Bug#406114: Processed: reopening 406114

2012-06-20 Thread Philipp Kern
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 11:03:56PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> # Op 09-01-2007 om 19:09 schreef Frans Pop:
> # > close 406114 
> # > thanks
> # > 
> # > > Bug#406114: Installer netinst needs ping and better ifconfig
> # > > Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> # > 
> # > There is absolutely no reason why this BR should remain open! As I said, 
> # > it's a duplicate and has absolutely no value by itself.
> # 
> # Value in this bugreport is how to use wget as ping replacement
> # also is explained why ping is not in d-i

Interestingly enough Ubuntu does ship a tiny ping in d-i which can tell you if
$IP is alive or not. It would be very helpful to have. I cannot use wget to
test if my gateway is reachable or not. And quite often (especially as d-i
cannot cope sanely with /32 netmasks) I do need to ensure exactly that for the
installer environment. A live CD wouldn't help.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120620101522.ga5...@spike.0x539.de



Bug#678264: "No common CD-ROM drive was detected" from debian-wheezy-DI-a1-sparc-netinst.iso on LDOM

2012-06-20 Thread T.J. Yang
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: debian-wheezy-DI-a1-sparc-netinst.iso CD
Image version: debian-wheezy-DI-a1-sparc-netinst.iso
Date: Wed Jun 20 07:34:55 CDT 2012

Machine: Sun Enterprize T5120 as host LDOM server
Processor:
Memory:
Partitions: 

Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn):

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [ ]
Detect network card:[ ]
Configure network:  [ ]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:

Please see following logs capture from vt100 session. Problem was it
can't find CDROM.
I remember read it somewhere, This problem is caused by T5120 using
usb interface to connect to CDROM.
same problem with stable squeezy netinstall.



SPARC Enterprise T5120, No Keyboard
Copyright (c) 1998, 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
OpenBoot 4.30.9, 2048 MB memory available, Serial #83526033.
Ethernet address 0:14:4f:fa:81:91, Host ID: 84fa8191.



{0} ok

{0} ok boot vcdrom


Boot device: /virtual-devices@100/channel-devices@200/disk@1  File and args:
SILO Version 1.4.14
EXT2 superblock magic is wrong
EXT2 superblock magic is wrong
\

  Welcome to Debian GNU/Linux wheezy!

This is a Debian installation CDROM, built on 20120512-00:53.
Keep it once you have installed your system, as you can boot from it
to repair the system on your hard disk if that ever becomes necessary.

WARNING: You should completely back up all of your hard disks before
  proceeding. The installation procedure can completely and irreversibly
  erase them! If you haven't made backups yet, remove the rescue CD from
  the drive and press L1-A to get back to the OpenBoot prompt.

Debian GNU/Linux comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted
by applicable law.

[ ENTER - Boot install ]   [ Type "expert" - Boot into expert mode ]
   [ Type "rescue" - Boot into rescue mode ]
boot:

