Processed: Re: Bug#637284: Can't install wheezy on a 2011 iMac
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 637284 installation-reports Bug #637284 [wnpp] Can't install wheezy on a 2011 iMac Bug reassigned from package 'wnpp' to 'installation-reports'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637284: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637284 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131296652714901.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#637289: installation-reports: Installation Debian Wheezy weekly-builds 08-08-2011 text=successful gui=not good
Package: installation-reports Severity: important Successful installation of Debian Wheezy/Testing on Dell D430 via USB flash drive. Burnt the iso image to USB after reading the manual to use the command: cat debian.iso > /dev/sdX. Successful booting from USB stick and presented with all options: Install (via text), Graphical Install, Advanced Options, Help, Install with Speech Synthesizer. All menus where visible and the same was true for KDE, XFCE, LXDE menus. I initially tried to install via GUI but when presented with the interface, the text was not shown. All I saw were square boxes where text should be. I switched to other terminal using Ctrl+Alt+F4 and this was the output: debconf: cdebconf_gtk (process:471): Pango - WARNING: failed to choose a font, expect ugly output. engine-type='PangoRenderFc', script='bengali' **several lines of the same output followed except bengali was replaced with the names of other languages. Reboot and chose Installation text method, everything went smoothly. Ethernet connection was picked up and setup correctly, partioning was simple enough, ext4 filesystem as default, Installation completed and standard GNOME desktop works out of the box. I just have to install a few packages for wireless to work. Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O], detected wireless card but needed to load firmware, chose Ethernet connection Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O ] Install base system:[ O] Clock/timezone setup: [ O] User/password setup:[O ] Install tasks: [ O] Install boot loader:[ O] Overall install:[ O] -- Package-specific info: Boot method: debian-testing-i386-DVD-1.iso USB install Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-dvd/debian-testing-i386-DVD-1.iso 08082011 Date: Machine: Dell Latitude D430 Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 @1.33Ghz 2GB RAM Partitions: Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [ ] Detect network card:[ ] Configure network: [ ] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [ ] Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Clock/timezone setup: [ ] User/password setup:[ ] Install tasks: [ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Overall install:[ ] Comments/Problems: -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer" DISTRIB_RELEASE="7.0 (wheezy) - installer build 20110808-00:05" X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux debdell 3.0.0-1-486 #1 Sun Jul 24 13:43:13 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS, 943/940GML and 945GT Express Memory Controller Hub [8086:27a0] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0201] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel lspci -knn: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27a2] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0201] lspci -knn: 00:02.1 Display controller [0380]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27a6] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0201] lspci -knn: 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family High Definition Audio Controller [8086:27d8] (rev 01) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0201] lspci -knn: 00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family PCI Express Port 1 [8086:27d0] (rev 01) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:1c.1 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family PCI Express Port 2 [8086:27d2] (rev 01) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:1c.2 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family PCI Express Port 3 [8086:27d4] (rev 01) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:1d.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB UHCI Controller #1 [8086:27c8] (rev 01) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0201] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1d.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB
Bug#637289: marked as done (installation-reports: Installation Debian Wheezy weekly-builds 08-08-2011 text=successful gui=not good)
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:27:43 +0100 with message-id <201108101027.43816.el...@debianpt.org> and subject line Re: Bug#637289: installation-reports: Installation Debian Wheezy weekly-builds 08-08-2011 text=successful gui=not good has caused the Debian Bug report #637289, regarding installation-reports: Installation Debian Wheezy weekly-builds 08-08-2011 text=successful gui=not good to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 637289: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637289 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: installation-reports Severity: important Successful installation of Debian Wheezy/Testing on Dell D430 via USB flash drive. Burnt the iso image to USB after reading the manual to use the command: cat debian.iso > /dev/sdX. Successful booting from USB stick and presented with all options: Install (via text), Graphical Install, Advanced Options, Help, Install with Speech Synthesizer. All menus where visible and the same was true for KDE, XFCE, LXDE menus. I initially tried to install via GUI but when presented with the interface, the text was not shown. All I saw were square boxes where text should be. I switched to other terminal using Ctrl+Alt+F4 and this was the output: debconf: cdebconf_gtk (process:471): Pango - WARNING: failed to choose a font, expect ugly output. engine-type='PangoRenderFc', script='bengali' **several lines of the same output followed except bengali was replaced with the names of other languages. Reboot and chose Installation text method, everything went smoothly. Ethernet connection was picked up and setup correctly, partioning was simple enough, ext4 filesystem as default, Installation completed and standard GNOME desktop works out of the box. I just have to install a few packages for wireless to work. Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O], detected wireless card but needed to load firmware, chose Ethernet connection Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O ] Install base system:[ O] Clock/timezone setup: [ O] User/password setup:[O ] Install tasks: [ O] Install boot loader:[ O] Overall install:[ O] -- Package-specific info: Boot method: debian-testing-i386-DVD-1.iso USB install Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-dvd/debian-testing-i386-DVD-1.iso 08082011 Date: Machine: Dell Latitude D430 Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 @1.33Ghz 2GB RAM Partitions: Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [ ] Detect network card:[ ] Configure network: [ ] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [ ] Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Clock/timezone setup: [ ] User/password setup:[ ] Install tasks: [ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Overall install:[ ] Comments/Problems: -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer" DISTRIB_RELEASE="7.0 (wheezy) - installer build 20110808-00:05" X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux debdell 3.0.0-1-486 #1 Sun Jul 24 13:43:13 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS, 943/940GML and 945GT Express Memory Controller Hub [8086:27a0] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0201] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel lspci -knn: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27a2] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0201] lspci -knn: 00:02.1 Display controller [0380]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27a6] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell D
Bug#637284: Can't install wheezy on a 2011 iMac
On 10/08/11 6:55 PM, Gergely Nagy wrote: reassign 637284 installation-reports thanks Installation reports (failure or success) should not be reported against the "Work Needing and Prospective Packages" virtual package, but against installation-reports. Ah, thanks Gergely -- I'm still new to this :-) -- Mike. It can then be reassigned from there to the appropriate package, if confirmed. I have reassigned the report to installation-reports, so it gets forwarded to the right place. -- --- Mike Horemike_h...@aapt.net.au --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e424bd5.4080...@aapt.net.au
Re: Resync netcfg in D-I git?
