Bug#886642: fixed? (please default to a larger /boot for guided partitioning)
Hi, "McIntyre, Vincent (CASS, Marsfield)" wrote: > Hi > > I thought this would have been fixed by this commit > > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-auto/-/commit/79bea1c75d2fd9fbd6eb01c1bea6de2914d24d22 > > which will be available in the 'daily' build of the installer. > I don't know what the prospects are for having this applied to > the 'stable' installer. This is indeed fixed for bullseye, tracked in #893886 / #951709, leading to /boot getting a size between 512 and 768MB (depending on disc size). @Tobias: you can try a daily build from https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/ to confirm it works for you for installation of bullseye. I was not aware of this bug, so did not close it... Should this be considered for backporting to stable? Holger -- Holger Wansing PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
Processed: Bug#961303 marked as pending in flash-kernel
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #961303 [flash-kernel] Please add an entry for Turris MOX Added tag(s) pending. -- 961303: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961303 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#886642: fixed? (please default to a larger /boot for guided partitioning)
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 13:22 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hi, > > "McIntyre, Vincent (CASS, Marsfield)" wrote: > > Hi > > > > I thought this would have been fixed by this commit > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-auto/-/commit/79bea1c75d2fd9fbd6eb01c1bea6de2914d24d22 > > > > which will be available in the 'daily' build of the installer. > > I don't know what the prospects are for having this applied to > > the 'stable' installer. > > This is indeed fixed for bullseye, tracked in #893886 / #951709, leading to > /boot > getting a size between 512 and 768MB (depending on disc size). > > @Tobias: you can try a daily build from > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/ > to confirm it works for you for installation of bullseye. > > I was not aware of this bug, so did not close it... > > Should this be considered for backporting to stable? I think it should, though there is a small risk of regression if people install on very small storage devices. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Nothing is ever a complete failure; it can always serve as a bad example. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
