Re: My retirement, status of live-manual, debian-installer-launcher
On 01/08/16 09:20 AM, Ben Armstrong wrote: > Hi, > > Many of you may have already heard, but I retired last month. For > details, see: > > http://syn.theti.ca/2016/08/01/retiring-as-a-debian-developer/ > > In particular, please note that live-manual and > debian-installer-launcher need maintainers, and I should be removed from > Uploaders on all live-* packages. I've just done this for live-manual. However, debian-installer-launcher is maintained by debian-boot, and apparently I don't have permission to remove myself, so I need help from them to take care of this. synrg@shade:~/work/debian-installer-launcher$ git show commit 7959768d3565bfb14b6d1103f0c4c62a53373b4d Author: Ben Armstrong Date: Mon Aug 1 10:07:39 2016 -0300 Removed myself from Uploaders. diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 96da568..5126858 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ Section: utils Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Uploaders: - Ben Armstrong , Otavio Salvador , Christian Perrier , Iain R. Learmonth synrg@shade:~/work/debian-installer-launcher$ git push Counting objects: 4, done. Delta compression using up to 2 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (4/4), done. Writing objects: 100% (4/4), 369 bytes | 0 bytes/s, done. Total 4 (delta 3), reused 0 (delta 0) remote: error: insufficient permission for adding an object to repository database ./objects remote: fatal: failed to write object error: unpack failed: unpack-objects abnormal exit To ssh://git.debian.org/git/d-i/debian-installer-launcher.git ! [remote rejected] master -> master (unpacker error) error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://git.debian.org/git/d-i/debian-installer-launcher.git' Ben
Re: My retirement, status of live-manual, debian-installer-launcher
Hi, Ben Armstrong (2016-08-01): > I've just done this for live-manual. However, debian-installer-launcher > is maintained by debian-boot, and apparently I don't have permission to > remove myself, so I need help from them to take care of this. Didn't notice your mail in addition to IRC… Anyway, pushed that: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/d-i/debian-installer-launcher.git/commit/?id=9d9a31e Thanks, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#833097: flash-kernel: should exist when DTB doesn't exist
Control: retitle -1 flash-kernel: should exit when DTB doesn't exist signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#833097: flash-kernel: should exist when DTB doesn't exist
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 flash-kernel: should exit when DTB doesn't exist Bug #833097 [flash-kernel] flash-kernel: should exist when DTB doesn't exist Changed Bug title to 'flash-kernel: should exit when DTB doesn't exist' from 'flash-kernel: should exist when DTB doesn't exist'. -- 833097: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833097 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Re: My retirement, status of live-manual, debian-installer-launcher
On 01/08/16 12:15 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Ben Armstrong (2016-08-01): >> I've just done this for live-manual. However, debian-installer-launcher >> is maintained by debian-boot, and apparently I don't have permission to >> remove myself, so I need help from them to take care of this. > Didn't notice your mail in addition to IRC… I waited for a bit on irc but didn't seem like anyone was around, and then posted. > Anyway, pushed that: > > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/d-i/debian-installer-launcher.git/commit/?id=9d9a31e Thanks. Cheers, Ben
Re: Bug#832004: jessie-pu: package wpa/2.3-1+deb8u4
Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2016-08-01 at 01:29 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Adam D. Barratt (2016-07-30): > > On Wed, 2016-07-27 at 15:07 +0200, Andrew Shadura wrote: > > > On 21/07/16 12:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > > > > > On 2016-07-21 11:01, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > >> Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed > > > > [...] > > > >> +wpa (2.3-1+deb8u4) jessie-security; urgency=medium > > > >> > > > >> The distribution there should be "jessie" (and was in the earlier > > > >> diff). With that changed, please feel free to go ahead. > > > > > > > > Actually, hold on that. It was just pointed out to me that the patches > > > > aren't in unstable yet - that needs to happen first. > > > > > > How about now? :) > > > > The package was uploaded, and looks okay to me - -boot? > > No objections, thanks. Thanks; flagged for acceptance. Regards, Adam
Bug#833185: Udhcd not killed when DHCP_ENABLED is no
Package: udhcpd Version: 1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1 Severity: minor Udhcpd is running. I edit /etc/default/udhcpd to set DHCPD_ENABLED to no, then do /etc/init.d/udhcpd stop The scripts checks the value of DHCPD_ENABLED, and does nothing. Is this the expected behaviour? Shouldn't the stop action kill a running udhcpcd unconditionally? -- Juliusz
Re: My retirement, status of live-manual, debian-installer-launcher