Allocated 64 Megs of memory at 0x4000 for kernel
EXT2 superblock magic is wrong
Loaded kernel version 3.2.15
EXT2 superblock magic is wrong
Loading initial ramdisk (4854411 bytes at 0xC80 phys, 0x40C0 virt)...
\
[0.00] PROMLIB: Sun IEEE Boot Prom 'OBP 4.30.9 2010/07/16 09:01'
[0.00] PROMLIB: Root node compatible: sun4v
[0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
[0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu
[0.00] Linux version 3.2.0-2-sparc64 (Debian 3.2.15-1)
(debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian 4.6.3-1) )
#1 Sun Apr 15 17:44:17 UTC 2012
[0.00] bootconsole [earlyprom0] enabled
[0.00] ARCH: SUN4V
[0.00] Ethernet address: 00:14:4f:fa:81:91
[0.00] Kernel: Using 2 locked TLB entries for main kernel image.
[0.00] Remapping the kernel... done.
[0.00] OF stdout device is: /virtual-devices@100/console@1
[0.00] PROM: Built device tree with 23158 bytes of memory.
[0.00] MDESC: Size is 10640 bytes.
[0.00] PLATFORM: banner-name [SPARC Enterprise T5120]
[0.00] PLATFORM: name [SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5120]
[0.00] PLATFORM: hostid [84fa8191]
[0.00] PLATFORM: serial# [00ab4130]
[0.00] PLATFORM: stick-frequency [457646c0]
[0.00] PLATFORM: mac-address [144ffa8191]
[0.00] PLATFORM: watchdog-resolution [1000 ms]
[0.00] PLATFORM: watchdog-max-timeout [3153600 ms]
[0.00] PLATFORM: max-cpus [64]
[0.00] SUN4V: Mondo queue sizes [cpu(8192) dev(16384) r(8192) nr(256)]
[0.00] Top of RAM: 0x87f96000, Total RAM: 0x7fa8
[0.00] Memory hole size: 133MB
[0.00] [0100-f8000900] page_structs=131072
node=0 entry=0/8192
[0.00] [0100-f8000940] page_structs=131072
node=0 entry=1/8192
[0.00] [0180-f8000980] page_structs=131072
node=0 entry=2/8192
[0.00] [0180-f80009c0] page_structs=131072
node=0 entry=3/8192
[0.00] [01000100-f8000a00] page_structs=131072
node=0 entry=4/8192
[0.00] [01000100-f8000a40] page_structs=131072
node=0 entry=5/8192
[0.00] Zone PFN ranges:
[0.00]   Normal   0x4200 -> 0x00043fcb
[0.00] Movable zone start PFN for each node
[0.00] early_node_map[3] active PFN ranges
[0.00] 0: 0x4200 -> 0x00043f3b
[0.00] 0: 0x00043fc3 -> 0x00043fc4
[0.00] 0: 0x00043fc7 -> 0x00043fcb
[0.00] Booting Linux...
[0.00] CPU CAPS: [flush,stbar,swap,muldiv,v9,blkinit,n2,mul32]
[0.00] CPU CAPS: [div32,v8plus,popc,vis,vis2,ASIBlkInit]
[0.00] Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility 

README in debian-live-6.0.4-amd64-rescue.iso has wrong arch

2012-06-20 Thread Theodore Ts'o
(Please keep me in the cc line since I'm not on the debian-boot mailing list)

Hi,

This is a minor nit, but I noticed today that the README files in
/live/image/README.txt and /live/image/README.html found in
debian-live-6.0.4-amd64-rescue.iso states that the contents of "this
CD-ROM" is the "Offical Snapshot i386 NETINST Binary-1 20110121-20:12".
The packages located in /live/image/pool/* are all amd64 .debs so it
looks like it's just the README which is wrong.

Is this a known problem?   Should I bother filing a bug?

Thanks,

- Ted




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/e1shkoh-00089o...@tytso-glaptop.cam.corp.google.com



Bug#678267: Can't preseed encryption cipher

2012-06-20 Thread StackCoder
Package: partman-auto-crypto

Subject: partman-auto-crypto: Can't preseed encryption cipher
Package: partman-auto-crypto
Severity: wishlist

Hey,

Could support be added for preseeding encryption cipher.
In this moment it's hardcoded in cryptobase.sh / crypto_set_defaults ().

A workaround would be changing cryptobase.sh with early_command: (Thanks
to Colin Watson)


d-i partman/early_command string sed -i '/echo aes > \$part
\/cipher/s/aes/serpent/' /lib/partman/lib/crypto-base.sh



Thanks

StackCoder 




Re: README in debian-live-6.0.4-amd64-rescue.iso has wrong arch

2012-06-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Theodore Ts'o  (20/06/2012):
> (Please keep me in the cc line since I'm not on the debian-boot mailing list)

Done.

> Hi,
> 
> This is a minor nit, but I noticed today that the README files in
> /live/image/README.txt and /live/image/README.html found in
> debian-live-6.0.4-amd64-rescue.iso states that the contents of "this
> CD-ROM" is the "Offical Snapshot i386 NETINST Binary-1 20110121-20:12".
> The packages located in /live/image/pool/* are all amd64 .debs so it
> looks like it's just the README which is wrong.
> 
> Is this a known problem?   Should I bother filing a bug?

