depends on the terminal.

This problem (both step 2 and step 3) is reproducible with xterm,
rxvt and GNOME Terminal, but not mlterm.

This might also be a terminal bug, but several terminals would be
affected by the same bug!

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre  - Web: 
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: 
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)



Bug#1027733: libc6: new libc6 breaks GNU Screen handling of some Unicode characters

2023-01-02 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2023-01-02 19:27:28 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Hmm... This also depends on the terminal.
> 
> This problem (both step 2 and step 3) is reproducible with xterm,
> rxvt and GNOME Terminal, but not mlterm.
> 
> This might also be a terminal bug, but several terminals would be
> affected by the same bug!

Forget this remark: without "screen", there is a small display issue
in mlterm. This appears to be related to the width of the character
(mlterm considers that it takes 1 column, contrary to the other
terminals).

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre  - Web: 
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: 
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)



Bug#1027733: libc6: new libc6 breaks GNU Screen handling of some Unicode characters

2023-01-02 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2023-01-02 19:08 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:

> On 2023-01-02 18:07:52 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2023-01-02 16:34 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> > There is no such issue under bullseye (Debian 11.6), which also has
>> > GNU Screen 4.09.00, so the breakage appears to be due to libc6.
>>
>> Without having looked at the problem: this appears to be a rather bold
>> conclusion.  There are also newer versions of mutt, ncurses and a few
>> other libraries which mutt or screen depend upon that could be
>> responsible.
>
> I've tested with the same version of Mutt (from Git). However, indeed,
> ncurses is different. I doubt that other libraries matter.

Probably not; the most likely candidates besides libc6 would be
ncurses-base (i.e. the terminfo database) and libncursesw6.  My advice
would be to start with a minimal bullseye chroot and then upgrade first
libc6, then ncurses-base and finally libncursesw6 to the sid or bookworm
versions.

>> > Example to reproduce the issue with the U+1FAF6 HEART HANDS character
>> > under Debian/unstable:
>> >
>> > 1. Run "screen" in a 80-column terminal.
>> >
>> > 2. Open this mailbox with "mutt -F /dev/null -f heart-hands.mbox".
>> >Result: line 10 is shifted 1 column to the right, and character "v"
>> >appears on the following line.
>>
>> I failed to reproduce that step, the 'v' appears on the last column for
>> me.
>
> Sorry, I did the test with my own version of Mutt. So, for this
> particular behavior at step 2, you need
>
>   mutt -n -F /dev/null -f heart-hands.mbox
>
> i.e. with the -n option so that the system-wide Muttrc configuration
> file is not read.

I still see the 'v' on the last column with mutt 2.2.9-1.

