Processing of di-netboot-assistant_0.38a+nmu1_amd64.changes
di-netboot-assistant_0.38a+nmu1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: di-netboot-assistant_0.38a+nmu1.dsc di-netboot-assistant_0.38a+nmu1.tar.xz di-netboot-assistant_0.38a+nmu1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1yiz2l-0008bg...@franck.debian.org
Bug#776565: preparing nmu for di-netboot-assistant
Hi, On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:38:57PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Andreas B. Mundt (2015-02-02): > > I have prepared a nmu which I plan to upload tomorrow after having > > tested the modification once more. > > (1-day notice is a short timeframe.) Yes, sorry, I planned to upload to DELAYED (as Holger suggested), but wanted to have this first 'go for it' to be able to re-adjust if necessary. [...] > > If you see any problems with the planned nmu, please rise your hand. > > It'd be nice to have some description of the changes in the changelog > (that's what it's for! ;)) instead of pointers to a bug report > thread/discussion. Right, I added some more details to the changelog now. > Whatever gets uploaded, please make sure to get that pushed into the > repository, or point to a branch/tag somewhere if you can't find anyone > to push your changes there. OK, I'll keep that in mind. (Perhaps I should/could take care of di-netboot-assistant ...). The package has been uploaded to DELAYED/2 now. Thanks to everybody involved, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150203091844.GA17204@flashgordon
Bug#776565: preparing nmu for di-netboot-assistant
Andreas B. Mundt (2015-02-03): > OK, I'll keep that in mind. (Perhaps I should/could take care of > di-netboot-assistant ...). Having an active maintainer for it would be super nice, yes. I've taken the liberty of adding you to the alioth d-i group; that doesn't mean that you *have* to be the d-i-n-a maintainer of course, it should just make it easy for you to push your changes to the d-i repositories, be it for NMUs or MUs. (FWIW with that addition we reached 256 members. ;)) Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#776917: fails to debootstrap without systemd
Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.67 Severity: important Due to #776912 I tried to debootstrap without systemd: debootstrap --arch=amd64 --variant=minbase --include=sysvinit-core \ --exclude=systemd,systemd-sysv jessie jessie However systemd gets still pulled in by incorrectly resolving init pre-depends: (...) init pre-depens on systemd-sysv | sysvinit-core | upstart systemd-sysv is not installed. sysvinit-core is not installed. upstart is not installed. (...) Selecting previously unselected package systemd. (...) Rest is in #776912. The manpage states wrt --include "Comma separated list of packages which will be added to download and extract lists.", however sysvinit-core doesn't show up at all in the debootstrap.log besides above mentioned init pre-depends message. Yours Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150203101530.13246.23320.report...@anguilla.debian.or.at
Bug#774752: debootstrap: When --no-resolve-deps and include/exclude is used get error get find debs:
Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.67 Followup-For: Bug #774752 I can reproduce the bug with 1.0.67. yours Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150203104750.ga...@anguilla.debian.or.at
Bug#776928: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150107
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock x-debbugs-cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org Hi, please unblock debian-installer-netboot-images/201501078 as the version currently in testing is unusable with jessie. $ debdiff debian-installer-netboot-images_20130613+deb7u2.b4.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20150107.dsc|diffstat debian/README |2 - debian/changelog| 54 +--- debian/compat |2 - debian/control | 48 +++ debian/control.in |2 - debian/lintian-overrides.in |5 debian/rules|9 --- get-images.sh | 17 - 8 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-) debian-installer-netboot-images (20150107) unstable; urgency=low * Update to 20150107 images. [ Dmitrijs Ledkovs ] * Bump debhelper compat level to 9. [ Didier Raboud ] * Update architectures' list, distribution codename and major version for Jessie (Closes: #766960) * Add a kfreebsd netboot directory postfix special-case * Add new matching lintian overrides * Move to one-digit versioning, aka from '-7.0-' to '-8-' [ Cyril Brulebois ] * Update README to document fancy .bN suffix for d-i-n-i when d-i has +bN. * Add a check in get-images.sh to detect wrong binNMU versioning. -- Didier Raboud Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:34:48 +0100 Full diff attached for your convinience... cheers, Holger diff -Nru debian-installer-netboot-images-20130613+deb7u2.b4/debian/changelog debian-installer-netboot-images-20150107/debian/changelog --- debian-installer-netboot-images-20130613+deb7u2.b4/debian/changelog 2015-01-05 23:59:30.0 +0100 +++ debian-installer-netboot-images-20150107/debian/changelog 2015-01-29 10:35:32.0 +0100 @@ -1,53 +1,23 @@ -debian-installer-netboot-images (20130613+deb7u2.b4) wheezy; urgency=low +debian-installer-netboot-images (20150107) unstable; urgency=low - * Update to 20130613+deb7u2+b4 images, from proposed-updates. + * Update to 20150107 images. - -- Adam D. Barratt Mon, 05 Jan 2015 21:23:44 + + [ Dmitrijs Ledkovs ] + * Bump debhelper compat level to 9. -debian-installer-netboot-images (20130613+deb7u2.b3) wheezy; urgency=low + [ Didier Raboud ] + * Update architectures' list, distribution codename and major version +for Jessie (Closes: #766960) + * Add a kfreebsd netboot directory postfix special-case + * Add new matching lintian overrides + * Move to one-digit versioning, aka from '-7.0-' to '-8-' - * Update to 20130613+deb7u2+b3 images, from proposed-updates. - - -- Adam D. Barratt Mon, 13 Oct 2014 20:08:24 +0100 - -debian-installer-netboot-images (20130613+deb7u2.b2) wheezy; urgency=low - - * Update to 20130613+deb7u2+b2 images, from proposed-updates. - - -- Adam D. Barratt Thu, 10 Jul 2014 05:44:50 +0100 - -debian-installer-netboot-images (20130613+deb7u2.b1) wheezy; urgency=low - - * Update to 20130613+deb7u2+b1 images, from proposed-updates. - - -- Adam D. Barratt Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:17:24 +0100 - -debian-installer-netboot-images (20130613+deb7u1.b2) wheezy; urgency=low - - * Update to 20130613+deb7u1+b2 images, from proposed-updates. - - -- Adam D. Barratt Wed, 05 Feb 2014 20:24:42 + - -debian-installer-netboot-images (20130613+deb7u1.b1) wheezy; urgency=low - - * Update to 20130613+deb7u1+b1 images, from proposed-updates. - - -- Adam D. Barratt Thu, 12 Dec 2013 19:03:39 + - -debian-installer-netboot-images (20130613+deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=low - - * Update to 20130613+deb7u1 images, from wheezy-proposed-updates. + [ Cyril Brulebois ] * Update README to document fancy .bN suffix for d-i-n-i when d-i has +bN. * Add a check in get-images.sh to detect wrong binNMU versioning. - -- Cyril Brulebois Fri, 11 Oct 2013 01:10:36 +0200 - -debian-installer-netboot-images (20130613) wheezy; urgency=low - - * Update to 20130613 images, from wheezy-proposed-updates. - - -- Cyril Brulebois Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:48:42 +0200 + -- Didier Raboud Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:34:48 +0100 debian-installer-netboot-images (20130430) unstable; urgency=low diff -Nru debian-installer-netboot-images-20130613+deb7u2.b4/debian/compat debian-installer-netboot-images-20150107/debian/compat --- debian-installer-netboot-images-20130613+deb7u2.b4/debian/compat 2014-07-09 23:31:41.0 +0200 +++ debian-installer-netboot-images-20150107/debian/compat 2014-08-28 20:29:50.0 +0200 @@ -1 +1 @@ -7 +9 diff -Nru debian-installer-netboot-images-20130613+deb7u2.b4/debian/control debian-installer-netboot-images-20150107/debian/control --- debian-installer-netboot-images-20130613+deb7u2.b4/debian/control 2014-10-13 20:01:17.0 +0200 +++ debian-installer-netboot-images-20150107/debian/control 2015-01-29 10:35:51.0 +0100 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Priority: optio
Network unattended installation - exclude packages from install
Hi All, I am preparing a minimal install to be the base of my jessie servers. I use (https://wiki.debian.org/ReduceDebian) to the base of packages i can remove and i make my own list from there: vim-tiny ispell laptop-detect manpages nano netcat-traditional installation-report wamerican wspanish aspell aspell-es dictionaries-common emacsen-common libaspell15 eject man-db groff-base tasksel tasksel-data task-spanish I now i can also uninstall following packages, but i let them during tests for easy keyboard use and dialogs: console-setup console-setup-linux xkb-data whiptail I used unattended network preseeded install. I first notice differences between packages installed as in manual expert installation i skip tasksell step. I have customized preseeded file but i still did not find the best way of doing it instead of putting an script that uninstall that packages. I have read appendix B4 (http://d-i.debian.org/manual/en.amd64/apbs04.html) and release notes (where i find exclude options) and debian installer internals (http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/doc/internals/) I attach here the relevant options of my configuration file: ## Base installer part d-i base-installer/install-recommends boolean false d-i base-installer/excludes string vim-tiny manpages nano netcat-traditional installation-report eject man-db groff-base tasksel # It works for vim-tiny manpages nano netcat-traditional man-db groff-base but it does not work for installation-report eject tasksel. I have seen that after base installer there are installed extra packages (including eject) that i cannot avoid installing ## Package selection part tasksel tasksel/first multiselect d-i pkgsel/excludes string ispell laptop-detect wamerican aspell task-spanish eject installation-report wamerican wspanish aspell aspell-es dictionaries-common emacsen-common libaspell15 eject taskel tasksel-data task-spanish d-i pkgsel/include string ntp openssh-server ### I cannot avoid to in this case any of the packages installation but i can install. My questions: Can i avoid the installation of the packages described? if the answer is yes, it is posible using excludes options or the only method is by an script? Where i can find the list of packages that are installed in each section? This last question is for prepare the installation next release, as packages installed during installation is it known that changes from time to time (i pleased this time with less and without aptitude). Thanks for your time, best regards, and sorry about this long writting, Diego