I think you want debian-l...@lists.debian.org? Adding to cc with this
mail.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#678283: installation-reports: Successful server install of wheezy

2012-06-20 Thread Tux
Package: installation-reports
Severity: minor

Dear Maintainer,

-- Package-specific info:

Boot method: CD
Image version: Alpha1 
(http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_alpha1/i386/iso-cd/)
Date: 

Machine: Compaq Presairo SR1103WM
Partitions: 
Filesystem Type 1K-blocks  
Used Available Use% Mounted on
rootfs rootfs   117535460  
13181588 104353872  12% /
udev   devtmpfs 10240   
  0 10240   0% /dev
tmpfs  tmpfs76596   
296 76300   1% /run
/dev/disk/by-uuid/5db9bcd8-6b96-4202-b9f6-bf3fdf712924 ext4 117535460  
13181588 104353872  12% /
tmpfs  tmpfs 5120   
  0  5120   0% /run/lock
tmpfs  tmpfs   153188   
820152368   1% /tmp
tmpfs  tmpfs   153188   
  0153188   0% /run/shm
/dev/sdg1  ext2 480720592  
34378908 446341684   8% /data
/dev/sdf1  ext2 961432104 
356674412 604757692  38% /data2
/dev/sda2  ext4 124822936  
60995484  63827452  49% /ubuntu-home
/dev/sda1  ext4  48727792  
12480420  36247372  26% /ubuntu-root

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O]
Detect network card:[O]
Configure network:  [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Install base system:[O]
Clock/timezone setup:   [O]
User/password setup:[O]
Install tasks:  [O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Overall install:[O]

Comments/Problems:



WPA worked flawlessly. :) (I'm using wireless because I hate wires ;))

Somehow Squeeze doesn't work on it, I need to look further but it could be my 
machine.

-- 

==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer"
DISTRIB_RELEASE="7.0 (wheezy) - installer build 20120508"
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom

==
Installer hardware-summary:
==
uname -a: Linux olimar 3.2.0-2-486 #1 Sun Apr 15 16:53:08 UTC 2012 i686 
GNU/Linux
lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 
82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE/PE DRAM Controller/Host-Hub Interface [8086:2560] 
(rev 03)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:5770]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel
lspci -knn: 00:02.0 Display controller [0380]: Intel Corporation 
82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE Chipset Integrated Graphics Device [8086:2562] (rev 
03)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:5778]
lspci -knn: 00:1d.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM 
(ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #1 [8086:24c2] (rev 02)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:5770]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1d.1 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM 
(ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #2 [8086:24c4] (rev 02)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:5770]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1d.2 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM 
(ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #3 [8086:24c7] (rev 02)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:5770]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1d.7 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBM 
(ICH4/ICH4-M) USB2 EHCI Controller [8086:24cd] (rev 02)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:5770]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1e.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge 
[8086:244e] (rev 82)
lspci -knn: 00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL 
(ICH4/ICH4-L) LPC Interface Bridge [8086:24c0] (rev 02)
lspci -knn: 00:1f.1 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 82801DB (ICH4) IDE 
Controller [8086:24cb] (rev 02)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:5770]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ata_piix
lspci -knn: 00:1f.3 SMBus [0c05]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM 
(ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) SMBus Controller [8086:24c3] (rev 02)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:5770]
lspci -knn: 01:09.0 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: Creative Labs CA01

Bug#667681: Updated patches for Dreamplug / Marvell Kirkwood FDT

2012-06-20 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 14:10 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Sorry for the delay
> 
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2012, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > +Machine: Globalscale Technologies Dreamplug
> > +Kernel-Flavors: kirkwood
> > +U-Boot-Kernel-Address: 0x8000
> > +U-Boot-Initrd-Address: 0x0
> > +Boot-Kernel-Path: /boot/uImage
> > +Boot-Initrd-Path: /boot/uInitrd
> 
> Could we use Boot-Device + relative pathnames instead?  I find this to
> be a cleaner abstraction for the "firmware area", it mounts the firmware
> area only when needed, and doesn't impose as many constraints on it; if
> one uses /boot to mount the "firmware area" where the bootloader reads
> uImage and such, it has to be sufficiently large to carry all installed
> kernel packages, might require support for symlinks (problematic for
> vfat) or might break more easily with certain fs types (e.g. ext2) if
> the device isn't stopped properly.

I'll take a look into this.

Currently on my dreamplug I have:
$ mount
/dev/sdb2 on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro)
[...]
/dev/sdb1 on /boot type ext2 (rw)

Are you suggesting that I should move the non-flash-kernel related
content of /dev/sdb1 (e.g. vmlinuz, initramfs etc) to /dev/sdb2:/boot
and remove sdb1 from the fstab, leaving it unmounted the majority of the
time?

