Re: Buffalo Linkstation support in debian installer
Hi, Michael Walle (2015-02-05): > Could you have a look at the issues #744714, #744715 and #744716? These add > support for the Buffalo Linkstation (ARM/kirkwood) to the debian installer. > There is already support for it in the debian kernel and in the flash-kernel > package in jessie. SO there is everything to run debian on this box, but no > installer image atm. Thanks for the ping (and the patches). > Unfortunately, the patches included in the issues never got merged. They > were already reviewed by Martin Michlmayr. Is there a chance that these > minor patches will still make it into the debian jessie installer? I think it's OK to merge them, even if it would have been preferable to do so earlier of course… I won't have much time until next week, so if someone else is quicker at merging+uploading, fine with me. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: i386 EFI (and Mac builds)
Steve McIntyre (2015-01-31): > So, I've spent a lot of time hacking on things to get i386 and mixed > amd64/i386 systems working with EFI in d-i, debian-cd, grub etc. Great. > As an explanation: turning on i386 EFI is an easy thing, but it will > cause some older x86 Macs to stop being able to boot Debian > installation media. They have broken firmware which breaks when more > than one boot method is available on CD media (in this case, BIOS boot > and EFI boot). So, if we want to continue supporting these users we'll > need to provide a/some special Mac flavour(s) of i386 install > disc. I'm proposing that we make *only* a special Mac flavour of the > netinst, and I've already started working on that locally in > debian-cd. > > So... How does that sound? We'll need to add more docs for this, of > course, and it's likely to confuse *some* users which bothers me. It's definitely tricky to get that right indeed. There's so much confusion around netinst vs. netboot in people's mind… but yeah, we can't hold i386 EFI back because of some old, buggy hardware, even if it's as widespread/famous as Macs. Pointing people to the right doc / image is something that shouldn't take us too much time once doc has been written/updated. Supporting newer hardware seems more important to me than keeping a flawless experience for older hardware (with all images that is, as long as we keep support for it through netinst…). Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: i386 EFI (and Mac builds)
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 12:12:35PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Steve McIntyre (2015-01-31): >> So, I've spent a lot of time hacking on things to get i386 and mixed >> amd64/i386 systems working with EFI in d-i, debian-cd, grub etc. > >Great. > >> As an explanation: turning on i386 EFI is an easy thing, but it will >> cause some older x86 Macs to stop being able to boot Debian >> installation media. They have broken firmware which breaks when more >> than one boot method is available on CD media (in this case, BIOS boot >> and EFI boot). So, if we want to continue supporting these users we'll >> need to provide a/some special Mac flavour(s) of i386 install >> disc. I'm proposing that we make *only* a special Mac flavour of the >> netinst, and I've already started working on that locally in >> debian-cd. >> >> So... How does that sound? We'll need to add more docs for this, of >> course, and it's likely to confuse *some* users which bothers me. > >It's definitely tricky to get that right indeed. There's so much >confusion around netinst vs. netboot in people's mind… but yeah, we >can't hold i386 EFI back because of some old, buggy hardware, even if >it's as widespread/famous as Macs. Pointing people to the right doc / >image is something that shouldn't take us too much time once doc has >been written/updated. Supporting newer hardware seems more important >to me than keeping a flawless experience for older hardware (with all >images that is, as long as we keep support for it through netinst…). OK, cool. :-) I pushed the changes and I've added initial Mac netinst support, but for now it's very much untested... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Who needs computer imagery when you've got Brian Blessed? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150206111518.gc8...@einval.com
Bug#776565: preparing nmu for di-netboot-assistant
Andreas B. Mundt (2015-02-05): > Thanks for adding me to the group! I thought a bit about taking > caring about d-i-n-a, and I think I will do that indeed. :-) Great news! Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#777255: installation-reports: The installation hangs after providing hostname/domainname, killing dhcp6c results in the install resuming.
Package: installation-reports Severity: important Dear Maintainer, The jessie installer seems to hang after providing hostname and domain name. I tried both the rc1 disk, and the recent weekly multiarch netinst image. It seems to happen when booted to either 32 bit install or 64 bit install. Killing the dhcp6c process in the ALT-F2 console will allow the installation to continue. -- Package-specific info: Boot method: CD Image version: Tried both [http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/jessie_di_rc1/multi-arch/iso-cd/debian-jessie-DI-rc1-amd64-i386-netinst.iso (2015-01-09) ] and [http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/multi-arch/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-i386-netinst.iso (2015-02-02)] Date: 2015-02-06 15:30 PT Machine: Virtual machine (Windows 2012r2 Hyper-V) Partitions: N/A, failure before drives are partitioned. Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [E] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == A clipping of /var/log/syslog == ... Feb 6 23:22:04 check-missing-firmware: no missing firmware in loaded kernel modules Feb 6 23:22:05 main-menu[197]: INFO: Menu item 'netcfg' selected Feb 6 23:22:05 netcfg[4133]: INFO: Starting netcfg v.1.127 (built 20150104-2209) Feb 6 23:22:05 netcfg[4133]: WARNING **: Couldn't read Wpasupplicant pid file, not trying to kill. Feb 6 23:22:05 netcfg[4133]: INFO: Could not find valid BOOTIF= entry in /proc/cmdline Feb 6 23:22:05 netcfg[4133]: INFO: Taking down interface eth0 Feb 6 23:22:05 netcfg[4133]: INFO: Taking down interface lo Feb 6 23:22:05 netcfg[4133]: INFO: Activating interface eth0 Feb 6 23:22:05 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: State is now 0 Feb 6 23:22:05 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: Want link on eth0 Feb 6 23:22:05 netcfg[4133]: INFO: Waiting time set to 3 Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: INFO: ethtool-lite: eth0 is connected. Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: INFO: Found link on eth0 Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: Commencing network autoconfiguration on eth0 Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: rdnssd started; PID: 4149 Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: nc_v6_interface_configured(eth0, scope local) Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: Running ip addr show eth0 to look for address Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: ip line: 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: ip line: link/ether 00:15:5d:04:0d:06 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: ip line: inet6 fe80::215:5dff:fe04:d06/64 scope link tentative Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: ip line:valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: nc_v6_interface_configured(eth0, scope local) Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: Running ip addr show eth0 to look for address Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: ip line: 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: ip line: link/ether 00:15:5d:04:0d:06 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: ip line: inet6 fe80::215:5dff:fe04:d06/64 scope link tentative Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: ip line:valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: nc_v6_interface_configured(eth0, scope local) Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: Running ip addr show eth0 to look for address Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: ip line: 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: ip line: link/ether 00:15:5d:04:0d:06 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: ip line: inet6 fe80::215:5dff:fe04:d06/64 scope link tentative Feb 6 23:22:06 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: ip line:valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever Feb 6 23:22:07 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: nc_v6_interface_configured(eth0, scope local) Feb 6 23:22:07 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: Running ip addr show eth0 to look for address Feb 6 23:22:07 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: ip line: 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 Feb 6 23:22:07 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: ip line: link/ether 00:15:5d:04:0d:06 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff Feb 6 23:22:07 netcfg[4133]: DEBUG: ip line:
Re: imprimez moins cher !
Pour visualiser correctement ce message, accèdez à la version en ligne.  FAITES BONNE IMPRESSION !.   1.000 cartes de visite   1.000 flyers format A6   100 plaquettes commerciales   Copyright © 2009 Numerifives, All rights reserved. 77 rue Pierre Legrand, 59000 Lille France Tél: 03.20.04.06.82 Website: www.numerifives.com   Pour cesser de recevoir nos informations sur l'adresse debian-boot@lists.debian.org 
