Processing of live-installer_49_i386.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

live-installer_49_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
  live-installer_49.dsc
  live-installer_49.tar.xz
  live-installer_49_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1ygpjf-0004id...@coccia.debian.org

Processing of live-installer_49_i386.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

live-installer_49_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  live-installer_49.dsc
  live-installer_49.tar.xz
  live-installer_49_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1ygply-0002gu...@franck.debian.org

live-installer_49_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 08:22:56 +0200
Source: live-installer
Binary: live-installer
Architecture: source i386
Version: 49
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team 
Changed-By: Christian Perrier 
Description:
 live-installer - Install the system (udeb)
Changes:
 live-installer (49) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Raphaël Hertzog ]
   * Add live-installer.d/ssl-cert to regenerate the Snake Oil certificate
 at installation time (it's dropped by live-build and recreated dynamically
 on each boot by live-config).
Checksums-Sha1:
 f8045d1e06b633e14b7ee4a0ca3dd4edde4c5fbb 1720 live-installer_49.dsc
 2c42800f82c2e3fd8537f4fd8b6355c3bea9a527 52240 live-installer_49.tar.xz
 7e677479abd2ebb3a3b85bfbe30c7553f71eeb51 36590 live-installer_49_i386.udeb
Checksums-Sha256:
 9ab0adaab8f78ef49fcc9d5bcd4c71149a7cddab8dd5190e6a7b93e435cada1c 1720 
live-installer_49.dsc
 04811267f534852fa92666c86ca5b33f633f907d95090d2f8694021b43c9d10c 52240 
live-installer_49.tar.xz
 3e4aa723bf0907aa7099b38ddea6b151952af7cfc885889b9bfdac39d4ec742a 36590 
live-installer_49_i386.udeb
Files:
 7edf2aa97740c38969e1099ff86bd97d 1720 debian-installer optional 
live-installer_49.dsc
 8783932ea07e2f4ae8f9d384bd5d97f9 52240 debian-installer optional 
live-installer_49.tar.xz
 75cbdc951597a2fb746c9716a5c1b522 36590 debian-installer optional 
live-installer_49_i386.udeb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=j+s/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1ygpsj-0003re...@franck.debian.org

Re: Help with the arm64 and ppc64el installation-guides needed

[Holger Wansing]

Hi,

Samuel Thibault  wrote:
> Breno Leitao, le Fri 10 Apr 2015 17:44:01 -0300, a écrit :
> > It is still on my github repository. Can you import it?
> 
> Uh. I requested this very kind of information in september and
> november, why wasn't this work (done in december) ever submitted
> before?  We can integrate it in the installation manual, but it will
> most probably not get translated for the release...

Yeah, it's a shame this has not been presented earlier!

> I'll however be unable to integrate things like "blablabla" (sic)...

The blablabla is indeed only a placeholder which gets removed in a later
commit.
If noone objects, I could create one single patch out of that for 
a review here.


Holger

-- 

Created with Sylpheed 3.2.0 under
D E B I A N   L I N U X   7 . 0   W H E E Z Y !

Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20150411100126.b62e9543f4975d4a861b3...@wansing-online.de

Bug#777905: oif, the patch is bad

[Adam Borowski]

Oops, the patch wrongly links to kernel/amd64.sh rather than just amd64.sh
I haven't noticed this in testing as the version uploaded to my private repo
was patched manually.  A fixed version is attached.

-- 
// If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately
// cease using counterfeit alphabets.  Instead, contact the nearest temple
// of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all
// your writing needs, for Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory prices.
>From 1ec12e462282b5f031cd28aaaef5ded7ffeb039d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adam Borowski 
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 07:39:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Link x32 kernel selectors to amd64.

---
 kernel/x32.sh | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
 create mode 12 kernel/x32.sh

diff --git a/kernel/x32.sh b/kernel/x32.sh
new file mode 12
index 000..2f5ab2e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/x32.sh
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+amd64.sh
\ No newline at end of file
-- 
2.1.4

Bug#782378: installation-report: Jessie-RC on DELL notebook

[Andreas Glaeser]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.58
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

this wa a flawless installation, wishlist only.


