Re: Bug#717518: RM: partman-ufs -- ROM; Now obsolete
> the kernel no longer provides > UFS modules and there is no point in having a D-I udeb for this > filesystem. See #717239. kFreeBSD does, it's our default filesystem! I don't think we really want to remove this package... Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/520e14e0.4070...@pyro.eu.org
Bug #717239: partman-ufs: depends on obsolete package
The dependency should be still satisfied on kFreeBSD and Hurd. On kFreeBSD it's even our default filesystem. Since the package is arch: all, is this an actionable bug? It seems to me no different than say, partman-zfs dependencies not being satisfied on GNU/Linux. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/520e1693@pyro.eu.org
Re: OpenJDK-7 for kfreebsd-*
Moin! Steven Chamberlain writes: > In particular we need to check libreoffice first. The maintainer > thought there were reproducible issues trying to build it on kfreebsd-* > using openjdk-7, on porter boxes; I didn't see a problem when I tried > it locally though. I talked to rene here at DebConf. The problems did show up in the past when running the testsuite (hangs). Rene tried with current OpenJDK on falla -- in current kfreebsd sid -- and it does now works as well as anywhere on !linux-x86 which means we should be fine from this side. Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87mwohkf0w@mitoraj.siccegge.de
Re: OpenJDK-7 for kfreebsd-*
On 16/08/13 13:15, Christoph Egger wrote: > I talked to rene here at DebConf. The problems did show up in the past > when running the testsuite (hangs). Rene tried with current OpenJDK on > falla -- in current kfreebsd sid -- and it does now works as well as > anywhere on !linux-x86 which means we should be fine from this side. Oh that's great. We should probably change to openjdk-7 as default ASAP, but how should we go about that? Other arches simply changed this in java-common in sid, but those are merely stepping from openjdk-6 to openjdk-7. Should we treat this as a transition co-ordinated with the release team, so that all rdepends are rebuilt? I'd actually prefer this in any case; it would fix some past build failures such as eclipse. And possibly libjogl-java, leading to scilab and more being built. (But perhaps these packages should also have had tighter Build-Depends if gcj is insufficient.) Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/520e1fbf.4040...@pyro.eu.org
Re: Bug#717518: RM: partman-ufs -- ROM; Now obsolete
Quoting Steven Chamberlain (ste...@pyro.eu.org): > > the kernel no longer provides > > UFS modules and there is no point in having a D-I udeb for this > > filesystem. See #717239. > > kFreeBSD does, it's our default filesystem! I don't think we really > want to remove this package... OK, hence closing..:-) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