Cheers,
   Sven



Bug#1027589: marked as done (adwaita-qt: FTBFS: dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols file: see diff output below)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 19:04:15 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1027589: fixed in adwaita-qt 1.4.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027589,
regarding adwaita-qt: FTBFS: dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns 
disappeared in the symbols file: see diff output below
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1027589: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027589
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: adwaita-qt
Version: 1.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230101 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/build-qt6'
> make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'preinstall'.
> make[3]: Leaving directory '/<>/build-qt6'
> Install the project...
> /usr/bin/cmake -P cmake_install.cmake
> -- Install configuration: "None"
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libadwaitaqt6priv.so.1.4.2
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libadwaitaqt6priv.so.1
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libadwaitaqt6priv.so
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libadwaitaqt6.so.1.4.2
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libadwaitaqt6.so.1
> -- Set runtime path of 
> "/<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libadwaitaqt6.so.1.4.2" 
> to ""
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libadwaitaqt6.so
> -- Installing: /<>/debian/tmp/usr/include/AdwaitaQt6/adwaita.h
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/include/AdwaitaQt6/adwaitacolors.h
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/include/AdwaitaQt6/adwaitarenderer.h
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/include/AdwaitaQt6/adwaitaqt_export.h
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/adwaita-qt6.pc
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/AdwaitaQt6/AdwaitaQt6Config.cmake
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/AdwaitaQt6/AdwaitaQt6ConfigVersion.cmake
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/AdwaitaQt6/AdwaitaQt6Targets.cmake
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/AdwaitaQt6/AdwaitaQt6Targets-none.cmake
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt6/plugins/styles/adwaita.so
> -- Set runtime path of 
> "/<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt6/plugins/styles/adwaita.so"
>  to ""
> make[2]: Leaving directory '/<>/build-qt6'
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
>dh_install
>dh_installdocs
>dh_installchangelogs
>dh_perl
>dh_link
>dh_strip_nondeterminism
>dh_compress
>dh_fixperms
>dh_missing
>dh_dwz -a
>dh_strip -a
>dh_makeshlibs -a
> dpkg-gensymbols: warning: debian/libadwaitaqt6-1/DEBIAN/symbols doesn't match 
> completely debian/libadwaitaqt6-1.symbols
> --- debian/libadwaitaqt6-1.symbols (libadwaitaqt6-1_1.4.2-1_amd64)
> +++ dpkg-gensymbols35Uvx_ 2023-01-01 09:15:51.699055302 +
> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@
>   
> _ZN9QtPrivate25QMetaTypeInterfaceWrapperIN7Adwaita13ColorsPrivateEE8metaTypeE@Base
>  1.4.1
>   
> (optional=templinst)_ZN9QtPrivate30QExplicitlySharedDataPointerV2I8QMapDataISt3mapIN7Adwaita12ColorVariantE6QColorSt4lessIS4_ESaISt4pairIKS4_S5_ED1Ev@Base
>  1.4.1
>   
> (optional=templinst)_ZN9QtPrivate30QExplicitlySharedDataPointerV2I8QMapDataISt3mapIN7Adwaita12ColorVariantE6QColorSt4lessIS4_ESaISt4pairIKS4_S5_ED2Ev@Base
>  1.4.1
> - (optional=templinst|arch=!alpha !ppc64 
> !s390x)_ZNK12QHashPrivate4DataINS_4NodeI7QString4QMapIN7Adwaita12ColorVariantE6QColor4findERKS2_@Base
>  1.4.1
> +#MISSING: 1.4.2-1# (optional=templinst|arch=!alpha !ppc64 
> !s390x)_ZNK12QHashPrivate4DataINS_4NodeI7QString4QMapIN7Adwaita12ColorVariantE6QColor4findERKS2_@Base
>  1.4.1
>   _ZNK7Adwaita12StyleOptions10colorGroupEv@Base 1.4.1
>   _ZNK7Adwaita12StyleOptions12colorVariantEv@Base 1.4.1
>   _ZNK7Adwaita12StyleOptions12outlineColorEv@Base 1.4.1
> dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some new symbols appeared in the symbols file: see 
> diff output below
> dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols 
> file: see diff output below
> dpkg-gensymbols: warning: debian/libadwaitaqt6priv1/DEBIAN/symbols doesn't 
> match completely debian/libadwaitaqt6priv1.symbols
> --- debian/libadwaitaqt6priv1.symbols (libadwaitaqt6priv1_1.4.2-1_amd64)
> +++ dpkg-gensymbolsckzYB0 2023-01-01 0

Bug#1027751: need to properly depend on python3-exceptiongroup

2023-01-02 Thread Nilesh Patra
Source: pytest
Version: 7.1.2-4
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: roehl...@debian.org

Hi,

While building pairtools version 1.0.2-1 I noticed this error. I have 
temporarliy added
a build depend on exceptiongroup in the said package to work around the issue.

| I: pybuild base:240: export CURPY=python3.10; cd 
/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.10/build && python3.10 -m pytest -v
| Traceback (most recent call last):
|  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/runpy.py", line 187, in _run_module_as_main
|mod_name, mod_spec, code = _get_module_details(mod_name, _Error)
|  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/runpy.py", line 146, in _get_module_details
|return _get_module_details(pkg_main_name, error)
|  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/runpy.py", line 110, in _get_module_details
|__import__(pkg_name)
|  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pytest/__init__.py", line 5, in 
|from _pytest._code import ExceptionInfo
|  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/_pytest/_code/__init__.py", line 2, in 

|from .code import Code
|  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/_pytest/_code/code.py", line 60, in 

|from exceptiongroup import BaseExceptionGroup
| ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'exceptiongroup'
| E: pybuild pybuild:388: test: plugin custom failed with: exit code=1: export 
CURPY=python3.10; cd /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.10/build && 
python3.10 -m pytest -v