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 11:01:22PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > Excerpts from Christian PERRIER's message of 2011-08-05 09:54:11 +0200: > > Would you mind, when possible (back from your "holidays"), resyncing > > D-I git with the uploaded 1.66 and 1.67 packages? > > I've now pushed everything into the d-i git repo. I thought that this > was automatically done by the do-upload script, but it seems that I > should have done this manually after the upload. Current versions of do-upload should indeed push automatically. Is your scripts/ directory up to date? Of course, it does rely on you having done 'git add' on anything that changed. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810101320.ga18...@riva.dynamic.greenend.org.uk
Re: cdebconf progress
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:44:38AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > I, for one, would vote for uploading to unstable. It is time to test > *now*. Closer to wheezy release might be too laste. Agreed, just go for unstable and (obviously) be responsive in case of breakage. If you think the changes are sound, then there's no need to be excessively timid at this point in the release cycle. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810101504.gb18...@riva.dynamic.greenend.org.uk
Re: cdebconf progress
On Wed, August 10, 2011 11:15, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:44:38AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: >> I, for one, would vote for uploading to unstable. It is time to test >> *now*. Closer to wheezy release might be too laste. > > Agreed, just go for unstable and (obviously) be responsive in case of > breakage. If you think the changes are sound, then there's no need to > be excessively timid at this point in the release cycle. Guess I'll do that this evening, then. I fixed a bug yesterday evening that had broken the none and noninteractive frontend ; but other than that everything should be ok. I've actually been using it on my laptop for a few weeks. Regis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/bd32f7e585e66696754bf34ac41bbd7e.squir...@imalip.net
Bug#637284: Can't install wheezy on a 2011 iMac
Hi, Very recently Wheezy moved to kernel Linux 3.0, which is being used to install and for the installed system. It would be useful feedback if you test with the current kernel. Can you test and report against such cd images [1] ? 1 - http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/ -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best Regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201108101135.39774.el...@debianpt.org
Bug#629695:
Hi! Sorry I've discovered this bug report only recently. I'm dealing with this failure since about 4-5 months. And I'm wondering what is the purpose of weekly generated DVD-images when the distribution can't be installed from them during the last 4-5 months? How to reproduce this? It would be enough straightforward to install that what has been generated on DVD-1 weekly image. I'm doing it every week under VirtualBox. The saved logs (from integrated WEB server) are attached. Hope it could help to find out what's going wrong here. Or please point me to the discussion on the structure of DVD-1 image (debian-installer - tasksel - pkgsel ...). Best regards, Andrey hardware-summary.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data partman.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data syslog.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Bug#637297: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.34 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd debootstrap fails to build from source on GNU/kFreeBSD. Please consider attached patch to fix the problem. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.2 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.1-1-amd64 Locale: LANG=ca_AD.utf8, LC_CTYPE=ca_AD.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages debootstrap depends on: ii wget 1.12-2.1 retrieves files from the web Versions of packages debootstrap recommends: ii debian-archive-keyring2010.08.28 GnuPG archive keys of the Debian a ii gnupg 1.4.10-4 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep debootstrap suggests no packages. -- no debconf information === modified file 'Makefile' --- Makefile 2011-08-10 10:28:36 + +++ Makefile 2011-08-10 10:42:41 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ VERSION := $(shell sed 's/.*(\(.*\)).*/\ MAKEDEV := /sbin/MAKEDEV -ifneq ($(shell uname),GNU) +ifeq ($(shell uname),Linux) all: devices.tar.gz else all: @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ install: chown root:root $(DESTDIR)/usr/sbin/debootstrap chmod 0755 $(DESTDIR)/usr/sbin/debootstrap -ifneq ($(shell uname),GNU) +ifeq ($(shell uname),Linux) install -o root -g root -m 0644 devices.tar.gz $(DSDIR)/ endif === modified file 'debian/control' --- debian/control 2011-08-10 10:28:36 + +++ debian/control 2011-08-10 10:42:41 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Section: admin Priority: extra Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Uploaders: Anthony Towns , Joey Hess , Junichi Uekawa , Colin Watson -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50), makedev (>= 2.3.1-69) [!hurd-i386] +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50), makedev (>= 2.3.1-69) [linux-any] Standards-Version: 3.9.2 Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=d-i/debootstrap.git Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/d-i/debootstrap.git
Bug#637298: broken cross-debootstraps (--foreign) with host=kfreebsd and target=linux
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.34
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
While cross-deboostraping a linux-i386 chroot using kfreebsd-amd64 host:
$ sudo debootstrap --foreign --arch=i386 squeeze /tmp/test
/usr/sbin/debootstrap: 425: cannot create /tmp/test/test-dev-null: Invalid
argument
E: Cannot install into target '/tmp/test' mounted with noexec or nodev
the problem here is that $ARCH stores the target architecture, but it is used
for tests where only the host architecture is relevant.
Please consider attached patch to fix the problem by adding a new variable,
$HOST_ARCH, for the host architecture.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.2
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.1-1-amd64
Locale: LANG=ca_AD.utf8, LC_CTYPE=ca_AD.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages debootstrap depends on:
ii wget 1.12-2.1 retrieves files from the web
Versions of packages debootstrap recommends:
ii debian-archive-keyring2010.08.28 GnuPG archive keys of the Debian a
ii gnupg 1.4.10-4 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep
debootstrap suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
=== modified file 'debootstrap'
--- debootstrap 2011-08-10 10:28:36 +
+++ debootstrap 2011-08-10 10:48:04 +
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ KEYRING=""
DISABLE_KEYRING=""
VARIANT=""
ARCH=""
+HOST_ARCH=""
KEEP_DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR=""
USE_DEBIANINSTALLER_INTERACTION=""
SECOND_STAGE_ONLY=""
@@ -389,20 +390,24 @@ fi
###
-if [ "$ARCH" != "" ]; then
- true
-elif [ -x /usr/bin/dpkg ] && \
+if [ -x /usr/bin/dpkg ] && \
/usr/bin/dpkg --print-architecture >/dev/null 2>&1; then
- ARCH=`/usr/bin/dpkg --print-architecture`
+ HOST_ARCH=`/usr/bin/dpkg --print-architecture`
elif type udpkg >/dev/null 2>&1 && \
udpkg --print-architecture >/dev/null 2>&1; then
- ARCH=`/usr/bin/udpkg --print-architecture`
+ HOST_ARCH=`/usr/bin/udpkg --print-architecture`
elif [ -e $DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR/arch ]; then
- ARCH=`cat $DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR/arch`