Bug#776974: debian-installer: Did not detect Intel RST RAID Disk
Package: installation-reports Boot method: USB stick Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/jessie_di_rc1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-jessie-DI-rc1-amd64-netinst.iso Date: Tue Feb 3 10:41:43 CST 2015 Machine: Supermicro motherboard with Intel RST Processor: Intel Xeon E5620 Memory: 100 GB Partitions: Never got that far Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [E] Partition hard drives: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Clock/timezone setup: [ ] User/password setup:[ ] Install tasks: [ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Overall install:[ ] Comments/Problems: The Intel RST RAID 5 Disk doesn't show up in the partition menu at all. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150203164459.gc13...@fattuba.com
Re: i386 EFI (and Mac builds)
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 03:49:37PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >I'm proposing that we make *only* a special Mac flavour of the >netinst, and I've already started working on that locally in >debian-cd. > >So... How does that sound? We'll need to add more docs for this, of >course, and it's likely to confuse *some* users which bothers me. But >I don't really see many other options. Much as I'd personally like to >see i386 start to die off and people move to better options like amd64 >(or arm64! *grin*), there are still a lot of i386 machines coming out >but they're not going to be supportable without EFI. Anyone? I'm hoping to get debian-cd changes pushed tonight and turn stuff on in d-i... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com You raise the blade, you make the change... You re-arrange me 'til I'm sane... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150203180316.gb26...@einval.com
Bug#776974: debian-installer: Did not detect Intel RST RAID Disk
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 10:45:00AM -0600, Ryan Nowakowski wrote: > Package: installation-reports > > Boot method: USB stick > Image version: > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/jessie_di_rc1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-jessie-DI-rc1-amd64-netinst.iso > Date: Tue Feb 3 10:41:43 CST 2015 > > Machine: Supermicro motherboard with Intel RST > Processor: Intel Xeon E5620 > Memory: 100 GB > Partitions: Never got that far > > Base System Installation Checklist: > [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it > > Initial boot: [O] > Detect network card:[O] > Configure network: [O] > Detect CD: [O] > Load installer modules: [O] > Detect hard drives: [E] > Partition hard drives: [ ] > Install base system:[ ] > Clock/timezone setup: [ ] > User/password setup:[ ] > Install tasks: [ ] > Install boot loader:[ ] > Overall install:[ ] > > Comments/Problems: > > The Intel RST RAID 5 Disk doesn't show up in the partition menu at all. Well certainly intel RST (which is of course fakeraid), should work with mdadm, but I have no idea if the installer supports that mode of operation. I used to run a system with raid 1 that way (using intel IMSM), and until recently, the initrd never did get starting it right and always needed manual help. That did eventually get fixed. Of course given that it is a fakeraid, it seems to me the obvious solution (well workaround at least) (unless you are dual booting with windows or something else that doesn't natively do software raid), would be to just use linux software raid. After all it is software raid either way, and using plain linux software raid has much better support, and there should not be any difference in performance. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150203185453.gb30...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
ifupdown is not installed by preseed, while iproute2 is installed
Hello! I have been installed Debian Jessie using pressed, after successful install and reboot I realized that eth0 is down and ifupdown package was missing. Why ? Same preseed file on wheezy installs ifupdown by default. Then I tried to do root@localhost:~# apt-get install ifupdown Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following extra packages will be installed: iproute Suggested packages: isc-dhcp-client dhcp-client ppp rdnssd iproute-doc The following packages will be REMOVED: iproute2 The following NEW packages will be installed: ifupdown iproute 0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 524 kB of archives. After this operation, 74.8 kB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Looks like iproute2 was installed which a) conflicts with ifupdown for some reason (why ? I guess it functionally can replace older iproute ) b) can't initiate interfaces alone (perhaps jessie is using newer network initialization method of which I'm not aware) Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/25491051423005...@web18j.yandex.ru