My hunch is that the issue is this:

| $ apt show python3-pytest | grep excep
| Depends: python3-attr, python3-more-itertools, python3-pkg-resources, 
python3-pluggy (>= 0.12), python3-py, python3-exceptiongroup | python3 (>> 
3.11), python3-importlib-metadata | python3 (>> 3.8), python3-iniconfig, 
python3-packaging, python3-tomli | python3 (>> 3.11), python3:any

The "python3 (>> 3.11)" dependency is now beginning to be satisfied with doko's 
new python3.11 upload i.e. version 3.11.1 (see[1])
exceptiongroup should still be picked in this scnario, this is a bit odd 
though, but definitely worth a look.

[1]: 
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1404008/accepted-python311-3111-2-source-into-unstable/

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.0.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled



Processed: retitle

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 1027751 pytest -- need to properly depend on python3-exceptiongroup
Bug #1027751 [src:pytest] need to properly depend on python3-exceptiongroup
Changed Bug title to 'pytest -- need to properly depend on 
python3-exceptiongroup' from 'need to properly depend on 
python3-exceptiongroup'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1027751: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027751
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1027701: marked as done (python3-pairtools-examples: missing Breaks+Replaces: python3-pairtools (<< 1.0.2))

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2023 19:37:20 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1027701: fixed in pairtools 1.0.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027701,
regarding python3-pairtools-examples: missing Breaks+Replaces: 
python3-pairtools (<< 1.0.2)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1027701: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027701
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: python3-pairtools-examples
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.

See policy 7.6 at
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Preparing to unpack .../python3-pairtools-examples_1.0.2-1_amd64.deb ...
  Unpacking python3-pairtools-examples:amd64 (1.0.2-1) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/python3-pairtools-examples_1.0.2-1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite 
'/usr/share/doc/python3-pairtools/examples/example_pipeline.sh', which is also 
in package python3-pairtools 0.3.0-2+b2
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/python3-pairtools-examples_1.0.2-1_amd64.deb


Some more examples were moved to the -examples package in 1.0.2-1
but corresponding B+R were forgotten.


cheers,

Andreas


python3-pairtools=0.3.0-2+b2_python3-pairtools-examples=1.0.2-1.log.gz
Description: application/gzip
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pairtools
Source-Version: 1.0.2-2
Done: Nilesh Patra 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pairtools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1027...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Nilesh Patra  (supplier of updated pairtools package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2023 00:30:28 +0530
Source: pairtools
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team 

Changed-By: Nilesh Patra 
Closes: 1027701
Changes:
 pairtools (1.0.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team Upload.
   * Add B+R on "python3-pairtools (<< 1.0.2)" (Closes: #1027701)
   * B-D on python3-exceptiongroup at least temporarily to fix FTBFS
Checksums-Sha1:
 5f956a7c042fdc9d0645a513373f465dbebcdea9 1739 pairtools_1.0.2-2.dsc
 331cada3ce13ea53781c2b49b1925c57d1049568 6988 pairtools_1.0.2-2.debian.tar.xz
 23693b0dc6ca4168c5218aa1f17cf376478f1644 10823 
pairtools_1.0.2-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 9cb020634b36335d74a100d5c4c0d00bbb853c729aab6431698237a43ae78a88 1739 
pairtools_1.0.2-2.dsc
 a61d9d86510b4d212ec4783dd59f13363ad045f1d1c932ac33fb0bb1f8405bdc 6988 
pairtools_1.0.2-2.debian.tar.xz
 1b17e2a985d59c990f6a3cc2cf687f1a706905ad72f06e6ac1e73739c4d264f6 10823 
pairtools_1.0.2-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 8752addc85fc37c6b76a9a494a54b0db 1739 python optional pairtools_1.0.2-2.dsc
 6de57ff0478fe8bbb4147cd75f787a1f 6988 python optional 
pairtools_1.0.2-2.debian.tar.xz
 c4e396e5bd4bfda743cc68fe90d9444a 10823 python optional 
pairtools_1.0.2-2_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iHUEARYIAB0WIQSglbZu4JAkvuai8HIqJ5BL1yQ+2gUCY7MvSgAKCRAqJ5BL1yQ+
2t/jAP475DM4r7A03icx2GhzEs1mU8YMwg02F9pK3Fb+pBmrQwD+J2DRV3SAjTmG
0kXduwqV2Jb6RRo6gLUBfVPkIk1r6QY=
=Kj/9
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---