+ HOST_ARCH=`cat $DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR/arch`
else
error 1 WHATARCH "Couldn't work out current architecture"
fi
+if [ "$ARCH" != "" ]; then
+ true
+else
+ ARCH=$HOST_ARCH
+fi
+
if [ "$TARGET" = "/" ]; then
CHROOT_CMD=""
elif doing_variant scratchbox; then
=== modified file 'functions'
--- functions 2011-08-10 10:28:36 +
+++ functions 2011-08-10 10:47:04 +
@@ -938,7 +938,7 @@ clear_mtab () {
}
setup_proc () {
- case "$ARCH" in
+ case "$HOST_ARCH" in
kfreebsd-*)
umount_on_exit /dev
umount_on_exit /proc
@@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ setup_devices () {
return 0
fi
- case "$ARCH" in
+ case "$HOST_ARCH" in
kfreebsd-*)
in_target mount -t devfs devfs /dev ;;
hurd-*)
@@ -1198,7 +1198,7 @@ get_next_predep () {
check_sane_mount () {
mkdir -p "$1"
- case "$ARCH" in
+ case "$HOST_ARCH" in
kfreebsd-*|hurd-*)
;;
*)
Bug#637297: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
Robert Millan, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 13:36:03 +0200, a écrit : > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ VERSION := $(shell sed 's/.*(\(.*\)).*/\ > > MAKEDEV := /sbin/MAKEDEV > > -ifneq ($(shell uname),GNU) > +ifeq ($(shell uname),Linux) > all: devices.tar.gz > else > all: Mmm, debootstrap should actually be an Arch:any package then. ATM, if one uploads it from kfreebsd or hurd, Linux systems won't have devices.tar.gz. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810114737.gp23...@type.famille.thibault.fr
Bug#637297: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
2011/8/10 Samuel Thibault : > Mmm, debootstrap should actually be an Arch:any package then. ATM, > if one uploads it from kfreebsd or hurd, Linux systems won't have > devices.tar.gz. Yes it should IMO. Note however that my patch isn't a regression in this area. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxowqc_orr6v4pynph+gt2f1xymnpk8ue8_jpb1fgdg...@mail.gmail.com
Processed: tagging 637297
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 637297 + pending Bug #637297 [debootstrap] FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637297: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637297 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131297770431689.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processing of debootstrap_1.0.35_i386.changes
debootstrap_1.0.35_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debootstrap_1.0.35.dsc debootstrap_1.0.35.tar.gz debootstrap_1.0.35_all.deb debootstrap-udeb_1.0.35_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qr7z9-00076q...@franck.debian.org
Bug#637297: marked as done (FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD)
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:17:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#637297: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.35 has caused the Debian Bug report #637297, regarding FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 637297: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637297 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.34 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd debootstrap fails to build from source on GNU/kFreeBSD. Please consider attached patch to fix the problem. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.2 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.1-1-amd64 Locale: LANG=ca_AD.utf8, LC_CTYPE=ca_AD.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages debootstrap depends on: ii wget 1.12-2.1 retrieves files from the web Versions of packages debootstrap recommends: ii debian-archive-keyring2010.08.28 GnuPG archive keys of the Debian a ii gnupg 1.4.10-4 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep debootstrap suggests no packages. -- no debconf information === modified file 'Makefile' --- Makefile 2011-08-10 10:28:36 + +++ Makefile 2011-08-10 10:42:41 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ VERSION := $(shell sed 's/.*(\(.*\)).*/\ MAKEDEV := /sbin/MAKEDEV -ifneq ($(shell uname),GNU) +ifeq ($(shell uname),Linux) all: devices.tar.gz else all: @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ install: chown root:root $(DESTDIR)/usr/sbin/debootstrap chmod 0755 $(DESTDIR)/usr/sbin/debootstrap -ifneq ($(shell uname),GNU) +ifeq ($(shell uname),Linux) install -o root -g root -m 0644 devices.tar.gz $(DSDIR)/ endif === modified file 'debian/control' --- debian/control 2011-08-10 10:28:36 + +++ debian/control 2011-08-10 10:42:41 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Section: admin Priority: extra Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Uploaders: Anthony Towns , Joey Hess , Junichi Uekawa , Colin Watson -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50), makedev (>= 2.3.1-69) [!hurd-i386] +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50), makedev (>= 2.3.1-69) [linux-any] Standards-Version: 3.9.2 Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=d-i/debootstrap.git Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/d-i/debootstrap.git --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: debootstrap Source-Version: 1.0.35 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of debootstrap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: debootstrap-udeb_1.0.35_all.udeb to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_1.0.35_all.udeb debootstrap_1.0.35.dsc to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.35.dsc debootstrap_1.0.35.tar.gz to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.35.tar.gz debootstrap_1.0.35_all.deb to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.35_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 637...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Colin Watson (supplier of updated debootstrap package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:04:41 +0100 Source: debootstrap Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.35 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Colin Watson Description: debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian system debootstrap-udeb - Bootstrap the Debian system (udeb) Closes: 637297 637298 Changes: debootstrap (1.0.35) unstable; urgency=low . [ Robert Millan ] * Don't build devices.tar.gz if building on GNU/kFreeBSD (closes: #637297). * Don't use --arch when we specifically care about the host architecture (closes: #637298). Checksums-Sha1: f1e8686ad84345118580d9e9d4537a3b3bbb2bf0 1747 debootstrap_1.0.35.dsc 413b88949666b4c753e8f5e9a54c53413d80d12b 54541 debootstrap_1.0.35.tar.gz c4f6bc8579db91e07cbde44d612eb7553f2f51e4 57806 debootstrap_1.0.35_all.deb 3dcc3da26237c74998dbe9a06e72372160b957b4 18896 debootstrap-udeb_1.0.35_all.udeb Checksums-Sha256: c1e7e45d60ce86ed40478c000f9dacbbe2dcd24afecd019de
Bug#637298: marked as done (broken cross-debootstraps (--foreign) with host=kfreebsd and target=linux)
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:17:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#637298: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.35
has caused the Debian Bug report #637298,
regarding broken cross-debootstraps (--foreign) with host=kfreebsd and
target=linux
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
637298: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637298
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.34
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
While cross-deboostraping a linux-i386 chroot using kfreebsd-amd64 host:
$ sudo debootstrap --foreign --arch=i386 squeeze /tmp/test
/usr/sbin/debootstrap: 425: cannot create /tmp/test/test-dev-null: Invalid
argument
E: Cannot install into target '/tmp/test' mounted with noexec or nodev
the problem here is that $ARCH stores the target architecture, but it is used
for tests where only the host architecture is relevant.
