Re: "No kernel modules were found" PowerPC Businesscard and Netinst daily CDs

[Rick Thomas]

We still have this problem.  Three weeks later.


On 07/04/11 01:37, Rick Thomas wrote:


I just downloaded and burned Businesscard and Netinst CDs from


Daily build #1 for powerpc, using installer build from wheezy

These images will install the testing version of Debian, currently
Wheezy.

See the top-level daily directory for more information about the daily
builds.

This build finished at Mon Jul 4 03:38:56 UTC 2011.

Name Last modified Size

Parent Directory -
MD5SUMS.small 04-Jul-2011 05:38 143
SHA1SUMS.small 04-Jul-2011 05:38 159
SHA256SUMS.small 04-Jul-2011 05:38 207
SHA512SUMS.small 04-Jul-2011 05:38 335
debian-testing-powerpc-businesscard.iso 04-Jul-2011 05:37 78M
debian-testing-powerpc-netinst.iso 04-Jul-2011 05:38 261M


Apache/2.2.14 (Unix) Server at cdimage.debian.org Port 80


When I attempted to install (using either CD) I got


[!!] Load installer components from CD
No kernel modules were found. ...


Just thought you'd like to know...

Rick



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e2fb337.7010...@pobox.com

Bug#630000: d-i cannot receive an IP address from Mac OS X

[Michael Tokarev]

27.07.2011 05:38, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 15:04, mailto:m...@tls.msk.ru>>
> wrote:
> 
> ... 
> 
> Maybe it's a good idea to include it into squeeze-p-u, and it's
> definitely nice fix to have for sid.  I'll apply the patch to
> git later today.
> 
> Can you prepare a squeeze branch with this fix?  This seems quite
> interesting to have it fixed for next point release.

Sure, that's easy, especially since we need to prepare
the fix for udhcpc too... ;)

Actually I just forgot about this bug, will do today or
tomorrow.

Thanks,

/mjt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e2fb89e.2020...@msgid.tls.msk.ru

Bug#633725: debian-installer: On IBM x3650 M3 debian installer, language selection broken

[Damien Martins]

Le 27/07/2011 00:30, Miguel Figueiredo a écrit :

A Segunda, 25 de Julho de 2011 16:08:25 Pierre Beck você escreveu:

I have the same issue, with two current Supermicro Intel Servers. Had it
with an earlier Squeeze installer version, too, so it's not a recent
change that causes the bug.

12 CPU cores with Hyperthreading enabled (=24 virtual CPUs), 144GB RAM.

Some overflow when judging the available memory perhaps?

Can you tell if this happens too with the current daily images [1] ? or is it
restricted to Squeeze?


1 - http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-
latest/amd64/iso-cd/

I didn't see it in logs, but this computer doesn't have 144GB RAM, 
"only" 8GB.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e2fc383.1030...@makelofine.org

Bug#629146: Not reproducable (bug #629146)

[Richard Rafalski]

Am 27.07.2011 01:08, schrieb Adam Baxter:
> Thanks for testing that,
> Please see if you can attach a text version of those logs - also,

The sylog from the installation system is attached

> which ISO did you use? Was it a daily/weekly build? Which version of
> debian-installer?

I used this hd-media kernel and initrd:

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/20110726-00:16/hd-media/vmlinuz
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/20110726-00:16/hd-media/initrd.gz

and this iso:

http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/20110726-3/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-businesscard.iso

put them on an usb stick and boot the kernel and the initrd with grub
without passing any kernel parameters. isolinux have not been used for
startup

Ritchi

Jul 27 07:57:21 syslogd started: BusyBox v1.18.5
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: klogd started: BusyBox v1.18.5 (Debian 1:1.18.5-1)
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] Linux version 2.6.39-2-amd64 (Debian 
2.6.39-3) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc version 4.4.6 (Debian 4.4.6-6) ) #1 SMP 
Tue Jul 5 02:51:22 UTC 2011
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] Command line: 
BOOT_IMAGE=/installer-wheezy/amd64/hd-media/vmlinuz_20110726
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]  BIOS-e820:  - 
0009f400 (usable)
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]  BIOS-e820: 0009f400 - 
000a (reserved)
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]  BIOS-e820: 000f - 
0010 (reserved)
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]  BIOS-e820: 0010 - 
257fd000 (usable)
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]  BIOS-e820: 257fd000 - 
2580 (reserved)
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]  BIOS-e820: feffc000 - 
ff00 (reserved)
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]  BIOS-e820: fffc - 
0001 (reserved)
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] NX (Execute Disable) protection: active
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] DMI 2.4 present.
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] DMI: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] e820 update range:  - 
0001 (usable) ==> (reserved)
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] e820 remove range: 000a - 
0010 (usable)
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] No AGP bridge found
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] last_pfn = 0x257fd max_arch_pfn = 
0x4
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] MTRR default type: write-back
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] MTRR fixed ranges enabled:
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]   0-9 write-back
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]   A-B uncachable
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]   C-F write-protect
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] MTRR variable ranges enabled:
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]   0 base 00E000 mask FFE000 
uncachable
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]   1 disabled
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]   2 disabled
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]   3 disabled
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]   4 disabled
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]   5 disabled
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]   6 disabled
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]   7 disabled
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x70406, new 
0x7010600070106
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] found SMP MP-table at [880fdc00] 
fdc00
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] initial memory mapped : 0 - 2000
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] Base memory trampoline at 
[8809a000] 9a000 size 20480
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] init_memory_mapping: 
-257fd000
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]  00 - 002560 page 2M
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00]  002560 - 00257fd000 page 4k
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] kernel direct mapping tables up to 
257fd000 @ 257fa000-257fd000
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] RAMDISK: 1bcf3000 - 1c23e000
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] ACPI: RSDP 000fdbb0 00014 (v00 
BOCHS )
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] ACPI: RSDT 257fdc40 00034 (v01 
BOCHS  BXPCRSDT 0001 BXPC 0001)
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] ACPI: FACP 257ffe70 00074 (v01 
BOCHS  BXPCFACP 0001 BXPC 0001)
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] ACPI: DSDT 257fde40 01FB7 (v01   
BXPC   BXDSDT 0001 INTL 20100528)
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] ACPI: FACS 257ffe00 00040
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] ACPI: SSDT 257fdda0 0009E (v01 
BOCHS  BXPCSSDT 0001 BXPC 0001)
Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] ACPI: APIC 257fdcc0 0007

Re: "No kernel modules were found" PowerPC Businesscard and Netinstdaily CDs

[Jeroen Diederen]

Is anyone reading the powerpc list?