I'm happy to do that, just want to make sure I understand before I start
moving stuff about.

FYI /boot is 205M on this system (I don't recall if I partitioned it, or
if the installer did it or if it came that way), so I'm not worried
about space constraints (205M is bigger than the whole disk on my last
Pentium based firewall machine ;-)). I think the original partition was
VFAT though so that concern is valid.

It is possible that other DP users will want /dev/sda* (the internal
sdcard) instead of /dev/sdb* (the external sdcard). Can I express sda vs
sdb in the flash-kernel db somehow?

Looking at my sda it seems the partitioning scheme used by the supplier
there is 100M VFAT + 3.9G EXT.

There is also some /dev/mtd devices but I think they are tiny SPI things
and not useful for booting.

Cheers,
Ian.

> 
> > --- a/functions
> > +++ b/functions
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> >  BOOTSCRIPTS_DIR="${FK_CHECKOUT:-$FK_DIR}/bootscript"
> >  MACHINE_DB="$(cat "${FK_CHECKOUT:-$FK_DIR}/db/"*.db)"
> >  PROC_CPUINFO="${FK_PROC_CPUINFO:-/proc/cpuinfo}"
> > +PROC_DTMODEL="${FK_PROC_DRMODEL:-/proc/device-tree/model}"
> >  PROC_MTD="/proc/mtd"
> >  
> >  
> > @@ -94,6 +95,16 @@ check_supported() {
> >  get_cpuinfo_hardware() {
> > grep "^Hardware" "$PROC_CPUINFO" | sed 's/Hardware\s*:\s*//'
> >  }
> > +get_dt_model() {
> > +   cat "$PROC_DTMODEL"
> > +}
> > +get_machine() {
> > +   if [ -f "$PROC_DTMODEL" ] ; then
> > +   get_dt_model
> > +   else
> > +   get_cpuinfo_hardware
> > +   fi
> > +}
> >  
> >  get_kfile_suffix() {
> > local kfile="$1"
> > @@ -302,7 +313,7 @@ elif [ -n "$FK_MACHINE" ]; then
> > machine="$FK_MACHINE"
> > [ "x$machine" = "xnone" ] && exit
> >  else
> > -   machine="$(get_cpuinfo_hardware)"
> > +   machine="$(get_machine)"
> >  fi
> >  
> >  if [ "x$1" = "x--supported" ]; then
> 
> This looks good!  Ideally we'd expand the testsuite
> 

-- 
Ian Campbell


The health of a democratic society may be measured by the quality
of functions performed by private citizens.
-- Alexis de Tocqueville



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: wheezy alpha1 release: red screen

2012-06-20 Thread Miguel Figueiredo

Hi,

on the log you sent i found the following issues:

1 - udhcp - unknown parameter

Jun 19 23:26:48 main-menu[281]: (process:4263): udhcpc: has been called 
with an unknown param: leasefail

Jun 19 23:26:48 main-menu[281]: (process:4263): Received SIGTERM

but installation continues, it's not fatal.


2 - modprobe - invalid option

Jun 19 23:27:10 main-menu[281]: (process:4374): modprobe: invalid option 
-- 'l'


the installation continues

3 - dpkg - segmentation fault

Jun 19 23:28:36 debootstrap: Segmentation fault
Jun 19 23:28:36 kernel: [  190.120214] dpkg[16076]: segfault at 15 ip 
080541f8 sp bf97e10c error 6 in dpkg[8048000+3e000]


Red screen of death should happen here, before you open the second console.

--
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,

Miguel Figueiredo


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fe230bf.9090...@debianpt.org



Re: wheezy alpha1 release: red screen

2012-06-20 Thread Miguel Figueiredo

2 - modprobe - invalid option

Jun 19 23:27:10 main-menu[281]: (process:4374): modprobe: invalid option
-- 'l'


I found 2 occurrences on:

hw-detect/hw-detect.sh: [ "$(modprobe -l $1)" ] || return 1

busybox/modutils/modprobe-small.c:modprobe -l -t  [ -a 
 ...


