Re: [call for testing] NPTL like pthread implementation for GNU/kFreeBSD
Hi! Petr Salinger writes: > Updated version of FBTL (NPTL like) glibc is available from experimental. I've been running the experimental libc now for several days on my notebook without any trouble! Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87zjtg87ea@mitoraj.siccegge.de
Re: DSA concerns for jessie architectures
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/22/2013 07:26 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > * sparc: no working nflog (mild concern); no stable kernels in stable > (compiling clisp for instance crashes the kernel reliably on smetana). We > need to run sparc with oldstable kernels to provide stable machines. > That's not an option for long. I think all machines except stadler and sompek are US IIIi machines. The problem with US IIIi is, that sun never published the cpu specs - they would have done it if somebody would have paid for the lawyers to look trough them before publishing. US IIi support was implemented by a student working at SUN under NDA and US IV and later was published. So I think if dropping (official) support for US IIIi CPUs would keep the port alive, we should do that. Running Debian on the more recent machines makes more sense anyway imho. The older ones are nice, but they consume a lt of power. - -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJR7DExAAoJEOs2Fxpv+UNffpcP/2Rs12KtUr1R8Fj/SUFsGTGi Qq4IyIsq6T9+0be/Q2NT+8vKhqy9eAfLIGPYfEfMP/gQUXHxqURF7452FCum5pCe PPbhpGMFL67rX9I9tdNbYGEcD6KnHksHc64PaV4FkCd5W/dvQzaVHxfP5I7TjFL2 JQVrfqYTi546kPN7kqo6YhNNC+jFRBJOxB+2RhdEddg12xU9/08/YIy865qJqXSP 0X+xBfiGu040AKUC+Ml4ZjFGKDnCOKhuuAKDYnyZLjLSFjTkE00WowKDS8JmJRLC ls89Xha2K4Sk01io+f4iermCjRsHD/GvS4mNIG5HsEQYHROdWoCFNRl4hAdGI0zZ CvFnxaJLwQ+cd0dsoFO/OkuRLTYOrjHKTniOjrWcgaOl0L6C6K4Jhyh+jpl2GmO/ sUs/K3jtUBos5Q1ojetmm/rAXjEFe3giOokosUP1DOB8fWUnYqRDYf5ODOeEucot nzl6lfvp+g2nQVQAAOqpSqxCYYhue23Mg8ZYfW1L/I8mNIvClrcSVfHAAP3URQeY eDGoyPNX6AIYiFX8J121ynfMa/TujGURfoPcQWWGFb3NyJ4/RM/FrTAAseldcIlW 2nfpRUX118LEYLQ6Jj4JQn7Ci6lL+SUgI2HfSRu/5a1aoBrEVhVF5ItUbMU6B0Vx YTnzPB7WteSULAbu90Iz =H+fH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51ec3137.1020...@bzed.de
Bug#666730: ia32 compat mode, ktimer_create etc return ENOSYS
Should be fixed in HEAD post r253531. Please package and upload new snapshot. Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.lnx.2.00.1307212151010.23...@contest.felk.cvut.cz
Bug#716746: marked as done (backport clock_getcpuclockid2 syscall into kfreebsd-9)
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:50:57 +0200 (CEST) with message-id and subject line 716746: fixed in kfreebsd-9 9.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #716746, regarding backport clock_getcpuclockid2 syscall into kfreebsd-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 716746: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=716746 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: kfreebsd-9 Severity: wishlist User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd To properly provide CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID, CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID and clock_id's created by clock_getcpuclockid() and pthread_getcpuclockid(), we need a kernel support. See also #665287. The kernel support is available in HEAD (but not in STABLE-9). It should not be to hard to backport kernel part of http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=168417 into our kernel. The FBTL based libpthread will use only this interface, it will not fallback to TSC timers at all. The reason is that TSC part is fragile and unaccurate. Petr --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: kfreebsd-9 Source-Version: 9.1-2 I verified that this set of patches suffices. Changes: kfreebsd-9 (9.1-2) experimental; urgency=low . [ Robert Millan ] * Bump B-D on freebsd-buildutils to 10~svn251967-4. . [ Petr Salinger ] * Build by gcc-4.8, disable unnecessary 901_disable_optimization_2.diff * Add 111_ldd_address.diff. Closes: #696556. * Add backport of CPU-timers support. See #716746. - 000_cpuclockid2_zombie.diff - 000_cpuclockid2_syscall.diff - 000_cpuclockid2_compat32.diff--- End Message ---