- -- Package-specific info:

Boot method: USB
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso,
2015-04-08
 Date: 2015-04-11, about 7.00 h to 9.00 h


Machine: Dell Latitude E 4300
Partitions: 
Filesystem Type 1K-blocksUsed Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mmcblk0p1 btrfs 14647296 4650552   9713976  33% /
udev   devtmpfs 10240   0 10240   0% /dev
tmpfs  tmpfs   3888565988382868   2% /run
tmpfs  tmpfs   972132 140971992   1% /dev/shm
tmpfs  tmpfs 5120   4  5116   1% /run/lock
tmpfs  tmpfs   972132   0972132   0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/mmcblk0p2 btrfs 146483205072  14369040   1% /home
/dev/sda3  xfs1038336   64568973768   7% /boot
tmpfs  tmpfs   194428   4194424   1% /run/user/119
tmpfs  tmpfs   194428  20194408   1% /run/user/1000

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [o]
Detect network card:[o]
Configure network:  [o]
Detect CD:  [o]
Load installer modules: [o]
Clock/timezone setup:   [o]
User/password setup:[o]
Detect hard drives: [o]
Partition hard drives:  [o]
Install base system:[o]
Install tasks:  [o]
Install boot loader:[o]
Overall install:[o]

Comments/Problems:

The last grub-update disabled my 32-bit testing-system.

Now I installed newly on a low-cost 32GB-SD-card, also with compressed btrfs, 
GNOME and
Cinnamon desktops.

It seems to do quite well so far.

Installation itself was quite quick, but defragmenting/recompressing everything 
takes
some time, it is probably not recommended to do it this way.
 

- -- 

Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report. Please compress large files using gzip.

Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org.

==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer"
DISTRIB_RELEASE="8 (jessie) - installer build 20150408-00:04"
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom

==
Installer hardware-summary:
==
uname -a: Linux e4300 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt7-1 (2015-03-01) 
x86_64
GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 
Series
Chipset Memory Controller Hub [8086:2a40] (rev 07) lspci -knn:  Subsystem: Dell
Device [1028:024d] lspci -knn:  Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel
lspci -knn: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 
4 Series
Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a42] (rev 07) lspci -knn:
Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:024d] lspci -knn: 00:02.1 Display controller 
[0380]: Intel
Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a43] 
(rev 07)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:024d] lspci -knn: 00:03.0 
Communication
controller [0780]: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset MEI Controller 
[8086:2a44]
(rev 07) lspci -knn:Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:024d] lspci -knn: 00:03.2 
IDE
interface [0101]: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset PT IDER Controller
[8086:2a46] (rev 07) lspci -knn:Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:024d] 
lspci -knn:
Kernel driver in use: ata_generic lspci -knn: 00:03.3 Serial controller 
[0700]:
Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset AMT SOL Redirection [8086:2a47] (rev 
07) lspci
- -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:024d] lspci -knn:  Kernel driver in
use: serial lspci -knn: 00:19.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 
82567LM
Gigabit Network Connection [8086:10f5] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell
Device [1028:024d] lspci -knn:  Kernel driver in use: e1000e
lspci -knn: 00:1a.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 
Family) USB
UHCI Controller #4 [8086:2937] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device
[1028:024d] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1a.1 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 
Family) USB
UHCI Controller #5 [8086:2938] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device
[1028:024d] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1a.2 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 
Family) USB
UHCI Controller #6 [8086:2939] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device
[1028:024d] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1a.7 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 

Re: Help with the arm64 and ppc64el installation-guides needed

[Holger Wansing]

Hi,

Holger Wansing  wrote:
> Samuel Thibault  wrote:
> > Breno Leitao, le Fri 10 Apr 2015 17:44:01 -0300, a écrit :
> > > It is still on my github repository. Can you import it?
> > 
> > Uh. I requested this very kind of information in september and
> > november, why wasn't this work (done in december) ever submitted
> > before?  We can integrate it in the installation manual, but it will
> > most probably not get translated for the release...
> 
> Yeah, it's a shame this has not been presented earlier!
> 
> > I'll however be unable to integrate things like "blablabla" (sic)...
> 
> The blablabla is indeed only a placeholder which gets removed in a later
> commit.

Sorry, I did not noticed there were several blablabla, only saw the first
one in preparing. So there is still some content missing indeed, as Samuel
mentioned! But we have several empty sections for other archs or
d-i modules too...