--
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,

Miguel Figueiredo


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fe23258.4000...@debianpt.org



Bug#678283: marked as done (installation-reports: Successful server install of wheezy)

2012-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2012 21:55:34 +0100
with message-id <4fe238c6.8000...@debianpt.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#678283: installation-reports: Successful server 
install of wheezy
has caused the Debian Bug report #678283,
regarding installation-reports: Successful server install of wheezy
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
678283: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678283
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports
Severity: minor

Dear Maintainer,

-- Package-specific info:

Boot method: CD
Image version: Alpha1 
(http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_alpha1/i386/iso-cd/)
Date: 

Machine: Compaq Presairo SR1103WM
Partitions: 
Filesystem Type 1K-blocks  
Used Available Use% Mounted on
rootfs rootfs   117535460  
13181588 104353872  12% /
udev   devtmpfs 10240   
  0 10240   0% /dev
tmpfs  tmpfs76596   
296 76300   1% /run
/dev/disk/by-uuid/5db9bcd8-6b96-4202-b9f6-bf3fdf712924 ext4 117535460  
13181588 104353872  12% /
tmpfs  tmpfs 5120   
  0  5120   0% /run/lock
tmpfs  tmpfs   153188   
820152368   1% /tmp
tmpfs  tmpfs   153188   
  0153188   0% /run/shm
/dev/sdg1  ext2 480720592  
34378908 446341684   8% /data
/dev/sdf1  ext2 961432104 
356674412 604757692  38% /data2
/dev/sda2  ext4 124822936  
60995484  63827452  49% /ubuntu-home
/dev/sda1  ext4  48727792  
12480420  36247372  26% /ubuntu-root

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O]
Detect network card:[O]
Configure network:  [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Install base system:[O]
Clock/timezone setup:   [O]
User/password setup:[O]
Install tasks:  [O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Overall install:[O]

Comments/Problems:



WPA worked flawlessly. :) (I'm using wireless because I hate wires ;))

Somehow Squeeze doesn't work on it, I need to look further but it could be my 
machine.

-- 

==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer"
DISTRIB_RELEASE="7.0 (wheezy) - installer build 20120508"
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom

==
Installer hardware-summary:
==
uname -a: Linux olimar 3.2.0-2-486 #1 Sun Apr 15 16:53:08 UTC 2012 i686 
GNU/Linux
lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 
82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE/PE DRAM Controller/Host-Hub Interface [8086:2560] 
(rev 03)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:5770]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel
lspci -knn: 00:02.0 Display controller [0380]: Intel Corporation 
82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE Chipset Integrated Graphics Device [8086:2562] (rev 
03)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:5778]
lspci -knn: 00:1d.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM 
(ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #1 [8086:24c2] (rev 02)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:5770]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1d.1 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM 
(ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #2 [8086:24c4] (rev 02)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:5770]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1d.2 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM 
(ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #3 [8086:24c7] (rev 02)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:5770]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1d.7 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBM 
(ICH4/ICH4-M) USB2 EHCI Controller [808

Re: d-i: Plans for beta 1?

2012-06-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Christian PERRIER  (11/06/2012):
> It's likely that a mass upload is needed for l10n purposes. Also, I
> think that a beta is the moment where I should decide about which
> languages I drop
> (http://www.perrier.eu.org/weblog/2012/06/09#di-deactivation-status-8)

I think you're done now?

If there's nothing left on anyone's todo list, I'll try and release beta
1 over the week-end. Will have to check if something needs be done WRT
upcoming kernel updates:
  https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/06/msg00474.html

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: d-i: Plans for beta 1?

2012-06-20 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:37:55AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Christian PERRIER  (11/06/2012):
>> It's likely that a mass upload is needed for l10n purposes. Also, I
>> think that a beta is the moment where I should decide about which
>> languages I drop
>> (http://www.perrier.eu.org/weblog/2012/06/09#di-deactivation-status-8)
>
>I think you're done now?
>
>If there's nothing left on anyone's todo list, I'll try and release beta
>1 over the week-end. Will have to check if something needs be done WRT
>upcoming kernel updates:
>  https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/06/msg00474.html

Ummm. Are you planning on checking with other folks first?

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"We're the technical experts.  We were hired so that management could
 ignore our recommendations and tell us how to do our jobs."  -- Mike Andrews


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120620230832.gd3...@einval.com