Please consider attached patch to fix the problem by adding a new variable,
$HOST_ARCH, for the host architecture.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.2
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.1-1-amd64
Locale: LANG=ca_AD.utf8, LC_CTYPE=ca_AD.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages debootstrap depends on:
ii wget 1.12-2.1 retrieves files from the web
Versions of packages debootstrap recommends:
ii debian-archive-keyring2010.08.28 GnuPG archive keys of the Debian a
ii gnupg 1.4.10-4 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep
debootstrap suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
=== modified file 'debootstrap'
--- debootstrap 2011-08-10 10:28:36 +
+++ debootstrap 2011-08-10 10:48:04 +
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ KEYRING=""
DISABLE_KEYRING=""
VARIANT=""
ARCH=""
+HOST_ARCH=""
KEEP_DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR=""
USE_DEBIANINSTALLER_INTERACTION=""
SECOND_STAGE_ONLY=""
@@ -389,20 +390,24 @@ fi
###
-if [ "$ARCH" != "" ]; then
- true
-elif [ -x /usr/bin/dpkg ] && \
+if [ -x /usr/bin/dpkg ] && \
/usr/bin/dpkg --print-architecture >/dev/null 2>&1; then
- ARCH=`/usr/bin/dpkg --print-architecture`
+ HOST_ARCH=`/usr/bin/dpkg --print-architecture`
elif type udpkg >/dev/null 2>&1 && \
udpkg --print-architecture >/dev/null 2>&1; then
- ARCH=`/usr/bin/udpkg --print-architecture`
+ HOST_ARCH=`/usr/bin/udpkg --print-architecture`
elif [ -e $DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR/arch ]; then
- ARCH=`cat $DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR/arch`
+ HOST_ARCH=`cat $DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR/arch`
else
error 1 WHATARCH "Couldn't work out current architecture"
fi
+if [ "$ARCH" != "" ]; then
+ true
+else
+ ARCH=$HOST_ARCH
+fi
+
if [ "$TARGET" = "/" ]; then
CHROOT_CMD=""
elif doing_variant scratchbox; then
=== modified file 'functions'
--- functions 2011-08-10 10:28:36 +
+++ functions 2011-08-10 10:47:04 +
@@ -938,7 +938,7 @@ clear_mtab () {
}
setup_proc () {
- case "$ARCH" in
+ case "$HOST_ARCH" in
kfreebsd-*)
umount_on_exit /dev
umount_on_exit /proc
@@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ setup_devices () {
return 0
fi
- case "$ARCH" in
+ case "$HOST_ARCH" in
kfreebsd-*)
in_target mount -t devfs devfs /dev ;;
hurd-*)
@@ -1198,7 +1198,7 @@ get_next_predep () {
check_sane_mount () {
mkdir -p "$1"
- case "$ARCH" in
+ case "$HOST_ARCH" in
kfreebsd-*|hurd-*)
;;
*)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: debootstrap
Source-Version: 1.0.35
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debootstrap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.35_all.udeb
to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_1.0.35_all.udeb
debootstrap_1.0.35.dsc
to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.35.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.35.tar.gz
to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.35.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.35_all.deb
to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.35_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 637...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distributio
debootstrap_1.0.35_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: debootstrap-udeb_1.0.35_all.udeb to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_1.0.35_all.udeb debootstrap_1.0.35.dsc to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.35.dsc debootstrap_1.0.35.tar.gz to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.35.tar.gz debootstrap_1.0.35_all.deb to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.35_all.deb Override entries for your package: debootstrap-udeb_1.0.35_all.udeb - extra debian-installer debootstrap_1.0.35.dsc - source admin debootstrap_1.0.35_all.deb - extra admin Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 637297 637298 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qr7it-0007wt...@franck.debian.org
Bug#571523: marked as done (debootstrap "--foreign" should not perform check_sane_mount())
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:59:26 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#637297 closed by Colin Watson (Bug#637297: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.35) has caused the Debian Bug report #571523, regarding debootstrap "--foreign" should not perform check_sane_mount() to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 571523: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571523 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.22 Hi. The kfreebsd-amd64 kernel is capable of limited emulation of (linux-)i386. I wanted to create chroot for test how limited it is. debootstrap --foreign --arch=i386 etch /linux http://ftp.cz.debian.org/debian It failed with: /usr/share/debootstrap/functions: line 1175: /lenny/test-dev-null: Operation not supported E: Cannot install into target '/linux' mounted with noexec or nodev It fails in the same way even iff --foreign is specified. debootstrap --foreign --arch=i386 etch /linux http://ftp.cz.debian.org/debian Please disable the check when --foreign is specified. Petr --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.0.35 I didn't notice there was already a bug for this, closing. -- Forwarded message -- From: Debian Bug Tracking System Date: 2011/8/10 Subject: Bug#637297 closed by Colin Watson (Bug#637297: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.35) To: Robert Millan This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the debootstrap package: #637297: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD It has been closed by Colin Watson . Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Colin Watson by replying to this email. -- 637297: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637297 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- Missatge reenviat -- From: Colin Watson To: 637297-cl...@bugs.debian.org Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:17:23 + Subject: Bug#637297: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.35 Source: debootstrap Source-Version: 1.0.35 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of debootstrap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: debootstrap-udeb_1.0.35_all.udeb to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_1.0.35_all.udeb debootstrap_1.0.35.dsc to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.35.dsc debootstrap_1.0.35.tar.gz to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.35.tar.gz debootstrap_1.0.35_all.deb to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.35_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 637...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Colin Watson (supplier of updated debootstrap package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:04:41 +0100 Source: debootstrap Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.35 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Colin Watson Description: debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian system debootstrap-udeb - Bootstrap the Debian system (udeb) Closes: 637297 637298 Changes: debootstrap (1.0.35) unstable; urgency=low . [ Robert Millan ] * Don't build devices.tar.gz if building on GNU/kFreeBSD (closes: #637297). * Don't use --arch when we specifically care about the host architecture (closes: #637298). Checksums-Sha1: f1e8686ad84345118580d9e9d4537a3b3bbb2bf0 1747 debootstrap_1.0.35.dsc 413b88949666b4c753e8f5e9a54c53413d80d12b 54541 debootstrap_1.0.35.tar.gz c4f6bc8579db91e07cbde44d612eb7553f2f51e4 57806 debootstrap_1.0.35_all.deb 3dcc3da26237c74998dbe9a06e72372160b957b4 18896 debootstrap-udeb_1.0.35_all.udeb Checksums-Sha256: c1e7e45d60ce86ed40478c000f9dacbbe2dcd24afecd019dec6104476466d9e2 1747 debootstrap_1.0.35.dsc 2f75bcc552c2fc5b4cf843741d33b98cbe303d35587d7c5bb0b3ef1e6eacabcb 54541 debootstrap_1.0.35.tar.gz 66d165c58594ddaa5c34f4d7894a1f30568c5483d953203a7bfa465496e1f57a 57806 debootstrap_1.0.35_all.deb fe3e358c23efe0d87e050d5b10ebddbd215a08f9bf4abc29b18b2216bf5de500 1889
Processed: forcibly merging 637298 571523
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 637298 571523 Bug#637298: broken cross-debootstraps (--foreign) with host=kfreebsd and target=linux Bug#571523: debootstrap "--foreign" should not perform check_sane_mount() Forcibly Merged 571523 637298. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 571523: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571523 637298: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637298 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131298264121187.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#637339: debian-installer: Adapt the script to run d-i to the Linkstation Mini.