> If noone objects, I could create one single patch out of that for 
> a review here.

So here we go.

I have merged Brenos changings in a local tree, and additionally to that:

in build/entities/common.ent there was the name of the architecture
missing. So what's the exact pronunciation of that arch?
(for powerpc we have "PowerPC" for example)
Is there some special form, or simply ppc64el?
In "Supported hardware" Breno has "Power Systems" as arch name. ???
The ports page on https://www.debian.org/ports/ lists
https://wiki.debian.org/ppc64el/ as basic info page for the
ppc64el port, and there is no mention of "Power Systems"...
Also, in "Instructions for Netboot installation" under preparing
there is the term "PowerLinux machine". 
This all should be harmonized to one term.

commented out "Boot parameters for ppc64el" in "Booting the installer",
since there is no content

commented out "Updating PowerVM hypervisor" in "Pre-Installation 
Hardware and Operating System Setup", since there is no content

some small fixes ("file name.img" -> "file_name.img")

Add some blank lines for document structure.

Convert list in "Supported Hardware - Machines" into
itemizedlist.



All that contained in attached patch for review.
The manual builds fine with it.


Holger

-- 

Created with Sylpheed 3.2.0 under
D E B I A N   L I N U X   7 . 0   W H E E Z Y !

Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/

Index: build/arch-options/ppc64el
===
--- build/arch-options/ppc64el	(Revision 69729)
+++ build/arch-options/ppc64el	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
 # the 'ppc64el' architecture
 # It is sourced by the build scripts
 
-archspec="powerpc;not-s390;not-x86"
-arch_listname="powerpc"
-arch_porturl="powerpc"
+archspec="ppc64el;not-s390;not-x86"
+arch_listname="ppc64el"
+arch_porturl="ppc64el"
 # TODO: update
 # This is coming from the lowmem package
 minimum_memory=32
Index: build/templates/docstruct.ent
===
--- build/templates/docstruct.ent	(Revision 69729)
+++ build/templates/docstruct.ent	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@
   
   
   
+  
   
   
   
Index: build/entities/urls.ent
===
--- build/entities/urls.ent	(Revision 69729)
+++ build/entities/urls.ent	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -311,6 +311,8 @@
 http://penguinppc.org/projects/bootx/";>
 
+https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/tutorials/l-ibm-powerkvm-system-bring-up/";>
 
 
 
Index: build/entities/common.ent
===
--- build/entities/common.ent	(Revision 69729)
+++ build/entities/common.ent	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
 
 
 64-bit PCARMPA-RISC32-bit PCIA-64MipsMipselPowerPCSPARCS/390">
+  "64-bit PCARMPA-RISC32-bit PCIA-64MipsMipselPowerPCppc64elSPARCS/390">
 
 
 Enter">
Index: en/preparing/bios-setup/powerpc.xml
===
--- en/preparing/bios-setup/powerpc.xml	(Revision 69729)
+++ en/preparing/bios-setup/powerpc.xml	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -50,3 +50,227 @@
 
 
   
+
+  
+  How to update bare metal ppc64el firmware
+
+
+This is an excerpt from
+IBM PowerKVM on IBM POWER8
+
+
+
+Open Power Abstraction Layer (OPAL) is the system firmware in the stack
+of POWER processor-based server.
+
+
+
+There may be instances when the user might have to upgrade the Power
+Systems firmware to a more recent level to acquire new features or
+additional support for devices.
+
+
+
+Make sure that the following requirements are met:
+
+
+
+an OS to be running on the system;
+
+the .img file of the OPAL level that the user needs to update to;
+
+the machine isn't under HMC control.
+
+
+
+
+Power Sy

Re: Bug#778492: unblock: ndisc6/1.0.1-2

[Michael Gilbert]

control: tag -1 - moreinfo

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Thanks for trying, but no, that's not sufficient. I really would
> like having a real use case where the bug gets reproduced without
> “cheating” (for the lack of a better wording), so that we can actually
> check that the change isn't worse than the bug it's supposed to fix.

