Bug#625317: cdebconf: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror
Package: cdebconf Version: 0.155 Severity: important Tags: wheezy sid User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.6 ftbfs-werror This package builds with -Werror, and GCC 4.6 triggers new warnings which will make the package fail to build. Currently a Debian patch just passes -Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable and -Wno-error=unused-but-set-parameter to avoid build failures, but this patch will be reverted with the GCC 4.6.1 release, and the severity of the report will be raised. The full build log can be found at: http://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/werror/cdebconf_0.155_lsid64.buildlog The last lines of the build log are at the end of this report. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qhcu9-00048q...@ravel.debian.org
Bug#408228: marked as done (cdebconf: uninstallable under some conditions because of dependancy cycle)
Your message dated Tue, 03 May 2011 19:41:32 +0200 with message-id <130496.4874.0.camel@x200s> and subject line Re: Bug#408228: Is this bug still valid ? has caused the Debian Bug report #408228, regarding cdebconf: uninstallable under some conditions because of dependancy cycle to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 408228: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=408228 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: cdebconf Version: 0.108 Severity: important Usertags: grid5000 piuparts Hi, During a piuparts run over all the packages in etch, I ran into a problem with your package: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... The following extra packages will be installed: defoma file fontconfig fontconfig-config libatk1.0-0 libcairo-directfb2 libcairo2 libdb4.4 libdebian-installer4 libdirectfb-0.9-25 libexpat1 libfontconfig1 libfreetype6 libgdbm3 libglib2.0-0 libgtk-directfb-2.0-0 libgtk2.0-0 libgtk2.0-common libjpeg62 libmagic1 libnewt0.52 libpango1.0-0 libpango1.0-common libpng12-0 libpopt0 libsysfs2 libtextwrap1 libtiff4 libx11-6 libx11-data libxau6 libxcursor1 libxdmcp6 libxext6 libxfixes3 libxft2 libxi6 libxinerama1 libxrandr2 libxrender1 perl perl-modules ttf-dejavu ucf whiptail x11-common Suggested packages: defoma-doc psfontmgr x-ttcidfont-conf dfontmgr libfreetype6-dev ttf-kochi-gothic ttf-kochi-mincho ttf-thryomanes ttf-baekmuk ttf-arphic-gbsn00lp ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp ttf-arphic-gkai00mp ttf-arphic-bkai00mp libterm-readline-gnu-perl libterm-readline-perl-perl Recommended packages: libft-perl libatk1.0-data libglib2.0-data hicolor-icon-theme libgtk2.0-bin libfribidi0 perl-doc debconf-utils The following NEW packages will be installed: cdebconf defoma file fontconfig fontconfig-config libatk1.0-0 libcairo-directfb2 libcairo2 libdb4.4 libdebian-installer4 libdirectfb-0.9-25 libexpat1 libfontconfig1 libfreetype6 libgdbm3 libglib2.0-0 libgtk-directfb-2.0-0 libgtk2.0-0 libgtk2.0-common libjpeg62 libmagic1 libnewt0.52 libpango1.0-0 libpango1.0-common libpng12-0 libpopt0 libsysfs2 libtextwrap1 libtiff4 libx11-6 libx11-data libxau6 libxcursor1 libxdmcp6 libxext6 libxfixes3 libxft2 libxi6 libxinerama1 libxrandr2 libxrender1 perl perl-modules ttf-dejavu ucf whiptail x11-common 0 upgraded, 47 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 22.6MB of archives. [...] E: Couldn't configure pre-depend x11-common for libxft2, probably a dependency cycle. I could reproduce it outside piuparts. If debconf is not installed, and you try to install cdebconf, you run into a problem: cdebconf depends on libxft2 libxft2 pre-depends on x11-common x11-common pre-depends on debconf | debconf-2.0 For some reason, apt doesn't understand that it can solve this by installing first debconf, then x11-common, then cdebconf... -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package: cdebconf Version: 0.144 --- End Message ---
Bug#625215: keyboard-configuration: configuration not applied on Linux console
Hi Anton, On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 07:58:52PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > I can confirm this with console-setup-mini but not with console-setup. > Does the problem resolves if you remove the files > /etc/console-setup/cached_*? I removed the files and rebooted. Nothing changed: I still cannot switch to the non-US layout, and none of the options have been taken into account (compose key, etc.). At reboot, I get an error message when the keymap and console are supposed to be initialized: Bad number of antecedents at /usr/bin/ckbcomp line 3078, line 372. It is the same message if I remove the cached_* files and run setupcon from the console. Please tell me if I can test something else to help. Best, Cédric signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#625290: debian-installer: ide_generic doesn't get included in the initrd, harddisk not available
Hi all, As the issue happens to the installed system I am not sure this bug belongs to the debian-installer. If some light can be shed on this, would be great. -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105032247.55768.el...@debianpt.org
Bug#616522: marked as done (debootstrap: please use better default mirror (cdn.debian.net?))