I sent a question about pmu_battery a while ago, I had no response.

Greetings
Jeroen

Op 27/7/2011 schreef "Rick Thomas" :

>
>We still have this problem.  Three weeks later.
>
>
>On 07/04/11 01:37, Rick Thomas wrote:
>>
>> I just downloaded and burned Businesscard and Netinst CDs from
>>
>>> Daily build #1 for powerpc, using installer build from wheezy
>>>
>>> These images will install the testing version of Debian, currently
>>> Wheezy.
>>>
>>> See the top-level daily directory for more information about the daily
>>> builds.
>>>
>>> This build finished at Mon Jul 4 03:38:56 UTC 2011.
>>>
>>> Name Last modified Size
>>>
>>> Parent Directory -
>>> MD5SUMS.small 04-Jul-2011 05:38 143
>>> SHA1SUMS.small 04-Jul-2011 05:38 159
>>> SHA256SUMS.small 04-Jul-2011 05:38 207
>>> SHA512SUMS.small 04-Jul-2011 05:38 335
>>> debian-testing-powerpc-businesscard.iso 04-Jul-2011 05:37 78M
>>> debian-testing-powerpc-netinst.iso 04-Jul-2011 05:38 261M
>>>
>>>
>>> Apache/2.2.14 (Unix) Server at cdimage.debian.org Port 80
>>
>> When I attempted to install (using either CD) I got
>>
>>> [!!] Load installer components from CD
>>> No kernel modules were found. ...
>>
>> Just thought you'd like to know...
>>
>> Rick
>
>
>--
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
>Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e2fb337.7010...@pobox.com
>
>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/hmghzela.1311754202.0840770.jjhdiede...@pop3.versatel.nl

Bug#635400: 20110725 snapshot of testing is not installable using dvd1: missing grub-pc

[Leonid Evdokimov]

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 02:12, Miguel Figueiredo  wrote:
>> ``GRUB Installation failed
>> The 'grub-pc' package failed to install into /target/. Without the
>> GRUB boot loaded the installed system will not boot.
>> ``
> Please take a look in the installation log, it may have details on what
> happened.

I have a hypothesis (I can't prove it yet as I'm not very familiar with d-i):

I had another error message that I ignored at first:
``[!!] Configure the package manager
apt configuration problem
An attempt to configure apt to install additional packages from the CD failed
``

That's why d-i could not install grub-pc. Actual grub-pc_1.99-8
package was found at the DVD and I had no network during installation,
so it could not be fetched from the internet.

I'll try to check the reason of apt-cdrom failure this evening as I
can't deduce it from syslog. I would appreciate if someone familiar
with d-i looks at the syslog file, maybe the reason of apt-cdrom
failure is obvious.
umount failure after apt-setup-udeb looks quite innocent and I see no
other errors.

> In case you want to share it so more people can take a look, please send it,
> (gzipped).

Attached copy of /var/log/syslog

--
WBRBW, Leonid Evdokimov
xmpp:l...@darkk.net.ru && http://darkk.net.ru
tel:+79816800702 && tel:+79050965222


syslog.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Re: Bug#610931: Please build wpasupplicant-udeb

[Kel Modderman]

On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 02:43:02 AM Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> 
> OK. How do you feel about me NMUing wpa_supplicant to add the udeb? I
> added an updated patch for the udeb to this mail. If you are OK I'll
> upload this as an NMU after libnl1-udeb enters the archive.

I would be very happy for you to do that.

Thanks, Kel.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201107272130.37993@otaku42.de

Re: "No kernel modules were found" PowerPC Businesscard and Netinstdaily CDs

[Lennart Sorensen]

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:10:02AM +0200, Jeroen Diederen wrote:
> Is anyone reading the powerpc list?
> 
> I sent a question about pmu_battery a while ago, I had no response.

I don't think the IBM p520 I work with has any battery. :)  I know the
RX5000 and RX1500 certainly don't which are the powerpc system I work
with most that run Debian (well kind of at least).

I don't know if I am subscribed to the powerpc list either (I am on
-boot though).  I should go subscribe to powerpc.

-- 
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110727140647.gb8...@caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca

partman-auto ignores swap preseeding

[Giuseppe Martino]

Hello,

and thanks in advance.

Using di recipe in preseeding

d-i partman-auto/expert_recipe string   \
minerep ::\
6114 6114 6114 ext3 \
$primary{ } $bootable{ }\
method{ format } format{ }  \
use_filesystem{ } filesystem{ ext3 }\
mountpoint{ / } \
.   \
4096 4096 4096 linux-swap   \
method{ swap } format{ }\
.   \
4096 4096 -1 ext3   \
$primary{ } \
method{ format } format{ }  \
use_filesystem{ } filesystem{ ext3 }\
mountpoint{ /var }  \
.   \


Given an 80GB drive. I ended up with these partitions:

/ 6GB
/var  4GB
swap  70GB

Where am I wrong?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1311777545.2887.27.ca...@monk.fi.trl

Bug#629146: marked as done (installation-reports: netinst ISO from 6/3/2011 faulty: cdrom-retriever: error: No components listed in /cdrom/dists/stable/Release)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:02:30 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#629146: fixed in iso-scan 1.36
has caused the Debian Bug report #629146,
regarding installation-reports: netinst ISO from 6/3/2011 faulty: 
cdrom-retriever: error: No components listed in /cdrom/dists/stable/Release
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
629146: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629146
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: USB
Image version:
1.  
03-Jun-2011 00:16
2.  
03-Jun-2011 00:16
3. 

 03-Jun-2011 19:11

Date: 6/3/2011

Machine: Lenovo G555
Partitions: did not get it


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O]
Detect network card:[ ]
Configure network:  [ ]
Detect CD:  [E]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:

The ISO image is detected but it cannot be used.

