Re: Finalizing beta2: please dak copy-installer, urgent d-i, build images
Cyril Brulebois (02/09/2012): > Hi ftpmasters, release team, cd team, > > please respectively, do: > - dak copy-installer > - urgent d-i > - start building installation images (I think it needs at least a >dinstall + a mirror pulse though); putting them into a “dot-dir” >for the time being would be nice. Ping? (On a side note, Steve, tasksel made it into testing.) Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Finalizing beta2: please dak copy-installer, urgent d-i, build images
On 03.09.2012 09:31, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Cyril Brulebois (02/09/2012): - urgent d-i Done, along with an unblock. - start building installation images (I think it needs at least a dinstall + a mirror pulse though); putting them into a “dot-dir” for the time being would be nice. Ping? fwiw, I see no sign of the original mail on debian-release... Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2d94e6eef7899d7876891ba71eb96...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#681673: Installer Wheezy amd64 NETINST Binary-1 20120715-10:38
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 681673 installation-reports Bug #681673 [installer and installation iso] amd64 installer fails Warning: Unknown package 'installer' Warning: Unknown package 'installation' Warning: Unknown package 'iso' Bug reassigned from package 'installer and installation iso' to 'installation-reports'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #681673 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #681673 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 681673: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681673 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134666340714874.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Bug#681285: RM: module-init-tools -- ROM; replaced by kmod
Hi! Could you please confirm that it is now save to remove module-init-tools now that #683790 has been solved? Just trying not to break anything again ;) Best regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120903133514.ga7...@iara.alphamar.org
Bug#682857: console-setup-udeb: can't preseed keyboard layout=de variant=nodeadkeys
On 2012-08-26 20:10, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Actually, thinking again about it, for space reasons we only include the > debconf-selectable layouts in the udebs anyway, so that will actually be > a wontfix. That's OK, but it needs to be documented in the installation manual. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5044c65e.9040...@abeckmann.de
Bug#680519: lxde: please depend on gdm3
Bob Bib, > to reduce the probability of user complaints, wouldn't it be better to make > it like this: > > Depends: gdm3 | lightdm Hi, i think this would be the best solution because now the dependency to gdm3 pulls in metacity as an dependency which most users don't want to install because lxde depend on openbox... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5044d73b.5050...@gmx.de
Bug#686606: debian-installer: Instalation freezes when used installer on wheeze hd-media and "Extended" partition is present
Package: debian-installer
Version: wheeze
Severity: normal
I installed Debian wheeze (amd64) from flash disk with these partitions
(fdisk):
/dev/sdb1 * 1 2 16033+ 14 Hidden FAT16 <32M
/dev/sdb2 3 6 32130b W95 FAT32
/dev/sdb3 7 245 1919767+ 5 Extended
/dev/sdb5 7 87 650601b W95 FAT32
/dev/sdb6 88 172 682731b W95 FAT32
/dev/sdb7 173 176 32098+ b W95 FAT32
/dev/sdb8 177 180 32098+ 83 Linux
/dev/sdb9 181 184 32098+ 83 Linux
/dev/sdb10185 188 32098+ 83 Linux
/dev/sdb11189 192 32098+ 83 Linux
/dev/sdb12193 196 32098+ 83 Linux
/dev/sdb13197 245 393561b W95 FAT32
On sdb6 there is hd-media and iso image.
After few steps Installer (I'm using text installer) started to search for iso
images on all partitions...Installler succefully checked few partitions but
then freezed on sdb3 (Extended partition).
On another console I ran ps and I got processlist including information about
running mount process.
Mount was in R ("running") state and installer was blocked for many minutes
(installer last message was like "processing sdb3") - mounting Extended partion
blocks the installer (after few minutes I interrupted installation process).
