Bug#631172: Wrong kernel installed for VIA C3 Nehemia
Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD Image version: Self-made Boot-CD with daily build of sid installer Date: 2011-06-21 Machine: Self-made Desktop PC Processor: VIA C3 Nehemia Memory: 256MB Partitions: -not performed- Output of lspci -knn: >> 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8623 [Apollo CLE266] >> [1106:3123] >> Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. Device [1106:aa01] >> Kernel driver in use: agpgart-via >> 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8633 [Apollo Pro266 AGP] >> [1106:b091] >> 00:10.0 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 >> Controller [1106:3038] (rev 80) >> Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller >> [1106:3038] >> Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd >> 00:10.1 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 >> Controller [1106:3038] (rev 80) >> Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller >> [1106:3038] >> Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd >> 00:10.2 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 >> Controller [1106:3038] (rev 80) >> Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller >> [1106:3038] >> Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd >> 00:10.3 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 [1106:3104] >> (rev 82) >> Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 [1106:3104] >> Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd >> 00:11.0 ISA bridge [0601]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8235 ISA Bridge >> [1106:3177] >> Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. Device [1106:aa01] >> 00:11.1 IDE interface [0101]: VIA Technologies, Inc. >> VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE [1106:0571] (rev 06) >> Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. Device [1106:aa01] >> Kernel driver in use: pata_via >> 00:11.5 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: VIA Technologies, Inc. >> VT8233/A/8235/8237 AC97 Audio Controller [1106:3059] (rev 50) >> Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. Device [1106:aa01] >> Kernel driver in use: VIA 82xx Audio >> 00:12.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102 [Rhine-II] >> [1106:3065] (rev 74) >> Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102 [Rhine II] Embeded Ethernet >> Controller on VT8235 [1106:0102] >> Kernel driver in use: via-rhine >> 00:14.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: D-Link System Inc DWL-510 / DWL-610 >> 802.11b [Realtek RTL8180L] [1186:3300] (rev 20) >> Subsystem: D-Link System Inc DWL-510 Wireless PCI Adapter [1186:3301] >> Kernel driver in use: rtl8180 >> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8623 >> [Apollo CLE266] integrated CastleRock graphics [1106:3122] (rev 03) >> Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8623 [Apollo CLE266] integrated >> CastleRock graphics [1106:3122] Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[E] Clock/timezone setup: [ ] User/password setup:[ ] Install tasks: [ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Overall install:[ ] Comments/Problems: During installation of Base system, the installer try to install the 686-Kernel. Since 2.6.39, the 686 Kernel is only supported, if CPU supports PAE. But, the VIA C3 has no PAE. Please install the 486 Kernel instead of 686 Kernel. Best regards Bernhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e003b88.1070...@yahoo.de
Bug#630523: Interested ???
Hello Friend, I have a business proposal for you worth 7.5Million Great British Pound Sterling's. If you are interested, please send a response . Best regards, Jeff Rice. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110620035902.52144j7igh7a7...@webmail.fuac.edu.co
Bug#516911: marked as done (Wrong kernel installed at K7 architecture)
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:45:05 +0200 with message-id <4dff16a1.8070...@yahoo.de> and subject line Lenny no more installed on this computer has caused the Debian Bug report #516911, regarding Wrong kernel installed at K7 architecture to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 516911: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516911 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD Image version: Self-made boot CD with Lenny Debian Installer 5.0.0 Date: 2009-02-23 Machine: Self-made Desktop PC Processor: AMD Duron 800MHz Memory: 256MB Partitions: > Dateisystem Typ1K‐Blöcke Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf > /dev/hda1 ext3 1921156635360 1188204 35% / > tmpfstmpfs 128284 4128280 1% /lib/init/rw > udev tmpfs 1024084 10156 1% /dev > tmpfstmpfs 128284 0128284 0% /dev/shm > /dev/hda5 xfs77443576 26133228 51310348 34% /storage1 > /dev/hdb5 xfs 244076732 160107184 83969548 66% /storage2 Output of lspci -knn: > 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 735 Host > [1039:0735] (rev 01) > Kernel driver in use: agpgart-sis > Kernel modules: sis-agp > 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] Virtual > PCI-to-PCI bridge (AGP) [1039:0001] > Kernel modules: shpchp > 00:02.