Bug#1027426: marked as done (tortoize: FTBFS with libcifpp 5.0.5)

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jan 2023 01:08:40 +0530
with message-id <20230102193840.ck6ihrqujy3ea...@nileshpatra.info>
and subject line Re: tortoize: FTBFS with libcifpp 5.0.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027426,
regarding tortoize: FTBFS with libcifpp 5.0.5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1027426: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027426
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tortoize
Version: 2.0.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=tortoize&arch=amd64&ver=2.0.5-2%2Bb1&stamp=1672401853&raw=0

[ 33%] Generating tortoize_rsrc.obj
/usr/bin/mrc -o /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tortoize_rsrc.obj 
/<>/rsrc/rama-data.bin /<>/rsrc/torsion-data.bin 
/usr/share/libcifpp/mmcif_pdbx_v50.dic
Error executing mrc: Could not open data file
make[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/tortoize.dir/build.make:77: tortoize_rsrc.obj] Error 1

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.0.10-1

This is fixed in the new version. I am closing this on behalf of Maarten.

Best,
Nilesh

On Sat, 31 Dec 2022 10:14:59 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher  
wrote:
> Source: tortoize
> Version: 2.0.5-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
> X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
> 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=tortoize&arch=amd64&ver=2.0.5-2%2Bb1&stamp=1672401853&raw=0
> 
> [ 33%] Generating tortoize_rsrc.obj
> /usr/bin/mrc -o /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tortoize_rsrc.obj 
> /<>/rsrc/rama-data.bin /<>/rsrc/torsion-data.bin 
> /usr/share/libcifpp/mmcif_pdbx_v50.dic
> Error executing mrc: Could not open data file
> make[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/tortoize.dir/build.make:77: tortoize_rsrc.obj] Error 
> 1
> 
> Cheers
> -- 
> Sebastian Ramacher


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---


Processed: fix

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> fixed 1027426 2.0.10-1
Bug #1027426 {Done: "Maarten L. Hekkelman" } 
[src:tortoize] tortoize: FTBFS with libcifpp 5.0.5
Marked as fixed in versions tortoize/2.0.10-1; no longer marked as fixed in 
versions 2.0.10-1.
> close 1027426
Bug #1027426 {Done: "Maarten L. Hekkelman" } 
[src:tortoize] tortoize: FTBFS with libcifpp 5.0.5
Bug 1027426 is already marked as done; not doing anything.
> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1027426: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027426
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1026633: Info received (Grig)

2023-01-02 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Black Michael
> Current github master plus one small patch fixes the compilation.

Hi Michael,

I see it has already been merged, thanks!

Let's see if they also tag a new release. Otherwise I'll make a temp
tarball in a few days.

Christoph



Bug#1026962: openjfx: tries to build with -j64 on a host with 2 processors

2023-01-02 Thread tony mancill
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 05:25:40PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 08:22:43PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Source: openjfx
> > Version: 11.0.11+0-1.1
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: ftbfs
> > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the 
> > past)
> > 
> > openjfx tries to build with -j64 on zani.debian.org, which only has 2
> > processors and 8GB of RAM:
> > 
> > buildd   3853047  0.0  0.0  67668 4 ?S11:07   0:00 cmake 
> > --build 
> > /build/openjfx-fzmlCD/openjfx-11.0.11+1/modules/javafx.web/build/linux/Release
> >  --config Release -- -j64
> > buildd   3853048  0.0  0.0   3200   272 ?S11:07   0:00 
> > /usr/bin/gmake -f Makefile -j64
> > 
> > This hogs the buildd resources and we had to kill the build.
> 
> Yeah, that seems excessive.  FWIW, the most recent upload didn't change
> anything related to the build options, so this has built successfully in
> the past.
> 
> It built successfully on armel with the auto-detected value -j4, so it's
> surprising to see it pick 64 if there are only 2 processors.  The only
> reference to the number of compile threads is this bit of Groovy from
> build.gradle:
> 
> defineProperty("NUM_COMPILE_THREADS", 
> "${Runtime.runtime.availableProcessors()}")
> 
> I will have a look to try to determine where the value of 64 is coming
> from.  We can clamp the value if need be.