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20110106+squeeze3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-CC: Martin Michlmayr
Hi,
Attached is a patch to add support for the Buffalo Linkstation Mini into
the script used to run d-i. Reviewed by Martin Michlmayr, I included his
suggestions.
Regards,
benjamin
diff --git a/build/boot/arm/lspro-config-debian b/build/boot/arm/lspro-config-debian
index 05e979e..95be499 100644
--- a/build/boot/arm/lspro-config-debian
+++ b/build/boot/arm/lspro-config-debian
@@ -5,19 +5,19 @@
NVRAM=$(which nvram)
FW_PRINTENV=$(which fw_printenv)
-path=$(mount | grep ext[23] | sed -n '/sda1/ {s/\/dev\/sda1 on \(.*\) type.*/\1/; p}')
+path=$(mount | grep ext[23] | sed -n '/sda1\|md0/ {s/\/dev\/\(sda1\|md0\) on \(.*\) type.*/\2/; p}')
if [ -z "$path" ]; then
- echo "You have to create an ext2 filesystem on /dev/sda1"
+ echo "You have to create an ext2 filesystem on /dev/sda1 or /dev/md0"
exit 1
fi
if [ ! -e $path/uImage.buffalo ]; then
- echo "You have to download the uImage.buffalo file from the debian-installer for Linkstation Pro/Live, and put it in $path"
+ echo "You have to download the uImage.buffalo file from the debian-installer for Linkstation, and put it in $path"
exit 1
fi
if [ ! -e $path/initrd.buffalo ]; then
- echo "You have to download the initrd.buffalo file from the debian-installer for Linkstation Pro/Live, and put it in $path"
+ echo "You have to download the initrd.buffalo file from the debian-installer for Linkstation, and put it in $path"
exit 1
fi
diff --git a/build/config/armel/orion5x/network-console.cfg b/build/config/armel/orion5x/network-console.cfg
index 61efb6e..7e86100 100644
--- a/build/config/armel/orion5x/network-console.cfg
+++ b/build/config/armel/orion5x/network-console.cfg
@@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ lsmini:
cp $(TEMP)/ls-wsgl/kernel.uboot $(SOME_DEST)/$(EXTRANAME)/buffalo/ls-wsgl/uImage.buffalo
mkimage -A arm -O linux -T ramdisk -C gzip -a 0x0200 -e 0x0200 -n "debian-installer ramdisk" -d $(TEMP_INITRD) $(TEMP)/ls-wsgl/initrd.uboot
cp $(TEMP)/ls-wsgl/initrd.uboot $(SOME_DEST)/$(EXTRANAME)/buffalo/ls-wsgl/initrd.buffalo
+ install -m 744 boot/arm/lspro-config-debian $(SOME_DEST)/$(EXTRANAME)/buffalo/ls-wsgl/config-debian
+ update-manifest $(SOME_DEST)/$(EXTRANAME)/buffalo/ls-wsgl/config-debian "Script to run debian-installer"
update-manifest $(SOME_DEST)/$(EXTRANAME)/buffalo/ls-wsgl/uImage.buffalo "Linux kernel for Linkstation Mini"
update-manifest $(SOME_DEST)/$(EXTRANAME)/buffalo/ls-wsgl/initrd.buffalo "initrd for Linkstation Mini"
Bug#637340: partman-ext3: check for ext[23] /boot on Linkstation Mini too
Package: partman-ext3 Version: 65 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch X-Debbugs-CC: Martin Michlmayr Hi, Attached is a patch to add a check for the Buffalo Linkstation Mini as it's being supported by d-i. Linkstation LiveV3 might also be included one day, but I can't test this as I don't have the hardware. Regards, benjamin diff --git a/check.d/ext2_or_ext3_boot b/check.d/ext2_or_ext3_boot index cde0de0..e32d795 100755 --- a/check.d/ext2_or_ext3_boot +++ b/check.d/ext2_or_ext3_boot @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ case $ARCH in arm*) machine=$(grep "^Hardware" /proc/cpuinfo | sed 's/Hardware\s*:\s*//') || true case "$machine" in - "Buffalo Linkstation Pro/Live" | "Buffalo/Revogear Kurobox Pro") + "Buffalo Linkstation Pro/Live" | "Buffalo/Revogear Kurobox Pro" \ + | "Buffalo Linkstation Mini") ;; "GLAN Tank") ;;
Re: Bug#637297: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Mmm, debootstrap should actually be an Arch:any package then. ATM, > if one uploads it from kfreebsd or hurd, Linux systems won't have > devices.tar.gz. That's a special case of the general problem that there exist Architecture: all packages which must be built on a subset of architectures. I would rather not solve it by changing debootstrap to Architecture: any, as it will be solved differently once ftpmaster changes to throwaway-binary uploads; I spoke with Mark Hymers at DebConf and he's aware of the general problem. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810153903.gc2...@riva.dynamic.greenend.org.uk
Bug#637339: Debian installer for Buffalo LS Live (LS-CHL) and Mini (LS-WSGL)
Hi Hector, Le mercredi 10 août 2011 à 16:27 +0100, Hector Oron a écrit : > 2011/8/10 Martin Michlmayr : > > * Benjamin Cama [2011-08-04 18:20]: > > >> Thanks. I will submit this patch if you think it's ok. > > > Sure. Presumably Hector Oron will apply the patch for you when you > > file a bug. > > Sure, but I'll need Benjamin to test it, as I do not own such device. As I said some time ago in this thread, I don't have the original system on my Mini anymore, and it's too much burden for me to install it back just to test that, sorry. Still, I “tested” this script by running it on my lsmini with Debian, with busybox applets for mount/grep/sed, and it worked OK. I know this isn't really a true /real/ conditions testing, but it looks “right enough” to me. Regards, benjamin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1312991486.12678.21.camel@localhost.localdomain
Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system
Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.35 debootstrap was install per the manual install method in section "D.3.2. Install debootstrap" of http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/apds03.html.en The result: # /usr/sbin/debootstrap --arch=amd64 squeeze /mnt/deb /http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian E: Couldn't work out current architecture Removing the "=" makes no difference. This is on an up-to-date CentOS 5.6 system: # uname -a Linux xxx.yyy.local 2.6.18-194.11.4.el5 #1 SMP Tue Sep 21 05:04:09 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I suggest that debootstrap should accept the --arch specification rather than try to "work out" what it is by whatever method. Or if its attempt to "work out" the architecture fails, it should offer the user a chance to over ride its failure and simply accept the architecture specified. Whit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810161936.ga20...@black.transpect.com
Bug#637366: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system
Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.35 Follow up on the report I just submitted. > # /usr/sbin/debootstrap --arch=amd64 squeeze /mnt/deb > /http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian > E: Couldn't work out current architecture Note that kludging the debootstrap script at line 402 as follows: else # error 1 WHATARCH "Couldn't work out current architecture" ARCH="amd64" fi results in a successful install. This is not a system with dpkg installed. (There is no convenient rpm of it in the CentOS 5.6 or RPMforge repositories.) In any case the --arch=amd64 flag should be accepted, as the help screen says of it "use if no dpkg." Whit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810163646.ga22...@black.transpect.com
Bug#637339: Debian installer for Buffalo LS Live (LS-CHL) and Mini (LS-WSGL)
Hello, 2011/8/10 Benjamin Cama : >> >> Thanks. I will submit this patch if you think it's ok. >> >> > Sure. Presumably Hector Oron will apply the patch for you when you >> > file a bug. Patch applied on version control system. Thanks. -- Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. -- Would you like to make a donation for Debian Conference? ** http://debconf11.debconf.org/payments.xhtml ** -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caodfwefag-1qiaf0hpcpxl2ctakigpxvozrdogvdzm30mq7...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#637366: Acknowledgement (debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system)
Please discard this. Resent to the original bug report. Didn't know how your system worked. - Whit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810164122.ga23...@black.transpect.com
Processed: merging 637366 637363
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 637366 637363 Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system Bug#637366: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system Merged 637363 637366. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637366: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637366 637363: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637363 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13129994351869.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system