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS85C503/5513 > (LPC Bridge) [1039:0018] > Kernel modules: i2c-sis630 > 00:02.1 SMBus [0c05]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS961/2 SMBus > Controller [1039:0016] > Kernel driver in use: sis96x_smbus > Kernel modules: i2c-sis96x > 00:02.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.1 > Controller [1039:7001] (rev 07) > Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd > Kernel modules: ohci-hcd > 00:02.3 USB Controller [0c03]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.1 > Controller [1039:7001] (rev 07) > Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd > Kernel modules: ohci-hcd > 00:02.5 IDE interface [0101]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 [IDE] > [1039:5513] (rev d0) > Kernel driver in use: SIS_IDE > Kernel modules: sis5513 > 00:0f.0 Network controller [0280]: RaLink RT2500 802.11g Cardbus/mini-PCI > [1814:0201] (rev 01) > Kernel driver in use: rt2500pci > Kernel modules: rt2500pci > 00:11.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 > Gigabit Ethernet [10ec:8169] (rev 10) > Kernel driver in use: r8169 > Kernel modules: r8169 > 00:13.0 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 > Controller [1106:3038] (rev 50) > Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd > Kernel modules: uhci-hcd > 00:13.1 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 > Controller [1106:3038] (rev 50) > Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd > Kernel modules: uhci-hcd > 00:13.2 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 [1106:3104] > (rev 51) > Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd > Kernel modules: ehci-hcd > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 RF/SG > AGP [1002:5246] > Kernel modules: aty128fb Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[E] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: The used architecture is a K7 architecture (AMD Duron 800MHz). The kernel has to be the 686 image. But there is the 486 image installed. Regards Bernhard --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- As described, Lenny is no more installed on this computer. --- End Message ---
rootskel: Add Freescale i.MX serial consoles, /dev/ttymxc*
Hi While checking how framebuffer gets set, I saw that the list of serial consoles in rootskel missed the Freescale i.MX ones, /dev/ttymxc[0-9]. According to etc/securetty, these seem to be the only missing ones as the other devices start with a capital letter. ok to commit? Cheers, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1308566781-5871-1-git-send-email-l...@debian.org
[PATCH] Add Freescale i.MX serial consoles, /dev/ttymxc*
--- src/lib/debian-installer/detect-console-linux |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/lib/debian-installer/detect-console-linux b/src/lib/debian-installer/detect-console-linux index 79dde91..404a4e7 100644 --- a/src/lib/debian-installer/detect-console-linux +++ b/src/lib/debian-installer/detect-console-linux @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ if [ -z "$TERM_TYPE" ]; then case $(readlink /proc/self/fd/0) in - /dev/console|/dev/tty[A-Z]*|/dev/hvc*|/dev/hvsi*) + /dev/console|/dev/tty[A-Z]*|/dev/ttymxc*|/dev/hvc*|/dev/hvsi*) TERM_TYPE=serial ;; /dev/tty*) -- 1.7.5.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1308566781-5871-2-git-send-email-l...@debian.org
[PATCH] Remove armeb netboot config
--- Hey It seems this file is a leftover from the armeb removal; ok to remove? Thanks, build/pkg-lists/netboot/armeb.cfg | 12 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 build/pkg-lists/netboot/armeb.cfg diff --git a/build/pkg-lists/netboot/armeb.cfg b/build/pkg-lists/netboot/armeb.cfg deleted file mode 100644 index db2897d..000 --- a/build/pkg-lists/netboot/armeb.cfg +++ /dev/null @@ -1,12 +0,0 @@ -console-keymaps-at - -kbd-chooser -bogl-bterm-udeb -hw-detect -ethdetect -netcfg - -#kernel modules - -#for all targets - -- 1.7.5.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1308571655-7704-1-git-send-email-l...@debian.org
[PATCH] armel: Check whether fb0 has a sysfs driver
--- .../S40framebuffer-module-linux-armel |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Hey, I was seeing some busybox output (Usage: basename FILE [SUFFIX] etc.) when starting d-i under QEMU emulating armel+vexpress. Turns out that under vexpress kernels, /sys/class/graphics/fb0 has a dev file which contains "29:0" but no device symlink to the platform device entry (nor any matching platform device) which I can see for instance on OMAP. I'm not entirely sure whether it's a linux bug or not, but it seems we'd be better off checking whether the node exists before readlink-ing across it. I've confirmed that this change silences the error message. From a quick look at the actual fb driver causing this, it seems that it's CONFIG_FB_ARMCLCD / linux/drivers/video/amba-clcd.c / "ARM PrimeCell PL110 support" which can indeed be built as a module; not sure how to detect this or have it register a platform device though. Cheers, diff --git a/src/lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S40framebuffer-module-linux-armel b/src/lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S40framebuffer-module-linux-armel index 0989d02..da6a052 100644 --- a/src/lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S40framebuffer-module-linux-armel +++ b/src/lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S40framebuffer-module-linux-armel @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ if [ -n "$TERM_FRAMEBUFFER_TRY" ] && \ if [ -d /sys/class/graphics/fb0 ]; then if [ "$(cat /sys/class/graphics/fb0/name)" = "udlfb" ]; then register-module -i udlfb - else + elif [ -e /sys/class/graphics/fb0/device/driver ]; then driver=$(basename $(readlink /sys/class/graphics/fb0/device/driver)) register-module -i "$driver" fi -- 1.7.5.