[…]
Jun  3 21:33:09 iso-scan: Detected ISO with 'testing' (wheezy) 
distribution
Jun  3 21:33:09 iso-scan: Detected ISO with distribution 'testing' 
(wheezy)
Jun  3 21:33:09 anna-install: Queueing udeb apt-mirror-setup for later 
installation
Jun  3 21:33:09 anna-install: Queueing udeb apt-cdrom-setup for later 
installation
Jun  3 21:33:09 anna-install: Queueing udeb -support for later 
installation
Jun  3 21:33:09 main-menu[340]: (process:1189): [sdb1] 
debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso (testing)
Jun  3 21:33:09 main-menu[340]: DEBUG: resolver (libc6-udeb): package 
doesn't exist (ignored)
Jun  3 21:33:09 main-menu[340]: INFO: Menu item 'load-iso' selected
Jun  3 21:33:09 anna[1861]: grep: /cdrom/dists/stable/Release: No such 
file or directory
Jun  3 21:33:09 cdrom-retriever: error: No components listed in 
/cdrom/dists/stable/Release.
Jun  3 21:33:48 anna[1861]: WARNING **: bad d-i Packages file
Jun  3 21:33:48 anna[1861]: grep: /cdrom/dists/stable/Release: No such 
file or directory
Jun  3 21:33:48 cdrom-retriever: error: No components listed in 
/cdrom/dists/stable/Release.
Jun  3 21:33:49 anna[1861]: WARNING **: bad d-i Packages file
Jun  3 21:33:49 anna[1861]: grep: /cdrom/dists/stable/Release: No such 
file or directory
Jun  3 21:33:49 cdrom-retriever: error: No components listed in 
/cdrom/dists/stable/Release.
Jun  3 21:34:11 anna[1861]: WARNING **: bad d-i Packages file
Jun  3 21:34:11 main-menu[340]: INFO: Menu item 'load-iso' succeeded 
but requested to be left unconfigured.
Jun  3 21:34:11 main-menu[340]: DEBUG: resolver (libc6-udeb): package 
doesn't exist (ignored)
Jun  3 21:34:16 main-menu[340]: INFO: Menu item 'save-logs' selected
Jun  3 21:34:24 main-menu[340]: DEBUG: resolver (libc6-udeb): package 
doesn't exist (ignored)
Jun  3 21:34:29 main-menu[340]: INFO: Menu item 'save-logs' selected
[…]

The ISO should be fine since the checksums match [1].

e7ea8d241d9006d007e91c38f7252c456d4965bcae0412e8a1339fce64591122  
debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso

$ sha256sum /media/debian-installer/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso 
e7ea8d241d9006d007e91c38f7252c456d4965bcae0412e8a1339fce64591122  
/media/debian-installer/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso


[1] 
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/SHA256SUMS.small


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: iso-scan
Source-Version: 1.36

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
iso-scan, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

iso-scan_1.36.dsc
  to main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_1.36.dsc
iso-scan_1.36.tar.gz
  to main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_1.36.tar.gz
iso-scan_1.36_all.udeb
  to main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_1.36_all.udeb
load-iso_1.36_all.udeb
  to main/i/iso-scan/load-iso_1.36_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous

Processing of iso-scan_1.36_amd64.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

iso-scan_1.36_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  iso-scan_1.36.dsc
  iso-scan_1.36.tar.gz
  iso-scan_1.36_all.udeb
  load-iso_1.36_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qm5yi-0005v7...@franck.debian.org

iso-scan_1.36_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:
iso-scan_1.36.dsc
  to main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_1.36.dsc
iso-scan_1.36.tar.gz
  to main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_1.36.tar.gz
iso-scan_1.36_all.udeb
  to main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_1.36_all.udeb
load-iso_1.36_all.udeb
  to main/i/iso-scan/load-iso_1.36_all.udeb


Override entries for your package:
iso-scan_1.36.dsc - source debian-installer
iso-scan_1.36_all.udeb - optional debian-installer
load-iso_1.36_all.udeb - extra debian-installer

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 629146 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qm5cy-0002uq...@franck.debian.org

Bug#629146: Not reproducable (bug #629146)

[Otavio Salvador]

Hello,

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:27, Richard Rafalski <
debianb...@richard-rafalski.de> wrote:

> Am 27.07.2011 01:08, schrieb Adam Baxter:
> > Thanks for testing that,
> > Please see if you can attach a text version of those logs - also,
>
> The sylog from the installation system is attached
> ...
>

I think I understood the problem. Basically the ISOs now doesn't include the
stable symlink they used to have (being it stable or not). Now they provide
the symlink that reflects the suite they are: testing -> wheezy in this
case.

I fixed iso-scan to handle it (but couldn't test it locally); please check
if tomorrow's daily works for you.

-- 
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854  http://projetos.ossystems.com.br

Bug#635400: 20110725 snapshot of testing is not installable using dvd1: missing grub-pc

[Otavio Salvador]

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:04, Leonid Evdokimov  wrote:

> ...
>
Attached copy of /var/log/syslog
>

It seems that it fails to unmount the DVD (I don't know why) but would be
nice if you could try to reproduce it again and pay attation to any detail
that might help us to reproduce it.

-- 
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854  http://projetos.ossystems.com.br

Bug#635576: marked as done (installation-reports: Dell Inspiron N5110 notebook: Intel Centrino Wireless-N 1030 needs kernel 2.6.38 from squeeze backports and non-free firmware)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:36:28 +0200
with message-id 

and subject line Re: Bug#635576: installation-reports: Dell Inspiron N5110 
notebook: Intel Centrino Wireless-N 1030 needs kernel 2.6.38 from squeeze 
backports and non-free firmware
has caused the Debian Bug report #635576,
regarding installation-reports: Dell Inspiron N5110 notebook: Intel Centrino 
Wireless-N 1030 needs kernel 2.6.38 from squeeze backports and non-free firmware
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
635576: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635576
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports
Severity: minor

Image version:  http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.2.1/amd64/iso-
cd/debian-6.0.2.1-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: Wed Jul 20 01:41:32 2011 (USA Mountain time zone)
Partitions: # parted -l
Model: ATA ST9640320AS (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 640GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos

Number  Start   End SizeType  File system Flags
 1  1049kB  106MB   105MB   primary   fat16   diag
 2  106MB   15.8GB  15.7GB  primary   ntfs
 3  15.8GB  126GB   110GB   primary   ntfs
 4  126GB   640GB   514GB   extended
 5  126GB   628GB   502GB   logical   ext4boot
 6  628GB   640GB   12.1GB  logical   linux-swap(v1)

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O]
Detect network card:[E]
Configure network:  [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Install base system:[O]
Clock/timezone setup:   [O]
User/password setup:[O]
Install tasks:  [O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Overall install:[0]

Comments/Problems:

All went well (thanks, Debian guys, y'all are great!) except the wireless
needed a bit of manual tweaking (wireline worked out of the box, no tweaking
needed).