It turns out the difficulty getting rdnssd automatically installed is a bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/782299

Steve will be uploading a debian-cd fix soon, but in the meantime I
tested a mini.iso (since it configures networking sufficiently early
to be able to fetch the package) for a sid gnome install.  Here is the
installer syslog relevant to rdnssd;

netcfg[1369]: rdnssd started; PID: 1384
[...]
apt-install: Queueing package rdnssd for later installation
netcfg[1369]: DEBUG: Stopping rdnssd, PID 1384
[...]
in-target: The following NEW packages will be installed:
in-target:   rdnssd
[...]
in-target: Unpacking rdnssd (1.0.1-2)
[...]
in-target: Setting up rdnssd (1.0.1-2)
[...]
in-target: pkgsel: starting tasksel [selected gnome as the desktop environment]
[...]
in-target: The following packages will be REMOVED:
in-target:   rdnssd
[...]
in-target: Removing rdnssd (1.0.1-2)
[...]
in-target: Setting up network-manager-gnome (0.9.10.0-2)

In conclusion again everything works entirely as expected.  Is this
now sufficient?

Best wishes,
Mike


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MOT3OVGaZcDJVejLwu10G466tsMMir=1vvlt63n-th...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Help with the arm64 and ppc64el installation-guides needed

[Ben Hutchings]

On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 17:13 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Holger Wansing  wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault  wrote:
> > > Breno Leitao, le Fri 10 Apr 2015 17:44:01 -0300, a écrit :
> > > > It is still on my github repository. Can you import it?
> > > 
> > > Uh. I requested this very kind of information in september and
> > > november, why wasn't this work (done in december) ever submitted
> > > before?  We can integrate it in the installation manual, but it will
> > > most probably not get translated for the release...
> > 
> > Yeah, it's a shame this has not been presented earlier!
> > 
> > > I'll however be unable to integrate things like "blablabla" (sic)...
> > 
> > The blablabla is indeed only a placeholder which gets removed in a later
> > commit.
> 
> Sorry, I did not noticed there were several blablabla, only saw the first
> one in preparing. So there is still some content missing indeed, as Samuel
> mentioned! But we have several empty sections for other archs or
> d-i modules too...
> 
> > If noone objects, I could create one single patch out of that for 
> > a review here.
> 
> So here we go.
> 
> I have merged Brenos changings in a local tree, and additionally to that:
> 
>   in build/entities/common.ent there was the name of the architecture
>   missing. So what's the exact pronunciation of that arch?
>   (for powerpc we have "PowerPC" for example)
>   Is there some special form, or simply ppc64el?
>   In "Supported hardware" Breno has "Power Systems" as arch name. ???
>   The ports page on https://www.debian.org/ports/ lists
>   https://wiki.debian.org/ppc64el/ as basic info page for the
>   ppc64el port, and there is no mention of "Power Systems"...
>   Also, in "Instructions for Netboot installation" under preparing
>   there is the term "PowerLinux machine". 
>   This all should be harmonized to one term.
[...]

Based on

 I think it's 'PowerPC 64-bit little-endian', or 'PowerISA little-endian'.

However, comparing with the way we've named other architectures, '64-bit
PowerPC (little-endian)' would be more consistent.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
compatible: Gracefully accepts erroneous data from any source


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Bug#780573: release-notes: Review from the d-i team

[Holger Wansing]

Hi,

Baptiste Jammet  wrote:
>  
>  New ports
> +
>  
>  
> -Support for the 'armhf' and 's390x' architectures has been added to the 
> installer.
> +Support for the 'arm64' and 'pp64el' architectures has been added to the 
> installer.

has to be 'ppc64el'

>  
>  
>  



Holger


-- 

Created with Sylpheed 3.2.0 under
D E B I A N   L I N U X   7 . 0   W H E E Z Y !

Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20150411172825.825f9cffa044015d8cd2c...@wansing-online.de

Re: Help with the arm64 and ppc64el installation-guides needed

[Holger Wansing]

Hi,

Holger Wansing  wrote:
> All that contained in attached patch for review.