Whit Blauvelt, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 12:19:36 -0400, a écrit : > # /usr/sbin/debootstrap --arch=amd64 squeeze /mnt/deb > /http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian There is a spurious '/' in front of http:// Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810180609.gw23...@type.famille.thibault.fr
Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system
That's spurious in my report because of not fully undoing my text editor's word wrap "feature," which broke the line there and started the second line with "# /" - I only noticed the "# " part when I reunited it. Anyway, the bug occurred without the spurious "/". Sorry that confused the report. Whit On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:06:09PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Whit Blauvelt, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 12:19:36 -0400, a écrit : > > # /usr/sbin/debootstrap --arch=amd64 squeeze /mnt/deb > > /http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian > > There is a spurious '/' in front of http:// > > Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810181315.ga29...@black.transpect.com
Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system
Just to verify my memory, I checked the history, and all test invocations indeed were: /usr/sbin/debootstrap --arch=amd64 squeeze /mnt/deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian (aside from also trying "--arch amd64") Sorry again for the stray "/" in the report. Whit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810181933.ga30...@black.transpect.com
Processing of cdebconf_0.157_amd64.changes
cdebconf_0.157_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdebconf_0.157.dsc cdebconf_0.157.tar.gz cdebconf-priority_0.157_all.udeb cdebconf_0.157_amd64.deb cdebconf-gtk_0.157_amd64.deb libdebconfclient0_0.157_amd64.deb libdebconfclient0-dev_0.157_amd64.deb cdebconf-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb cdebconf-text-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qrdma-0001no...@franck.debian.org
Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system
retitle 637363 should fallback to uname to determine current architecture thanks Whit Blauvelt, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 12:19:36 -0400, a écrit : > # /usr/sbin/debootstrap --arch=amd64 squeeze /mnt/deb > /http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian > E: Couldn't work out current architecture > > Removing the "=" makes no difference. > > This is on an up-to-date CentOS 5.6 system: > > # uname -a > Linux xxx.yyy.local 2.6.18-194.11.4.el5 #1 SMP Tue Sep 21 05:04:09 EDT 2010 > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > I suggest that debootstrap should accept the --arch specification rather > than try to "work out" what it is by whatever method. --arch is the target architecture, not the current architecture. It needs the latter to know how to deal with some details. debootstrap should probably resort to uname in such case. It used to provide an arch file providing the info but not any more at since 2005... Actually all we seem to need nowadays is linux vs freebsd vs hurd, so `uname` should be enough. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810183412.ga29...@type.famille.thibault.fr
Bug#442293: marked as done (needs a dpkg-preconfigure)
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:32:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#442293: fixed in cdebconf 0.157 has caused the Debian Bug report #442293, regarding needs a dpkg-preconfigure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 442293: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=442293 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: cdebconf Version: 0.120 Severity: wishlist To be a full debconf replacement, a dpkg-preconfigure for cdebconf would be nice. We could get away without one, but then we'd lose grouping the debconf questions at the start of the install or upgrade, and I feel that's a useful debconf feature, really.. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages cdebconf depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.18.0-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.6.1-2GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo-directfb21.4.10-1 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libdebian-installer4 0.52 Library of common debian-installer ii libglib2.0-0 2.14.0-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk-directfb-2.0-0 2.10.13-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtk2.0-0 2.10.13-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libnewt0.52 0.52.2-11 Not Erik's Windowing Toolkit - tex ii libpango1.0-0 1.18.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libtextwrap1 0.1-5 text-wrapping library with i18n - cdebconf recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: cdebconf Source-Version: 0.157 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cdebconf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb cdebconf-gtk_0.157_amd64.deb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk_0.157_amd64.deb cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb cdebconf-priority_0.157_all.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.157_all.udeb cdebconf-text-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-text-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb cdebconf-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb cdebconf_0.157.dsc to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.157.dsc cdebconf_0.157.tar.gz to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.157.tar.gz cdebconf_0.157_amd64.deb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.157_amd64.deb libdebconfclient0-dev_0.157_amd64.deb to main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0-dev_0.157_amd64.deb libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb libdebconfclient0_0.157_amd64.deb to main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0_0.157_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 442...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Regis Boudin (supplier of updated cdebconf package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:50:48 +0100 Source: cdebconf Binary: cdebconf cdebconf-gtk libdebconfclient0 libdebconfclient0-dev cdebconf-udeb cdebconf-priority libdebconfclient0-udeb cdebconf-text-udeb cdebconf-slang-udeb cdebconf-newt-udeb cdebconf-gtk-udeb Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 0.157 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Regis Boudin Description: cdebconf - Debian Configuration Management System (C-implementation) cdebconf-gtk - Gtk+ frontend for Debian Configuration Management System cdebconf-gtk-udeb - Gtk+ frontend for Debian Configuration Management System (udeb) cdebconf-newt-udeb - Newt frontend for Debian Configuration Management System (udeb) cdebconf-priority - Change debconf prio
Bug#451130: marked as done (cdebconf deb does not initalise the template database, which is needed to work out of the box)