Specifically, the Intel Centrino Wireless-N 1030 card needs some non-free
firmware and the newer 2.6.38 kernel from squeeze backports, as follows.

For the firmware,

http://wiki.debian.org/iwlwifi
http://wiki.debian.org/iwlagn

emacs /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian squeeze main contrib non-free

aptitude update
aptitude install firmware-iwlwifi wireless-tools

And for the 2.6.38 kernel,

http://backports-master.debian.org/Instructions/

emacs /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main

aptitude update
aptitude -t squeeze-backports install linux-doc-2.6.38
aptitude -t squeeze-backports install linux-headers-2.6.38-bpo.2-all
aptitude -t squeeze-backports install linux-headers-2.6.38-bpo.2-all-amd64
aptitude -t squeeze-backports install linux-headers-2.6.38-bpo.2-amd64
aptitude -t squeeze-backports install linux-headers-2.6.38-bpo.2-common
aptitude -t squeeze-backports install linux-image-2.6.38-bpo.2-amd64
aptitude -t squeeze-backports install linux-image-2.6.38-bpo.2-amd64-dbg
aptitude -t squeeze-backports install linux-kbuild-2.6.38
aptitude -t squeeze-backports install linux-manual-2.6.38
aptitude -t squeeze-backports install linux-modules-2.6.38-bpo.2-amd64
aptitude -t squeeze-backports install linux-patch-debian-2.6.38
aptitude -t squeeze-backports install linux-source-2.6.38
aptitude -t squeeze-backports install linux-support-2.6.38-bpo.2
aptitude -t squeeze-backports install linux-tools-2.6.38

Rebooted, and WiFi works just fine!

Thanks always, folks!



-- Package-specific info:

Boot method: network installer CD
Image version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.2.1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-6.0.2.1-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 

Machine: Dell Inspiron N5110 notebook
Partitions: 


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [ ]
Detect network card:[ ]
Configure network:  [ ]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:




-- 

Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report. Please compress large files using gzip.

Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org.

===

Bug#635336: debian-installer: USB install: fails to "mount CD"

[Otavio Salvador]

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:40, Adam Borowski  wrote:

> ...

Boot and initial steps of d-i go just fine.
>
> However, it later fails at the "Detect and mount CD-ROM" stage.  The
> machine
> happens to physically have one, it's just empty.  Trying to skip the stage
> doesn't work.  Only manually doing: mount -tvfat /dev/sdb /cdrom will let
> the installation to continue.
> ...


We uploaded iso-scan (1.36) with a fix that might solve this issue. Please
give a try using tomorrow's daily.

-- 
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854  http://projetos.ossystems.com.br

Re: "No kernel modules were found" PowerPC Businesscard and Netinst daily CDs

[Otavio Salvador]

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 08:41, Rick Thomas  wrote:
>
> We still have this problem.  Three weeks later.


Did you check current image? We got many issues fixed and would be nice to
do a new try. By the way, are you scanning for the ISO or booting it
directly?

-- 
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854  http://projetos.ossystems.com.br

Bug#635400: 20110725 snapshot of testing is not installable using dvd1: missing grub-pc

[Leonid Evdokimov]

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 19:32, Otavio Salvador  wrote:
> It seems that it fails to unmount the DVD (I don't know why) but would be
> nice if you could try to reproduce it again and pay attation to any detail
> that might help us to reproduce it.

I can easily reproduce it using virtualbox-ose 4.0.4-dfsg-1ubuntu4 on
ubuntu 11.04 host.

VirtualBox does not have access to the network, there is only one
host-only adapter (I use it to get syslog file).

I was able to workaround the problem in following way:

# chroot /target
# cd /dev
# ln -s sr0 scd0

I don't know why d-i hardcodes(?) scd0 device name, but there was no
such device.
I found it out while trying $(apt-cdrom ident) in the chroot.

Ok, it fixed apt problem I was prompted if I want to scan other CDs, I
had no other *.iso files, so I answered "no".
But grub-pc was not installed still, so..
 # again
# sed -i 's/# deb cdrom/deb cdrom/' /target/etc/apt/sources.list #
cdrom source was commented for some reason

And now testing is installed! yahoo!

--
WBRBW, Leonid Evdokimov
xmpp:l...@darkk.net.ru && http://darkk.net.ru
tel:+79816800702 && tel:+79050965222



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAB-U=tD4weDs=8vamdhplbfgrryob1moa5_t1ntft8d3ikb...@mail.gmail.com

Processed: reassign 597223 to partman-target, reassign 612251 to partman-target, forcibly merging 597223 612251

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 597223 partman-target
Bug #597223 [debian-installer] udev: The First partition on USB flashdrives 
always attempts to be mounted as ISOFS
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'partman-target'.
> reassign 612251 partman-target
Bug #612251 [installation-reports] Installation Report - USB install leaves 
bogus /etc/fstab file wrt cdrom
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'partman-target'.
> forcemerge 597223 612251
Bug#597223: udev: The First partition on USB flashdrives always attempts to be 
mounted as ISOFS
Bug#612251: Installation Report - USB install leaves bogus /etc/fstab file wrt 
cdrom
Forcibly Merged 597223 612251.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
597223: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597223
612251: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612251
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131178318520875.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: do