I repeated this process with amd64 Debian squeeze hd-media (same steps) and I
found no problems. This error is probably new in wheeze...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.5
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120903185300.14166.45163.reportbug@belik
Bug#683329: flash-kernel: Toshiba AC100 support broken [fix included]
Package: flash-kernel Version: 3.2 Followup-For: Bug #683329 Dear Maintainer, This is probably the same bug, although the original report contains close to zero information... Trying to flash a new kernel failed - flash-kernel exits early because some shell command returned an error code. I have tracked this down to faulty boot device detection. This little loop from /usr/share/flash-kernel/functions around line 468 does the detection: for p in "$android_boot_device"*[0-9]; do abootimg="$(LC_ALL=C abootimg -i "$p" 2>/dev/null)" image_size="$(abootimg_get_image_size "$abootimg")" if [ -n "$image_size" ] && [ "$image_size" -gt "$largest_size" ]; then part="$p" fi done The assignment to abootimg contains a call to abootimg -i "$p". This call fails when the glob pattern on the line above returns a block device that is not an android boot image. Since the script is executed with -e, this aborts the script. Adding a "|| :" after the command fixes the problem thus: for p in "$android_boot_device"*[0-9]; do abootimg="$(LC_ALL=C abootimg -i "$p" 2>/dev/null || : )" image_size="$(abootimg_get_image_size "$abootimg")" if [ -n "$image_size" ] && [ "$image_size" -gt "$largest_size" ]; then part="$p" fi done -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers precise-updates APT policy: (800, 'precise-updates'), (800, 'precise-security'), (800, 'precise'), (700, 'testing'), (650, 'unstable'), (600, 'stable') Architecture: armel (armv7l) Kernel: Linux 3.0.27-1-ac100 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages flash-kernel depends on: ii devio1.2-1build1 ii initramfs-tools 0.99ubuntu13 ii linux-base 3.4ubuntu2 flash-kernel recommends no packages. Versions of packages flash-kernel suggests: ii u-boot-tools 2011.09-2 -- Configuration Files: /etc/initramfs/post-update.d/flash-kernel changed [not included] /etc/initramfs/post-update.d/zz-flash-kernel changed [not included] -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120903162106.10025.13342.reportbug@joy
Bug#686614: task-lxde-desktop: Added a dependency to gdm3.
Package: task-lxde-desktop Version: 3.12 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Latest update introduces direct dependency to gdm3, and loads of gnome-related libs. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? N/A * What was the outcome of this action? Unwanted Gnome libraries installed on a lightweight environment. * What outcome did you expect instead? Any login manager should satisfy the need for one, not only gdm3. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120903204158.8859.53653.report...@warbird.mobile.leh
Bug#686606: debian-installer: Instalation freezes when used installer on wheeze hd-media and "Extended" partition is present
Dne Po 3. září 2012 21:40:06 jste napsal(a): > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 08:53:00PM +0200, Jan Belohoubek wrote: > > Package: debian-installer > > Version: wheeze > > Severity: normal > > > > I installed Debian wheeze (amd64) from flash disk with these partitions > > (fdisk): > > > > /dev/sdb1 * 1 2 16033+ 14 Hidden FAT16 <32M > > /dev/sdb2 3 6 32130b W95 FAT32 > > /dev/sdb3 7 245 1919767+ 5 Extended > > /dev/sdb5 7 87 650601b W95 FAT32 > > /dev/sdb6 88 172 682731b W95 FAT32 > > /dev/sdb7 173 176 32098+ b W95 FAT32 > > /dev/sdb8 177 180 32098+ 83 Linux > > /dev/sdb9 181 184 32098+ 83 Linux > > /dev/sdb10185 188 32098+ 83 Linux > > /dev/sdb11189 192 32098+ 83 Linux > > /dev/sdb12193 196 32098+ 83 Linux > > /dev/sdb13197 245 393561b W95 FAT32 > > > > On sdb6 there is hd-media and iso image. > > > > After few steps Installer (I'm using text installer) started to search > > for iso images on all partitions...Installler succefully checked few > > partitions but then freezed on sdb3 (Extended partition). > > Hello, > > this problem has come up in Wheezy Beta 1, resulting from a regression > in the kernel. A fix is already worked on and will likely be in > Wheezy Beta 2. Until Beta 2 is released, you could try the daily > built netboot image at > http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/netboot/mini.iso which > should not exhibit this problem. > > Regards, > Karsten Merker Hello, thank you! Have a nice day! With Regards, Jan Bělohoubek it.sFortelem.cz, i...@sfortelem.cz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201209032258.03323...@sfortelem.cz
Re: Installation-guide cleanup
Hi Karsten Merker writes: > If there are no objections, I would start working on the > installation guide and remove (and in some cases replace) several > outdated parts. Due to limited time available on my side this > will probably have to be done bit by bit during the next weeks. > If possible, it would be helpful if I could get svn commit > access, so I could regularly commit the reworked parts. Just speaking for myself. I would very much appreciate this work! I agree the remove the outdated content you mentioned. I can't give you access as I'm not an admin. Best, Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871uiig6cd@meteor.durcheinandertal.bofh
Bug#686614: task-lxde-desktop: Added a dependency to gdm3.