Your message dated Tue, 3 May 2011 23:11:23 +0100 with message-id <201105032311.23580.el...@debianpt.org> and subject line Re: Bug#616522: debootstrap: please use better default mirror (cdn.debian.net?) has caused the Debian Bug report #616522, regarding debootstrap: please use better default mirror (cdn.debian.net?) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 616522: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=616522 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.26 Severity: minor debootstrap currently defaults to ftp.us.debian.org for the mirror. This is not a particularly good default for anyone outside the US. cdn.debian.net would be a better default, since it automatically chooses the mirror closest to the user. Would it be possible to default to that? -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages debootstrap depends on: ii wget 1.12-2.1 retrieves files from the web Versions of packages debootstrap recommends: ii gnupg 1.4.10-4 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep debootstrap suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- As cdn.debian.net it's not an official Debian service and there are several concerns using this by default there's no point in keep the bug open. Hence, closing. -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org --- End Message ---
Bug#618320: marked as done (invalid a.out header while booting on kfreebsd)
Your message dated Tue, 3 May 2011 23:31:47 +0100 with message-id <201105032331.48278.el...@debianpt.org> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #618320, regarding invalid a.out header while booting on kfreebsd to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 618320: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618320 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch- latest/kfreebsd-amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-kfreebsd-amd64-businesscard.iso Date: 2011.03.14 Machine: kvm Processor: amd64 Memory: 512M Partitions: Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [E ] Detect network card:[ ] Configure network: [ ] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [ ] Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Clock/timezone setup: [ ] User/password setup:[ ] Install tasks: [ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Overall install:[ ] Comments/Problems: Initial boot menu is displayed but booting gives the following error: error: invalid a.out header error: only ELF kernel supports module. screen image available on: http://i.imgur.com/bVjfW.png -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Tested with today's images and now the daily businesscard image now boots successfully. Hence, closing. --- End Message ---
[PATCH] grub-installer: Handle disks with multi-letter names
On a system with more than 26 disks, after /dev/sda through /dev/sdz are used, disks start to get names like /dev/sdaa, /dev/sdab, etc. Unfortunately grub-installer doesn't cope with these names; the pattern used to figure out how to compute disc_offered_devfs doesn't match properly and so trying to install a system with the root FS on eg /dev/sdaa fails when trying to install grub. Fix this by extending the pattern used to match /dev/sdX and /dev/vdX to handle the cases where X is two or three letters (I checked the kernel source, and the sd and vd cases will only use up to three letters; the IDE hd case only uses one letter). cf https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/776633 (I've only tested this with Ubuntu but the upstream grub-installer tree pretty clearly has the same bug) --- grub-installer |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/grub-installer b/grub-installer index 95b6532..c8c1e74 100755 --- a/grub-installer +++ b/grub-installer @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ case $prefix in /dev/mapper) disc_offered_devfs="$bootfs" ;; - /dev/[hsv]d[a-z0-9]|/dev/xvd[a-z]|/dev/cciss/c[0-9]d[0-9]*|/dev/ida/c[0-9]d[0-9]*|/dev/rs/c[0-9]d[0-9]*|/dev/mmcblk[0-9]|/dev/ad[0-9]*|/dev/da[0-9]*) + /dev/[hsv]d[a-z]|/dev/[sv]d[a-z][a-z]|/dev/[sv]d[a-z][a-z][a-z]|/dev/xvd[a-z]|/dev/cciss/c[0-9]d[0-9]*|/dev/ida/c[0-9]d[0-9]*|/dev/rs/c[0-9]d[0-9]*|/dev/mmcblk[0-9]|/dev/ad[0-9]*|/dev/da[0-9]*) disc_offered_devfs="$prefix" ;; *) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87aaf34dc7@shaolin.home.digitalvampire.org
Bug#607541: marked as done (Installation : Impossible)
Your message dated Tue, 3 May 2011 17:53:07 -0500 with message-id <20110503225307.GA7102@elie> and subject line Re: Installation : Impossible has caused the Debian Bug report #607541, regarding Installation : Impossible to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 607541: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607541 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: installation-reports Boot method: cédérom beta daily build Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_beta2/amd64/iso-cd/debian-squeeze-di-beta2-amd64-netinst.iso Date: 16 december 2010 20:00 Machine: ASROCK 890fx deluxe 4 Processor: AMD phenom 6 core Memory: 4 Gi Partitions: never reached that point Résultat de lspci -knn (ou lspci -nn) system does not start Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [ O] Detect network card:[E] Configure network: [] Detect CD: [E] Load installer modules: [ ] Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [ ] Install base system: [ ] Clock/timezone setup: [ ] User/password setup:[ ] Install tasks: [ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Overall install:[ ] Comments/Problems: (following 605...