I have been poking at this and the issue isn't with NUM_COMPILE_THREADS.
It appears that cmake is picking the value of 64 all by itself, and it
doesn't respect CMAKE_BUILD_PARALLEL_LEVEL when it is set in the build
environment.  So perhaps cmake has changed.

In any event, I will continue to look for a way to avoid this on s390x.



Bug#1025868: lintian autopkgtest fails on all but amd64: x86_64-linux-gnu expected build-and-evaluate-test-packages/eval/checks/desktop/gnome/gir/gir/generic.t

2023-01-02 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Paul,

finally found time to tackle this.

Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Can you please investigate the situation
> 
> Already done. Issue are mostly hardcoded x86_64 and amd64 strings in
> the test suite.
> 
> Problem is IIRC that Lintian's testsuite currently doesn't support a
> templating system, at least not for many of these places. IIRC I fixed
> already some of them which were easy to fix.

Actually there seems a possibility to fix this like in these cases
t/recipes/checks/desktop/gnome/gir/gir/eval/post-test which has the
following sed command in it:

  s, usr/lib/[^/${}]+/girepository-1.0$, usr/lib/MULTIARCH/girepository-1.0,

But it doesn't seem to be applied in the comparison, because if I put
"MULTIARCH" into the hints file, it fails on amd64 as well.

Another weird point seems that
t/recipes/checks/desktop/gnome/gir/gir/eval/desc says:

  Testname: gir
  Check: desktop/gnome/gir
  Test-Architecture: amd64

So that clearly means it should only be run on amd64. So why is it run
on arm64 at all?

Hrm, a "git grep Test-Architecture" shows that most if not all other
such cases have "Test-Architectures" (plural with trailing "s") in
that place. So this is a typo which hasn't been caught yet.

So with my commit f415bc56c4b40d25410af21f2ea629e8eb0733b6 this part
of the test failures should be fixed. And with commit
695582b83f397d6bd5f47f99af77b2195ed1e604 we should also have an
internal check which finds such field name typos. (Needs to be
maintained, though, if fields get added or removed.)

Still need to figure out where the issue with bin-sbin-mismatch. But
that tag is known (at least to me) for weird false positives.

Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 10-12-2022 22:55, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Ehm, that version no more in the archive anywhere. Did you maybe mean
> > 2.115.3 as currently in Testing and Unstable? (Feel free to remove the
> > moreinfo tag once this is clarified.)
> 
> I meant, I see the issue *since* that version.

Ah, ok. Yeah, kinda makes sense. I kinda expected that this version is
usually the one the bug report was written against with any additional
version hints being added as secondary version via Control statements.

> But indeed, that's a bit weird if not commented on. I have added a
> `found` version now.

Thanks!

> > Will have to look into it again, but I fear in short term, it means to
> > either reduce the tests or only run a subset on non-amd64
> > architectures.
> 
> If the test can't easily support other architectures (which is fine in my
> opinion) than please ensure it only runs on amd64. I advice to do that by
> adding a "Architecture: amd64" field to d/t/control.

Thanks for that hint. But there's already enough code in place for
that so that making it work should be merely fixing a few more lines.
The big question is which lines. ;-) But at least half of the issue is
fixed already.

P.S.: Any idea how we get Salsa CI autopkgtests on arm64?

Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-|  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE



Bug#1025868: lintian autopkgtest fails on all but amd64: x86_64-linux-gnu expected build-and-evaluate-test-packages/eval/checks/desktop/gnome/gir/gir/generic.t

2023-01-02 Thread Paul Gevers

Hi,

On 02-01-2023 21:10, Axel Beckert wrote:

Another weird point seems that
t/recipes/checks/desktop/gnome/gir/gir/eval/desc says:

   Testname: gir
   Check: desktop/gnome/gir
   Test-Architecture: amd64

So that clearly means it should only be run on amd64. So why is it run
on arm64 at all?


I suspect this is a lintian internal, but I guess you figured that out.


Ah, ok. Yeah, kinda makes sense. I kinda expected that this version is
usually the one the bug report was written against with any additional
version hints being added as secondary version via Control statements.


I cake these reports from a template and file them in with what I see on 
ci.d.n.