Thanks for all your hard work Ben, good luck in your future endeavours Cheers. Michael.. On 1 August 2016 at 23:21, Ben Armstrong wrote: > On 01/08/16 09:20 AM, Ben Armstrong wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Many of you may have already heard, but I retired last month. For > > details, see: > > > > http://syn.theti.ca/2016/08/01/retiring-as-a-debian-developer/ > > > > In particular, please note that live-manual and > > debian-installer-launcher need maintainers, and I should be removed from > > Uploaders on all live-* packages. > > I've just done this for live-manual. However, debian-installer-launcher > is maintained by debian-boot, and apparently I don't have permission to > remove myself, so I need help from them to take care of this. > > synrg@shade:~/work/debian-installer-launcher$ git show > commit 7959768d3565bfb14b6d1103f0c4c62a53373b4d > Author: Ben Armstrong > Date: Mon Aug 1 10:07:39 2016 -0300 > > Removed myself from Uploaders. > > diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control > index 96da568..5126858 100644 > --- a/debian/control > +++ b/debian/control > @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ Section: utils > Priority: optional > Maintainer: Debian Install System Team > Uploaders: > - Ben Armstrong , > Otavio Salvador , > Christian Perrier , > Iain R. Learmonth > synrg@shade:~/work/debian-installer-launcher$ git push > Counting objects: 4, done. > Delta compression using up to 2 threads. > Compressing objects: 100% (4/4), done. > Writing objects: 100% (4/4), 369 bytes | 0 bytes/s, done. > Total 4 (delta 3), reused 0 (delta 0) > remote: error: insufficient permission for adding an object to > repository database ./objects > remote: fatal: failed to write object > error: unpack failed: unpack-objects abnormal exit > To ssh://git.debian.org/git/d-i/debian-installer-launcher.git > ! [remote rejected] master -> master (unpacker error) > error: failed to push some refs to > 'ssh://git.debian.org/git/d-i/debian-installer-launcher.git' > > Ben > >
Re: My retirement, status of live-manual, debian-installer-launcher
Thanks. I'll be around, just no longer as a DD. Ben On August 1, 2016 6:55:28 PM "Michael ." wrote: Thanks for all your hard work Ben, good luck in your future endeavours Cheers. Michael.. On 1 August 2016 at 23:21, Ben Armstrong wrote: On 01/08/16 09:20 AM, Ben Armstrong wrote: > Hi, > > Many of you may have already heard, but I retired last month. For > details, see: > > http://syn.theti.ca/2016/08/01/retiring-as-a-debian-developer/ > > In particular, please note that live-manual and > debian-installer-launcher need maintainers, and I should be removed from > Uploaders on all live-* packages. I've just done this for live-manual. However, debian-installer-launcher is maintained by debian-boot, and apparently I don't have permission to remove myself, so I need help from them to take care of this. synrg@shade:~/work/debian-installer-launcher$ git show commit 7959768d3565bfb14b6d1103f0c4c62a53373b4d Author: Ben Armstrong Date: Mon Aug 1 10:07:39 2016 -0300 Removed myself from Uploaders. diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 96da568..5126858 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ Section: utils Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Uploaders: - Ben Armstrong , Otavio Salvador , Christian Perrier , Iain R. Learmonth synrg@shade:~/work/debian-installer-launcher$ git push Counting objects: 4, done. Delta compression using up to 2 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (4/4), done. Writing objects: 100% (4/4), 369 bytes | 0 bytes/s, done. Total 4 (delta 3), reused 0 (delta 0) remote: error: insufficient permission for adding an object to repository database ./objects remote: fatal: failed to write object error: unpack failed: unpack-objects abnormal exit To ssh://git.debian.org/git/d-i/debian-installer-launcher.git ! [remote rejected] master -> master (unpacker error) error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://git.debian.org/git/d-i/debian-installer-launcher.git' Ben
Re: [PATCH] Add Stretch pages
Hi,
Niels Thykier wrote:
> Holger Wansing:
> > [Added debian-boot to the loop]
> >
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > There is some room for improvement with the current debian-installer page
> > for
> > Stretch: https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/debian-installer/
> > contains the chapter for Stretch (stable) images
> > ("To install Debian (stretch), download any of the following images "),
> > Documentation and Errata, all for Stretch, but they are not relevant at the
> > moment, of course.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > A proposal patch is attached, and also two html files, how the page would
> > look like now (during Stable=Jessie) and after the next release (when
> > Stable=Stretch).
> >
> >
> >
> > Holger
> >
> >
>
> Looks good to me! Thanks for spotting this. :)
>
> ~Niels
Ok, so I will commit this, if noone objects within the next week...
Holger
--
Created with Sylpheed 3.5.0 under
D E B I A N L I N U X 8 . 0 " J E S S I E " .
Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/
Bug#833185: marked as done (Udhcd not killed when DHCP_ENABLED is no)
Your message dated Tue, 2 Aug 2016 07:33:18 +0200 with message-id <20160802053318.gy24...@gpm.stappers.nl> and subject line Re: Bug#833185: Udhcd not killed when DHCP_ENABLED is no has caused the Debian Bug report #833185, regarding Udhcd not killed when DHCP_ENABLED is no to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 833185: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833185 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: udhcpd Version: 1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1 Severity: minor Udhcpd is running. I edit /etc/default/udhcpd to set DHCPD_ENABLED to no, then do /etc/init.d/udhcpd stop The scripts checks the value of DHCPD_ENABLED, and does nothing. Is this the expected behaviour? Shouldn't the stop action kill a running udhcpcd unconditionally? -- Juliusz --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 11:48:38PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > > Udhcpd is running. I edit /etc/default/udhcpd to set DHCPD_ENABLED to no, > then do > > /etc/init.d/udhcpd stop > > The scripts checks the value of DHCPD_ENABLED, and does nothing. > > Is this the expected behaviour? Yes. > Shouldn't the stop action kill a running udhcpcd unconditionally? It does when DHCPD_ENABLED. Script /etc/init.d/udhcpd begins with sourcing /etc/default/udhcpd and see that way is it disabled and exits. Works fine at start up. Works fine at stop when udhcpd was stopped before /etc/default/udhcpd was edited. Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven--- End Message ---