@bugs.debian.org) Motherboard ASROCK 890 FX Deluxe 4 CD/DVD ROM Asus IDE Onboard network controller all tested and fonctionnal, the machines boots and runs with OpenBSD. Hard disk is SATA 3, so CD/DVD is master on IDE. CD is not detected by install. Network is not detected by install. Install cannot proceed. Any ideas you'd like me to try ? regards --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2010-12-19, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Volny DE PASCALE (vo...@ieee.org): >> all tested and fonctionnal, the machines boots and runs with OpenBSD. >> >> Hard disk is SATA 3, so CD/DVD is master on IDE. >> CD is not detected by install. >> Network is not detected by install. >> Install cannot proceed. >> >> Any ideas you'd like me to try ? > > Without information, I'm afraid no. > > Do you have information about the network card? Closing. :/ Please feel free to reopen if you have trouble again or more information. --- End Message ---
Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: armel May 03 18:00 joey@box build_orion5x_network-console http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_orion5x_network-console.log * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 May 04 00:10 buildd@fano build_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_cdrom.log * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 May 04 00:11 buildd@fano build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-i386 May 04 00:10 buildd@finzi build_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-i386/daily/build_cdrom.log * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-i386 May 04 00:11 buildd@finzi build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-i386/daily/build_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:mips Apr 20 00:19 buildd@ball build_malta_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_malta_netboot-2.6.log * OLD BUILD:mips Apr 20 00:23 buildd@ball build_r4k-ip22_cdrom-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_r4k-ip22_cdrom-2.6.log * OLD BUILD:mips Apr 20 00:27 buildd@ball build_r4k-ip22_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_r4k-ip22_netboot-2.6.log * OLD BUILD:mips Apr 20 00:32 buildd@ball build_r5k-ip32_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_r5k-ip32_netboot-2.6.log * OLD BUILD:mips Apr 20 00:37 buildd@ball build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6.log * OLD BUILD:mips Apr 20 00:38 buildd@ball build_miniiso http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_miniiso.log * OLD BUILD:mipsel May 02 00:07 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log * OLD BUILD:mipsel May 02 00:09 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_ssh http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_ssh.log * OLD BUILD:mipsel May 02 00:11 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_common http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_common.log * OLD BUILD:mipsel May 02 00:13 buildd@rem build_malta_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_malta_netboot-2.6.log * OLD BUILD:mipsel May 02 00:17 buildd@rem build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6.log * OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 19 00:11 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc_cdrom.log * OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 19 00:15 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 19 00:19 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc_netboot-gtk.log * OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 19 00:21 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc_hd-media http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc_hd-media.log * OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 19 00:24 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc64_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc64_cdrom.log * OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 19 00:26 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc64_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc64_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 19 00:31 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc64_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc64_netboot-gtk.log * OLD BUILD:s390 May 01 00:03 buildd@zandonai build_generic http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390/daily/build_generic.log * OLD BUILD:s390 May 01 00:03 buildd@zandonai build_tape http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390/daily/build_tape.log * FAILED BUILD: amd64 May 03 23:54 debian-cd@pettersson 1sidkfreebsd-amd64 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/1sidkfreebsd-amd64 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 May 03 23:54 debian-cd@pettersson 2sidkfreebsd-amd64 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2sidkfreebsd-amd64 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 May 03 23:55 debian-cd@pettersson 1sidkfreebsd-i386 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/1sidkfreebsd-i386 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 May 03 23:55 debian-cd@pettersson 2sidkfreebsd-i386 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2sidkfreebsd-i386 Totals: 159 builds (9 failed, 20 old) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debia
Bug#625517: os-prober: ubuntu partition found on Debian install, but then lost upon kenel update
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.42
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
When I installed Debian 6.0.1 squeeze, the Ubuntu partition
was found and put into grub menu. Later I installed some
packages from "testing" and after that the Ubuntu partition
was not found when the kernel upgraded.