I forgot to mention the arch specific variables in
build/arch-options/ppc64el.
There are currently set:


# Options below are assembled into one variable 'condition'
# in the build scripts
fdisk="mac-fdisk.txt;cfdisk.txt"
network="supports-tftp;supports-bootp;supports-nfsroot"
boot="supports-floppy-boot;bootable-disk"
frontend="newt;gtk"
other="supports-wireless;supports-pcmcia;supports-serial-console"
smp="supports-smp-sometimes"
goodies="supports-lang-chooser"
status="not-checked"


Probably some of them are not up-to-date:
supports-floppy-boot - I think that arch has no floppy support
supports-wireless - is there wireless hardware available?
supports-smp-sometimes - that generation of cpu will most likely
 fully support smp, right?
... maybe some more ...




Can someone on debian-powerpc give info on that?


Holger


-- 

Created with Sylpheed 3.2.0 under
D E B I A N   L I N U X   7 . 0   W H E E Z Y !

Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20150411202249.d840b1199c45e272a4316...@wansing-online.de

Re: Help with the arm64 and ppc64el installation-guides needed

[Holger Wansing]

Hi,

Holger Wansing  wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Holger Wansing  wrote:
> > All that contained in attached patch for review.
> 
> I forgot to mention the arch specific variables in
> build/arch-options/ppc64el.

And: is there support for the graphical installer?
As far as I can see, the images do not contain the graphical
installer.
So that should be set to NO.


Holger

-- 

Created with Sylpheed 3.2.0 under
D E B I A N   L I N U X   7 . 0   W H E E Z Y !

Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20150411212037.b8353ac0ac99bd8c3508b...@wansing-online.de

Bug#709883: keyboard-configuration: X keyboard configuration lost after upgrade

[Santiago Ruano Rincón]

Package: keyboard-configuration
Version: 1.121
Followup-For: Bug #709883

Hi,

I've just lost my keyboard configuration after upgrading these packages:

Upgrade: libsystemd-login0:amd64 (215-14, 215-15), dselect:amd64
(1.17.24, 1.17.25), python3-nose:amd64 (1.3.4-2, 1.3.6-1), dpkg:amd64
(1.17.24, 1.17.25), dmsetup:amd64 (1.02.90-2.1, 1.02.90-2.2),
python-nose:amd64 (1.3.4-2, 1.3.6-1), console-setup:amd64 (1.120,
1.121), dpkg-dev:amd64 (1.17.24, 1.17.25), console-setup-linux:amd64
(1.120, 1.121), libsystemd-daemon0:amd64 (215-14, 215-15),
libgudev-1.0-0:amd64 (215-14, 215-15), libpam-systemd:amd64 (215-14,
215-15), udev:amd64 (215-14, 215-15), libudev-dev:amd64 (215-14,
215-15), libudev1:amd64 (215-14, 215-15), libudev1:i386 (215-14,
215-15), myspell-es:amd64 (1.11-9, 1.11-10), libdpkg-perl:amd64
(1.17.24, 1.17.25), lintian:amd64 (2.5.30+deb8u3, 2.5.30+deb8u4),
debian-keyring:amd64 (2015.03.30, 2015.04.10), gnome-font-viewer:amd64
(3.14.0-1, 3.14.0-2), ispanish:amd64 (1.11-9, 1.11-10), systemd:amd64
(215-14, 215-15), libdevmapper-event1.02.1:amd64 (1.02.90-2.1,
1.02.90-2.2), libdevmapper1.02.1:amd64 (1.02.90-2.1, 1.02.90-2.2),
libmarkdown2:amd64 (2.1.8-1, 2.1.8-2), google-talkplugin:amd64
(5.40.2.0-1, 5.41.0.0-1), keyboard-configuration:amd64 (1.120, 1.121),
libsystemd0:amd64 (215-14, 215-15), libsystemd0:i386 (215-14, 215-15),
aspell-es:amd64 (1.11-9, 1.11-10), liblvm2app2.2:amd64 (2.02.111-2.1,
2.02.111-2.2), ntpdate:amd64 (4.2.6.p5+dfsg-5, 4.2.6.p5+dfsg-7)
End-Date: 2015-04-11  20:16:31

My keyboard layout was changed. I use French alternative (latin-9), but
this variant was set to empty when upgrading. Although, I've been unable
to reproduce the problem.

Cheers,

Santiago

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_CO.utf8, LC_CTYPE=es_CO.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages keyboard-configuration depends on:
ii  debconf 1.5.56
ii  initscripts 2.88dsf-59
ii  liblocale-gettext-perl  1.05-8+b1

keyboard-configuration recommends no packages.

keyboard-configuration suggests no packages.