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1308576254-22459-1-git-send-email-l...@debian.org
Bug#562122: marked as done (netcfg: Improve preseeding of network device to use)
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:26:08 +0100 with message-id <20110620162608.ga22...@riva.ucam.org> and subject line Re: Bug#562122: Improve preseeding of network device to use has caused the Debian Bug report #562122, regarding netcfg: Improve preseeding of network device to use to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 562122: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=562122 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: netcfg Version: 1.51 Severity: wishlist I've just sat through many installs on ThinkPad T41, T43 vintage laptops, using PXE, wired Ethernet, and a preseeded installation. I've preseeded netcfg/choose_interface to "auto", to try and avoid the netcfg/choose_interface question being asked. What I suspect is the problem, is the wireless interface is showing "link" so the question still gets asked. My thoughts on how to extend this functionality was: allow preseeding the interface to use based on: 1) vendor component of the MAC 2) PCI ID 3) some substring of the interface description because preseeding the specific interface by name is a non-starter, due to the way Linux can't consistently enumerate the interfaces. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.3 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: netcfg Source-Version: 1.63 On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 05:48:49AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 04:24:13PM +0100, Floris Bos wrote: > > I think that at least selection of the network interface by MAC-address > > instead of interface name should be possible. > > > > There is currently a patch pending for Ubuntu: > > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/60443113/S31pxedust > > (belonging to bug > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netcfg/+bug/56679 > > ) > > > > Any chance of getting this into Debian as well? > > The feature, yes. That patch... not so much. I fixed this in netcfg 1.63 (not using the above patch!) without realising that this bug report existed. Closing. netcfg (1.63) unstable; urgency=low * If BOOTIF= is set on the Linux command line, look for an interface with that address and use it by default (closes: #615600, LP: #56679). [ Updated translations ] * Asturian (ast.po) by MAAC * German (de.po) by Holger Wansing * Italian (it.po) by Milo Casagrande -- Colin Watson Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:03:01 +0100 Cheers, -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] --- End Message ---
Bug#570905: marked as done (iceweasel is no longer a desktop environment independent browser)
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:55:27 -0400 with message-id <4dff7b7f.3040...@gmail.com> and subject line Close has caused the Debian Bug report #570905, regarding iceweasel is no longer a desktop environment independent browser to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 570905: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570905 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: xulrunner Version: 1.9.1.8-2 Severity: important Tags: d-i X-Debbugs-CC: task...@packages.debian.org I was very surprised when I upgraded a KDE system to find that xulrunner tried to pull in all sorts of GNOME packages. It was quite a bit of work to unselect everything that got pulled in through those Recommends. I'm talking about the Recommends for: - libdbus-glib-1-2 - libgconf2-4 - libgnome2-0 - libgnomeui-0 - libgnomevfs2-0 And the deps for those packages are far from trivial. I guess the change was introduced in 1.9.1.6-2 with: Merge xulrunner-1.9.1-gnome-support into xulrunner-1.9.1. But I question if the Recommends of those packages is policy compliant as Recommends should only be used for packages "that would be found together with this one in all but unusual installations" [1]. And that's only true for systems running a GNOME desktop environment. For systems running KDE the GNOME packages are not needed and even in a lot of cases very much not desired. I also question the value of the Recommends: if a user is running GNOME they will all be installed already anyway! As Debian Installer now installs Recommends by default and the desktop tasks installs iceweasel for