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 597223 partman-target
Bug #597223 [partman-target] udev: The First partition on USB flashdrives 
always attempts to be mounted as ISOFS
Bug #612251 [partman-target] Installation Report - USB install leaves bogus 
/etc/fstab file wrt cdrom
Ignoring request to reassign bug #597223 to the same package
Ignoring request to reassign bug #612251 to the same package
> reassign 612251 partman-target
Bug #612251 [partman-target] Installation Report - USB install leaves bogus 
/etc/fstab file wrt cdrom
Bug #597223 [partman-target] udev: The First partition on USB flashdrives 
always attempts to be mounted as ISOFS
Ignoring request to reassign bug #612251 to the same package
Ignoring request to reassign bug #597223 to the same package
> forcemerge 597223 612251
Bug#597223: udev: The First partition on USB flashdrives always attempts to be 
mounted as ISOFS
Bug#612251: Installation Report - USB install leaves bogus /etc/fstab file wrt 
cdrom
Forcibly Merged 597223 612251.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
597223: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597223
612251: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612251
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13117849269364.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#597223: marked as done (udev: The First partition on USB flashdrives always attempts to be mounted as ISOFS)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:47:20 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#597223: fixed in partman-target 75
has caused the Debian Bug report #597223,
regarding udev: The First partition on USB flashdrives always attempts to be 
mounted as ISOFS
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597223: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597223
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: udev
Version: 160-1
Severity: important

I tried 4 or 5 different brands of flash drives all with the same result.
There are three partition setup on this flash drive.
sdb2 and sdb3 automount and work without any problems but
sbb1 will always attempt to mount as an ISOFS.
I'm guessing for some reason udev is assuming it's a U3 image?

kernel: [ 1603.007096] usb-storage: device found at 6
kernel: [ 1603.007101] usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before
scanning
kernel: [ 1608.007795] usb-storage: device scan complete
kernel: [ 1608.008314] scsi 9:0:0:0: Direct-Access SanDisk  SanDisk Cruzer
8.02 PQ: 0 ANSI: 0 CCS
kernel: [ 1608.010113] sd 9:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 0
kernel: [ 1608.010886] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdb] 15753215 512-byte logical blocks:
(8.06 GB/7.51 GiB)
kernel: [ 1608.011382] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
kernel: [ 1608.011385] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 45 00 00 08
kernel: [ 1608.011387] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
kernel: [ 1608.014133] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
kernel: [ 1608.014141]  sdb: sdb1 sdb2 sdb3
kernel: [ 1608.016644] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
kernel: [ 1608.016649] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI removable disk
kernel: [ 1609.068133] UDF-fs: No VRS found
kernel: [ 1609.068137] UDF-fs: Rescanning with blocksize 2048
kernel: [ 1609.602188] EXT4-fs (sdb2): mounted filesystem with ordered data
mode
kernel: [ 1609.683431] UDF-fs: No VRS found
kernel: [ 1609.683439] UDF-fs: No partition found (1)
kernel: [ 1609.726774] ISOFS: Unable to identify CD-ROM format.
ntfs-3g[3073]: Version 2010.3.6 integrated FUSE 27
ntfs-3g[3073]: Mounted /dev/sdb3 (Read-Write, label "Cruize_Ntfs", NTFS 3.1)
ntfs-3g[3073]: Cmdline options:
rw,nosuid,nodev,uhelper=udisks,uid=1000,gid=1000,dmask=0077,fmask=0177
ntfs-3g[3073]: Mount options:
rw,nosuid,nodev,uhelper=udisks,silent,allow_other,nonempty,relatime,fsname=/dev/sdb3,blkdev,blksize=4096,default_permissions
ntfs-3g[3073]: Global ownership and permissions enforced, configuration type 1
ntfs-3g[3073]: Unmounting /dev/sdb3 (Cruize_Ntfs)
kernel: [ 1749.583274] usb 3-1: USB disconnect, address 6

Unable to mount Cruize_BAD
Error mounting: mount exited with exit code 1: helper failed with:
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1,
   missing codepage or helper program, or other error
   In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
   dmesg | tail  or so

what works?
mount -t ext4 /dev/sdb1 /media/Cruize_BAD
The filesystem will mount and work fine but mount can only be used with root
priv.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages udev depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]1.5.35  Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc62.11.2-5Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libselinux1  2.0.96-1SELinux runtime shared libraries
ii  libudev0 160-1   libudev shared library
ii  libusb-0.1-4 2:0.1.12-16 userspace USB programming library
ii  lsb-base 3.2-23.1Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip
ii  util-linux   2.17.2-3.1  Miscellaneous system utilities

Versions of packages udev recommends:
ii  pciutils  1:3.1.7-5  Linux PCI Utilities
ii  usbutils  0.87-5 Linux USB utilities

udev suggests no packages.

-- debconf information:
  udev/new_kernel_needed: false
  udev/title/upgrade:
  udev/reboot_needed:


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: partman-target
Source-Version: 75

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman-target, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman-target_75.dsc
  to main/p/partman-target/partman-target_75.dsc
partman-target_75.tar.gz
  to main/p/partman-target/

Bug#612251: marked as done (Installation Report - USB install leaves bogus /etc/fstab file wrt cdrom)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:47:20 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#597223: fixed in partman-target 75
has caused the Debian Bug report #597223,
regarding Installation Report - USB install leaves bogus /etc/fstab file wrt 
cdrom
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597223: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597223
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports

Boot method:
USB stick with rc2 installer
Command line to place image on USB stick was:
# dd if=debian-squeeze-di-rc2-i386-netinst.iso of=/dev/sdc  # (on another
machine)

Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_rc2/i386/iso-cd/debian-squeeze-di-rc2-i386-netinst.iso

Date: 6 Feb 2011 (just before stable release)

Machine: Acer Aspire One ZG5 (aka A110)
Processor:  Atom
Memory:  1.5 Gb
Partitions:
FilesystemType   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 ext4 6908264   3184432   3372908  49% /
tmpfstmpfs  770960 0770960   0% /lib/init/rw
udev tmpfs  766608   204766404   1% /dev
tmpfstmpfs  770960 0770960   0% /dev/shm

Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn):
00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME Express Memory
Controller Hub [8086:27ac] (rev 03)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:015b]
Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME
Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27ae] (rev 03)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:015b]
Kernel driver in use: i915
00:02.1 Display controller [0380]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME,
943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27a6] (rev 03)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:015b]
00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family High
Definition Audio Controller [8086:27d8] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:015b]
Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel
00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family PCI Express
Port 1 [8086:27d0] (rev 02)
Kernel driver in use: pcieport
00:1c.1 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family PCI Express
Port 2 [8086:27d2] (rev 02)
Kernel driver in use: pcieport
00:1c.2 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family PCI Express
Port 3 [8086:27d4] (rev 02)
Kernel driver in use: pcieport
00:1c.3 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family PCI Express
Port 4 [8086:27d6] (rev 02)
Kernel driver in use: pcieport
00:1d.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB UHCI
Controller #1 [8086:27c8] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:015b]
Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
00:1d.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB UHCI
Controller #2 [8086:27c9] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:015b]
Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
00:1d.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB UHCI
Controller #3 [8086:27ca] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:015b]
Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
00:1d.3 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB UHCI
Controller #4 [8086:27cb] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:015b]
Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
00:1d.7 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB2 EHCI
Controller [8086:27cc] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:015b]
Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd
00:1e.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge
[8086:2448] (rev e2)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation 82801GBM (ICH7-M) LPC Interface
Bridge [8086:27b9] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:015b]
00:1f.2 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 82801GBM/GHM (ICH7 Family)
SATA IDE Controller [8086:27c4] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:015b]
Kernel driver in use: ata_piix
00:1f.3 SMBus [0c05]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family SMBus Controller
[8086:27da] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:015b]
Kernel driver in use: i801_smbus
02:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL8101E/RTL8102E PCI Express Fast Ethernet controller [10ec:8136] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:015b]
Kernel driver in use: r8169
03:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Atheros Communications Inc. AR5001
Wireless Network Adapter [168c:001c] (rev 01)
Subsystem: Foxconn International, Inc. Device [105b

Processing of partman-target_75_i386.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

partman-target_75_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-target_75.dsc
  partman-target_75.tar.gz
  partman-target_75_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qm7cw-0002vh...@franck.debian.org

partman-target_75_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:
partman-target_75.dsc
  to main/p/partman-target/partman-target_75.dsc
partman-target_75.tar.gz
  to main/p/partman-target/partman-target_75.tar.gz
partman-target_75_all.udeb
  to main/p/partman-target/partman-target_75_all.udeb


Override entries for your package:
partman-target_75.dsc - source debian-installer
partman-target_75_all.udeb - standard debian-installer

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 597223 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qm7gs-0003a2...@franck.debian.org

Processed: reassign 635400 to libdebian-installer

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 635400 libdebian-installer
Bug #635400 [installation-reports] 20110725 snapshot of testing is not 
installable using dvd1: missing grub-pc
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'libdebian-installer'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
635400: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635400
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131179895014718.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: limit source to libdebian-installer, tagging 635400

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> #libdebian-installer (0.79) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> #  * devfs: linux references the CD device as srX instead of scdX.
> #Closes: #635400.
> #
> limit source libdebian-installer
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 
'libdebian-installer'
Limit currently set to 'source':'libdebian-installer'

> tags 635400 + pending
Bug #635400 [libdebian-installer] 20110725 snapshot of testing is not 
installable using dvd1: missing grub-pc
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
635400: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635400
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131179937817715.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processing of libdebian-installer_0.79_amd64.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

libdebian-installer_0.79_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  libdebian-installer_0.79.dsc
  libdebian-installer_0.79.tar.gz
  libdebian-installer4_0.79_amd64.deb
  libdebian-installer4-dev_0.79_amd64.deb
  libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.79_amd64.udeb
  libdebian-installer-extra4_0.79_amd64.deb
  libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.79_amd64.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qmbga-0006w7...@franck.debian.org

Bug#621628: marked as done (libdebian-installer: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 27 Jul 2011 21:19:28 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#621628: fixed in libdebian-installer 0.79
has caused the Debian Bug report #621628,
regarding libdebian-installer: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying 
dependency_libs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
621628: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621628
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libdebian-installer
Severity: normal
User: codeh...@debian.org
Usertags: la-file-removal

To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed
or stripped of the dependency_libs variable.

http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html

Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script:

http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt

The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this
post to debian-devel:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html

To generate the list of packages, I've used:

grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1

The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you
have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was
parsed.

libdebian-installer appears in this list as a source package because
one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain
.la files.

In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process
behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further
dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your
package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the
dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once
libdebian-installer is fixed, the process will repeat and other
packages which you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is
important that packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs.

If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the
dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for
clarification.
-- 

Neil Williams
=
codeh...@debian.org
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libdebian-installer
Source-Version: 0.79

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libdebian-installer, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.79_amd64.udeb
  to 
main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.79_amd64.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.79_amd64.deb
  to main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.79_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.79_amd64.deb
  to main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4-dev_0.79_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.79_amd64.udeb
  to main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.79_amd64.udeb
libdebian-installer4_0.79_amd64.deb
  to main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4_0.79_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer_0.79.dsc
  to main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer_0.79.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.79.tar.gz
  to main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer_0.79.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 621...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Otavio Salvador  (supplier of updated 
libdebian-installer package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:00:47 +0200
Source: libdebian-installer
Binary: libdebian-installer4 libdebian-installer4-dev libdebian-installer4-udeb 
libdebian-installer-extra4 libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.79
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team 
Changed-By: Otavio Salvador 
Description: 
 libdebian-installer-extra4 - Library of some extra debian-installer functions
 libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb - Library of some extra debian-installer 
functions (udeb)
 libdebian-installer4 - L

Bug#635400: marked as done (20110725 snapshot of testing is not installable using dvd1: missing grub-pc)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 27 Jul 2011 21:19:28 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#635400: fixed in libdebian-installer 0.79
has caused the Debian Bug report #635400,
regarding 20110725 snapshot of testing is not installable using dvd1: missing 
grub-pc
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
635400: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635400
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: 20110725 snapshot of testing, dvd1
Image version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-dvd/debian-testing-i386-DVD-1.iso
Date: 20110725

Machine: VirtualBox VM
Processor: 1
Memory: 386 MB
Partitions: default layout

Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn):


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O]
Detect network card:[ ]
Configure network:  [ ]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Install base system:[O]
Clock/timezone setup:   [O]
User/password setup:[O]
Install tasks:  [O]
Install boot loader:[E]
Overall install:[E]

Comments/Problems:

``GRUB Installation failed
The 'grub-pc' package failed to install into /target/. Without the
GRUB boot loaded the installed system will not boot.
``