Versions of packages console-setup depends on:
ii  console-setup-linux  1.121
ii  debconf  1.5.56
ii  xkb-data 2.12-1

Versions of packages console-setup suggests:
ii  locales   2.19-17
ii  lsb-base  4.1+Debian13+nmu1

Versions of packages console-setup-linux depends on:
ii  kbd  1.15.5-2

Versions of packages console-setup-linux suggests:
ii  console-setup  1.121

Versions of packages keyboard-configuration is related to:
pn  console-common  
pn  console-data
pn  console-tools   
ii  kbd 1.15.5-2

-- debconf information:
  console-setup/framebuffer_only:
* keyboard-configuration/variantcode: latin9
  console-setup/guess_font:
  keyboard-configuration/unsupported_options: true
  keyboard-configuration/unsupported_config_layout: true
  debian-installer/console-setup-udeb/title:
  keyboard-configuration/unsupported_layout: true
* keyboard-configuration/layout:
  keyboard-configuration/unsupported_config_options: true
* keyboard-configuration/store_defaults_in_debconf_db: true
* keyboard-configuration/toggle: No toggling
  console-setup/fontsize-fb47: 8x16
* keyboard-configuration/optionscode: terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp
* keyboard-configuration/variant: Francés - Francés (arcaico, alternativo)
* keyboard-configuration/xkb-keymap: fr(latin9)
* keyboard-configuration/other:
* console-setup/charmap47: UTF-8
  console-setup/codesetcode: Lat15
  console-setup/use_system_font:
  console-setup/store_defaults_in_debconf_db: true
* keyboard-configuration/modelcode: latitude
* keyboard-configuration/altgr: The default for the keyboard layout
* keyboard-configuration/model: Portátil Dell Latitude
* keyboard-configuration/layoutcode: fr
* keyboard-configuration/switch: No temporary switch
* keyboard-configuration/ctrl_alt_bksp: true
  console-setup/codeset47: # Latin1 and Latin5 - western Europe and Turkic 
languages
  console-setup/fontsize-text47: 8x16
  console-setup/fontface47: Fixed
  console-setup/fontsize: 8x16
* keyboard-configuration/compose: No compose key


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Help with the arm64 and ppc64el installation-guides needed

[Ben Hutchings]

On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 20:22 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Holger Wansing  wrote:
> > All that contained in attached patch for review.
> 
> I forgot to mention the arch specific variables in
> build/arch-options/ppc64el.
> There are currently set:
> 
> 
>   # Options below are assembled into one variable 'condition'
>   # in the build scripts
>   fdisk="mac-fdisk.txt;cfdisk.txt"
>   network="supports-tftp;supports-bootp;supports-nfsroot"
>   boot="supports-floppy-boot;bootable-disk"
>   frontend="newt;gtk"
>   other="supports-wireless;supports-pcmcia;supports-serial-console"
>   smp="supports-smp-sometimes"
>   goodies="supports-lang-chooser"
>   status="not-checked"
> 
> 
> Probably some of them are not up-to-date:
> supports-floppy-boot - I think that arch has no floppy support
> supports-wireless - is there wireless hardware available?

Current hardware is mostly datacentre type stuff where wireless
networking is not likely to be used.

In any case, none of the PowerPC architectures seem to have useful
wireless drivers in the installer (only PCMCIA wireless drivers, for
some reason).

> supports-smp-sometimes - that generation of cpu will most likely
>  fully support smp, right?
[...]

Yes.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
compatible: Gracefully accepts erroneous data from any source


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Help with the arm64 and ppc64el installation-guides needed

[Paul Wise]

On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Sandeep G.R wrote:

> I have a sid PPC64 from http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-ports running on
> Freescale Powerpc. Is their PPC64(Big-Endian) for Jessie similarly?

The PPC64 port didn't get added to jessie, if you want jessie you'll
need to switch to ppc64el. If you want PPC64 big-endian, stick to
debian-ports unstable. Some info about the port is here:

https://wiki.debian.org/PPC64

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6FNM9Hc7pyAJsCO679_WBiqbi-W0P8w6u6WgaB8xyh=t...@mail.gmail.com