P.S.: Any idea how we get Salsa CI autopkgtests on arm64?


I understand the issue is on the salsa admin side where there are issues 
with shared runners or something. There is a host available that could 
run the tests, but the host can't be added for $reasons.


Paul


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1027176: u-boot-amlogic: broken non-EFI boot on odroid-c2

2023-01-02 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2022-12-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> The odroid-c2 fails to boot syslinux/extlinux style menus (e.g. those
> produced by u-boot-menu) or boot.scr as of upstream 2022.07-rc1. The
> commit triggering the issue has been identified as:
>
>   a9bf024b2933bba0e23038892970a18b72dfaeb4
>   efi_loader: disk: a helper function to create efi_disk objects from
>   udevice
>
> Workarounds I've heard are to disable EFI support for that board, or to
> boot using EFI rather than boot scripts or syslinux/extlinux style
> menus.

Well, this patch applied to 2022.10+dfsg-2 or 2023.01~rc4+dfsg-1 is
enough to get it booting on odroid-c2 with syslinux/extlinux style menus
and boot scripts:

diff --git a/configs/odroid-c2_defconfig b/configs/odroid-c2_defconfig
index a4c4fc7906..281d5e0014 100644
--- a/configs/odroid-c2_defconfig
+++ b/configs/odroid-c2_defconfig
@@ -67,3 +67,4 @@ CONFIG_BMP_16BPP=y
 CONFIG_BMP_24BPP=y
 CONFIG_BMP_32BPP=y
 CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT_OVERLAY=y
+# CONFIG_EFI_LOADER is not set

Obviously, it breaks EFI booting...

Worst case, I suppose we could create two variants, one with EFI, one
without...


live well,
  vagrant


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Processed: nghttp2: missing build-depends on tzdata

2023-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> fixed 981600 1.51.0-1
Bug #981600 [src:nghttp2] nghttp2: missing build-depends on tzdata
Marked as fixed in versions nghttp2/1.51.0-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
981600: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=981600
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#981600: nghttp2: missing build-depends on tzdata

2023-01-02 Thread Santiago Vila

fixed 981600 1.51.0-1
thanks

Hi. For some reason this is not a problem in bookworm anymore,
therefore I'm marking this as fixed in this version.
(Could someone double-check?)

For bullseye, I propose the attached patch.

Note: Some people ask why bother to fix bugs like this
in stable when debootstrap installs tzdata by default.

Well, I believe the fact that this bug took so much time to be properly
diagnosed is an indication that adding a single line to debian/control
may save a good amount of debugging time for those who work with minimal
chroots (i.e. without packages which are really not build essential).

Andreas: I see that you tagged this "sid bookworm".
Should it not be really "bullseye" given that it does not happen
anymore in bookworm?

Thanks.diff -Nru nghttp2-1.43.0/debian/changelog nghttp2-1.43.0/debian/changelog
--- nghttp2-1.43.0/debian/changelog 2021-02-13 18:47:24.0 +0100
+++ nghttp2-1.43.0/debian/changelog 2023-01-02 21:18:00.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+nghttp2 (1.43.0-1+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium
+
+  * Add missing tzdata to Build-Depends, required for the unit tests
+when building the arch-dependent packages. Closes: #981600.
+
+ -- Tomasz Buchert   Mon, 02 Jan 2023 21:18:00 +0100
+
 nghttp2 (1.43.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * New upstream release 1.43.0
diff -Nru nghttp2-1.43.0/debian/control nghttp2-1.43.0/debian/control
--- nghttp2-1.43.0/debian/control   2021-02-13 18:47:24.0 +0100
+++ nghttp2-1.43.0/debian/control   2023-01-02 21:15:08.0 +0100
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
libsystemd-dev,
libxml2-dev,
pkg-config,
+   tzdata,
zlib1g-dev
 Build-Depends-Indep: python3-sphinx
 Standards-Version: 4.5.1


Bug#1027751: need to properly depend on python3-exceptiongroup

2023-01-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 12:53:47AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> While building pairtools version 1.0.2-1 I noticed this error. I have 
> temporarliy added
> a build depend on exceptiongroup in the said package to work around the issue.

I ran into the same thing in python-ws4py, and am applying the same
workaround there.

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@debian.org]



  1   2   >