On 03/09/12 05:41 PM, Gyuro Lehel wrote: >* What led up to the situation? > Latest update introduces direct dependency to gdm3, and loads of > gnome-related libs. >* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)? > N/A >* What was the outcome of this action? > Unwanted Gnome libraries installed on a lightweight environment. >* What outcome did you expect instead? > Any login manager should satisfy the need for one, not only gdm3. This is a duplicate of #683345, fixed in the upload of tasksel 3.13 earlier today which is currently sitting in incoming. Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50453ec3.6000...@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca
Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * OLD BUILD:sparc Sep 02 00:12 buildd@sompek build_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/sparc/daily/build_cdrom.log * OLD BUILD:sparc Sep 02 00:17 buildd@sompek build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/sparc/daily/build_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:sparc Sep 02 00:20 buildd@sompek build_miniiso http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/sparc/daily/build_miniiso.log Totals: 135 builds (0 failed, 3 old) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1t8hup-0006qz...@ravel.debian.org
Bug#686314: Wheezy Instalation Report on Samsung NP305U1A
Em 31-08-2012 06:09, Christian PERRIER escreveu: Can you confirm that loading the fuse module *during the install process before the boot loader setup* was enough for W7 to be detected? The first time the boot loader setup run it did not find W7. I went back several times and retried the setup. The same. Then I lookup up the installation scripts and one of them (don't remember now which one) called grub-mount. I invoked grub-mount on the command line and got the error "fuse not available" or something like that. I tried to insmod fuse but the module was not found. Then I installed the fuse module from the "target" dir. Retried the boot loader setup and W7 was now found. If it helps I can reinstall wheezy from scratch. Just Let me know which information I should collect. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/504558a6.9070...@nocturno.org
Bug#686314: Wheezy Instalation Report on Samsung NP305U1A
clone 686314 -1 reassign -1 linux retitle -1 Please add the fuse module to d-i kernel packages thanks Quoting Rúben Leote Mendes (ru...@nocturno.org): > Em 31-08-2012 06:09, Christian PERRIER escreveu: > >Can you confirm that loading the fuse module *during the install > >process before the boot loader setup* was enough for W7 to be > >detected? > > The first time the boot loader setup run it did not find W7. I went > back several times and retried the setup. The same. Then I lookup up > the installation scripts and one of them (don't remember now which > one) called grub-mount. I invoked grub-mount on the command line and > got the error "fuse not available" or something like that. I tried > to insmod fuse but the module was not found. Then I installed the > fuse module from the "target" dir. Retried the boot loader setup and > W7 was now found. > > If it helps I can reinstall wheezy from scratch. Just Let me know > which information I should collect. > No, that's not needed. Your information seems enough to confirm that we need the fuse module in the installer kernel and have it loaded in os-prober prior to OS tests. Thanks for your help. I'm therefore cloning this bug so that kernel maintainers add the fuse module to installer kernel packages and we modify os-prober (probably os-probes/common/50mounted-tests) to load this module beforecalling grub-mount (not sure about the latter). -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#686314: Wheezy Instalation Report on Samsung NP305U1A
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 686314 -1 Bug #686314 [os-prober] Requires the fuse module to be loaded in order to detect Windows 7 Bug 686314 cloned as bug 686631 > reassign -1 linux Bug #686631 [os-prober] Requires the fuse module to be loaded in order to detect Windows 7 Bug reassigned from package 'os-prober' to 'linux'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #686631 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #686631 to the same values previously set > retitle -1 Please add the fuse module to d-i kernel packages Bug #686631 [linux] Requires the fuse module to be loaded in order to detect Windows 7 Changed Bug title to 'Please add the fuse module to d-i kernel packages' from 'Requires the fuse module to be loaded in order to detect Windows 7' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 686314: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686314 686631: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686631 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134673426810911.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