I can still manually put the Ubuntu into the grub.cfg file to start it
menuentry 'Ubuntu, with Linux 2.6.38-8-generic' --class ubuntu
--class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os {
recordfail
set gfxpayload=$linux_gfx_mode
insmod part_msdos
insmod ext2
set root='(/dev/sda,msdos3)'
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root
2eb8cda6-366c-4ef7-b7da-8ff292ca7e61
linux /vmlinuz-2.6.38-8-generic
root=UUID=18c56003-c1d4-4fa1-8753-a20bf3034b7e ro quiet splash
vt.handoff=7
initrd /initrd.img-2.6.38-8-generic
}
however, os-prober still does not see Ubuntu, but it does see Windoze:
$ sudo os-prober
[sudo] password for pauljohn:
/dev/sda1:Microsoft Windows XP Professional:Windows:chain
My Ubuntu is installed with a boot partition /dev/sda3 and the main root is
/dev/sda7.
Version numbers:
os-prober 1.42
grub-common 1.99~rc1-13
linux-image-2.6-amd64 2.6.38+33
linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd642.6.32-31
linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd642.6.38-3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages os-prober depends on:
ii libc6 2.11.2-11 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
os-prober recommends no packages.
os-prober suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110504023504.7243.55190.reportbug@pols124
Bug#621769: debian-installer: fails to load preseed file from local media
reopen 621769 severity 621769 wishlist retitle 621769 please include file-reseed udeb on netboot images thanks On ven., 2011-04-08 at 13:27 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > I'm using the netboot files (so linux kernel and initrd.gz). I've tried > > various setups: > > > > preseed/file=/hd-media/foo.cfg > > preseed/file=file:///hd-media/foo.cfg > > > > Looking at the content of the initrd it seems that there is nothing > > mounting the media nor anything done to handle preseed/file. I've found > > stuff for handling preseed/url but nothing for the file scheme. > > /hd-media is mounted by iso-scan. That will work fine if you're > installing from a hd-media image. Otherwise it won't, and you'll > have to put the file somewhere else. > > d-i does not have one initrd, it has initrds customized for different > media types. The file-preseed udeb that handles preseed/file is only > present on the hd-media, cdrom, and monolithic initrds. Ok, the more I think about it, the more I'd find it useful to be able to just drop a preseed file in a usb key along with kernel/initrd and be able to use it. hd-media doesn't fit because that means having a complete mirror of what you want on the key (since it won't be able to install from a http mirror) and you need to have the usb key plugged in for the whole install (it's alway more practical to be able to just remove the key once it has booted, and in cases like you have a lot of install running in parallel it means you can just have once key for all of them). Adding the preseed files to the initramfs means you have to rebuild it each time the installed is updated or you change the preseed file, which is a bit painful. file-preseed udeb is just 24kb installed (3.8kb for the package, meaning it compresses just fine in the initramfs) so I guess it's not too much of a space problem. All in all it's not a huge problem, there are workarounds, but it'd be really convenient, imho. Thanks for your work and consideration. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: Re: Bug#621769: debian-installer: fails to load preseed file from local media
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 621769
Bug #621769 {Done: Yves-Alexis Perez } [preseed]
debian-installer: fails to load preseed file from local media
> severity 621769 wishlist
Bug #621769 [preseed] debian-installer: fails to load preseed file from local
media
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
> retitle 621769 please include file-reseed udeb on netboot images
Bug #621769 [preseed] debian-installer: fails to load preseed file from local
media
Changed Bug title to 'please include file-reseed udeb on netboot images' from
'debian-installer: fails to load preseed file from local media'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
621769: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621769
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130449191325001.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
