Re: Busybox problem

2012-06-07 Thread Fabian Weiss
I have exactly the same problem! I've tried the new installer and the
classic shell installer.
I was installing under KVM/qemu and used an ISO from May and today again a
new ISO for amd64 architecture.
All the time installer stopps and tells me there is a problem with
busybox...


Processed: tagging 636162

2012-06-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 636162 - patch
Bug #636162 [busybox-syslogd] busybox-syslogd: it doesn't start on hurd
Removed tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
636162: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636162
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13391365929671.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



reassign 676001 back to initramfs-tools

2012-06-07 Thread Michael Tokarev
reassign 676001 initramfs-tools
thanks

Reassigning the bug back to initramfs-tools where it belongs
according to my comments below and lack of any arguments to
the opposite.  With all my dislike to such a ping-pong.

Thanks,

/mjt

On 05.06.2012 08:45, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
> I disagree it is a busybox problem, and don't think it is a
> switch_root business (be it from busybox or from util-linux).
> 
> There are a few special directories which needs to be moved
> or umounted.  This includes /proc, /dev, /sys and not mentioned
> here /run.  These directories might be mounted in the new root
> already, or there may be some option passed to initramfs to
> not mount these, or there may be other local policy or whatever
> decisions.  All that can't be handled and can't be known to
> switch_root -- this is exactly why we have initramfs/init as
> a script, to be able to handle various local usecases/policies
> and made it extendable.
> 
> Also, as shown by Vagrant in the initial bugreport, it is
> really trivial to fix it in initramfs.
> 
> The fact that util-linux is doing this does not make it right
> thing to do.
> 
> Why do you think it is a busybox bug?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd19c52@msgid.tls.msk.ru



Processed: reassign 676001 back to initramfs-tools

2012-06-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 676001 initramfs-tools
Bug #676001 [busybox] initramfs-tools: busybox's switch_root doesn't handle 
/proc or /sys moving
Bug reassigned from package 'busybox' to 'initramfs-tools'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #676001 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #676001 to the same values 
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
676001: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676001
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133913710912651.transcr...@bugs.debian.org