all desktops, this means that all those GNOME packages would get installed on KDE desktop systems by default, As iceweasel is supposed to be desktop environment independent, I urge you to reconsider this change. IMO the current Recommends make iceweasel unsuitable for default installation. I also feel that for packages like iceweasel integration support for specific desktop environments should always be optional. Cheers, FJP [1]http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-binarydeps --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- xulrunner 1.9.1.8-4 has indeed demoted the problematic Recommends to Suggests. Although I probably have several of these packages installed now, I used Iceweasel without the problematic packages for a long time on KDE and didn't notice issues. I also don't really share the idea that Konqueror can be a replacement for Iceweasel. I don't see anything that could actually replace Mozilla on KDE. If anyone still considers this a problem, feel free to open a new report pointing to actual issues currently seen. --- End Message ---
Re: [PATCH] armel: Check whether fb0 has a sysfs driver
So turns out it's indeed a driver problem; https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+bug/799795 we can go either way for d-i; if we keep the warning, it will look ugly on bogus platforms and might hint / push at fixing it -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110620181247.ga26...@bee.dooz.org
Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jun 21 00:09 buildd@barber build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jun 21 00:12 buildd@barber build_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_netboot-gtk.log * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jun 21 00:12 buildd@barber build_netboot-xen http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_netboot-xen.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Jun 19 18:49 buildd@alain build_iop32x_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Jun 19 18:49 buildd@alain build_iop32x_network-console_glantank http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_glantank.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Jun 19 18:50 buildd@alain build_iop32x_network-console_n2100 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_n2100.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Jun 19 18:50 buildd@alain build_iop32x_network-console_ss4000e http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_ss4000e.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Jun 19 18:51 buildd@alain build_kirkwood_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Jun 19 18:51 buildd@alain build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Jun 19 18:52 buildd@alain build_kirkwood_network-console http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_network-console.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Jun 19 18:52 buildd@alain build_orion5x_network-console http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_orion5x_network-console.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Jun 19 18:53 buildd@alain build_versatile_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_versatile_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: i386 Jun 21 00:08 buildd@biber build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: i386 Jun 21 00:10 buildd@biber build_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_netboot-gtk.log Totals: 111 builds (14 failed, 0 old) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qypjz-0001ln...@ravel.debian.org
Various failures in D-I daily builds
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
1) armel iop32x and kirkwood subarches builds fail because of missing kernel
udebs
2) netboot images for amd64 and i386 fail because of:
.../...
-no-emul-boot -boot-load-size 4 -boot-info-table \
-o ./tmp/netboot-gtk/mini.iso ./tmp/netboot-gtk/cd_tree
Size of boot image is 4 sectors -> No emulation
35.68% done, estimate finish Tue Jun 21 00:12:34 2011
71.25% done, estimate finish Tue Jun 21 00:12:23 2011
Total translation table size: 2048
Total rockridge attributes bytes: 4913
Total directory bytes: 10622
Path table size(bytes): 46
Max brk space used 0
14035 extents written (27 MB)
geniso_hybrid_plus_firmware_partition ./tmp/netboot-gtk/mini.iso
mkfs.msdos 3.0.9 (31 Jan 2010)
Command (m for help): Command action
e extended
p primary partition (1-4)
Partition number (1-4, default 2): First sector (57344-69631, default 57344):
Using default value 57344
Last sector, +sectors or +size{K,M,G} (57344-69631, default 69631): Value out
of range.
Last sector, +sectors or +size{K,M,G} (57344-69631, default 69631): Last
sector, +sectors or +size{K,M,G} (57344-69631, default 69631): Value out of
range.
Last sector, +sectors or +size{K,M,G} (57344-69631, default 69631): Value out
of range.
Last sector, +sectors or +size{K,M,G} (57344-69631, default 69631): Last
sector, +sectors or +size{K,M,G} (57344-69631, default 69631):
make[2]: *** [arch_miniiso] Error 1
make[1]: *** [_build] Error 2
make: *** [build_netboot-gtk] Error 2
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