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:32:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#451130: fixed in cdebconf 0.157 has caused the Debian Bug report #451130, regarding cdebconf deb does not initalise the template database, which is needed to work out of the box to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 451130: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=451130 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: debconf Version: 1.5.17 Severity: wishlist This is part of the long term mass bug filing for cross build support: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/11/msg00116.html No patch this time, as I'm not sure how debconf would actually fit these changes into the Debian package. Emdebian is using cdebconf and removing perl from 'Essential' so there is no place for debconf as-is. Unfortunately, cdebconf is not complete when used alone; two problems exist. 1. cdebconf wants /usr/share/debconf/confmodule 2. cdebconf does not initialise the debconf template database. Emdebian is working around this by creating a 'debconf-shell' package that includes: drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 ./ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 ./usr/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 ./usr/share/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 ./usr/share/debconf/ -rw-r--r-- root/root 2577 ./usr/share/debconf/confmodule -rwxr-xr-x root/root 1844 ./usr/share/debconf/demo -rw-r--r-- root/root 5174 ./usr/share/debconf/demo.templates Described as: Package: debconf-shell Source: debconf Version: 1.5.17em1 Architecture: all Maintainer: Debconf Developers Installed-Size: 48 Depends: cdebconf Section: devel Priority: extra Description: debconf confmodule shell library This package contains the usr/share/debconf/confmodule shell library to retrieve debconf values without perl. . It also bypasses the DEBCONF_USE_CDEBCONF environment variable which can be problematic during installations. (You can ignore the em1 suffix to the version string, that just helps Emdebian separate our packages from Debian test builds from the same source.) Note that Emdebian does not use 'Essential:' at all and I have no preference for whether this package should be essential - Emdebian will throw away the 'Essential:' tag anyway. However, if this new package were to become the home of /usr/share/debconf/confmodule in Debian (as would probably be necessary), it would probably need the same Priority etc. as debconf itself. I am using this postinst for debconf-shell: #!/bin/sh set -e if [ "$1" = configure ]; then export DEBCONF_USE_CDEBCONF=true # emdebian initialise database with demo templates. /usr/lib/cdebconf/debconf-loadtemplate /usr/share/debconf/demo /usr/share/debconf/demo.templates fi #DEBHELPER# This works for us. (TM) :-) The demo template produces a bit of unwanted output so there may be a smoother way of initialising the template database without output and that would be useful. I was also wondering if this could be a new *source* package as well as a new binary because then Emdebian would not need to patch out 90% of the existing debconf debian/* content to build debconf-shell. (why cross-build perl to cross-build debconf when Emdebian won't be using either perl or debconf?) Alternatively, maybe these changes need to be migrated from debconf into cdebconf? (One less package for me to cross build.) -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages debconf depends on: ii debconf-i18n 1.5.17 full internationalization support ii perl-base 5.8.8-11.1 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis Versions of packages debconf recommends: ii apt-utils 0.7.9 APT utility programs -- debconf information: debconf-apt-progress/title: debconf-apt-progress/info: * debconf/priority: medium debconf-apt-progress/preparing: debconf-apt-progress/media-change: * debconf/frontend: Gnome --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: cdebconf Source-Version: 0.157 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cdebconf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb cdebconf-gtk_0.157_amd64.deb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk_0
Bug#537536: marked as done (missing hacks to run config script, do template autoload, etc)
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:32:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#537536: fixed in cdebconf 0.157 has caused the Debian Bug report #537536, regarding missing hacks to run config script, do template autoload, etc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 537536: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537536 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: cdebconf Version: 0.146 Severity: normal perl debconf, in the "frontend" program, has complicated probing that figures out the package whose postinst script is being run, and loads the corresponding templates file and runs the corresponding config script first. (Etc.) cdebconf is missing all that ugliness. It is not needed in d-i, because udpkg kindly loads the templates, and udebs don't have config scripts. But, to replace perl debconf, all that nastiness needs to be replicated in cdebconf. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages cdebconf depends on: ii debconf 1.5.27 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.9-19 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libdebian-installer4 0.63 Library of common debian-installer ii libnewt0.52 0.52.10-4 Not Erik's Windowing Toolkit - tex ii libslang2 2.1.4-3The S-Lang programming library - r ii libtextwrap1 0.1-8 text-wrapping library with i18n - cdebconf recommends no packages. Versions of packages cdebconf suggests: pn cdebconf-gtk (no description available) -- no debconf information -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: cdebconf Source-Version: 0.157 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cdebconf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb cdebconf-gtk_0.157_amd64.deb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk_0.157_amd64.deb cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb cdebconf-priority_0.157_all.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.157_all.udeb cdebconf-text-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-text-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb cdebconf-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb cdebconf_0.157.dsc to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.157.dsc cdebconf_0.157.tar.gz to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.157.tar.gz cdebconf_0.157_amd64.deb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.157_amd64.deb libdebconfclient0-dev_0.157_amd64.deb to main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0-dev_0.157_amd64.deb libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb libdebconfclient0_0.157_amd64.deb to main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0_0.157_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 537...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Regis Boudin (supplier of updated cdebconf package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:50:48 +0100 Source: cdebconf Binary: cdebconf cdebconf-gtk libdebconfclient0 libdebconfclient0-dev cdebconf-udeb cdebconf-priority libdebconfclient0-udeb cdebconf-text-udeb cdebconf-slang-udeb cdebconf-newt-udeb cdebconf-gtk-udeb Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 0.157 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Regis Boudin Description: cdebconf - Debian Configuration Management System (C-implementation) cdebconf-gtk - Gtk+ frontend for Debian Configuration Management System cdebconf-gtk-udeb - Gtk+ frontend for Debian Configuration Management System (udeb) cdebconf-newt-udeb - Newt frontend for Debian Configuration Management System (udeb) cdebconf-
cdebconf_0.157_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb cdebconf-gtk_0.157_amd64.deb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk_0.157_amd64.deb cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb cdebconf-priority_0.157_all.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.157_all.udeb cdebconf-text-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-text-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb cdebconf-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb cdebconf_0.157.dsc to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.157.dsc cdebconf_0.157.tar.gz to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.157.tar.gz cdebconf_0.157_amd64.deb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.157_amd64.deb libdebconfclient0-dev_0.157_amd64.deb to main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0-dev_0.157_amd64.deb libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb libdebconfclient0_0.157_amd64.deb to main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0_0.157_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb - optional debian-installer cdebconf-gtk_0.157_amd64.deb - optional admin cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb - optional debian-installer cdebconf-priority_0.157_all.udeb - standard debian-installer cdebconf-text-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb - optional debian-installer cdebconf-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb - standard debian-installer cdebconf_0.157.dsc - source utils cdebconf_0.157_amd64.deb - extra utils libdebconfclient0-dev_0.157_amd64.deb - optional libdevel libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb - optional debian-installer libdebconfclient0_0.157_amd64.deb - optional libs Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 442293 451130 537536 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qrdzh-0002qz...@franck.debian.org
Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:34:12PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > --arch is the target architecture, not the current architecture. It > needs the latter to know how to deal with some details. debootstrap > should probably resort to uname in such case. Note in the default case (if I understand correctly now) debootstrap assumes that the current architecture shown by dpkg is also the target architecture. Why not also assume the reverse - that if the target architecture is specified through --arch and the current architecture is not discovered, the current architecture should be assumed the same as the target? Also note "target" is an ambiguous term - the target in normal English is the existing object which receives the new thing (as when the target is a dartboard, and the new element introduced the dart), so the use of "target architecture" in the --help screen misleads a number of people besides me - as I see from Googling the error message. Thanks, Whit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810190915.ga...@black.transpect.com
Bug#637363: ***SPAM*** Re: Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system
Whit Blauvelt, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 15:09:15 -0400, a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:34:12PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > --arch is the target architecture, not the current architecture. It > > needs the latter to know how to deal with some details. debootstrap > > should probably resort to uname in such case. > > Note in the default case (if I understand correctly now) debootstrap assumes > that the current architecture shown by dpkg is also the target architecture. > Why not also assume the reverse - that if the target architecture is > specified through --arch and the current architecture is not discovered, the > current architecture should be assumed the same as the target? There's no reason why we shouldn't just trust uname. > Also note "target" is an ambiguous term - the target in normal English is > the existing object which receives the new thing That is the meaning here: on which machine you will run the installed debian system. > (as when the target is a > dartboard, and the new element introduced the dart), so the use of "target > architecture" in the --help screen misleads a number of people besides me - > as I see from Googling the error message. It's probably simply that nobody up to now reported the issue to get it actually fixed... Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810191331.gb23...@type.famille.thibault.fr
Bug#637363: ***SPAM*** Re: Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:13:31PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Also note "target" is an ambiguous term - the target in normal English is > > the existing object which receives the new thing > > That is the meaning here: on which machine you will run the installed > debian system. Ah, but when debootstrap is being used to install Debian into a chroot then the meaning of "target" can be mistaken to mean the architecture hosting the chroot - the one which is running debootstrap in this case - rather than the architecture to be used by Debian within the chroot. That is, with a CentOS machine installing Debian to a chroot, the "target" architecture can be misunderstood to be the CentOS architecture, rather than the architecture of what you're throwing onto that target, which is Debian. Whit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810194923.ga4...@black.transpect.com
Bug#637363: ***SPAM*** Re: Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system
Whit Blauvelt, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 15:49:23 -0400, a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:13:31PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > Also note "target" is an ambiguous term - the target in normal English is > > > the existing object which receives the new thing > > > > That is the meaning here: on which machine you will run the installed > > debian system. > > Ah, but when debootstrap is being used to install Debian into a chroot then > the meaning of "target" can be mistaken to mean the architecture hosting the > chroot - the one which is running debootstrap in this case - rather than the > architecture to be used by Debian within the chroot. It can't be the "target" of debootstrap, since debootstrap is already running in it. Think of it (the host, Centos) as the hand which is holding the dart (debootstrap) to the target (the actual machine running the just-installed Debian, which may or may not be Centos). Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810195236.gc23...@type.famille.thibault.fr
Bug#637363: ***SPAM*** Re: Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:52:36PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > It can't be the "target" of debootstrap, since debootstrap is already > running in it. Think of it (the host, Centos) as the hand which is > holding the dart (debootstrap) to the target (the actual machine running > the just-installed Debian, which may or may not be Centos). Once you've explained it, I understand your technical use of "target" to mean what you mean by it. I'm only suggesting it is ambiguous, so that other people may easily misunderstand it in the context of building in a chroot, where the "target" may be misinterpreted to mean the host of the chroot. Again, once you've clarified it, it's clear. But the term "target," without the clarification, can confuse - as in "I'm going to throw Debian into a chroot on this CentOS box. | CentOS | || Debian > | | chroot | | || || Now, is the target named "CentOS," or named "chroot"? That's the ambiguity. Googling the --arch error shows I'm not the only one to take the wrong fork in the road of intrepretation there. Best, Whit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810202100.ga5...@black.transpect.com
Bug#637363: ***SPAM*** Re: Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system
clone 637363 -1 retitle -1 explain what "target" means severity -1 wishlist thanks Whit Blauvelt, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 16:21:00 -0400, a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:52:36PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > It can't be the "target" of debootstrap, since debootstrap is already > > running in it. Think of it (the host, Centos) as the hand which is > > holding the dart (debootstrap) to the target (the actual machine running > > the just-installed Debian, which may or may not be Centos). > > Once you've explained it, I understand your technical use of "target" to > mean what you mean by it. I'm only suggesting it is ambiguous, so that other > people may easily misunderstand it in the context of building in a chroot, > where the "target" may be misinterpreted to mean the host of the chroot. > Again, once you've clarified it, it's clear. But the term "target," without > the clarification, can confuse - as in "I'm going to throw Debian into a > chroot on this CentOS box. Ok, then cloning the bug. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810202432.ge23...@type.famille.thibault.fr
Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Aug 11 00:07 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Aug 11 00:08 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_ssh http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_ssh.log * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Aug 11 00:08 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_common http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_common.log * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Aug 11 00:09 buildd@rem build_malta_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_malta_netboot-2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Aug 11 00:09 buildd@rem build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Aug 11 00:10 buildd@rem build_loongson-2f_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_loongson-2f_netboot-2.6.log Totals: 108 builds (6 failed, 0 old) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qrjcy-00042e...@ravel.debian.org