OOps :(

--
WBRBW, Leonid Evdokimov
xmpp:l...@darkk.net.ru && http://darkk.net.ru
tel:+79816800702 && tel:+79050965222


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libdebian-installer
Source-Version: 0.79

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libdebian-installer, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.79_amd64.udeb
  to 
main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.79_amd64.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.79_amd64.deb
  to main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.79_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.79_amd64.deb
  to main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4-dev_0.79_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.79_amd64.udeb
  to main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.79_amd64.udeb
libdebian-installer4_0.79_amd64.deb
  to main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4_0.79_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer_0.79.dsc
  to main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer_0.79.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.79.tar.gz
  to main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer_0.79.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 635...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Otavio Salvador  (supplier of updated 
libdebian-installer package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:00:47 +0200
Source: libdebian-installer
Binary: libdebian-installer4 libdebian-installer4-dev libdebian-installer4-udeb 
libdebian-installer-extra4 libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.79
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team 
Changed-By: Otavio Salvador 
Description: 
 libdebian-installer-extra4 - Library of some extra debian-installer functions
 libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb - Library of some extra debian-installer 
functions (udeb)
 libdebian-installer4 - Library of common debian-installer functions
 libdebian-installer4-dev - Library of common debian-installer functions
 libdebian-installer4-udeb - Library of common debian-installer functions (udeb)
Closes: 621628 635400
Changes: 
 libdebian-installer (0.79) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Hector Oron ]
   * subarch-arm-linux.c: add mx5 flavour (armhf architecture)
 .
   [ Sebastian Reichel ]
   * Add support for Nokia N900
   * Add support for Pandaboard
   * Add support for Beagleboard
 .
   [ Luk Claes ]
   * Do'nt ship .la files (Closes: #621628).
 .
   [ Otavio Salvador ]
   * devfs: linux references the CD device as srX instead of scdX.
 Closes: #635400.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 3397b4bc167ea0da2105db51cedaf6a9d5db2943 1786 libdebian-installer_0.79.dsc
 b394b3481d993b0c330d25ac9d491395d0bbe10d 386977 libdebian-installer_0.79.ta

Processing of partman-zfs_7_kfreebsd-i386.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

partman-zfs_7_kfreebsd-i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-zfs_7.dsc
  partman-zfs_7.tar.gz
  partman-zfs_7_kfreebsd-i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qmbqh-0007pf...@franck.debian.org

libdebian-installer_0.79_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.79_amd64.udeb
  to 
main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.79_amd64.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.79_amd64.deb
  to main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.79_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.79_amd64.deb
  to main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4-dev_0.79_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.79_amd64.udeb
  to main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.79_amd64.udeb
libdebian-installer4_0.79_amd64.deb
  to main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4_0.79_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer_0.79.dsc
  to main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer_0.79.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.79.tar.gz
  to main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer_0.79.tar.gz


Override entries for your package:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.79_amd64.udeb - optional debian-installer
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.79_amd64.deb - optional libs
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.79_amd64.deb - optional libdevel
libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.79_amd64.udeb - optional debian-installer
libdebian-installer4_0.79_amd64.deb - optional libs
libdebian-installer_0.79.dsc - source libs

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 621628 635400 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qmbvo-00087m...@franck.debian.org

partman-zfs_7_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:
partman-zfs_7.dsc
  to main/p/partman-zfs/partman-zfs_7.dsc
partman-zfs_7.tar.gz
  to main/p/partman-zfs/partman-zfs_7.tar.gz
partman-zfs_7_kfreebsd-i386.udeb
  to main/p/partman-zfs/partman-zfs_7_kfreebsd-i386.udeb


Override entries for your package:
partman-zfs_7.dsc - source debian-installer
partman-zfs_7_kfreebsd-i386.udeb - standard debian-installer

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qmbys-cu...@franck.debian.org

Bug#631314: [cowbuilder] --create fails when removing original tree

[Otavio Salvador]

reassign 631314 cowbuilder
thanks

Hello,

I reproduced this problem using cowbuilder at my machine and then started
trying to track it down. After checking debootstrap code it seemed it was
doing the right thing and thus I created two chroot (regular and buildd) and
removed them and all worked fine.

It does seem to be an issue with cowbuilder. Reassigning according.

-- 
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854  http://projetos.ossystems.com.br

Processed: Re: Bug#631314: [cowbuilder] --create fails when removing original tree

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 631314 cowbuilder
Bug #631314 [debootstrap] [cowbuilder] --create fails when removing original 
tree
Bug reassigned from package 'debootstrap' to 'cowbuilder'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
631314: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631314
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131180410622188.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#498731: --foreign fails due to setup_devices

[Samuel Thibault]

I haven't yet managed to run the second stage on kfreebsd (I have built
an image that should work, I just don't know how to make kfreebsd start
debootstrap instead of /sbin/init). I have tried with Linux in the
meanwhile, it fails at the device creation step in the second stage:

E: no /debootstrap/devices.tar.gz. cannot create devices

This is indeed missing.

Samuel



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110727223240.ga12...@const.dc0b.debconf.org

Bug#635657: Consider adding link to Debian Installation Guide in win32-loader.txt

[Greg Farough]

Package: win32-loader
Severity: wishlist

As win32-loader may be the first encounter many users have with Debian and its 
installer, it may be beneficial to add a link to the Installation Guide in 
win32-loader.txt so they may print it, etc.

This would be especially helpful for the network version (and sites like 
Goodbye-Microsoft), since they don't display the install discs' usual web 
browser welcome message.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.2
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (650, 'testing'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages win32-loader depends on:
ii  base-files   6.0squeeze2 Debian base system miscellaneous f

win32-loader recommends no packages.

Versions of packages win32-loader suggests:
ii  wine  1.0.1-3.1  Windows API implementation - stand



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110727225315.3329.70699.report...@aomori.ampthill.us

Re: debconf and debconf/frontend

[Regis Boudin]

Hello again,

So, after some work, I have a couple of patches. However, I would very
much like some feedback on it before pushing them.

The first one reworks completely the frontend loading to be more robust,
and better handle situations where debconf/frontend is changed,
including not crashing if selecting one which is not available.

One side effect of this is that cdebconf can load the debconf templates
file without crashing. Therefore, all templates can be loaded and the
values from the debconf database be loaded. I have a very ugly local
script to do it, which will need more work to make sure it actually
handles all transition cases possible.

The second patch reads debconf/frontend which takes precedence over the
value in the config file. Debconf does it the other way around, but this
one sounds more sensible, so I'm not sure in which order to apply it.

Then there's the issue of the debconf/frontend values not being
compatible with cdebconf, but at least now they are simply ignored.

Obviously I'm very keen on my patches being reviewed before I push them,
as it's a rather intrusive change that I don't want to get wrong.

Regis

On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 23:38 +0100, Regis Boudin wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> So, with the small patch applied to debconf, I have now switched my
> laptop to use cdebconf with DEBCONF_USE_CDEBCONF. As a result, I can see
> some real life issues.
> 
> The first one is the use of debconf/frontend. At every GO call, cdebconf
> checks its value, and if it's different from the current frontend, tries
> to load it. Since the default returned value is Dialog, cdebconf crashes
> after loading debconf.templates. Is the value actually set and used by
> d-i, is this a bit of unused code (couldn't find any template for it
> other than in debconf), should it be changed to "cdebconf/frontend" ?
> I'm seriously considering the later, but would like feedback first. I'm
> also considering reworking it to be more robbust ; so that when cdebconf
> fails to load a new frontend, it reverts to to previous one instead of
> crashing. I'm also wondering if, when calling frontend_new(), the value
> from the database should be checked and take precedence over the default
> from the config file.
> 
> Any comment on this ?
> 
> Regis
> 
> 

>From f8db54347ccb9a55a9a280bd736ca240781d7a01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Regis Boudin 
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:50:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Rework frontend_new and frontend reloading
 frontend_new() now tries to load modules according to
 the following precedence:  * DEBIAN_FRONTEND
 environment variable.  * The value passed as command
 line parameter.  * The default frontend from the
 configuration file. In case of failure to load, it
 falls back to the next one.

Frontend reloading when modified is handled differently:
When debconf/frontent is set, DEBIAN_FRONTEND is set accordingly, to take
precedence over the value that was passed at the launch.
If loading and initialising the new module fails, reinitialise the previously
running one.
---
 src/commands.c |   54 ++-
 src/frontend.c |   76 +++
 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/commands.c b/src/commands.c
index ad3e2b2..491ffd0 100644
--- a/src/commands.c
+++ b/src/commands.c
@@ -195,28 +195,41 @@ command_go(struct confmodule *mod, char *arg)
 char *out;
 const char *running_frontend = NULL;
 const char *requested_frontend = NULL;
-struct question *q;
 int ret;
 
 argc = strcmdsplit(arg, argv, DIM(argv) - 1);
 CHECKARGC(== 0);
 
-q = mod->questions->methods.get(mod->questions, "debconf/frontend");
-if (q)
-	requested_frontend = question_getvalue(q, "C");
-question_deref(q);
+requested_frontend = getenv("DEBIAN_FRONTEND");
 
-running_frontend = getenv("DEBIAN_FRONTEND");
+if (requested_frontend)
+{
+if (mod != NULL && mod->frontend != NULL)
+running_frontend = mod->frontend->name;
 
-if (requested_frontend && strcmp(running_frontend, requested_frontend) != 0) {
-	q = mod->frontend->questions;
-	mod->frontend->methods.shutdown(mod->frontend);
-	if (mod->frontend->handle != NULL)
-	dlclose(mod->frontend->handle);
-	DELETE(mod->frontend);
-	setenv("DEBIAN_FRONTEND",requested_frontend,1);
-	mod->frontend = frontend_new(mod->config, mod->templates, mod->questions);
-	mod->frontend->questions = q;
+if (requested_frontend && running_frontend &&
+strcmp(running_frontend, requested_frontend) != 0)
+{
+struct frontend *old_frontend;
+struct frontend *new_frontend;
+
+/* Shut down the current frontend, but do not close unless opening
+ the new one actually succeeds */
+mod->frontend->methods.shutdown(mod->frontend);
+
+new_frontend = frontend_new(mod->config, mod->templates, mod->questions);
+if (ne

Debian installer build: failed or old builds

[Daily build aggregator]

Debian installer build overview
---

Failed or old builds:

* OLD BUILD:armel Jul 23 17:32 buildd@alain build_iop32x_netboot 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log

* OLD BUILD:armel Jul 23 17:34 buildd@alain 
build_iop32x_network-console_glantank 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_glantank.log

* OLD BUILD:armel Jul 23 17:37 buildd@alain 
build_iop32x_network-console_n2100 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_n2100.log

* OLD BUILD:armel Jul 23 17:39 buildd@alain 
build_iop32x_network-console_ss4000e 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_ss4000e.log

* OLD BUILD:armel Jul 23 17:41 buildd@alain build_kirkwood_netboot 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_netboot.log

* OLD BUILD:armel Jul 23 17:46 buildd@alain build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk.log

* OLD BUILD:armel Jul 23 17:48 buildd@alain build_kirkwood_network-console 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_network-console.log

* OLD BUILD:armel Jul 23 17:52 buildd@alain build_orion5x_network-console 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_orion5x_network-console.log

* OLD BUILD:armel Jul 23 17:54 buildd@alain build_versatile_netboot 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_versatile_netboot.log

* OLD BUILD:armel Jul 23 17:56 buildd@alain build_ads_cf 
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_ads_cf.log

* OLD BUILD:mipsel Jul 16 00:09 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log

* OLD BUILD:mipsel Jul 16 00:12 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_ssh 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_ssh.log

* OLD BUILD:mipsel Jul 16 00:14 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_common 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_common.log

* OLD BUILD:mipsel Jul 16 00:18 buildd@rem build_malta_netboot-2.6 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_malta_netboot-2.6.log

* OLD BUILD:mipsel Jul 16 00:21 buildd@rem build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6.log

* OLD BUILD:mipsel Jul 16 00:23 buildd@rem build_loongson-2f_netboot-2.6 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_loongson-2f_netboot-2.6.log

* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jul 26 10:18 debian-cd@pettersson sidpowerpc 
http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/sidpowerpc


Totals: 157 builds (1 failed, 16 old)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qmexh-0008ui...@ravel.debian.org